A place-based policy for promoting Industry 4.0: the case of the Castellon ceramic tile district

References

• Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. doi: 10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allarakhia, M., & Walsh, S. (2010). Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Technovation, 31(2/3), 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604–633. doi: 10.2307/2393511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Pitelis, C., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2018). A place-based developmental regional industrial strategy for sustainable capture of co-created value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1521–1542. doi: 10.1093/cje/bey019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy, A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectation. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic concept. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, and W. Sengenberger. Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy (pp. 413–431). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., & Albu, M. (1999). Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development, 27(9), 1715–1734. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00073-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belso-Martinez, J. A., Diez-Vial, I., Lopez-Sanchez, M. J., & Mateu-Garcia, R. (2018). The brokerage role of supporting organizations inside clusters: How does it work? European Planning Studies, 26(4), 706–725. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1422482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505–528. doi: 10.1080/09654310802682065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039. doi: 10.5465/256722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P. (2010). How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. Research Policy, 39(2), 239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Policy and collective action in place. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 335–351. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsy011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2016). On the policy space of smart specialization strategies. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1428–1437. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1176126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaldón-Estevan, D., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., & Molina-Morales, F. X. (2018). An analysis of the Spanish ceramic tile industry research contracts and patents. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 895–914. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1427701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofoli, G. (1991). Local networks, innovation and policy in Italian industrial districts. In E. M. Bergman et al. (Eds.), Regions reconsidered (pp. 119–140). London: Mansell.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, B. A. (2012). Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins. Research Policy, 41(4), 734–742. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasmeier, A. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the World Watch Industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469–485. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervás-Oliver, J. L. (2016). What about disruptions in clusters? Retaking a missing debate. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodríguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (Vol. 40, pp. 105–121). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hervás-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2007). Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in cluster. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(2), 113–136. doi: 10.1080/08985620601137554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2009). The role of the firm's internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 263–283. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5-6), 431–452. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2014.933489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., Estelles-Miguel, S., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2018). Radical innovation in Marshallian Industrial Districts. Regional Studies, 52(10), 1388–1397. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1390311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Lleo, M., & Cervello, R. J. (2017). The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. Research Policy, 46(1), 73–92. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Estelles-Miguel, S. & Rojas-Alvarado, R. (2019). Radical vs incremental innovation in Marshallian Industrial Districts in the Valencian Region: what prevails? European Planning Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1638887
   Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas-Alvarado, R., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, 52(3), 338–349. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group. Frankfurt/Main: Forschungsunion.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, Y., Loures, E. R., Deschamps, F., Brezinski, G., & Venâncio, A. (2018). The impact of the fourth industrial revolution: A cross-country/region comparison. Production, 28, e20180061. doi: 10.1590/0103-6513.20180061
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317–338. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<317::AID-SMJ28>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2018). Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy, 103612. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, L. F. (2007). Starting over when the bickering never ends: Rebuilding aggregate trust among clustered firms through trust facilitators. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 72–91. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.23463711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Stamer, J., Maggi, C., & Seibel, S. (2004). Upgrading the tile industry of Italy, Spain, and Brazil: insights from cluster and value chain analysis. In H. Schmitz (Ed.), Local enterprises in the global economy (pp. 174–199). Chelteham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergaard, C. R., & Park, E. (2015). What makes clusters decline? A study on disruption and evolution of a high-tech cluster in Denmark. Regional Studies, 49(5), 834–849. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1015975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225. doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, 24(4), 543–562. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(94)00786-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (2014). The Silicon valley model: Economic dynamism, social exclusion. In M. Castells and P. Himanen (Eds.), Reconceptualizing development in the global information age (pp. 28–51). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. I. (1992). The Roepke lecture in economic geography: The collective order of flexible production agglomerations: Lessons for local economic development policy and strategic choice. Economic Geography, 68, 219–233. doi: 10.2307/144183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123–155. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staber, U., & Sautter, B. (2011). Who are we, and do we need to change? Cluster identity and life cycle. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1349–1361. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.490208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J., Shao, Y., & Li, W. (2013). To be different, or to be the same? An exploratory study of isomorphism in the cluster. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 83–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. (1993). Innovation and industry development: The case of cochlear implants. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 5, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• York, J. G., Hargrave, T. J., & Pacheco, D. F. (2016). Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 579–610. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar