Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts

References

• Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(6), 1149–1170. doi: 1068/a37304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37, 353–369. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. A. (2018). A marginal man and his central contributions: The creative spaces of William (‘Wild Bill’) Bunge and American geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1697–1715. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17707524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 340–363. doi: 10.1177/0309132513507823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, D. (2004). Creative planning in Ireland: The role of cultural-led development in Irish planning. European Planning Studies, 12(4), 497–515. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000212759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierlorzer, H. (2010). The regionale. A regional approach to stabilizing structurally weak urban peripheries applied to the southern fringe of the metropolitan area Rhine-Ruhr. disP, 46(2), 80–88. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2010.10557089
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2010). Sharing: Table 1. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715–734. doi: 10.1086/612649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun-Thürmann, H. (2005). Innovationen [Innovations]. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR). (2007). Neue Stadtquartiere. Bestand und städtebauliche Qualitäten [New urban neighbourhoods. Portfolio and quality of urban design]. BBR-Online-Publikation Nr. 01/2007. Bonn: BBR. Retrieved from http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/BBSROnline/2007/DL_NeueStadtquartiere.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS), & Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR). (2008). Zwischennutzungen und Nischen im Städtebau als Beitrag für eine nachhaltige Stadtentwicklung [Temporary uses and nishes in city planning as a contribution to a sustainable urban development]. Werkstatt Praxis Heft 57. Bonn: BBR.
   Google Scholar
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B. (2012). Raumpioniere in Stadtquartieren und die kommunikative (Re-) Konstruktion von Räumen [Spatial pioneers in urban neighbourhoods and the communicative (re-)construction of spaces]. In R. Keller, H. Knoblauch, & J. Reichertz (Eds.), Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus: Theoretische und empirische Arbeiten zu einem neuen wissenssoziologischen Ansatz [Communicative Constructivism: Theoretical and empirical investigations in the framework of a new approach to the sociology of knowledge] (pp. 153–184). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2018). How does novelty enter spatial planning? Conceptualizing innovations in planning and research strategies. In W. Rammert, A. Windeler, H. Knoblauch, & M. Hutter (Eds.), Innovation society today. Perspectives, fields, and cases (pp. 247–272). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. (2006, 1953). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (DIFU). (2003). Strategien für die Soziale Stadt [Strategies for the socially integrative city]. Berlin: DIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltges, M., & Kocks, M. (2015). Integrierte Ansätze in der räumlichen Planung – das Programm Soziale Stadt [Integrated approaches in spatial planning – the programme Socially Integrative City]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ewers, H.-J., & Wettmann, R. W. (1980). Innovation-oriented regional policy. Regional Studies, 14(3), 161–179. doi: 10.1080/09595238000185171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1985). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Landscape Planning, 12(3), 239–256. doi: 10.1016/0304-3924(85)90004-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füg, F. (2015). Reflexive Regionalpolitik als soziale Innovation: Vom Blick in die Sackgasse zur kollektiven Neuerfindung [Reflexive regional policy as a social innovation. From the view into the deadlock to the collective reinvention]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Füg, F., & Ibert, O. (in this Special Issue). Assembling social innovations in emergent professional communities. The case of learning region policies in Germany. European Planning Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillwald, K. (2000). Konzepte sozialer Innovation [Concepts of social innovation]. WZB Paper, P00-519. Berlin: WZB. Retrieved from http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2000/p00-519.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1994). The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of interfirm relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., & Thiel, J. (2015). Mobilizing action, incorporating doubt: London’s reflexive strategy of hosting the Olympic Games 2012. In G. Grabher & J. Thiel (Eds.), Self-induced shocks: Mega-projects and urban development: Perspectives in metropolitan research (pp. 87–98). Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Güntner, S. (2007). Soziale Stadtpolitik: Institutionen, Netzwerke und Diskurse in der Politikgestaltung [Social urban policy. Institutions, networks and discourses in policy making]. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, T., Wohn, B., & Rebholz-Chaves, K. (1998). Wohnsiedlungen. Entwürfe. Typen. Erfahrungen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz [Residential areas. Designs. Types. Experiences from Germany, Austria and Switzerland]. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36(2), 175–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1998). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Häußermann, H., & Siebel, W. (1994a). Die Kulturalisierung der Regionalpolitik [The culturalisation of regional policy]. Geographische Rundschau, 45, 218–223.
   Google Scholar
• Häußermann, H., & Siebel, W. (1994b). Wie organisiert man Innovationen in nicht innovativen Milieus [How to organise innovations in non-innovative milieus]? In R. Kreibich (Ed.) ,Bauplatz Zukunft: Dispute über die Entwicklung von Industrieregionen [Building place ‘future’. Disputes about the development of industrial regions] (pp. 52–62). Essen: Klartext Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Häussling, R. (2007). Sozialwissenschaftliche Innovationsforschung: Zum aktuellen Umgang der Gesellschaft mit dem Neuen [Social-science based innovation research: Towards the current society’s dealing with novelty]. Soziologische Revue, 30(4), 369–382. doi: 10.1524/srsr.2007.30.4.369
   Google Scholar
• Haydn, F., & Temel, R. (Eds.). (2006). Temporäre Räume: Konzepte zur Stadtnutzung [Temporary places. Concepts of using the city]. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162. doi: 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422(602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). The revival of strategic planning in Europe. In P. Healey (Ed.), Making strategic plans: Innovation in Europe (pp. 3–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320. doi: 10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510–1526. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Zimmermann, K. (2011). ‘How can we explain diversity in metropolitan governance within a country?’ Some reflections on recent developments in Germany. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6), 1175–1192. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2015). Zwischennutzung als soziale Innovation: Von alternativen Lebensentwürfen zu Verfahren der räumlichen Planung [Temporary uses as a social innovation. From alternative lifestyles to procedures of spatial planning]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2017). From squatters to creatives: An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(2), 268–287. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1303536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2018). A touch of post-truth: The roles of narratives in urban policy mobilities. Geographica Helvetica, 73(2), 133–145. doi: 10.5194/gh-73-133-2018
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). “Soziale Innovation” im Fokus: Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts [„Social innovations“ in the focus: A sketch of a socio-theoretically informed research design]. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Ibert, O., Christmann, G. B., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2015). Innovationen in der räumlichen Planung [Innovations in spatial planning]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ibert, O., & Müller, F. C. (2015). Network dynamics in constellations of cultural differences. Relational distance in innovation processes in legal services and biotechnology. Research Policy, 44, 181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, J. (2004). Europäische Stadt als Bausteinkasten für die Städtebaupraxis – die neuen Stadtteile [The European city as a modular kit for urban development practices – the new urban neighbourhoods]. In W. Siebel (Ed.), Die europäische Stadt [The European city] (pp. 92–104). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. (2010). Innovationen im Städtebau [Innovations in urban design]. In A. Harth & G. Scheller (Eds.), Soziologie der Stadt- und Freiraumplanung [Sociology of urban and open-space planning] (pp. 283–296). Wiesbaden: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, J., & Zupan, D. (2017). Leitbildwechsel. Wie kommt Neues in die Stadtplanung? [Change in the guiding principle. How does novelty enter urban planning?]. Forum Stadt, 1, 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Kauzick, M. (2007). Zwischennutzung als Initiator einer neuen Berliner Identität [Temporary use as initiator of a new city’s identity in Berlin]? Institut für Stadt- und Regionalplanung. Graue Reihe, Heft 7, Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-tuberlin/files/1702/Graue_Reihe_Heft_7_Zwischennutzung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., & Oerlemans, L. (2008). The social network perspective: Understanding the structure of cooperation. In S. Cropper (Ed.), Handbook of inter-organizational relationships (pp. 289–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koczy, O. (2015). Neue Akteure im Stadtteil: Entstehungslinien des Quartiermanagements [New actors in the neighbourhood. Lines of development of the neighbourhood management]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Koczy, O. (2018). Quartiersmanagement als soziale Innovation. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Prozess der Entstehung, Verbreitung und Ausstrahlung integrierter und sozialraumorientierter Verfahren der Quartiersentwicklung. [Neighbourhood management as social innovation. Empirical study on the emergence, dissemination and transfer of integrated sociospatial planning procedures in neighbourhood development]. Dissertation an der Universität Stuttgart [PhD-Thesis at the University of Stuttgart].
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & van de Ven, A. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.4001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. C., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lelong, B. (2014). Grasping micro-macro-interactions in urban development politics: A multidimensional network approach to collective action. Historical Social Research, 39(2), 203–234. doi: 10.12759/hsr.39.2014.2.203-234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhult, E. (2008). Are partnerships innovative? In L. Svensson & B. Nilsson (Eds.), Partnership – as a strategy for social innovation and sustainable change (pp. 37–54). Stockholm: Satéruns Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 42–51. doi: 10.1068/a44178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013). A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies, 34(1), 2–18. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2012.748563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Jessop, B., Hulgard, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation: A new stage in innovation process analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Müller, F. C., & Ibert, O. (2015). (Re-)sources of innovation: Understanding and comparing time-spatial innovation dynamics through the lens of communities of practice. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 65, 338–350. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation. Retrieved from https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neuloh, O. (Ed.). (1977). Soziale Innovation und sozialer Konflikt [Social innovation and social conflict]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. doi: 10.1177/1059601114560063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinson, G. (2002). Political government and governance: Strategic planning and the reshaping of political capacity in Turin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 477–493. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. (2010). Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft [The innovations of the society]. In J. Howaldt, & H. Jacobsen (Eds.), Soziale Innovation: Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma [Social innovation. On the path to a post-industrial innovation paradigm] (pp. 21–51). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. (1972). On the planning crisis: System analysis of the first and second generation. Bedriftsøkonomen, 8, 390–396.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2012). Ethnographic circulations: Space-time relations in the worlds of poverty management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 31–41. doi: 10.1068/a44180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung [Theory of economic development]. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700054279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1953). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(1), 1–38. doi: 10.2307/2104013
   Google Scholar
• Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin. (2007). Urban pioneers. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, U.-J. (2008). Integrated area based approaches in neighourhood regeneration – the European experience. In W. Strubelt & G. Gorzelak (Eds.), City and region (pp. 346–357). Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. (2002). Planning the twentieth-century city: The advanced capitalist world. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2008). Dokumenten und Aktenanalyse [Document and file analysis]. In U. Flick et al. (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung [Qualitative research] (pp. 502–513). Reinbek near Hamburg: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, W. (1989). Über soziale Innovationen [On social innovations]. Soziale Welt, 40(1/2), 170–183.
   Google Scholar
• Zupan, D. (2015). Von der Großsiedlung der Spätmoderne zum kompakten nutzungsgemischten Stadtquartier. Verlaufsformen eines städtebaulichen Erneuerungsprozesses [From the large housing estate of the late modernism to the compact mixed-used urban neighbourhood. The course of a renewal process in urban design]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Zupan, D. (2018). Leitbildwechsel: Dynamiken und Charakteristika städtebaulicher Innovationsprozesse [Changes in the guiding principle: Dynamics and characteristics of innovation processes in urban design]. Detmold: Rohn.
   Google Scholar