Utilizing endogenous potentials through EU cohesion policy: examples from Central Europe

References

• Andersson, M., & Karlsson, C. (2004). Regional innovation systems in small & medium-sized regions. A critical review & assessment. Cesis Elektronic Working Paper Series 10. Stockholm. Retrieved from http://www.kth.se/dokument/itm/cesis/CESISWP10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialisation: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/11, Lund University, CIRCLE – Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2015_011.html
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2017). Policies for small and medium-sized towns: European, national and local approaches. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108(4), 472–487. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdikos, V., & Chardas, A. (2016). European Union cohesion policy post 2014: More (Place-based and conditional) growth – less redistribution and cohesion. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4, 97–117. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2014.992460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Retrieved from http://www.ecostat.unical.it/Dorio/Corsi/Corsi202017/Politiche20Sviluppo20Locale/Materiale20poleco/report_barca_v0306.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, G., & Pugalis, L. (2014). Shifting paradigms: People-centred models, active regional development, space-blind policies and place-based approaches. Local Economy, 29, 283–294. doi: 10.1177/0269094214541355
   Google Scholar
• Bergbaumuseum Oelsnitz. (2018). Bergbaumuseum Oelsnitz/Erzgebirge [Mining museum Oelsnitz/Ore Mountains]. Official Homepage. Retrieved from https://www.bergbaumuseum-oelsnitz.de
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: A conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383–1402. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.681640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Vale, M. (2018). Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, the Economy and Society, 11(2), 275–295. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. challenges, visions, ways forward. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (Ed.). (1995). The rise of the rustbelt. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Černič Mali, B., Klančišar, K., & Marot, N. (2009). Regional profile of Zasavje region. Ljubljana: Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, O., Lindquvist, M., Roto, J., & Sterling, J. (2009). Territorial potentials in the European Union (Nordregio Working Paper 2009: 6). Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford, M., & Smith, A. (2000). Catching up or falling behind? Economic performance and regional trajectories in the “New Europe”. Economic Geography, 76, 169–195. doi: 10.2307/144552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickcek, G., & McKinney, H. (2006). “Small cities blues”: Looking for growth factors in small and medium-sized cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(3), 232–258. doi: 10.1177/0891242406290377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2006). The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (SMESTO). Final Report. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-1.4.1_revised-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2013a). Detecting Territorial Potentials and Challenges (DeTeC). Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2013/scientific-platform/detec-detecting-territorial-potentials-and
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2013b). TOWN – Small and Medium-Sized Town. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2013/applied-research/town-E280%93-small-and-medium-sized-town
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). EUROPE 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the informal ministerial meeting of ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development on 19th May 2011, Gödöllő, Hungary. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2011/territorial-agenda-of-the-european-union-2020
   Google Scholar
• FLOEZ Association. (2018). Future of Lugau-Oelsnitz-Zwickau. Zusammenarbeit in der ehemaligen Steinkohlenbergbauregion [Collaboration within a former coal mining region]. Retrieved from http://floez-sachsen.de/Projekte
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialization. From academic idea to political instrument. The surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. Working paper. Retrived from http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/170252
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2018). Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions. Annals of Regional Science, 60(2), 241–264. doi: 10.1007/s00168-017-0828-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrič, J. (2018). Moj cilj je, da v prihodnje postanemo vodilni na področju trajnostnega razvoja mesta, z visoko kakovostjo življenja in z nizko brezposelnostjo. (Interview) Srečno Trbovlje, 25, 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Office for the Development and Cohesion Policy. (2017). Slovenia’s smart specialisation strategy. Retrieved from http://www.svrk.gov.si/fileadmin/svrk.gov.si/pageuploads/Dokumenti_za_objavo_na_vstopni_strani/S4_dokument_V_2017EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, C., & Hudson, R. (2014). Contemporary crisis across Europe and the crisis of regional development theories. Regional Studies, 48, 208–218. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harfst, J., & Simić, D. (2017). Industrial culture as an emerging topic in regional development? Proceedings of the 3rd Geobalcanica Conference 2017 (pp. 147–153). Retrieved from http://geobalcanica.org/wp-content/uploads/GBP/2017/GBP2017.20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harfst, J., & Wirth, P. (2014). Zur Bedeutung endogener Potenziale in klein- und mittelstädtisch geprägten Regionen – Überlegungen vor dem Hintergrund der Territorialen Agenda 2020. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72, 463–475. doi: 10.1007/s13147-014-0312-9
   Google Scholar
• Harfst, J., Wirth, P., & Simić, D. (2019). Utilising endogenous potentials via regional policy-led development initiatives in (post-) industrial regions of Central Europe. In M. Finka, M. Jaššo, & M. Husar (Eds.), The role of public sector in local economic and territorial development (pp. 43–58). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. (2016). Smart specialization in a centralized state: Strengthening the regional contribution in North East Romania. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1527–1543. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, M., David, B., Donner-Amnell, J., & 14 other authors. (2017). Economic performance and place-based characteristics of industrial regions in Europe. Technical Report. Retrieved from: www.researchgate.net/publication/325195233_Economic_performance_and_place-based_characteristics_of_industrial_regions_in_Europe
   Google Scholar
• Jerič, M. (2017, July 21st). Z županovanjem zaključujem [I am finishing my job as a mayor]. Retrieved from: https://savus.si/miran-jeric-z-zupanovanjem-zakljucujem/
   Google Scholar
• Jona, G. (2015). Determinants of Hungarian sub-regions’ territorial capital (2015). European Spatial Research and Policy, 22(1), 101–119. doi: 10.1515/esrp-2015-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinossian, N. (2017). Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: A critical response. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 365–375. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, P., & Mayer, H. (2013). Small town sustainability: Economic, social, and environmental innovation (2nd ed.). Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalke, H. (2000). Sachsen [Saxony]. Gotha: Klett.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatek-Sołtys, A., Mainet, H., Wiedermann, K., & Édouard, J. (Eds.). (2014). Small and medium towns’ attractiveness at the beginning of the 21st century. Clermond-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.
   Google Scholar
• Lacquement, G., & Chevalier, P. (2016). Territorial capital and development of local territories, theoretical and methodological issues raised when transposing a concept of territorial economy into geographic analysis. Annales de Geographie, 711(5), 490–518. doi: 10.3917/ag.711.0490
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeroni, M., Bellini, N., Cortesi, G., & Loffredo, A. (2013). The territorial approach to cultural economy: New opportunities for the development of small towns. European Planning Studies, 21, 452–472. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2010). Territorial cohesion policy in the light of peripherality. Town Planning Review, 81(4), 445–466. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2010.12
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., & Jones, M. (2007). Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a ‘regional world’? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177–1191. doi: 10.1080/00343400701646182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marot, N. (2005). Regionalna identiteta mladih v Zasavju. Geografski Vestnik, 77(1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N. (2012). Zasavje (Slovenia)–A region reinventing itself. In P. Wirth, W. Fischer, & B. Černič Mali (Eds.), Post-mining regions in central europe-problems, potentials, possibilities (pp. 104–117). Munchen: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N. (2015). Youth: The motor of redevelopment in mid-sized post-industrial towns. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 17(2), 223.
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N., & Cernic Mali, B. (2012). Using potentials of post-mining regions–a good practice overview of Central Europe. In P. Wirth, W. Fischer, & B. Černič Mali (Eds.), Post-mining regions in central europe-problems, potentials, possibilities (pp. 130–147). Munchen: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Marot, N., & Harfst, J. (2012). Post-mining potentials and redevelopment of former mining regions in central europe–case studies from Germany and Slovenia. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 52(1), 99–119. doi: 10.3986/AGS52104
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P., & Morgan, K. (2018). The heroic assumptions of smart specialisation: A sympathetic critique of regional innovation policy. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 275–293). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2015). Rebalancing the spatial economy: The challenge for regional theory. Territory, Politics and Governance, 3(3), 235–272. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1064825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (1998). Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Economic Geography, 74, 201–227. doi: 10.2307/144374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2015). The regional and urban policy of the European Union: Cohesion, results-orientation and smart specialisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. (2013). The post-2013 reform of EU cohesion policy and the place-based narrative. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 639–659. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.736733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013). Path dependence and the state: The politics of novelty in old industrialised regions. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition (pp. 318–340). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37, 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Overmann, H., & Mieg, H. (Eds.). (2014). Industrial heritage sites in transformation: Clash of discourses (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakos, G., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Rovolis, A. (2005). Growth, integration, and regional disparities in the European Union. Environment & Planning A, 37, 1837–1855. doi: 10.1068/a37348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promotion of Balanced Regional Development Act. (2011). Official gazzette of the Republic of Slovenia, 20/11.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Development Agency. (2015). RRP Zasavje: RRP zasavske regije 2014–2020 [Regional development programme of Zasavje region 2014–2020]. Zagorje ob Savi: Regional Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Development Centre. (2007). Regional development programme of the Zasavje region for the period 2007–2013. Zagorje ob Savi: Regional Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RRA Zasavje. (2018). On-line information about the organization and activities of the Regional Council of Zasavje and Development Council of Zasavje. Retrieved from: https://www.rra-zasavje.si/si/regionalni-razvoj/
   Google Scholar
• Sächsisches Oberbergamt (Ed.). (2016). Der Bergbau in Sachsen. Bericht für das Jahr 2015 [Mining in Saxony. Report about the year 2015]. Retrieved from: http://www.oba.sachsen.de/download/2016_11_09_JB2015_Druckfassung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., & Hamdouch, A. (2017). Small and medium-sized towns in Europe: Conceptual, methodological and policy issues. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 365–379. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., & Russo, A. (2012). Territorial attractiveness in EU urban and spatial policy: A critical review and future research agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(4), 349–365. doi: 10.1177/0969776411430289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2003). Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 607–620. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špitalar, T. (2016, May 2nd). Interview with the director of the Regional Development Agency Zasavje. Retrieved from: http://etv.elektroprom.si/template/pogovor_meseca/tadej_spitalar/
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. (2018). Data on the commuters. Retrieved from: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatDb/pxweb/sl/10_Dem_soc/10_Dem_soc__07_trg_dela__05_akt_preb_po_regis_virih__09_07727_del_mig_kazal/0772755S.px/
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. (2019a). Data about the regions’ population. Retrieved from: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatDb/pxweb/sl/10_Dem_soc/10_Dem_soc__05_prebivalstvo__10_stevilo_preb__10_05C20_prebivalstvo_stat_regije/?tablelist=true
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. (2019b). Data about the regions’ area and population. Retrieved from: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatDb/pxweb/en/50_Arhiv/50_Arhiv__02_upravna_razdelitev__02148_terit_enote/0214819S.px/
   Google Scholar
• Stemmler, G., & Vogel, R. (1997). Oelsnitz im Erzgebirge 1940–1990. Gesicht einer Stadt. [Oelsnitz in the Ore Mountains 1940–1090. Face of a town]. Hohenstein-Ernstthal: Oehme.
   Google Scholar
• Stough, R., Stimson, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). An endogenous perspective on regional development and growth. In K. Kourtit, P. Nijkamp, & R. Stough (Eds.), Drivers of innovation, entrepreneurship and regional dynamics (pp. 3–20). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Švagan, M. (2018, November 3rd). Matjaž Švagan kandidat za župana Zagorja ob Savi [Matjaž Švagan, the candidate for the mayor of Zagorje]. Retrieved from: https://savus.si/matjaz-svagan-kandidat-za-zupana-zagorja-ob-savi/
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2004). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated policy approach with respect to regional innovation systems. (SRE Discussion papers 2004/1). Retrived from http://epub.wu.ac.at/944/
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, G., Franz, M., Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., & Nathanail, P. (2007). The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(2), 116–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, B. (2014). Territorial capital: Theory, empirics and critical remarks. European Planning Studies, 23(7), 1327–1344. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.928675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, B. (2017). Territorial capital – a fuzzy policy-driven concept: Context, issues, and perspectives. Europa XXI, 33, 5–19. doi: 10.7163/Eu21.2017.33.1
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, E. (2010). Urban-rural interactions: Towns as focus points in rural development. Heidelberg: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Volkswagen Sachsen. (2019). Zahlen und Fakten [Facts and figures]. Retrieved from: https://www.volkswagen-sachsen.de/de/unternehmen/zahlen-und-fakten.html
   Google Scholar
• Vonnahme, L., & Lang, T. (2017). Rethinking territorial innovation: World market leaders outside of agglomerations (Working paper series SFB 1199). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/321678712_Rethinking_Territorial_Innovation_World_Market_Leaders_outside_of_Agglomerations
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, P., Elis, V., Müller, B., & Yamamoto, K. (2016). Peripheralisation of small towns in Germany and Japan – dealing with economic decline and population loss. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar