Innovation in planning: creating and securing public value

References

• Adams, D., & Watkins, C. (2014). The value of planning. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(4), 571–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, C., Miles, S., & Stark, P. (2004). Culture-led urban regeneration and the revitalisation of identities in Newcastle, Gateshead and the North East of England. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1080/1028663042000212328
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A. M. (2014). Organising for innovation in the public sector. In L. Fuglsang, R. Rønning, & B. Enquist (Eds.), Framing innovation in public service sectors (pp. 130–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. doi: 10.1111/puar.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesborough, X. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther, U.-J. Towards the emergence of innovations in spatial planning. The social process of innovating – phases, actors, conflicts. European Planning Studies. (in this Special Issue ).
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B. Introduction: Struggling with innovations – social innovations and conflicts in urban planning and development. European Planning Studies. (in this Special Issue ).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge economies: Clusters, learning and competitive advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: New departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(5), 543–564. doi: 10.1068/d110543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, P. (2017). Performing planning: Understanding community participation in planning through theatre. Town Planning Review, 88(4), 401–421. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2017.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Cowie, P. (2016). Guiding principles of ‘good’ territorial governance. In P. Schmitt, & L. V. Well (Eds.), Territorial governance across Europe: Pathways, practices and prospects (pp. 48–59). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Pendlebury, J. (2010). Centenary paper: The evolution of planning as an academic discipline. Town Planning Review, 81(6), 613–646. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2010.24
   Google Scholar
• EDAW. (1996). Grainger town regeneration strategy: Final report. Newcastle: Grainger Town Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B (1998). Rationality and power - democracy in practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E. (2012). Collaborative resilience: Moving through crisis to opportunity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, S., & Hillier, J. (2012). Processes of innovation: Reformation of the English strategic spatial planning system. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), 359–381. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.706630
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1982). Great planning disasters. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. (2015). Leading the inclusive city: Place-based innovation for a bounded planet. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Civil society enterprise and local development. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(1), 11–27. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.995212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2017a). Place, identity and governance: Transforming discourses and practices. In E. Rooksby (Ed.), Habitus: A sense of place (pp. 205–234). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2017b). Creating public value through caring for place. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 65–79. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14817306640776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/ social_innovation. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R., Maclean, M., & de la Torre, M. (2003). Hadrian’s wall world heritage site: English heritage, a case study. In M. de laTorre (Ed.), Heritage values in site management (pp. 172–213). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140–156. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything, Allen Lane – Penguin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in governance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. (2010). Social innovation and community development. In F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, & S. Gonzalez (Eds.), Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation (pp. 4–16). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd edn.). Paris: OECD Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, F. & Zass-Ogilvie, I. (2010). Sustaining regeneration: Grainger town review. Newcastle: Newcastle City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow, & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 89–113). New York, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. doi: 10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2014). Enhancing social innovation by rethinking collaboration, leadership and public governance. Social frontiers. The next edge of social innovation research. Glasgow: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., Cowie, P., & Healey, P. (2014). Success and innovation in planning: Creating public value. RTPI Research Report No. 7. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. New York, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, C. (2014). The need for a management plan and the 1st and 2nd management plans. In P. Stone & B. Brough (Eds.), Managing, using and interpreting Hadrian’s wall as world heritage (pp. 21–32). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar