Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems: reflections from the Twente region

References

• Adam, F., & Westlund, H. (Eds.). (2013). Innovation in socio-cultural context. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. (2012). The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination. Regional Studies, 46(8), 993–1004. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Economic Geography, 90(5), 429–435.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional Frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Hospers, G. J. (2007). The new economic geography of old industrial regions: Universities as global – local pipelines. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(6), 779–802. doi: 10.1068/c0620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Pinheiro, R. (2017). Regional upgrading in the periphery: A view from the ‘rich’ Northern European cousins. In M. Fonseca & U. Fratesi (Eds.), Regional Upgrading in Southern Europe: Spatial dimensions and human capital (pp. 299–321). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, S. R., & Karlsen, J. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S., & van Schaik, T. (2005). Social capital and growth in European regions: An empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 301–324. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2002). Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145–161. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A., Flint, C. G., & Luloff, A. E. (2009). Bringing together local culture and rural development: Findings from Ireland, Pennsylvania and Alaska. Sociologia Ruralis, 49(1), 97–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘globalisation 2’ – a new model of industry organisation. Research Policy, 34, 1128–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, R. (2013). Growth in the intersection of eHealth and active and healthy ageing. Technology and Health Care, 21(2), 169–172. doi: 10.3233/THC-130727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., Benneworth, P. S., & Asheim, B. T. (2019). Towards regional responsible research and innovation? Integrating RRI and RIS3 in European innovation policy. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz029
   Google Scholar
• Genus, A., & Iskandarova, M. (2018). Responsible innovation: Its institutionalisation and a critique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. (2000). Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Science and Public Policy, 27(3), 159–163. doi: 10.3152/147154300781782011
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J. (2012). How does governance change research content? On the possibility of a sociological middle-range theory linking science policy studies to the sociology of scientific knowledge. The Technical University Technology Studies Working Paper series, TUTS-WP-1-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. Winter. MIT Press, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320. doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126
   Google Scholar
• Horn, G., et al. (2016). An architecture for using commodity devices and smart phones in health systems. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: Case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1993–2008. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.516523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, R., Innovatieroutes in de zorg. 2014, Zorg voor innoveren: netwerkbijeenkomst ‘decentraliseren=innoveren’, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, M. (2005). Modes of knowledge and patterns of power. Higher Education, 49(1-2), 9–30. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-2911-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F. (2015). Editorial: Evolutionary economic geography – theoretical and empirical progress. Regional Studies, 49(5), 705–711. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1033178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., Schulze Greiving, V., & Benneworth, P. S. (in press). The role of user-led regional innovation networks in shaping responsible innovation in eHealth: Lessons from the East of the Netherlands. In T. Iakovleva, L. Foss, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation in the e-health sector. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kos, A., Sedlar, U., & Pustisek, M. (2016). Research and innovation in ICT with examples in the field of eHealth and wellbeing. In S. Loshkovska & S. Koceski (Eds.), ICT innovations 2015: Emerging technologies for better living (pp. 1–10). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C., & Lorenz, E. (1999). Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4), 305–317. doi: 10.1080/713693555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chaminade, C., & Asheim, B. (2013). The geography and structure of global innovation networks: A knowledge base perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1456–1473. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.755842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N. (2011). Telecare technology and the transformation of health care. Health, technology and society, ed. A. Webster Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible Research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2013). Regional planning and the mobilization of ‘regional identity’: From bounded spaces to relational complexity. regional Studies, 47(8), 1206–1219. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.661410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, J. M., et al. (2016). Use and uptake of eHealth in general practice: A cross-sectional survey and focus group study among health care users and general practitioners. JMIR Medical Informatics, 4(2), e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S. (2017). ‘Art washing: Social capital & anti-gentrification activism. In Colouring-in culture. Retrieved from http://colouringinculture.org/blog/artwashingsocialcapitalantigentrification
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., Bengtsson, L., Benneworth, P., Bührer, S., Castro-Martínez, E., Hansen, M., … Shapira, P. (2018). Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(3), 316–331. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2014). Community and the dynamics of spatially distributed knowledge production: The case of Wikipedia. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 179–200). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2016). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1–16. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16664906
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, J. (1998). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. (2011). Regional innovation systems and knowledge-sourcing activities in traditional industries—evidence from the Vienna food sector. Environment and Planning A, 43(7), 1599–1616. doi: 10.1068/a4416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedder, H. H. (2014). Good neighbourliness in a sustainable European internal electricity market: A tale of communities and uncommunautaire thinking. Available at SSRN 2589022.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, P. (2017). Wie zorgt voor onze ouderen in landelijke gebieden? Interview Aanjagers Nederland Zorgt Voor Elkaar. Sociaal Bestek, 79(5), 59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Volksgezondheidzorg. (2018). COPD: Regionaal. Retrieved from https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/copd/regionaal-internationaal/regionaal
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies Fields. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Walhout, B., Walhout, B., Kuhlmann, S., Ordonez Matamoros, H. G., & Edler, J. (2016). Res-AGorA concepts and approach. In R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Griessler, A. Loconto,  … N. Mejlgaard (Eds.), Navigating towards shared responsibility in research and innovation: Approach, process and results of the Res-AGorA Project (pp. 46–53). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W. (2009). Situating regional development in the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. In H. W. Yeung (Ed.), Globalizing regional development in east Asia: Production networks, clusters, and entrepreneurship (pp. 5–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., Wilson, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2017). Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 559–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar