2,075
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenges of knowledge combination in strategic regional innovation processes - the Creative Science Park in Aveiro

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1922-1940 | Received 26 Apr 2019, Accepted 22 Nov 2019, Published online: 15 Dec 2019

References

  • Aranguren, M., & Larrea, M. (2011). Regional innovation policy processes: Linking learning to action. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(4), 569–585. doi: 10.1007/s13132-011-0068-1
  • Aranguren, M., Navarro, M., & Wilson, J. (2015). Constructing research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). In J. Valdaliso & J. Wilson (Eds.), Strategies for shaping territorial competitiveness (pp. 218–242). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Arenas, D., Sanchez, P., & Murphy, M. (2013). Different paths to collaboration between businesses and civil society and the role of third parties. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 723–739. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1829-5
  • Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Intent versus actuality. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(4), 441–444. doi: 10.1177/0021886396324008
  • Asheim, B., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
  • Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2013.869428
  • Benneworth, P. (2007). Leading innovation: Building effective regional coalitions for innovation. Research Report from the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA). London: NESTA.
  • Benneworth, P. (ed.). (2018). Universities and regional economic development - Engaging with the Periphery. London: Routledge.
  • Benneworth, P., Hospers, G., Jongbloed, B., Leiyste, L., & Zomer, A. (2011). The 'Science City' as a system coupler in fragmented strategic urban environments? Built Environment, 37(3), 317–335. doi: 10.2148/benv.37.3.317
  • Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Karlsen, J. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
  • Boekholt, P., Arnold, E., & Tsipouri, L. (1998). The evaluation of the pre-pilot actions under Article 10: Innovative Measures regarding Regional Technology Plans. Report to the European Commission. Retrieved from www.innovatingregions.org/download/RTPreport.pdf
  • Borrás, S., & Jordana, J. (2016). When regional innovation policies meet policy rationales and evidence: A plea for policy analysis. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2133–2153. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1236074
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Brinkerhoff, J. (2002). Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: A proposed framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(3), 215–231. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00017-4
  • Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 85–101. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0781-5
  • Coffano, M., & Foray, D. (2014). The centrality of entrepreneurial discovery in building and implementing a smart specialisation strategy. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 33–50. doi: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001003
  • Cooke, P. (1995). Keeping to the high road: Learning, reflexivity and associative governance in regional economic development. In P. Cooke (Ed.), The rise of the rustbelt (pp. 231–245). London: UCL Press.
  • Georgieva, O. (2018). The Mayor of Aveiro, Mr. José Ribau Esteves: It is very important that citizens have an accurate picture of the importance of the European Union for their lives. TheMayor.eu. Retrieved from www.themayor.eu/en/the-mayor-of-aveiro-mr-jose-ribau-esteves-it-is-very-important-that-citizens-have-an-accurate-picture-of-the-importance-of-the-european-union-for-their-lives
  • Grillitisch, M., & Trippl, M. (2014). Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305–2325. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.835793
  • Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2009). Planning in ten words or less. A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. London: Routledge.
  • Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
  • Kickert, W. (2011). Distinctiveness of administrative reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Common characteristics of context, administrations and reforms. Public Administration, 89(3), 801–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01862.x
  • Laasonen, V., & Kolehmainen, J. (2017). Capabilities in knowledge-based regional development – towards a dynamic framework AU. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1673–1692. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1337727
  • Lagendijk, A., & Oinas, P. (2005). Proximity, external relations, and local economic development. In A. Lagendijk, & P. Oinas (Eds.), Proximity, distance, and diversity: Issues on economic interaction and local development (pp. 336). London: Routledge.
  • Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 167–185. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.167
  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rst007
  • Navarro, M., Valdaliso, J., Aranguren, M., & Magro, E. (2014). A holistic approach to regional strategies: The case of the Basque Country. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 532–547. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct080
  • Nieth, L., Benneworth, P., Charles, D., Fonseca, L., Rodrigues, C., Salomaa, M., & Stienstra, M. (2018). Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems – Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. European Planning Studies, 26(11), 2147–2166. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1530144
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • OECD. (2011). Regions and Innovation Policy. Retrieved from Paris: www.oecd.org/regional/regionsandinnovationpolicy
  • Oliveira, E., & Hersperger, A. (2018). Disentangling the governance configurations of strategic spatial plan-making in European urban regions. Planning Practice & Research, 34(1), 47–61. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2018.1548218
  • Pinto, H., & Rodrigues, P. (2010). Knowledge production in European regions: The impact of regional strategies and regionalization on innovation. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1731–1748. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.504352
  • PÚBLICO. (2015). Ílhavo inaugurates controversial access to Science and Innovation Park [Ílhavo inaugura acesso polémico ao Parque da Ciência e Inovação]. PÚBLICO. Retrieved from www.publico.pt/2015/04/30/local/noticia/ilhavo-inaugura-acesso-polemico-ao-parque-da-ciencia-e-inovacao-1694137
  • Rodrigues, C., & Teles, F. (2017). The Fourth Helix in smart specialsiation strategies: The gap between discourse and practice. In S. Monteiro & E. Carayannis (Eds.), The quadruple innovation helix nexus: A smart growth model, quantitative empirical validation and operationalization for OECD countries (pp. 111–136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
  • Santana, M. (2014). Quercus tries to stop work on the access road to the Science Park of Aveiro [Quercus tenta parar obra da via de acesso ao parque da ciencia de aveiro]. PÚBLICO. Retrieved from www.publico.pt/2014/04/07/local/noticia/quercus-tenta-parar-obra-da-via-de-acesso-ao-parque-da-ciencia-de-aveiro-1631372
  • Silva, P., Teles, F., & Rosa Pires, A. (2016). Paving the (hard) way for regional partnerships: Evidence from Portugal. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(4), 449–474. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2016.1219720
  • Sotarauta, M. (2016). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. London: Routledge.
  • Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 190–203. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902
  • Sotarauta, M., & Mustikkamäki, N. (2012). Strategic leadership relay: How to keep regional innovation journeys in motion? In M. Sotarauta, L. Horlings & J. Liddle (Eds.), Leadership and change in sustainable regional development (pp. 190–211). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  • Universidad de Aveiro. (2015). UA Enterprises: Competences and Services. Retrieved from Aveiro: https://issuu.com/universidade-de-aveiro/docs/ua_enterprises_web
  • Universidad de Aveiro. (2019, March 22). Ministro Adjunto e da Economia no aniversário do PCI - Creative Science Park Aveiro Region [Minister of State and Economy at the anniversary of the PCI - Creative Science Park Aveiro Region]. UA Online. Retrieved from https://uaonline.ua.pt/pub/detail.asp?c=57644&lg=pt
  • Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., Wilson, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2017). Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 559–568. doi: 10.1177/2399654417705914
  • Valdaliso, J., & Wilson, J. (eds.). (2015). Strategies for shaping territorrial competetiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4