Transition through design: enabling innovation via empowered ecosystems

References

• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2011). A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 796–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 628–649. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennes, C. (2017, June 14). A year as chief design officer [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://www.helsinkidesignweek.com/series/a-year-as-a-chief-design-officer/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., & Winhall, J. (2006). Transformation design (RED Paper 02). Retrieved from Design Council website https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/red-paper-transformation-design.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi: 10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Urban governance and social innovations. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context (pp. 21–44). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2009). Gabriel Tarde und die Verwaltung von Großstädten [Gabriel Tarde and the administration of large cities]. In C. Borch & U. Stäheli (Eds.), Soziologie der Nachahmung und des Begehrens: Materialien zu Gabriel Tarde [Sociology of imitation and desire: Materials about Gabriel Tarde] (pp. 372–396). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2014). Design and organizational change in the public sector. Design Management Journal, 9(1), 85–97. doi: 10.1111/dmj.12013
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J., Kaletka, C., & Pelka, B. (2017). Inclusion through digital SIs. Modelling an ecosystem of drivers and barriers. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human - computer interaction, UAHCI 2017 proceedings, part I (pp. 67–84). Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flach, J. M. (2012). Complexity: Learning to muddle through. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 187–197. doi: 10.1007/s10111-011-0201-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. In D. Benyon & P. Moody (Eds.), DIS ‘04 proceedings of the 5th conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 261–268). Cambridge, MA: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes: Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772–791. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems: An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 298–312. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorb, P., & Dumas, A. (1987). Silent design. Design Studies, 8(3), 150–156. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(87)90037-8
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (Eds.). (2014). Theoretical approaches to Social Innovation: A critical literature review. Retrieved from http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. In K. Henning & F. Hees (Eds.), Studies for innovation in a modern working environment - international monitoring (Vol. 5). Retrieved from http://www.sfs.tu-dortmund.de/cms/en/social_innovation/publications/IMO-MAG_Howaldt_final_mit_cover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229–246. doi: 10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaletka, C., Markmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2017). Peeling The Onion: An exploration of the layers of SI ecosystems. Modelling a context sensitive perspective on driving and hindering factors for SI. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2009). Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. Presented at the CRESC Conference (pp. 1–15), Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.lucykimbell.com/stuff/CRESC_Kimbell_v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2012). Wicked problems: Problems worth solving. Austin, TX: Austin Center for Design.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu Cipriani, T. & Rossi, M. (2018). Working with complexity: A contemporary skill framework for service designers. In A. Meroni, A. M. Ospina Medina, & B., ServDes2018 (Eds.), Service design proof of concept, proceedings of the ServDes.2018 conference (pp. 105–116). Retrieved from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/150/009/ecp18150009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi: 10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (1998). Products in a period of transition: Products, services and interactions for a sustainable society. In T. Balcioglu (Ed.), The role of product design in post-industrial society (pp. 43–58). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., & Jégou, F. (2003). Sustainable everyday. Milan: Edizioni Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., & Meroni, A. (2014). Catalysing social resources for sustainable changes: Social innovation and community-centered design. In C. Vezzoli, C. Kohtala, & A. Srinivasan (Eds.), Product-service system design for sustainability (pp. 362–379). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. (2003). Healing the world: A challenge for designers. New York: Archeworks.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: Intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 13–24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D., & Stappers, P. (2015). Designx: Complex sociotechnical systems. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1(2), 83–106. doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. (2014). Urbane Reallabore: Ein Blick in die aktuelle Forschungswerkstatt [Urban real laboratories: A view in the current research workshop]. pnd-online, 3, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U., Augenstein, K., Stelzer, F., & Wanner, M. (2018). Structure matters: Real-world laboratories as a new type of large-scale research infrastructure: A framework inspired by Giddens’ structuration theory. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 12–17. doi: 10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani, I., & Ravasi, D. (2012). Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1232–1259. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (2009). Die Gesetze der Nachahmung [The laws of imitation]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Taverna, E. (2017, December 5). Beni comuni è Bologna: online il Report 2017 [Blog Post]. Retrieved from http://www.labsus.org/2017/12/beni-comuni-e-bologna-online-il-report-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Terstriep, J., Kleverbeck, M., Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2015). Comparative report on social innovation across Europe. Deliverable D3.2 of the project “Boosting the impact of SI in Europe through economic underpinnings” (SIMPACT). Retrieved from http://www.simpact-project.eu/publications/reports/SIMPACT_D32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, S. (2010, October). The co-evolvement of local development – From the triple to the quadruple helix model. Paper presented at Triple Helix VIII, Madrid. Retrieved from http://www.leydesdorff.net/th8/TRIPLE%20HELIX%20-%20VIII%20CONFERENCE/PROCEEDINGS/0110_Wallin_Sirkku_O-104/triple%20helix%20Wallin%20final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weischenberg, S. (1990). Das ‘Paradigma Journalistik’. Publizistik, 35(1), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. (2016). Transition management, action research and actor roles. Understanding local sustainability transitions (Doctoral dissertation). Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Retrieved from https://repub.eur.nl/pub/
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., van Steenbergen, F., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., & Schäpke, N. (2014). Action, research and participation: Roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 483–496. doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar