Public-private entanglements: consultant use by local planning authorities in England

References

• Allmendinger, P. (2016). Contemporary spatial governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Governmentality after neoliberalism (pp. 16–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler, A. (1965). The city planning process. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armbrüster, T. (2006). The economics and sociology of management consulting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. (2006). The planning system: Matching expectations and capacity. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., & Siemiatycki, M. (2016). Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketization: The entangling of state and markets. Progress in Human Geography, 40(2), 177–198. doi: 10.1177/0309132515570512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Claydon, J., & Nadin, V. (2003). The RTPI’s education commission: Context and challenges. Town Planning Review, 74(3), 333–345. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Brudell, P. (2014). The role of private consultancies in neoliberal urban regeneration. In A. MacLaren & S. Kelly (Eds.), Neoliberal urban policy and the transformation of the city (pp. 233–246). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Values and professional identities in planning practice. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures (pp. 65–92). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, L. C. (1986). Why the rational paradigm persists — the resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 5(3), 147–153. doi: 10.1177/0739456X8600500302
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Healey, P. (1990). Using planning consultants: The experience of Tyne and Wear Development Corporation. Newcastle: University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M. (1989). Privatization and the rhetoric of planning practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7(4), 449–462. doi: 10.1068/d070449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organisations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fordham, R. (1990). Planning consultancy: Can it serve the public interest? Public Administration, 68(2), 243–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00757.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud, J., Johal, S., Moran, M., & Williams, K. (2017). Outsourcing the state: New sources of elite power. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5-6), 77–101. doi: 10.1177/0263276417717791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijzen, J. (2010). Outsourcing planning: What do consultants do in regional spatial planning in the Netherlands?. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, S., & Vigar, G. (2012). Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997-2010. Town Planning Review, 83(5), 533–552. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2012.33
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., & Allmendinger, P. (1999). The changing nature of public planning practice under the new right: The legacies and implications of privatisation. Planning Practice and Research, 14(1), 39–67. doi: 10.1080/02697459915823
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., Tait, M., & Wargent, M. (forthcoming). Serving the public interest? Towards a genealogy of private sector planning expertise. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1989). The common good: Citizenship, morality and self-interest. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2016). Politics of expertise: Constructing professional design knowledge in the public and private sectors. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(4), 451–464. doi: 10.1177/0739456X15620656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019a). Shifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy. Urban Affairs, 55(6), 1666–1701. doi: 10.1177/1078087417752475
   Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019b). Shareholder as client: Firms, markets, and the new business of planning. Journal of Urban Affairs. Published online 24 January 2019. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1562303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Arroyo, R. L. (2017). Special ethical considerations for planners in private practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), 168–179. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2017.1286945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. K. (2013). Planning consultants and local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), 138–147. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2013.883251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Hincks, S. (2010). Making plans: The role of evidence in England’s reformed spatial planning system. Planning Practice and Research, 25(4), 477–496. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2010.511019
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2014). Is planning “under attack”? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 345–361. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.741574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2014). The entrepreneurial state. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. The Professional Geographer, 53(2), 207–218. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile urbanism: Cities and policy-making in the global age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. (1995). A survey of chief planning officers’ attitudes to planning consultants. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(1), 20–34. doi: 10.1108/09513559510077805
   Google Scholar
• Momani, B., & Khirfan, L. (2013). Explaining the use of planning consultants in Ontario cities. Canadian Public Administration, 56(3), 391–413. doi: 10.1111/capa.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (NAO). (2018). Financial sustainability of local authorities 2018 ( HC 834). London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• NAO. (2019). Planning for new homes ( HC 1923). London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2014). Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3290–3305. doi: 10.1177/0042098013505159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, E., & MacLeod, G. (2018). Beyond consensus and conflict in housing governance: Returning to the local state. Planning Theory, 18(3), 319–338. doi: 10.1177/1473095218790988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Lynn, T., & Wargent, M. (2015). Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England. Town Planning Review, 86(5), 519–536. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2015.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Street, E., Raco, M., & Freire-Trigo, S. (2014). In planning we trust? Public interest and private delivery in a co-managed planning system. Town and Country Planning, 83(12), 537–540.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Street, E., & Wargent, M. (2018). The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 734–750. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1532529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Street, E., & Wargent, M. (2019). Advocates, advisors and scrutineers: The technocracies of private sector planning in England. In M. Raco & F. Savini (Eds.), Planning and knowledge: How new forms of technocracy are shaping contemporary cities (pp. 157–167). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (1944/2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 188–203. doi: 10.1177/0309132511417659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2013). The new contractualism, the privatization of the welfare state, and the barriers to open source planning. Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 45–64. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.694306
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2018). Private consultants, planning reform and the marketisation of local government finance. In J. Ferm & J. Tomaney (Eds.), Planning practice (pp. 123–137). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M., Street, E., & Freire-Trigo, S. (2016). The new localism, anti-political development machines, and the role of planning consultants: Lessons from London’s South Bank. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), 216–240. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1036912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D. C., & Leland, S. M. (2011). Does sector matter? An analysis of planners’ attitudes regarding politics and competing interests in the planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 639–653. doi: 10.1177/0275074010390031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, E. (1987). British town and country planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (2019). The UK planning profession in 2019. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, D. (1998). The new managerialism and the policy influence of consultants in government: An historical-institutionalist analysis of Britain, Canada and France. Governance, 11(3), 319–356. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, D. (2000). Building the new managerialist state: Consultants and the politics of public sector reform in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Raco, M. (2019). The rise of a new urban technocracy. In M. Raco & F. Savini (Eds.), Planning and knowledge: How new forms of technocracy are shaping contemporary cities (pp. 3–17). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., & Carter, D. P. (2019). Collaborative governance or private policy making? When consultants matter more than participation in collaborative environmental planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(2), 153–173. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1566061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, D., Gunn, S., & Schoneboom, A. (2019). Serving the public interest? The reorganisation of UK planning services in an era of reluctant outsourcing. London: RTPI.
   Google Scholar
• Stapper, E. W., Van der Veen, M., & Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2019). Consultants as intermediaries: Their perceptions on citizen involvement in urban development. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. Published June 5, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419853583
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W. (2009). Australian urban planners: Hybrid roles and professional dilemmas? Urban Policy and Research, 27(2), 189–203. doi: 10.1080/08111140902908873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, M. (2016). Planning and the public interest: Still a relevant concept for planners? Planning Theory, 15(4), 335–343. doi: 10.1177/1473095216660780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelpohl, A. (2018). Consulting as a threat to local democracy? Flexible management consultants, pacified citizens, and political tactics of strategic development in German cities. Urban Geography, 39(9), 1345–1365. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2018.1452872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wargent, M., Parker, G., & Street, E. (forthcoming). Private expertise and the spatial reorganisation of planning in England. In A. E. G. Jonas, N. Koch, C. Lizotte, J. Luukkonen, & S. Moisio (Eds.), Handbook on the changing geographies of the state: New spaces of geopolitics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylönen, M., & Kuusela, H. (2019). Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda. Governance, 32(2), 241–258. doi: 10.1111/gove.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanotto, J. (2019). Detachment in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(1), 37–52. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1560491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar