A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures

References

• Adolf, M. (2012). Die Kultur der Innovation: Eine Herausforderung des Innovationsbegriffs als Form gesellschaftlichen Wissens [The culture of innovation: The challenge of the innovation term as a pattern of societal knowledge]. In R. M. Hilty, T. Jaeger, & M. Lamping (Eds.), Herausforderung Innovation [Challenge innovation] (pp. 25–43). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1080/13511610701722846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. doi: 10.1017/S004727941600009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blättel-Mink, B. (2006). Kompendium der Innovationsforschung [Compendium of innovation research]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, K.-W. (2010). Social practices and sustainable consumption: Benefits and limitations of a new theoretical approach. In M. Gross, & H. Heinrichs (Eds.), Environmental sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges (pp. 217–235). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Cattacin, S., Evers, A., & Zimmer, A. (Eds.). (2016). Social innovations in the urban context. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of European Policy Advisers. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Butzin, A., Howaldt, J., Weber, M., & Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2014). Innovation studies. In J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski, & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review. Retrieved from http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3), 201–234. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambon, J.-L., Alix, D., & Devevey, J.-M. (1982). Les innovacions sociales [Social innovations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B. (2011). Soziale Innovationen, Social Entrepreneurs und Raumbezüge [Social innovation, social Entrepreneurship and spatial References]. In P. Jähnke, G. B. Christmann, & K. Balgar (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: Perspektiven für die Raumentwicklung [Social entrepreneurship: Perspectives for spatial development] (pp. 193–210). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1993). Die Zwänge kollektiven Handelns: Über Macht und Organisation [The compulsions of collective action: About power and organization]. Frankfurt am Main: Hain.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2009). Gabriel Tarde und die Verwaltung von Großstädten [Gabriel Tarde and the administriation of large cities]. In C. Borch, & U. Stäheli (Eds.), Soziologie der Nachahmung und des Begehrens: Materialien zu Gabriel Tarde [Sociology of imitation and desire: Materials about Gabriel Tarde] (pp. 372–396). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. (2009). Nach der Krise: Zurück zur protestantischen Ethik? Sechs Anmerkungen [After the crisis: Back to the protestant ethic? Six remarks]. Merkur. Deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken [Merkur. German Journal for European Thinking], 63(720), 373–381.
   Google Scholar
• Domanski, D., Howaldt, J., Villalobos, P., & Huenchuleo, C. (2015). Social innovation in Latin America: The Chilean case. Santiago de Chile: CIEPLAN.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J., Kaletka, C., & Pelka, B. (2017). Inclusion through digital social innovations. Modelling an ecosystem of drivers and barriers. In M. Antona, & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human - computer interaction, UAHCI 2017 Proceedings, part I (pp. 67–84). Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). What is Horizon 2020? Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020
   Google Scholar
• Fontan, J. M., Klein, J. L., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2008). Social innovation at the territorial level: From path dependency to path building. In P. Drewe, J. L. Klein, & E. Hulsbergen (Eds.), The challenge of social innovation in urban revitalization (pp. 17–28). Techne Press: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• FORA. (2010). New nature of innovation. Retrieved from https://www.tem.fi/files/24835/New_Nature_of_Innovation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Berlin, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilgenmann, K. (2010). Gabriel Tarde oder die Erfindung und Nachahmung eines Klassikers [Gabriel Tarde or the invention and imitation of a classic]. Soziologische Revue [Sociological Revue], 33(3), 261–286. doi: 10.1524/srsr.2010.0016
   Google Scholar
• Gillwald, K. (2000). Konzepte sozialer Innovation [Concepts of social innovation]. (WZB paper: Querschnittsgruppe Arbeit und Ökologie). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Retrieved from http://stages-online.info/pdfs/soziale-innovationen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., & Seyfang, G. (2013). Up, down, round and round: Connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(2), 402–420. doi: 10.1068/a45124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrisson, D., Bourque, R., & Széll, G. (2009). Social innovation, economic development, employment and democracy. In R. Bourque, D. Harrisson, & G. Széll (Eds.), Social innovation, the social economy and world economic development: Democracy and labour rights in an era of globalization (pp. 7–15). Frankfurt am Main, New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hochgerner, J. (2013). Social innovations and the advancement of the general concept of innovation. In C. Ruiz Viñals, & C. Parra Rodríguez (Eds.), Social innovation. New forms of organisation in knowledge-based societies (pp. 12–28). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C., (Eds.). (2014). Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review. Retrieved from http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., & Schwarz, M. (2015). Rethinking social entrepreneurship: The concept of social entrepreneurship under the perspective of socio-scientific innovation research. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 1, 88–89. Retrieved from http://www.journalcbi.com/social-entrepreneurship.html
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M. (2018). Atlas of social innovation – New practices for a better future. Dortmund: TU Dortmund University, Sozialforschungsstelle.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Kesselring, A., Kopp, R., & Schwarz, M. (2014). Social theory. In J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski, & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review (pp. 9–32). Retrieved from http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Kopp, R. (2012). Shaping social innovation. In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 43–56). Berlin, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Schröder, A., Kaletka, C., Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2016). Mapping the world of social innovation: a global comparative analysis across sectors and world regions. doi:10.17877/DE290R-17198
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Retrieved from http://www.sfs.tu-dortmund.de/cms/Medienpool/small_publications/Doc_1289_IMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ibert, O., Christmann, G. B., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2015). Innovationen in der räumlichen Planung [innovations in spatial planning]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung [Information for Spatial Development], 3, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Interreg IVC. (2015). Interreg Europe 2014-2020. Retrieved from http://www.interreg4c.eu/interreg-europe
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2012). Wohlstand ohne Wachstum: Leben und Wirtschaften in einer endlichen Welt [wealth without growth: Living and economizing in a finite world]. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, R. (2013). Kritik von Lebensformen [Critique of lifeforms]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jonker, J. (2012). Sustainable thinking and acting: An inspirational book for shaping our common future. Deventer: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. L., Fontan, J. M., Harrisson, D., & Lévesque, B. (2013). The Quebec model: A social innovation system founded on cooperation and consensus building. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 371–383). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. (2005). Einleitung [Introduction]. In M. Groß, H. Hoffmann-Riem, & W. Krohn (Eds.), Realexperimente. Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft [real experiments. Ecological design processes in the knowledge society] (pp. 11–26). Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, C. (2015). Local governance - Modewort oder wichtiger Ansatz für die Zukunft ländlicher räume [local governance – Buzzword or an important approach for the future of rural areas]. In S. Franke, M. Miosga, & S. Schöbel-Rutschmann (Eds.), Impulse zur Zukunft des ländlichen Raums in Bayern [Impulses for the future of the rural areas in Bavaria] (pp. 31–36). München: Bayerische Akademie Ländlicher Raum e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Leggewie, C., & Welzer, H. (2009). Das Ende der Welt, wie wir sie kannten: Klima, Zukunft und die Chancen der Demokratie [The end of the world as we know: Climate, future and the opportunities of democracy]. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Marg, S., Geiges, L., Butzlaff, F., & Walter, F. (2013). Die neue Macht der bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen? BP-Gesellschaftsstudie [The new power of the people: What motivates the protest movements? BP-society study]. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in University quadruple helix ecosystems: An absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, 46(2), 383–399. doi: 10.1111/radm.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: Intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 13–24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). (2013a). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013b). General introduction: The return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 1–6). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Mehmood, A., MacCallum, D., & Leubolt, B. (Eds.). (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations - the role of research. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ogburn, W. (1969). Erneute Betrachtung des problems der sozialen evolution [anew view of the problems of social evolution]. In H. Maus, & F. Fürstenberg (Eds.), Soziologische Texte. Band 56. William F. Ogburn. Kultur und Sozialer Wandel. Ausgewählte Schriften. Herausgegeben und eingeleitet von Otis Dudley Duncan [Sociological texts. Volume 56. William F. Ogburn. Culture and social change. Selected Papers. Edited and introduced by Otis Dudley Duncan] (pp. 50–67). Neuwied, Berlin: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Pelka, B., & Terstrip, J. (2016). Mapping the social innovation maps – the state of research practice across Europe. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(1), 3–16. doi: 10.31637/epsir.16-1.1
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885. doi:10.2016/j.socec.2009.02.011 doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. (2010). Die Innovationen in der Gesellschaft [The innovations in the society]. In J. Howaldt, & H. Jacobsen (Eds.), Soziale innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma [social innovation. On its way to a post industrial innovation paradigm] (pp. 21–52). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2003). Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken: Eine sozialtheoretische Perspektive [basic elements of a theory of social practices: A social theoretical perspective]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [Journal of Sociology], 32(4), 282–301. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2003-0401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2008). Unscharfe Grenzen – Perspektiven einer Kultursoziologie [Blurred frontiers – perspectives of cultural sociology]. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2008). Philosophie als Kulturpolitik [Philosophy as cultural politics]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Rückert-John, J. (2013). Die Nachhaltigkeit der Debatte um soziale Innovationen – Innovationsschub für den nachhaltigen Wandel [The sustainability of the debate about social innovation – innovation thrust for the sustainable change]. In J. Rückert-John (Ed.), Soziale innovation und Nachhaltigkeit: Perspektiven sozialen Wandels [social innovation and sustainability: Perspectives of social change] (pp. 289–307). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rüede, D., & Lurtz, K. (2012). Mapping the Various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. EBS Business School Research Paper, 12(3), Retrieved from https://www.h-brs.de/files/rueede_lurtz_-_mapping_the_various_ meanings_ of_social_innovation_isi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. V. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfers, B. (2002). Sozialstruktur und sozialer Wandel in Deutschland [Social structure and social change in Germany]. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
   Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. (2014). Urbane Reallabore: Ein Blick in die aktuelle Forschungswerkstatt [Urban Real Laboratories: A view in the current research workshop]. pnd-online (3). Retrieved from http://www.planung-neu-denken.de/images/stories/pnd/dokumente/3_2014/schneidewind.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1964). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung [Theory of economic development]. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Scoppetta, A., Butzin, A., & Rehfeld, D. (2014). Social innovation in the social economy and civil society. In J. Howaldt, A. Butzin, D. Domanski, & C. Kaletka (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review (pp. 79–96). Retrieved from http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Secco, L., & Burlando, C. (2017). Social capital, network governance and social innovation: Towards a New paradigm? In E. Pisani, G. Franceschetti, L. Secco, & A. Christoforou (Eds.), Social capital and local development (pp. 83–105). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sgaragli, F. (2014). Enabling social innovation ecosystems for community-led territorial development. Rom: Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6), 1273–1285. doi: 10.1068/a42282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practise: Everyday life and how it changes. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (2009). Die Gesetze der Nachahmung [The laws of imitation]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• The Rockefeller Foundation & The Bridgespan Group. (2014). Social innovation labs: How social innovation labs can advance your work. Retrieved from http://globalknowledgeinitiative.org/pdf/Social-Innovation-Labs-External-Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vobruba, G. (2013). Soziologie und Kritik [sociology and Critic]. Soziologie [Sociology], 42(2), 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, S. (2010, October). The co-evolvement in local development – from the triple to the quadruple helix model. Paper presented at Triple Helix VIII, Madrid. Retrieved from http://www.leydesdorff.net/th8/TRIPLE%20HELIX%20-%20VIII%20CONFERENCE/PROCEEDINGS/0110_Wallin_Sirkku_O-104/triple%20helix%20Wallin%20final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Welzer, H. (2013). Selbst denken: Eine Anleitung zum Widerstand [Thinking for yourself: An instruction for resistance]. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F., Laban, S., Rose, C., McGowan, K., Robinson, K., Tjornbo, O., & Tovy, M. (2015). Social Innovation Lab Guide. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/sites/ca.waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/files/uploads/files/10_silabguide_final.pdf
   Google Scholar