Re-imagining the city: branding migration-related diversity

References

• Amsterdam Partners. (2004). The Making of … the city marketing of Amsterdam. Report, Amsterdam Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, I. (2016). ‘Green cities’ going greener? Local environmental policy-making and place branding in the ‘Greenest City in Europe’. European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1197–1215. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1152233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, G. (2009). The instruments of place branding: How is it done? European Spatial Research and Policy, 16(1), 9–22. doi: 10.2478/v10105-009-0001-9
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, G., Kavaratzis, M., & Warnaby, G. (2015). The need to rethink place branding. In M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, & G. Ashworth (Eds.), Rethinking place branding comprehensive brand development for cities and regions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Boisen, M., Groote, P., Terlouw, K., & Couwenberg, O. (2018). Patterns of place promotion, place marketing and place branding in Dutch municipalities. Journal of Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 14(2), 78–88. doi: 10.1057/s41254-017-0083-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantle, T. (2012). Interculturalism: The new era of cohesion and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caponio, T. (2018). Immigrant integration beyond national policies? Italian cities’ participation in European city networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(12), 2053–2069. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., Scholten, P., & Zapata-Barrero, R. (2018). Handbook to the governance of migration and diversity in cities. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J., & Poth, C. (2017). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Fourth edition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crul, M. (2016). Super-diversity vs. Assimilation: How complex diversity in majority–minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(1), 54–68. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1061425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukes, T., & Musterd, S. (2012). Towards social cohesion: Bridging national integration rhetoric and local practice: The case of the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1981–1997. doi: 10.1177/0042098012444889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. (2012). Branding in governance and public management. New York / London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. (2017). City branding as a governance strategy. In J. Hannigan, & G. W. Richards (Eds.), The handbook of new urban studies (pp. 92–105). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Falcous, M., & Silk, M. (2010). Olympic bidding, multicultural nationalism, terror, and the epistemological violence of ‘making Britain proud. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 10(2), 167–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2010.01073.x
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foner, N., Rath, J., Duyvendak, J., & van Reekum, R. (2014). New York and Amsterdam: Immigration and the New urban landscape (vol. 22, pp. 13–42). New York: NYO Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202. doi: 10.1080/13691830802586179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrels, C., Van Munster, O., Pen, M., Prins, M., & Thevenet, J. (2003). Kiezen voor Amsterdam: Merk, concept en organisatie van de city marketing. Berenschot: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Goess, S., de Jong, M., & Meijers, E. (2016). City branding in polycentric urban regions: Identification, profiling and transformation in the Randstad and Rhine-Ruhr. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 2036–2056. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1228832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassen, I., & Giovanardi, M. (2018). The difference of ‘being diverse’: City branding and multiculturalism in the ‘Leicester Model’. Cities, 80, 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavaratzis, M. (2008). From city marketing to city branding. (PhD Thesis) University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2013). The dynamics of place brands: An identity-based approach to place branding theory. Marketing Theory, 13(1), 69–86. doi: 10.1177/1470593112467268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. (1993). The major tasks of marketing management. Marketing Management, 2(3), 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, A. (2015). The political dimension of place branding. (PhD Thesis) Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Mommaas, H. (2002). City branding: The importance of socio-cultural goals. In T. Hauben, M. Vermeulen & V. Patteeuw (Eds.), City branding: Image building and building images. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: NAI Uitgevers, pp. 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Amsterdam. (2004). City marketing: de Amsterdamse aanpak. Report, Municipality of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam. (2005). Rotterdam Dares! Instruction Brand Communication Rotterdam. Report, Municipality of Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam. (2007). Rotterdam, a strong international brand. Report by municipality of Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://www.rotterdam.nl/CMO/Document/Merkstrategie20NL20nov%202008.pdf (accessed in August 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam. (2008a). Economic Vision Rotterdam 2010. Economic Development Board Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://www.rotterdam.nl/Concern/Document/EconomischeVisie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam, city branding document. (2008b). Rotterdam World Story. Retrieved from www.rotterdam.nl/rotterdamworldbrand
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Rotterdam. (2014). The DNA of Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://www.rotterdam.nl/Clusters/BSD/Document%202013/DNA%20van%20Rotterdam/DNA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. (2016). Place branding in strategic spatial planning. (Published PhD Thesis) University of Groningen, Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, S. (2016). Great expectations of autonomous agencies. (PhD thesis) Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Paddison, R. (1993). City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 30(2), 339–349. doi: 10.1080/00420989320080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquinelli, C. (2014). Branding as urban collective strategy-making: The formation of Newcastle Gateshead’s organisational identity. Urban Studies, 51(4), 727–743. doi: 10.1177/0042098013493025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riezebos, R. (2014). Position paper Rotterdam 2014. Brand values and style characteristics regarding the marketing of the city of Rotterdam. Report by Municipality of Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rotterdam Unlimited. (2013). Celebrating Cultural Diversity. Rotterdam: Municipality of Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. (2013). Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable policy controversies: The case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 217–236. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9170-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., & Duyvendak, J. (2008). Civilising the city: Populism and revanchist urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 45(7), 1485–1503. doi: 10.1177/0042098008090685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., Rossi, U., & van Houtum, H. (2005). Reinventing multiculturalism: Urban citizenship and the negotiation of ethnic diversity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3), 622–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., & Lo, M. (2011). Planning, preservation and place branding: A tale of sharing assets and narratives. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(2), 116–126. doi: 10.1057/pb.2011.11
   Google Scholar
• Van Breugel, I., Maan, X., & Scholten, P. (2015). Mainstreaming in Practice. European Union funded project: UPSTREAM. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Superdiversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, A. (2013). Race, multiculturalism and the ‘progressive’ politics of London 2012: Passing the ‘Boyle test’. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 137–143. doi: 10.5153/sro.3069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., & van Thiel, S. (2008). Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review, 8, 137–153. doi: 10.1007/s11115-008-0054-7
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R., Caponio, T., & Scholten, P. (2017). Theorizing the ‘local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework: A case study of immigrant policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 241–246. doi: 10.1177/0020852316688426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavattaro, S., & Adams, F. (2015). Bridging the gap: An exploration of how DMO managers use education to overcome challenges. Urban Studies, 53(4), 669–688. doi: 10.1177/0042098014568069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenker, S., Braun, E., & Petersen, S. (2017). Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors. Tourism Management, 58, 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar