Uncover the theory practice gap in Swedish transport planning: an interdisciplinary approach

References

• Alexander, E. (1997). A mile or a millimterer? Measuring the ‘planning theory – practice gap’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 3–6. doi: 10.1068/b240003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. (2010). Introduction: Does planning theory affect practice, and if so, how? Planning Theory, 9(2), 99–107. doi: 10.1177/1473095209357862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. (2016). There is no planning – only planning practices: Notes for spatial planning theories. Planning Theory, 15(1), 91–103. doi: 10.1177/1473095215594617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2002). Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory, 1(1), 77–99. doi: 10.1177/147309520200100105
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2017). Planning theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, H., & Kaspersen, L. (2000). Classical and modern social theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, G., & Boréus, K. (2005). Textens mening och makt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, G. (2011). Theory(izing)/practrice: The model of recursive cultural adaption. Planning Theory, 11(3), 221–241. doi: 10.1177/1473095211433570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. (2007). Game theory. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1980/1992). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12, 311–356. doi: 10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965/2003). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. In S. Campbell, & S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 210–223). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1893/2019). Engels to Franz Mehring. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1893/letters/93_07_14.htm
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1973). Planning theory. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Feitelson, E. (2011). Issue generating assessment: Bridging the gap between evaluation theory and practice? Planning Theory and Practice, 12(4), 549–568. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.626305
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1993). Når demokratiet svigter, rammes miljøet. In B. Kullinger & U.-B. Strömberg (Eds.), Planera för en bärkraftig utveckling (pp. 187–197). Stockholm: Byggforskningsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing power to planning research: One researcher’s praxis story. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 353–366. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0202100401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frølund Thomsen, J., & Andersen, H. (2000). Neo-Marxist theories. In H. Andersen & L. B. Kaspersen (Eds.), Classical and modern social theory (pp. 160–175). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Oxford: Blackwell publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A., & Buttigieg, J. (1932/2010). Prison notebooks, volume 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1975). Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism. Theory and Society, 2, 287–300. doi: 10.1007/BF00212739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action one, reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1985). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action two, lifeworld and system: A critique of the functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996/2007). Civil society and political public spheres. In C. Calhoun, J. Gerties, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 388–407). Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1992). Urban and regional planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Holme, I., & Solvang, B. (1997). Forskningsmetodik: Om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2009). Building legitimacy for risky policies: The cost of avoiding conflict in Stockholm. Transportation Research A, 43, 251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Jaret, C. (1983). Recent neo-marxist urban analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 499–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, L. (1977). Lectures on macroeconomic planning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Khakee, A. (2005). Transformation of some aspects of the local mode of regulation in Sweden. Planning Theory, 4(1), 67–86. doi: 10.1177/1473095205051443
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, M. (1983). Ideology, politics, and planning: Reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 10, 71–87. doi: 10.1068/b100071
   Google Scholar
• Kudva, N. (2008). Teaching planning, constructing theory. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(3), 363–376. doi: 10.1080/14649350802277845
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1959/1996). The science of “muddling through”. In S. Campbell, & S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 196–209). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1690/2010). The second treatise of government. In P. Schumaker (Ed.), The political theory reader (pp. 31–37). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A. (2013). Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning. Planning Theory, 13(1), 26–43. doi: 10.1177/1473095213477642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, J. (1983). A class analysis of pluralism I and II. The American Social Science Review, 77(2), 368–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Månson, P. (2000a). Marxism. In H. Andersen, & L. B. Kaspersen (Eds.), Classical and modern social theory (pp. 16–33). Maiden, MA: Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Månson, P. (2000b). Max Weber. In H. Andersen, & L. B. Kaspersen (Eds.), Classical and modern social theory (pp. 75–92). Maiden, MA: Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• March, A. (2010). Practising theory: When theory affects urban planning. Planning Theory, 9(2), 108–125. doi: 10.1177/1473095209357864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1844/2007). Economic and philosophic manuscript of 1844. In C. Calhoun, J. Gerties, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Classical sociological theory (pp. 86–95). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848/2007). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In C. Calhoun, J. Gerties, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Classical sociological theory (pp. 86–95). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. (2007). Neopluralism. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 45–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072005.152119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J. (1969). Urban and regional planning: A system approach. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. (1860/2010). On liberty. In Schumaker (Ed.), The political theory reader (pp. 240–242). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P. (2015). Critical realism, urban planning and urban research. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1228–1244. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.994091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2000). Communicate this! does consensus lead to advocacy and pluralism? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 343–350. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974/2001). Anarki, stat och utopi. Viborg: Nörhaven Paperback.
   Google Scholar
• Pargetter, R. (1984). The scientific inference to other minds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62(2), 158–163. doi: 10.1080/00048408412341341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., & Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1975/2010). A Kantian conception of reality. In P. Schumaker (Ed.), The political theory Reader (pp. 320–325). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Region Gävleborg. (2008). Region Gävleborg – regional systemanalys [pdf]. Retrieved from http://www.bergslagsbanan.se/Userfiles/Archive/51/Dokument/Gavleborg2008Slutrapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Region Halland. (2008). Framtidens transportsystem i Halland. En Regional systemanalys [pdf]. Retrieved from http://www.regionhalland.se/PageFiles/20760/systemanalys-halland-2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Region Skåne. (2008). Systemanalys för infrastrukturen i Skåne. Region Skåne [pdf]. Retrieved from https://www.skane.se/upload/Webbplatser/Sk%C3%A5nes%20utveckling/Dokument/Systemanalys-skane.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (2008). Sociological theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. doi: 10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, L. (2009). Contemporary political ideologies: A comparative analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J. (1946/1986). Existentialismen är en humanism. Udevalla: Askelin och Hägglund.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J. (1960/1976). Critique of dialectical reason (Vol. 1). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J. (1960/1991). Critique of dialectical reason (Vol. 1). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Methods in social science. A realist approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, P. (Eds.). (2010). The political theory reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, P. (1991/2010). Social cleavages and complex equality. In P. Schumaker (Ed.), The political theory reader (pp. 160–164). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 195–212. doi: 10.1068/c120195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talvitie, A. (2009). Theoryless planning. Planning Theory, 8(2), 166–190. doi: 10.1177/1473095209102233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Jordan, G. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 137–161. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. (2000). Re-defining planning: The roles of theory and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 1(1), 126–133. doi: 10.1080/14649350050135248
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (1983). On the determination of social action in space and time. Environment and Planning D, 1, 23–57. doi: 10.1068/d010023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafikverket. (2013a). Projektbeskrivning. Systemanalyser och underlag för transportplanering – SUT. Borlänge: Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket. (2013b). Förslag till nationellplan för transportsystemet 2014–2015. Remissversion 2013-06-14. Borlänge: Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket, Banverket, Vägverket, Sjöfartsverket, & Luftsfartsstyrelsen. (2008). Regionala Systemanalyser Metodbeskrivning. Borlänge: Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• Trivector. (2008). Analys av mål, funktioner och åtgärder. Lund: Trivector.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2015). Is planning theory really open for planning practice? Planning Theory and Practice, 16(1), 128–132. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1004901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2008). Down to earth: Linking planning theory and practice in the ‘metropole’ and beyond. International Planning Studies, 13(3), 223–223. doi: 10.1080/13563470802521408
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922/1987). Ekonomi och samhälle. Förståelsesociologins grunder 3. Lund: Argos.
   Google Scholar
• Willson, R. (2001). Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation, 28, 1–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1005247430522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (1989). Towards a new type of urban planning theories. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 16, 23–39. doi: 10.1068/b160023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar