Advanced search
Publication Cover
European Planning Studies Volume 28, 2020 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
177
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Compliance with social requirements for integrated local land use planning in Serbia

Tijana DabovićFaculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Dejan DjordjevićFaculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaView further author information
,
Bojana PoledicaFaculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaView further author information
,
Milan RadovićFaculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaView further author information
&
Marija R. JeftićFaculty of Geography, Department of Spatial Planning, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaView further author information
Pages 1219-1241 | Received 12 Dec 2018, Accepted 19 Aug 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019

References

  • Albrechts, L. (2006). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1487–1500. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852464
  • Aspinall, R. J., & Hill, M. J. ( Eds.). (2008). Land use change: Science, policy and management. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Berke, P., & Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976081
  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975696
  • Carvalho, G. (2001). Sustainable development: Is it achievable within the existing international political economy context? Sustainable Development, 9(2), 61–73. doi: 10.1002/sd.159
  • Čolić, R., Mojović, Đ, Petković, M., & Čolić, N. (2013). Guide for participation in urban development planning. Belgrade: GIZ, GmbH/AMBERO Consulting-ICON Institute.
  • Coppedge, M., Alvarez, A., & Maldonado, C. (2008). Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 632–647. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080663
  • Dabović, T., Nedović-Budić, Z., & Djordjević, D. (2019). Pursuit of integration in the former Yugoslavia’s planning. Planning Perspectives, 34(2), 215–241. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2017.1393628
  • Darmanović, S. (2017). The never-boring Balkans: The elections of 2016. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 116–128. doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0010
  • Davidson, K. (2014). A typology to categorize the ideologies of actors in the sustainable development debate. Sustainable Development, 22(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1002/sd.520
  • Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. ( Eds.). (2008). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. London: Routledge.
  • Dijst, M., Schot, P. & de Jong, K. ( Eds.). (2003). Framing land use dynamics: integrating knowledge on spatial dynamics in socio-economic and environmental systems for spatial planning in western urbanised countries, reviewed abstracts. Utrecht: Faculty of GeoSciences Utrecht University.
  • De Wit, P., & Verheye, W. (2003). Land use planning for sustainable development. In H. W. Verheye (Ed.), Land cover, land use and soil sciences, Vol. III (pp. 33–60). Oxford, UK: UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers.
  • Djordjević, D., & Dabović, T. (2009). System of spatial planning in Serbia: A critical overview. Dela, 31, 143–157.
  • Djordjević, D., Dabović, T., & Živak, N. (2013). Fizičko planiranje srpskog prostora [Physical planning of the Serbian area]. In Zbornik obilježavanja 20. godišnjice Geografskog društva Republike Srpske (pp. 303–313). Banja Luka: Geografsko društvo Republike Srpske.
  • Djordjević, S. (2012). Decentralizacija i jačanje kapaciteta lokalnih vlasti u Srbiji [Decentralization and Strengthening of local government capacities in Serbia]. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva, 8(1), 179–202.
  • FAO. (2012). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance on tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. Rome: Author.
  • FAO/UNEP. (1999). The future of our land - Facing the challenge. Rome: Author.
  • Frödin, O. (2015). Researching governance for sustainable development: Some conceptual clarifications. Journal of Developing Societies, 31(4), 447–466. doi: 10.1177/0169796X15603236
  • Fuchs, C. (2017). Critical social theory and sustainable development: The role of class, capitalism and domination in a dialectical analysis of un/sustainability. Sustainable Development, 25(5), 443–458. doi: 10.1002/sd.1673
  • Gibbons, M. (1999). Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402(Suppl.), C81–C84. doi: 10.1038/35011576
  • Gligorijević, Ž. (2012, September). Belgrade planning in a new cycle of transition. Paper presented at the 48th ISOCARP Congress, Perm, Russia.
  • Godschalk, D. (2004). Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976334
  • Golubović, Z. (2006). A socio-anthropological analysis of deficits of transition process in Serbia 2005-2006 and possibilities for elaborating alternative projects. Filozofija i drustvo, 30, 91–105. doi: 10.2298/FID0630091G
  • Göll, E., & Thio, S. (2008). Institutions for a sustainable development—Experiences from EU-countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 69–88. doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9039-2
  • Griffin, L. (2010). Governance innovation for sustainability: Exploring the tensions and dilemmas. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(6), 365–369. doi: 10.1002/eet.555
  • Hadžić, M., & Zeković, S. (2005). Strategic framework for sustainable development in the period of transition towards market economy: Critical overview of the strategy of long-term development of Serbia. Spatium, 12, 1–11. doi: 10.2298/SPAT0512001H
  • Harris, J. M. (2003). Rethinking sustainability: Power, knowledge, and institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London: Routledge.
  • Healey, P. (2001). New approaches to the content and process of spatial development frameworks. In Towards a new role of spatial planning (pp. 143–163). Paris: OECD.
  • Healey, P. (2006). Territory, integration and spatial planning. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Territory, identity and spatial planning. Spatial governance in a fragmented nation (pp. 64–79). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Healey, P., & Shaw, T. (1993). Planners, plans and sustainable development. Regional Studies, 27(8), 769–776. doi: 10.1080/00343409312331347955
  • Healey, P., & Williams, R. (1993). European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(4-5), 701–720. doi: 10.1080/00420989320081881
  • ICLEI. (1996). The local agenda 21 planning guide: An introduction to sustainable development planning. Toronto: ICLEI.
  • Janin Rivolin, U. (2017). Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 994–1012. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
  • Jessop, B. (2016). State theory. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 71–85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. (2012). Debating education for sustainable development 20 years after Rio: A conversation between Bob Jickling and Arjen Wals. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 49–57. doi: 10.1177/097340821100600111
  • Jordan, A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 17–33. doi: 10.1068/cav6
  • Kaganova, O. (2014). Regulating land and other immovable property in Serbia: A suggested framework. Municipal Economic Growth Activity Project – MEGA, USAID/Urban Institute.
  • Kidd, S. (2007). Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: An exploration from a health perspective. Planning Theory and Practice, 8(2), 161–181. doi: 10.1080/14649350701324367
  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.
  • Kostovicova, D. (2006). Civil society and post-Communist democratization: Facing a double challenge in post-Milošević Serbia. Journal of Civil Society, 2(1), 21–37. doi: 10.1080/17448680600730918
  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., … Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
  • Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. doi: 10.1002/sd.1582
  • Lestrelin, G., Castella, J. C., & Bourgoin, J. (2012). Territorialising sustainable development: The Politics of land-use planning in Laos. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(3), 581–602. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2012.706745
  • Liodakis, G. (2010). Political economy, capitalism and sustainable development. Sustainability, 2(8), 2601–2616. doi: 10.3390/su2082601
  • Listhaug, O., Ramet, S. P., & Dulić, D. ( Eds.). (2011). Civic and uncivic values: Serbia in the post-Milošević Era. Budapest: Central European University Press.
  • Loh, C. G. (2015). Conceptualizing and operationalizing planning capacity. State and Local Government Review, 47(2), 134–145. doi: 10.1177/0160323X15590689
  • Maksić, M. (2012). European experiences as guidelines for public, private and civil sector role redefinition in spatial policy formulation process in Serbia. Spatium, 27, 40–45. doi: 10.2298/SPAT1227040M
  • Maksin, M. (2014). Planning system for sustainable territorial development in Serbia. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 296–315. doi: 10.1504/IJESD.2014.062917
  • Maksin, M., Tošić, D., & Krunić, N. (2014). Perspektive regionalnog prostornog planiranja u Srbiji [Prospects of regional spatial planning in Serbia]. In J. Petrić & M. Vujošević (Eds.), Obnova strateškog prostornog mišljenja, istraživanja i upravljanja u Srbiji (pp. 45–78). Knjiga 2. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije - IAUS.
  • Mazza, L. (2003). Appunti sul disegno di un sistema di pianificazione [Notes on the design of a planning system]. Critica della razionalità urbanistica, 14, 51–66.
  • McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2000). Sustainable development: A new(ish) idea for a new century? Political Studies, 48(2), 370–387. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00265
  • Mijačić, D. (2012). Decentralisation, regionalism and regional development in Serbia. InTER Newsletter, 12(1), 1–5.
  • Milutinovic, S., & Jolovic, A. (2010). Building capacity for sustainability: Strategic planning processes for local sustainable development practices in Western Balkan. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 8(3), 293–311. doi: 10.4335/8.3.293-311(2010)
  • Milutinović, S., & Nikolić, V. (2014). Rethinking higher education for sustainable development in Serbia: An assessment of copernicus charter principles in current higher education practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.028
  • Mirić, O. (2014). Improvement of strategic and operative planning system in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: European Movement Serbia.
  • Nedović-Budić, Z., Djordjević, D., & Dabović, T. (2011). The mornings after … Serbian spatial planning legislation in context. European Planning Studies, 19(3), 429–455. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548448
  • Nedovic-Budic, Z., Zekovic, S., & Vujosevic, M. (2012). Land privatization and management in Serbia – Policy in Limbo. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 29(4), 306–317.
  • OECD. (2001). Towards a new role for spatial planning. Territorial development. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2002). Improving policy coherence and integration for sustainable development: A checklist. Paris: Author.
  • Owens, S. E., & Cowell, R. (2002). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. London: Routledge.
  • Pavlović, D. (2016). Serbian elections 2016. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 496–512.
  • Petrović, M. (2012). Pretpostavke novog modela upravljanja okruženjem u Srbiji [Preconditions for new environmental governance in Serbia]. Sociologija, 54(1), 87. doi: 10.2298/SOC1201087P
  • Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. ( Eds.). (1999). Democracy, accountability, and representation ( Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sachs, J. (2015). The age of sustainable development. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015
  • Šević, Ž. ( Ed.). (2006). Local government financial capacity building in transition countries: Selected country studies. Bratislava: The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.
  • Simmie, J. (1989). Self-management and town planning in Yugoslavia. Town Planning Review, 60(3), 271–286. doi: 10.3828/tpr.60.3.41kx5830641245t7
  • Slack, L. (2015). The post-2015 Global Agenda–A role for local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 16(17), 3–11. doi: 10.5130/cjlg.v0i0.4483
  • Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317–332. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229752
  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Bristol, UK: Schumacher CREATE Environment Centre.
  • Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2017). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. New York: Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Tsenkova, S., & Nedović-Budić, Z. (2006). Urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: Space, institutions and policy. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • UN. (2002). Report of the world summit on sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
  • UNCED. (1993). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. New York: UN.
  • Underdal, A. (1980). Integrated marine policy: What? Why? How? Marine Policy, 4(3), 159–169. doi: 10.1016/0308-597X(80)90051-2
  • UNECE. (2008). Spatial planning: Key instrument for development and effective governance with special reference to countries in transition. New York and Geneva: UN.
  • UNSG SAB. (2016). Science for sustainable development [Policy Brief]. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002461/246105E.pdf
  • Vigar, G. (2009). Towards an integrated spatial planning? European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1571–1590. doi: 10.1080/09654310903226499
  • Vujošević, M. (2010). Collapse of strategic thinking, research and governance in Serbia and possible role of the spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) in its renewal. Spatium, 23, 22–29. doi: 10.2298/SPAT1023022V
  • Vujošević, M., & Spasić, N. (2007). Transition changes and their impact on sustainable spatial, urban and rural development of Serbia. In M. Vujošević (Ed.), Sustainable development of towns in Serbia (pp. 1–45). Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia - IAUS.
  • Vujošević, M., Zeković, S., & Maričić, T. (2012). Post-socialist transition in Serbia and its unsustainable path. European Planning Studies, 20(10), 1707–1727. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713330
  • Vujošević, М, Zeković, S., & Maričić, T. (2015). Spatial regularization, planning instruments and urban land market in a post-socialist society: The case of Belgrade. Habitat International, 48, 65–78. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010
  • Vukelić, J. (2009). Neposredno učešće građana u donošenju odluka na lokalnom nivou vlasti u Srbiji [Citizen participation at the local level of government in Serbia]. Sociologija, 51(3), 291–312. doi: 10.2298/SOC0903291V
  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Wehrmann, B. ( Ed.). (2012). Land use planning: Concept, tools and applications. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).
  • Živanović-Miljković, J. (2016). Promene načina korišćenja zemljišta i vlasništva nad zemljištem sa aspekta prostornog planiranja [Land use changes and land ownership changes from the spatial planning aspect]. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Belgrade Faculty of Geography, Belgrade.

Web references

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.