Real innovation in urban planning? Assessing the institutional capacity in the frame of the integrated sustainable urban development programmes

References

• Atkinson, R. (2001). The emerging ‘urban agenda’ and the European spatial development perspective: Towards an EU urban policy? European Planning Studies, 9(3), 385–406. doi: 10.1080/09654310120037630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Rossignolo, C. (2009, June 4–6). An “explicit” EU urban policy alter a “learning” phase?. Paper presented at the II European Urban Research Association Conference (EURA), Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner. Brussels: Commissioner for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., & Parnell, S. (2015). Ideas, implementation and indicators: Epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1), 87–98. doi: 10.1177/0956247815621473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busetti, S., & Pacchi, C. (2014). Institutional capacity for EU Cohesion policy: Concept, evidence and tools that matter. disP-The Planning Review, 50(4), 16–28. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2014.1007657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2007). Understanding urban policy: A critical approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio Hurtado, S. (2014). La Iniciativa Comunitaria URBAN como factor de transformación de la práctica de la regeneración urbana: Aproximación al caso español. Ciudad y Territorio, 180, 253–275.
   Google Scholar
• Del Castillo, J., & Haarich, S. N. (2013). Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible cofinanciado por el FEDER en España 2014–2020: Directrices Estratégicas y Prioridades de Inversión, Final Report. DG Regio.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2014). Evidence for a European urban agenda. (territorial Observation n 13). Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Integrated sustainable urban development (Factsheet), Cohesion Policy, Brussels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/brochures/2014/integrated-sustainable-urban-development
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Report from the commission to the council on the Urban Agenda for EU. COM 657 final. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/urban/report_urban_agenda2017_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2007, May 24–25). Leipzig Charter on sustainable European cities. Adopted at the informal meeting of ministers of EU Member States responsible for urban development, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González Medina, M. (2013). La europeización urbana a través de la Política de cohesión”. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 104, 133–154.
   Google Scholar
• González Medina, M. (2018). Del enfoque integrado de desarrollo urbano sostenible de la Unión europea al paradigma de la gobernanza urbana en España, In Alonso, M.R. (Dir.): Retos del desarrollo urbano sostenible integrado. Gestionar las interdependencias, Tirant lo Blanch. Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Grazi, L. (2012). Le città e l’Unione europea. La dimensione Urbana tra percorsi storici e dinamiche di europeizzazzione, Il Mulino. Bolonia.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, J., & Corjin, E. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Intermediate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies, 42, N 3, 503–526. doi: 10.1080/00420980500035436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25. Spring. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Palomero, A. (2010). La iniciativa comunitaria URBAN y la construcción inconclusa de una política urbana para la Unión Europea. Papeles de Geografía, 51–52, 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Peter M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization (Cambridge Journals), 43(3), 377–403. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300032975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2013). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society. 1–29. doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, A. M. (2016). Wicked problems and challenging opportunities: Development of integrated public health policies for the prevention of obesity. Belgium: Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2017). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in new governance arrangements. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2
   Google Scholar
• Huete García, M. A., Merinero Rodríguez, R., & Muñoz, R. (2016). Urban regeneration policy from the model of integrated urban development in the European Union: An analytical approach based on the study of Spanish cities. Local Government Studies, 42(2), 267–286. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1110520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF. (2002). The role of capacity-building in poverty reduction. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2002/031402.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). A policy paper environmental policy integration: A state of art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 147–158. doi: 10.1002/eet.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Galés, P. (2005). Elusive urban policies in Europe. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Cities in Europe (pp. 235–254). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, G., Schensul, D., & Singh, G. (2016). “Inclusive urbanization: Can the 2030 Agenda be delivered without it?” Environment and Urbanisation, 28(1), 13–34. doi: 10.1177/0956247815627522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Van Der Zwet, A. (2019). Evaluating integrated sustainable urban development strategies: A methodological framework applied in Portugal. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1606898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prats, J. (2005). De la burocracia al management, del management a la gobernanza. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Repetto, F. (2003). Capacidad estatal: requisito necesario para una mejor política social en América Latina. VIII Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Panamá, October 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas Huerta, A. (2008). Una ruta metodológica para evaluar la capacidad institucional. Política y Cultura, 2008(30), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V. (1998). Global challenge and institutional capacity: Or, how we can refit local administration for the next century. Administration & Society, 30, 3. doi: 10.1177/0095399798303002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkinki, K. (1993, August). Las capacidades y la autonomía del Estado en Brasil y la Argentina. Un enfoque institucionalista, Desarrollo Económico, núm.128, Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Berg, L., Braun, E., & van der Meer, J. (1996). Organising and implementing major metropolitan projects. Paper presented at the 36th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Brande, L. (2014). Multilevel governance and partnership. The Van den Brande Report, prepared at the request of the Commissioner for Regional and Urban Policy Johannes Hahn.
   Google Scholar