Proximities and the emergence of regional industry: evidence of the liability of smallness in Malta

References

• Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Bus Econ, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiléra, A., Lethiais, V., & Rallet, A. (2012). Spatial and non-spatial proximities in inter-firm relations: An empirical analysis. Industry and Innovation, 19(3), 187–202. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.669609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldacchino, G. (2002). A Taste of small-island success: A case from Prince Edward island. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 254–259. doi: 10.1111/1540-627X.00055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldacchino, G. (2015). Entrepreneurship in small island states and territories. (Vol. 8). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.883598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Letaifa, S., & Goglio-Primard, K. (2016). How does institutional context shape entrepreneurship conceptualizations? Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5128–5134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Letaifa, S., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzi, L., & Langley, A. (2012). Studying processes in and around networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(2), 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (Eds.). (2010). The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography. The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 3–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409–433. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callois, J.-M. (2008). The two sides of proximity in industrial clusters: The trade-off between process and product innovation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 146–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Crevoisier, O., & Jeannerat, H. (2009). Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1223–1241. doi: 10.1080/09654310902978231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système: Les contraintes de l’action collective. [The actor and the system: The constraints of collective action]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, M., & Frenken, K. (2018). Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: Towards an integrated framework. Regional Studies, 52(1), 23–34. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.1.57.12806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, W., & Kraay, A. (2000). Small states, small problems? Income, growth, and volatility in small states. World Development, 28(11), 2013–2027. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erina, I., Shatrevich, V., & Gaile-Sarkane, E. (2017). Impact of stakeholder groups on development of a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. European Planning Studies, 25(5), 755–771. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1282077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. (2014). EY's attractiveness survey Malta 2014, 50 years of FDI: Looking forward. Ernst & Young Report.
   Google Scholar
• Freel, M. S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32(5), 751–770. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (2002). Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36(3), 205–214. doi: 10.1080/00343400220122025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., Melchior, A., Schiemer, B., Schüßler, E., & Sydow, J. (2018). From being there to being aware: Confronting geographical and sociological imaginations of copresence. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(1), 245–255. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17743507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54(1), 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1672–1684. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, K., & Rabetino, R. (2019). Knowledge-intensive territorial servitization: Regional driving forces and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Regional Studies, 53(3), 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F. (2012). On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1169–1182. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., Johnston, A., & Thompson, P. (2012). Network capital, social capital and knowledge Flow: How the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry and Innovation, 19(3), 203–232. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.669615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A., & Huggins, R. (2016). Drivers of University–industry Links: The case of knowledge-intensive business service firms in rural locations. Regional Studies, 50(8), 1330–1345. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1009028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A., Lassalle, P., & Yamamura, S. (2016). Re-conceptualising entrepreneurial ecosystems: A theoretical exploration. Geography, open innovation. Diversity and Entrepreneurship, 5, 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (2003). Small states and small states revisited. New Political Economy, 8(1), 9–30. doi: 10.1080/1356346032000078705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007). Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 457–466. doi: 10.1080/09654310601133260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., & Capone, F. (2016). How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5855–5865. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leca, B., & Naccache, P. (2006). A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization, 13(5), 627–651. doi: 10.1177/1350508406067007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch, C. M., Hill, F. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2010). The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship: Quality, validation, and trust. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 67–84. doi: 10.1177/1094428109339839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (2011). Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: Open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(1), 36–59. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2011.040821
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(3), 429–449. doi: 10.1068/a3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B., & Tyler, P. (2016). How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies, 50(4), 561–585. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.552493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Motoyama, Y., & Knowlton, K. (2016). From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: The case of government sponsorship in St. Louis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5–6), 448–470. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1186749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Statistics Office M. (2018). Demography: total population by regional, district and locality. Retrieved from https://nso.gov.mt/statdb/start#
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: The foundations of place-based renewal. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parjanen, S., & Hyypiä, M. (2018). Innovation platforms as a solution to the proximity paradox. European Planning Studies, 26(7), 1312–1329. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1476469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radinger-Peer, V., Sedlacek, S., & Goldstein, H. (2018). The path-dependent evolution of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) – dynamics and region-specific assets of the case of Vienna (Austria). European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1499–1518. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1494136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallet, A., & Torre, A. (2017). Geography of innovation, proximity and beyond. In The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (p. 421).
   Google Scholar
• Read, R. (2004). The implications of increasing globalization and regionalism for the economic growth of small island states. World Development, 32(2), 365–378. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2015). Far from the Madding Crowd: Slow innovators, information value, and the geography of innovation. Growth and Change, 46(3), 424–442. doi: 10.1111/grow.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2016). How open innovation processes vary between urban and remote environments: Slow innovators, market-sourced information and frequency of interaction. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5–6), 337–357. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1154984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., & Storper, M. (2008). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1020–1039. doi: 10.1068/a3930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spigel, B. (2015). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1111/etap.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168. doi: 10.1002/sej.1268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E. (2014). The Dutch Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Retrieved from SSRN 2473475.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman foundation research series on city. Metro, and regional entrepreneurship, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 652–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. doi: 10.2307/2096399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2010.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar