The role of regional contextual factors for science and technology parks: a conceptual framework

References

• Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of Science and Technology Park characteristics on firms’ innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 253–279. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahari, A., Catalano, G., & Landoni, P. (2013). Evaluation of national science park systems: A theoretical framework and its application to the Italian and Spanish systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(5), 599–614. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.785508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2017). Technology Parks versus science parks: Does the university make the difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 13–28. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2010). Science and Technology Parks impacts on tenant organisations: A review of literature. MPRA Paper (41914), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 187–210. doi: 10.1007/s00191-006-0048-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92(2), 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64–81). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma, N., Schutjens, V., & Stam, E. (2011). Regional entrepreneurship. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, B. R. Martin, D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 482–494). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. doi: 10.4337/9780857931504
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, D. (2013). From ‘wannabe’ Silicon Valley to global back office? Examining the socio-spatial consequences of technopole planning practices in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1111/apv.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, R., & Dahab, S. S. (1998). Science parks in developing countries: The case of BIORIO in Brazil. International Journal of Technology Management, 16(8), 726. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.1998.002693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first century industrial complexes.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K.-Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A., & Pretorius, M. W. (2011). Innovation outcomes of South African new technology-based firms: A contribution to the debate on the performance of science park firms. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 14(4), 361–378. doi: 10.4102/sajems.v14i4.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, F., van Oort, F., Geertman, S., & Hooimeijer, P. (2014). Science parks and the co-location of high-tech small- and medium-sized firms in China’s Shenzhen. Urban Studies, 51(5), 1073–1089. doi: 10.1177/0042098013493020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comins, N., & Rowe, D. N. E. (2008). Success factors for science parks in the developed world and emerging economies (1).
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sánchez, Á. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation, 50–51, 41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Porto Gomez, I. (2017). A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371–387. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1244516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington, D. W. (2008). The Kyoto research park and innovation in Japanese cities. Urban Geography, 29(5), 411–450. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.29.5.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efrat, K. (2014). The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation. Technovation, 34(1), 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R and D Management, 48(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1111/radm.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich, K., & Hassink, R. (2018). Smart specialization and the role of universities and science parks. World Technopolis Review, 7(2), 1–8. doi: 10.7165/wtr18s1122.19
   Google Scholar
• Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. A., & Luger, M. I. (1990). Science/technology parks and regional development theory. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(1), 64–78. doi: 10.1177/089124249000400108
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: From structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25(9), 1039–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, J. C., & Georghiou, L. (2005). Foresight in innovation policy: Shared visions for a science park and business–university links in a city region. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(2), 147–160. doi: 10.1080/09537320500088716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommen, L., Doloreux, D., & Larsson, E. (2006). Emergence and growth of Mjärdevi Science Park in Linköping, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1331–1361. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M. C. (2011). Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion: The revisit of Taiwan’s Hsinchu Science Park. Scientometrics, 88(3), 949–977. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0427-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, T. S. (2008). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese Science Parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 163–187. doi: 10.1080/09654310701814462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, T. S., Lin, C. Y., & Chang, S. L. (2005). Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: A case study of HSIP, Taiwan. Technovation, 25(4), 367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. J., & Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2016). High-tech development and spatial planning: Comparing the Netherlands and Taiwan from an institutional perspective. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1662–1683. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1187717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S. (2011). Regional innovation and diversity. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Todtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 143–154). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C., & Leicht, K. T. (2018). Do high technology policies work ? High technology industry employment growth in U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1988–1998 differing views on location-specific technology policies. Social Forces, 85(1), 1988–1998. doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0128
   Google Scholar
• Jongwanich, J., Kohpaiboon, A., & Yang, C. H. (2014). Science park, triple helix, and regional innovative capacity: Province-level evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 19(2), 333–352. doi: 10.1080/13547860.2014.880285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, O. (2002). Innovation processes and proximity: The case of IDEON firms in Lund, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 705–722. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000003771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, L. (2007). Regional industrial policies driving peri-urban dynamics in Hyderabad, India. Cities, 24(2), 95–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2006.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Lee, Y. S., & Hwang, H. R. (2014). Regionalization of planned S&T Parks: The case of Daedeok S&T Park in Daejeon, South Korea. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 843–862. doi: 10.1068/c1269r
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., Lin, G. T. R., & Hsi, P. H. (2017). Industrial cluster development and its contribution to economic growth in Taiwan – Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park (HSIP). Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 76(5), 273–278. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/41604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9683–9697. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms-assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off science parks. Omega, 30(3), 143–154. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00023-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). US science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic mission of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1323–1356. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00085-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofsten, H., & Lindelof, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden – industrial renewal and development? R and D Management, 31(3), 309–322. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Omega, 30(3), 143–154. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6
   Google Scholar
• Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00086-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems – analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Malairaja, C., & Zawdie, G. (2008). Science parks and university-industry collaboration in Malaysia. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(6), 727–739. doi: 10.1080/09537320802426432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in university science park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, I. P., Silvestre, B. S., von Nordenflycht, A., & Breznitz, S. M. (2018). A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47(August 2015), 110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Miao, J. T., & Hall, P. (2014). Optical illusion? The growth and development of the optics valley of China. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 863–879. doi: 10.1068/c1270r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2015a). Research excellence and university-industry collaboration in UK science parks. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 181–196. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvu032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguillo, D., & Thelwall, M. (2015b). Which are the best innovation support infrastructures for universities? Evidence from R&D output and commercial activities. Scientometrics, 102(1), 1057–1081. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1458-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minguillo, D., Tijssen, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Do science parks promote research and technology? A scientometric analysis of the UK. Scientometrics, 102(1), 701–725. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1435-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora-Valentín, E. M., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Nájera-Sánchez, J. J. (2018). Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10961-018-9654-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motohashi, K. (2013). The role of the science park in innovation performance of start-up firms: An empirical analysis of Tsinghua Science Park in Beijing. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 578–599. doi: 10.1080/13602381.2012.673841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukkala, K. (2010). The role of regional policies in promoting networking and innovative activity: Evidence from small Finnish high-tech firms. European Planning Studies, 4313. doi: 10.1080/09654311003744175
   Google Scholar
• Nahm, K. B. (2000). The evolution of science parks and metropolitan development. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 4(1), 81–95. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2000.9693465
   Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C., Kleibrink, A., & Stancova, K. (2014). The role of science parks in smart specialisation strategies. JRC Technical Reporrs. Europen Commission, 08, 1–25. doi: 10.2791/8851
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. A. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Lockett, N. (2013). Shifting sands: Regional perspectives on the role of social capital in supporting open innovation through knowledge transfer and exchange with small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 31(3), 296–318. doi: 10.1177/0266242612467659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Dawood, S. R. S. (2014). Untangling the spaces of high technology in Malaysia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 896–915. doi: 10.1068/c1272r
   Google Scholar
• Piirainen, K. A., Tanner, A. N., & Alkærsig, L. (2017). Regional foresight and dynamics of smart specialization: A typology of regional diversification patterns. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 289–300. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilar Latorre, M., Hermoso, R., & Rubio, M. A. (2017). A novel network-based analysis to measure efficiency in science and technology parks: The ISA framework approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1255–1275. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9585-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2014). Technology and industrial parks in emerging countries. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07992-9
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, E. (2011). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232. doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador, E., & Rolfo, S. (2011). Are incubators and science parks effective for research spin-offs? Evidence from Italy. Science and Public Policy, 38(3), 170–184. doi: 10.3152/016502611X12849792159191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29(Suppl. 2), S9–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., & Doloreux, D. (2000). Science parks: Actors or reactors? Canadian science parks in their urban context. Environment and Planning A, 32(6), 1065–1082. doi: 10.1068/a32126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H. (2000). An alternative approach to developing science parks: A case study from Korea. Regional Science, 5, 103–111. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-6
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms : A review of recent U.K. evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20, 177–184. doi: 10.1023/A:1022268100133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M. (2008). Science parks’ tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 45–71. doi: 10.1007/s10961-007-9037-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks, knowledge spillovers, and firms’ innovative performance. Evidence from Finland. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 32, 0–29. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27730
   Google Scholar
• Starr, P., & Saxenian, A. (1995). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Contemporary sociology (Vol. 24). Harvard University Press. doi: 10.2307/2076522
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-L., & Chang, H.-C. (2016). Evaluation of critical factors for the regional innovation system within the HsinChu science-based park. Kybernetes, 45(4), 699–716. doi: 10.1108/K-02-2015-0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamis, A. (2009). Science and technology parks in the less favoured regions of Europe: An evaluation of their performance and the parameters of success (PhD thesis). London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Urriago, A. R., Barge-Gil, A., Rico, M. A., & Paraskevopoulou, E. (2014). The impact of science and technology parks on firms' product innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 835–873. doi: 10.1007/s00191-013-0337-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Mathys, L., & Foster, M. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship: The missing ingredient in China’s STIPs? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(3), 249–274. doi: 10.1080/08985620600593161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, L., & North, D. (2018). The role of technological business incubators in supporting business innovation in China: A case of regional adaptability? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2), 29–57. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2017.1364789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M. R., Chien, K. M., Hong, L. Y., & Yang, T. N. (2018). Evaluating the collaborative ecosystem for an innovation-driven economy: A systems analysis and case study of science parks. Sustainability, 10(3), 1–13. doi: 10.3390/su10030887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38(1), 77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. Y.-R., Hsu, J.-Y., & Ching, C.-H. (2009). Revisiting the Silicon Island? The geographically varied “strategic coupling” in the development of high-technology parks in Taiwan. Regional Studies, 43(3), 369–384. doi: 10.1080/00343400902777067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S., & Lee, J. (2013). An innovation network analysis of science clusters in South Korea and Taiwan. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 277–289. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2013.866310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S., Xie, X., & Tam, C. (2010). Evaluating innovation capabilities for science parks: A system model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(3), 397–413. doi: 10.3846/tede.2010.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., & Zhao, W. (2013). Anatomy of Tsinghua University science park in China: Institutional evolution and assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 663–674. doi: 10.1007/s10961-013-9314-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar