Green social innovation – towards a typology

References

• Anheier, H. K., Krlev, G., Preuss, S., Mildenberger, G., Bekkers, R., Mensink, W., … Hernandez, A. (2014). Social innovation as impact of the Third Sector. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2006). Fear of small numbers: An essay on the geography of anger. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Amanatidou, E., Edwards Schachter, M., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2015). Social innovation futures: beyond policy panacea and conceptual ambiguity. Working Papers on Innovation Studies, 20150127, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Boelman, V., & Heales, C. (eds.) (2015). Social innovation strategies - regional report. D3.6.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2014). The governance of change in socio-technical and innovation systems: Three pillars for a conceptual framework. In The governance of socio-technical systems: Explaining change (pp. 23–48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). Sozialer Raum und” Klassen": Leçon sur la leçon. 2 Vorlesungen. Pierre Bourdieu. Übers. Von Bernd Schwibs. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bria, F., Sestini, F., Gasco, M., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., Almirall, E., & Kresin, F. (2015). Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe: DSI Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, K., Nyssens, M., O’Shaughnessy, M., & Defourny, J. (2016). Public policies and work integration social enterprises: The challenge of institutionalization in a Neoliberal era. Nonprofit Policy Forum. doi: 10.1515/npf-2016-0028
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., David, P., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253. doi:10.1093/icc/9.2.211. Retrieved from http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/2/211.abstract
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, J., Benneworth, P., & Oliveira, P. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: A conceptual distinction. In Handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 616–639). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, A., Mensink, W., Einarsson, T., & Bekkers, R. (2017). Beyond service production: Volunteering for social innovation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2), 52S–71S.
   Google Scholar
• Drewe, P., Klein, J.-L., & Hulsbergen, E. (2008). The challenge of social innovation in urban revitalization. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1957). Landmarks of tomorrow. A report on the new post-modern world. London: Transaction Publishers. (original 1957: Harper&Row).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 64–79. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Haddadeh, R., Irani, Z., Millard, J., & Schröder, A. (2014). Toward a coherent methodological framework for examining social innovation in the public sector. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 250–258. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elg, U., & Johansson, U. (1996). Networking when national boundaries dissolve. European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 61–74. doi: 10.1108/03090569610106653
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1976). Der Prozeß der Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Elisa, N. (1977). Zur Gundlegung einer Theorie sozialer Prozesse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 6(2), 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• Faucheux, S., & Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2020–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L. (2008). Innovation and the creative process: Towards innovation with care. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gaggioli, A. (2017). Digital social innovation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 723–723. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.29090.csi
   Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in services: A review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 149–172. doi:10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://000263797500002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallouj, F., & Zanfei, A. (2013). Innovation in public services: Filling a gap in the literature. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.791066 doi: 10.5465/19416520.2013.791066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, M. E. B. (2015). Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1468–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644. doi:10.1080/096922900750034563. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://000165335800003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (eds.). (2015). Theoretical approaches to social innovation: A critical literature review. www.si-drive.eu
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Schröder, A., Kaletka, C., Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2016a). Comparative Analysis (Mapping 1). Retrieved from https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/SI-DRIVE-D1-4-Comparative-Analysis-2016-08-15-final. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Schröder, A., Kaletka, C., Rehfeld, D., & Terstriep, J. (2016b). Mapping the world of social innovation. Key Results of a Comparative Analysis of, 1. Social Innovation Initiatives at a Glance. SI Drive. Dortmund. Retrieved from https://www.si-drive.ei/?p=2283
   Google Scholar
• Kaletka, C., & Schröder, A. (2017). A global mapping of social innovations: Challenges of a theory driven methodology. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 78–92. doi: 10.31637/epsir.17-1.6
   Google Scholar
• Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. S. (2016). Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever changing world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, A. (2009). The Swedish model of industrial relations: Self-regulation and combined centralisation-decentralisation. In: Phelan, C. (Ed.), Trade Unionism since 1945: Towards a Global History: Volume 1, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Africa and the Middle East (Vol 1, pp. 155–197). Oxford: Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau (Ed.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Larosse, J., van Humbeeck, P., & Dries, I. (2006). Linking innovation policy and sustainable development in Flanders. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R. (2004). Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? MPIfG. Cologne. Working Paper 04/1. Retrieved from http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp04-1/wp04-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R., & Nedelmann, B. (1997). Eigendynamische soziale Prozesse. In R. Mayntz (Ed.), Soziale Dynamik und politische Steuerung. Theoretische und methodologische Überlegungen (pp. 96–114). Frankfurt/Main-New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K., Kurucz, E. C., & Colbert, B. A. (2018). Social entrepreneurial opportunity and active stakeholder participation: Resource mobilization in enterprising conveners of cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, J. (2017). The role of social innovation in poverty reduction and sustainable development. SI-Drive Policy Brief, 2. Retrieved from https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/POLICY-BRIEF-SI-DRIVE-Poverty-Reduction-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. (2016). Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re) produced. In D. MacCallum, and S.V. Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 27–40). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., Martinelli, F., & Gonzalez, S. (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city?: Community development and social innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Ali, R., Halkett, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). In and out of sync: The challenge of growing social innovations. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Noya, A. (2011). Fostering innovation to address social challenges. Paris: OECD LEED Forum on Social Innovations.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2010). Open innovation typology. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2(4), 175–183. doi: 10.1260/1757-2223.2.4.175
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. doi: 10.1177/1059601114560063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. (2003). Neither market nor hierarchy. The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings, 315, 104–117.
   Google Scholar
• Rexhepi, G., Kurtishi, S., & Bexheti, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovation–the drivers of business growth? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 532–541. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.058
   Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation for a better world: A consolidation or a new beginning? London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rüede, D., & Lurtz, K. (2012). Mapping the various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. EBS Business School Paper 12-03. Oestrich-winkel. Retrieved from https://www.h-brs.de/files/rueede_lurtz_-_mapping_the_various_meanings_of_social_innovation_isi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Wepner, B., Andersson, T., Abbas, Q., Asenova, D., Damianova, Z., … Ecer, S. (2017). Social Innovation in Environment and Climate Change: Summary Report. SI-Drive Paper. Dortmund. Retrieved from https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SI-DRIVE-D6_4-Final-Policy-Field-Report-Environment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. H. (2006). Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity? Current Sociology, 54(1), 77–97. doi: 10.1177/0011392106058835
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. W. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change. Innovation policy 3.0. SPRU Working Paper, Draft v2.
   Google Scholar
• Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2015). From advocacy to social innovation: A typology of social change efforts by nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2581–2603. doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9535-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (2009). Die Gesetze der Nachahmung. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, R. (2006). The decentralisation of social assistance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(1/2), 20–31. doi: 10.1108/01443330610644407
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1991). Economic institutions: Spontaneous and intentional governance. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7, 159–187. doi: 10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1998). The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F., & Toivonen, M. (2016). The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations A bridge between service and social innovation research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 150–166. doi:10.1108/Ejim-05-2015-0033. Retrieved from < Go to ISI>://000382538300001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, D. A. (2010). Architectures of innovation: techno-economic paradigms, institutional change and prospects for growth. Paper presented at the Druid Summer Conference 2010, Imperial College London Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar