Delimiting cross-border areas for policy implementation: a multi-factor proposal

References

• Anderson, J., O’Dowd, J., & Wilson, T. M. (2003). New borders for a changing Europe. Cross-border cooperation and governance. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2004). From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 530–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20(1), 14–34. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunerhielm, L., Alfredsson-Olsson, E., & Medeiros, E. (2019). The importance of the Swedish–Norwegian border citizens’ perspectives for bottom-up cross-border planning strategies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 73(2), 96–109. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2019.1598485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. C. (1992). Turbulent Waters, cross-border Finance and International governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, H.-J. (2019). Scaling and Bordering: An elusive relationship? Journal of Borderlands Studies, 34(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1300926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., Fratesi, U., & Resmini, L. (2011). Globalization and regional Growth in Europe past Trends and Future Scenarios. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho, R., Vulevic, A., Fernández, J., Fernández-Pozo, L., Gómez, J., & Loures, L. (2017). Accessibility and connectivity – Movement between cities, as a critical factor to achieve success on cross-border cooperation (CBC) projects. A European Analysis, Sustainable Cities and Society, 32(2017), 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.026
   Google Scholar
• CoR. (2018). EGTC monitoring report 2017. Brussels: Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Danson, M., & De Souza, P. (2012). Regional development in Northern Europe. Peripherality, marginality and border issues. Regions and cities. Routledge, London: Regional Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, L. (2013). Understanding European cross-border cooperation: A framework for analysis. Journal of European Integration, 35(6), 669–687. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2012.711827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2013). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 221–237. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
   Google Scholar
• dell’Agnese, E., & Amilhat Szary, A.-L. (2015). Borderscapes: From border Landscapes to border Aesthetics. Geopolitics, 20(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2015.1014284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P. (2011). Global Shift. Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (6th Edition). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. (2015). Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production – The case of the Eurometropolis Lille– Kortrijk–Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(3), 309–328. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Decoville, A. (2018). Establishing cross-border spatial planning. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Lamour, C. (2014). Cross-border metropolitan governance: The multi-faceted state power. Space and Polity, 18(3), 197–214. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2014.957041
   Google Scholar
• EC. (1990). Interreg, InfoTechnique B-501-90, European Commisiion Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2017). Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European parliament. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2018). Comprehensive analysis of the existing cross-border rail transport connections and missing links on the internal EU borders. Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2019a). Cross-border public services in Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2019b). Cross-border public services (CPS) Targeted analysis Final report Scientific report – Annex V case study report - Galicia – Norte de Portugal. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2019c). Cross-border public services (CPS) Targeted analysis Final report Scientific report – Annex XI case study report – Alentejo-Extremadura-Andalucia. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., & Engl, A. (2018). Taking Stock of the European Grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC): from policy formulation to policy implementation. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R. (2016). Iberian major regions interregional trade across the border. Journal of Economics and Business Research, 22(2), 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. (2012). Advancement in conceptualizing cross-border daily mobility: The Benelux context in the European Union. EJTIR, 12(2), 178–192.
   Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, T., & Gualda, E. (2016). Reporting a bottom-up political process: Local perceptions of cross-border cooperation in the southern Portugal–Spain region. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 468–480. doi: 10.1177/0969776413518781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramillano, A., et al. (2016). Collecting solid evidence to assess the needs to be addressed by INTERREG cross-border cooperation programmes (2015CE160AT044). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, P. (2001). Geography. A global synthesis. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. L. (2000). Economic, political, and cultural integration in an inner European Union border region: The Danish German border region. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 15(2), 91–118. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2000.9695558
   Google Scholar
• Heddebaut, O. (2004). The EUROREGION from 1991 to 2020. An ephemeral stamp? In B. Hooper, & O. Kramsch (Eds.), Cross-border governance in the European Union (pp. 71–87). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R. (2011). Cross-border spatial planning: Understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German–Polish–Czech borderland. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 629–645. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krätke, S. (1999). Regional integration or fragmentation? The German-Polish border region in a new Europe. Regional Studies, 33(7), 631–641. doi: 10.1080/00343409950078675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krätke, S. (2002). Cross-border cooperation and regional development in the German-Polish border area. In M. Perkmann, N. Sum (Ed.), Globalization, regionalization and cross-border region (pp. 125–150).
   Google Scholar
• Lafourcade, M., & Paluzie, E. (2011). European integration, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the geography of French trade. Regional Studies, 45(4), 419–439. doi: 10.1080/00343401003713357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J. (2016). The multiscalar production of borders. Geopolitics, 21(3), 465–482. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1195132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, E., & Pires, I. (2018). The role and rise of European cross-border entities. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lundén, T. (2004). On the boundary. About humans at the end of territory. Huddinge: Södertörns Högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Lundén, T. (2018). Border regions and cross-border cooperation in Europe. A theoretical and historical approach. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. (pp. 97–114). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., Williams, A., Mitze, T., & Weidenfeld, A. (2018). Science and technology cooperation in cross-border regions: A proximity approach with evidence for Northern Europe. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1500528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. (2010). Creating new spaces for politics? The role of national minorities in Building capacity of cross-border regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 20(3), 335–351. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2010.484572
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014c). Cross-border cooperation in Raia Ibérica: The role of the INTERREG in building territorial networks. In Iva Pires and Luis Dominguez Castro (Eds.), Cross border cooperation structures in Europe, learning from the past to the future (pp. 135–154). Euroclio, Studies and Documents, P.I.E. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2010). Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Sweden-Norway. Area, 42(4), 434–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011). (Re)defining the concept of Euroregion. European Planning Studies, 19(1), 141–158. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.531920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014a). Barrier effect and cross-border cooperation: Sweden-Norway INTERREG.A territorial effects. Finisterra, XLIX(98), 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2014b). Is there a new ‘trust’ in Inner Scandinavia, evidence from cross-border planning and governance. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(4), 363–386. doi: 10.1111/geob.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017). Cross-border cooperation in Inner Scandinavia: A territorial impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62(2017), 147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2018a) The role of European territorial cooperation (ETC) in EU Cohesion policy. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2018b). Should EU cross-border cooperation programmes focus mainly on reducing border obstacles?. Documents D’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 64(3), 467–491. doi: 10.5565/rev/dag.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2019). Cross-Border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlbye, P., & Böhme, K. (2018). More territorial cooperation post 2020? A contribution to the debate of future EU Cohesion policy. Spatial Foresight Brief 2017:8. Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Encarta. (2009). Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, C., Alfredsson-Olsson, E., Ericsson, B., & Overvåg, K. (2018). The border as an engine for mobility and spatial integration: A study of commuting in a Swedish–Norwegian context. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 72(4), 217–233. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2018.1497698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2009). Political boundaries. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Vol. 8, pp. 217-227). Conventry: Elsavier.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2011). A “border theory”: an unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars? In D. Wastl-Walter (Ed.), A research Companion to border studies (pp. 11–31). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Zimmerbauer, K. (2016). Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15594805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2002). The rise of the Euroregion. A bird’s eye perspective on European cross-border co-operation. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/perkmann-rise-of-euroregion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pires, I., & Nunes, F. (2018). Labour mobility in the Euroregion Galicia–Norte de Portugal: Constraints faced by cross-border commuters. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 376–395. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1404968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P. (2012). Barrier effects of borders: Implications for border-crossing Infrastructures. EJTIR, 12(2), 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Rumley, D. (2010). A Review of “borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory's edge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(1), 236–237. doi: 10.1080/00045600903423832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2009). Europe of regions. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Vol. 3, pp. 649-657). Conventry: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, S., & Balogh, P. (2018). Limits to integration: Persisting border obstacles in the EU. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Szytniewski, B., Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2017). Sociocultural proximity, daily life and shopping tourism in the Dutch–German border region. Tourism Geographies, 19(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2016.1233289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K. (2012). Border surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned cross-border behaviour and planned territorial structures of cross-border governance. Planning Practice & Research, 27(3), 351–366. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.670939
   Google Scholar
• Wastl-Walter, D. (2009). Europe of regions. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Vol 3, pp. 332-339). Conventry: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, G. M., et al. (2013). Climate Change and U.S.-Mexico Border Communities. Chapter 16 in Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278658778_Climate_Change_and_US-Mexico_Border_Communities
   Google Scholar
• Winder, G. M. (2009). Europe of regions. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Vol. 5, pp. 330–343). Conventry: Elsavier.
   Google Scholar