Responsible research and innovation (RRI) and regional innovation studies (RIS) – reflecting on the normative aspects

References

• Apel, K. O. (2017). Transzendentale Reflexion und Geschichte. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Cooke, P., & Martin, R. (2006). Clusters and regional development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Augstein, J. (2017). Reclaim autonomy. Selbstermächtigung in der digitalen Weltordnung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2017). Die Metamorphose der Welt. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Benko, G., & Dunford, M. (1991). Industrial change and regional development. London: Belhaven.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 689–709. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9861-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., et al. (2010). Regionalisation. Theory, practice and prospects in Germany. Stockholm: SIR.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, G., van der Daele, W., & Krohn, W. (1973). Die Finalisierung der Wissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2(2), 128–144.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (2010). Soziologie und Sozialkritik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Vom Gebrauch der Wissenschaft (Les usages sociaux de la science). Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Bellhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G., Feldman, M., & Gertler, M. (2000). The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2013). Re-framing regional development. Evolution, innovation and transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2018). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council Serve as a role model? CIRCLE papers in Innovation Studies (Paper No 2018/02), https://swopec.hhs.se/lucirc/abs/lucirc2018_002.htm
   Google Scholar
• Froese, A., & Mevissen, N. (2016). Fragmentierter Wissenstransfer in den Sozialwissenschaften: Zur Relevanz disziplinenspezifischer Kontextfaktoren. In A. Froese, D. Simon, & J. Böttcher (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaft und Gesellschaft Neue Verortungen von Wissenstransfer (pp. 31–63). Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1978). Methodologie und Ideologie. Frankfurt/Main: Surkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations. A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1990). On the weakness and strong ties. The ambivalent role of inter-firm relations in the decline and reorganization of the Ruhr, Berlin, WZB (Wissenschaftzentrum) Fs I 90-4.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In R. Eccles & N. Nohria (Eds.), Networks and organizations (pp. 25–56). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D., & Urry, J. (1985). Social relations and spatial structures. Houndsmill: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J., & Ladikas, M. (2014). Responsible research and innovation: A global perspective. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 10, 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Häußermann, H., Ipsen, D., & Krämer-Badoni, R. (1992). Stadt und Raum. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, R., & Voelzkow, H. (1997). Die Regionalisierung der Strukturpolitik in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2015). Die Idee des Sozialismus. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. (2010). The rise of regional authority. A comparative study of 42 democracies (1950–2006). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, F. (2017). Es gibt keine kulturelle Identität. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2010). Eine neue Soziologie für eine neue Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2018). Das terreristische Manifest. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1977). Theoretische und praktische Probleme der anwendungsbezogenen Sozialwissenschaften. In Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (Ed.), Interaktion von Wissenschaft und Politik (pp. 16–39). Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbubani, K. (2008). The new Asian hemisphere: The irreversible shift of global power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs. An introduction to design of social innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (1999).: Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33, 869–884. doi: 10.1080/00343409950075506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D., & Meegan, R. (1982). The anatomy of job loss. The how, why, and where of employment decline. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2014). Das Kapital des Staates. München, Kunstmann Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2014). Kritik der schwarzen Vernunft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. (2011). From the ruins of empire. The revolt against the West and the remaking of Asia. London: Pinguin.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). Die organisation des Wissens. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Novotny, H. (1979). Kernenergie: Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (1999). Es ist so. Es könnte auch anders sein. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1985). Das Ende der Massenproduktion. Berlin: Wagenbach.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, D. (2004). Arbeiten an der Quadratur des Kreises. Erfahrungen an der Schnittstelle zwischen Wissenschaft und praxis. München: Hampp.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2017). Coping with social innovation dilemmas: An exploratory study of middle range theory. In S. Alijani & C. Karyotis (Eds.), Finance and economy for society: Integrating sustainability (pp. 349–360). Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, R. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation (pp. 241–323). London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2010). Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Stöhr, W. B. (1986). Regional innovation complexes. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 59, 29–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1986.tb00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative. Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H. (2013). A report on responsible research & innovation. Prepared for DG Research and Innovation, EC. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/…/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, K., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Responsible innovation – opening up the dialogue and debate. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation (355–442). London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Terstriep, J. (2016). Boosting SI’s social & economic impact, Final Report, Gelsenkirchen, IAT.
   Google Scholar
• Weisser, G. (1978). Beiträge zur Gesellschaftspolitiik. Göttingen: Otto Schwartz & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Willke, H., Krück, C. P., & Thorn, C. (1995). Benevelont conspiracies. The role of enabling technologies in the welfare of nations. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R., et al. (2018). Social innovation and the capability approach. In J. Howaldt (Ed.), Atlas of social innovation. Final Report (pp. 37–40). Dortmund: SfS.
   Google Scholar