6,337
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Science Parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship

, &
Pages 2465-2488 | Received 03 Sep 2019, Accepted 23 Jan 2020, Published online: 05 Feb 2020

References

  • Alagaraja, M. (2013). HRD and HRM perspectives on organisational performance: A review of literature. Human Resource Development Review, 12(2), 117–143. doi: 10.1177/1534484312450868
  • Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms’ innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97, 253–279. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12253
  • Albahari, A., Catalano, G., & Landoni, P. (2013). Evaluation of national science park systems: A theoretical framework and its application to the Italian and Spanish systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(5), 599–614. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.785508
  • Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. (2019). Science and technology parks: A study of value creation for park tenants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1256–1272. doi: 10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9
  • Bandalos, D., & Boehm-Kaufman, M. (2009). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. In C. E. Lance, & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends (pp. 61–87). New York: Routledge.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
  • Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49–61. doi: 10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192
  • Barney, J., & Wright, P. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199821)37:1<31::AID-HRM4>3.0.CO;2-W
  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Bellavista, J., & Sanz, L. (2009). Science and technology parks: Habitats of innovation: Introduction to special section. Science and Public Policy, 36(7), 499–510. doi: 10.3152/030234209X465543
  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & García, J. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2272–2278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.010
  • Beugelsdijk, S. (2008). Strategic human resource practices and product innovation. Organisation Studies, 29(6), 821–847. doi: 10.1177/0170840608090530
  • Bezdek, R. (1975). The 1980 economic impact regional and occupational of compensated shifts in defense spending. Journal of Regional Science, 15(2), 183–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1975.tb00919.x
  • Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002
  • Bonacina Roldan, L., Hansen, P., & Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D. (2018). The relationship between favorable conditions for innovation in technology parks, the innovation produced, and companies’ performance. Innovation & Management Review, 15(3), 286–302. doi: 10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0027
  • Boudreau, J., & Ramstad, P. (2005). Talentship and the new paradigm for human resource management: From professional practice to strategic talent decision science. Human Resource Planning, 28(2), 17–26.
  • Boudreau, J., & Ramstad, P. (2007). Beyond HR: The new science of human capital. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. (2005). The networked business incubator - leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005
  • Cadorin, E., Germain-Alamartine, E., Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2019b). Universities and science parks: Engagements and interactions in developing and attracting talent. In Developing Engaged and Entrepreneurial Universities (pp. 151–169). doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8130-0_8
  • Cadorin, E., Johansson, S., & Klofsten, M. (2017). Future developments for science parks: Attracting and developing talent. Industry and Higher Education, 31(3), 156–167. doi: 10.1177/0950422217700995
  • Cadorin, E., Klofsten, M., Albahari, A., & Etzkowitz, H. (2019c). Science Parks and the attraction of talents: Activities and challenges. Triple Helix Journal, 1–33. doi: 10.1163/21971927-00601002
  • Cadorin, E., Klofsten, M., & Löfsten, H. (2019a). Science Parks, talent attraction and stakeholder involvement – an international study. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–28. doi: 10.1007/s10961-019-09753-w
  • Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 74–82.
  • Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 208–226. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.680601
  • Chang, S., Gong, Y., Way, S., & Jia, L. (2013). Flexibility-oriented HRM systems, absorptive capacity, and market responsiveness and firm innovativeness. Journal of Management, 39(7), 1924–1951. doi: 10.1177/0149206312466145
  • Cheba, K., & Hołub-Iwan, J. (2014). How to measure the effectiveness of technology parks? The case of Poland. Ekonometria, 1(43), 27–38.
  • Collings, D., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001
  • Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Colombo, M., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0
  • Cooke, P. (2007). Regional innovation, entrepreneurship and talent systems. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Talent Systems, 7 (2/3/4/5), 117–139.
  • De Cleyn, S., Braet, J., & Klofsten, M. (2015). How human capital interacts with the early development of academic spin-offs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 599–621. doi: 10.1007/s11365-013-0294-z
  • Deeds, D., Decarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). The determinants of research productivity in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 211–229. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00013-5
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x
  • Eul, F. (1985). Science Parks and innovation centres – property, the unconsidered element. In J. L. Gibb (Ed.), Science Parks and innovation centres: Their economic and social impact (pp. 162–167). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Feldman, J. (2007). The managerial equation and innovation platforms: The case of Linköping and Berzelius Science Park. European Planning Studies, 15(8), 1027–1045. doi: 10.1080/09654310701448162
  • Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs—location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 5–17. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd
  • Florida, R. (1999). The role of the university: Leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology, 15, 67–73. doi: 10.1086/250095
  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. (1982). Two structural equation models: Lisrel and pls applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. doi: 10.1177/002224378201900406
  • Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112. doi: 10.1177/001698628502900302
  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory-a response. High Ability Studies, 15, 165–166. doi: 10.1080/1359813042000314745
  • Galbraith, C. (1985). High technology location and development: The case of orange county. California Management Review, 28(1), 98–109. doi: 10.2307/41165172
  • Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. (2013). What is the meaning of “talent” in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002
  • Groysberg, B. (2010). Chasing stars: The myth of talent and the portability of performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Guadix, J., Carrillo-Castrillo, J., Onieva, L., & Navascues, J. (2016). Success variables in science and technology parks. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4870–4875. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.045
  • Guy, K. (1996). Designing a Science Park evaluation. The Science Park evaluation handbook European innovation monitoring system (EIMS) (pp. 8–28).
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Heinen, J., & O‘Neill, C. (2004). Managing talent to maximize performance. Employment Relations Today, 31(2), 67–82. doi: 10.1002/ert.20018
  • Hogan, B. (1996). Evaluation of science and technology parks: The measurement of success. In K. Guy (Ed.), The science park evaluation handbook (pp. 86–97). Brighton: Technopolis Group.
  • Holland, P., Sheehan, C., & De Cieri, H. (2007). Attracting and retaining talent: Exploring human resources development trends in Australia. Human Resource Development International, 10(3), 247–262. doi: 10.1080/13678860701515158
  • Hommen, L., Doloreux, D., & Larsson, E. (2006). Emergence and growth of Mjärdevi Science Park in Linköping, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1331–1361. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852555
  • Hu, T. (2006). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese Science Parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 163–187.
  • Hu, T. (2008). Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: A comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development. European Planning Studies, 16, 163–187. doi: 10.1080/09654310701814462
  • Huffman, D., & Quigley, J. (2002). The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. The Annals of Regional Science, 36, 403–419. doi: 10.1007/s001680200104
  • Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. (2012). Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organisational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(19), 4025–4047. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.690567
  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2005). Innovation and human resource management fit: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 26(4), 364–381. doi: 10.1108/01437720510609555
  • Jonsson, O. (2002). Innovation processes and proximity: The case of IDEON firms in Lund, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 705–722. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000003771
  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (1996). Stimulation of technology-based small firms, a case study of university-industry cooperation. Technovation, 16(4), 187–213. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(95)00052-6
  • Lado, A., & Wilson, M. (1994). Human resource system and Sustained competitive advantage: Competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699–727. doi: 10.5465/amr.1994.9412190216
  • Lai, Y., Hsu, M., Lin, F., Chen, Y., & Lin, Y. (2014). The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 734–739. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.036
  • Lau, C., & Ngo, H. (2004). The HR system, organisational culture, and product innovation. International Business Review, 13(6), 685–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.08.001
  • Laursen, K., & Foss, N. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243–263. doi: 10.1093/cje/27.2.243
  • Lawler III E. (2008). Talent: Making people Your competitive advantage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559–595. doi: 10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x
  • Lee, W., & Yang, W. (2000). The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry development—hsinchu Science Park (HSP). Technovation, 20(1), 55. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00085-1
  • Lewis, R., & Heckman, R. (2006). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 139–154. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001
  • Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2005). Academic versus corporate new technology-based firms in Swedish Science Parks: An analysis of performance, business networks and financing. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(¾), 334–357. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2005.006638
  • Löfsten, H. (2016). Business and innovation resources: Determinants for the survival of new technology-based firms. Management Decision, 54(1), 88–106. doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2015-0139
  • Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms - academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6
  • MacCallum, R. (1990). The need for alternative measures of fit in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 157–162. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_2
  • Martin-Rios, C. (2014). Why do firms seek to share human resource management knowledge? The importance of inter-firm networks. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 190–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.004
  • McDonnell, A. (2011). Still fighting the “war for talent”? Bridging the science versus practice gap. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 169–173. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9220-y
  • McDonnell, A., Collings, D., Mellahi, K., & Schuler, R. (2017). Talent management: A systematic review and future prospects. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), 86–128.
  • Mellander, C., & Florida, R. (2011). Creativity, talent, and regional wages in Sweden. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 637–660. doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0354-z
  • Meyers, M., van Woerkom, M., & Dries, N. (2013). Talent—innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 305–321. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.003
  • Monck, C., Porter, R., Quintas, P., Storey, D., & Wynarczyk, P. (1988). Science Parks and the Growth of high technology firms. London.: Crooom Helm.
  • Moon, H., Mariadoss, B. J., & Johnson, J. L. (2019). Collaboration with higher education institutions for successful firm innovation. Journal of Business Research, 99, 534–541.
  • Mundfrom, D., Shaw, D., & Ke, T. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
  • Phan, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001
  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, N. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408
  • Pouder, R., & St John, R. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225. doi: 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071867
  • Preacher, K., & MacCallum, R. (2002). Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 153–161. doi: 10.1023/A:1015210025234
  • Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: Questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161–175. doi: 10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-E
  • Ross, S. (2013). Talent derailment: A multi-dimensional perspective for understanding talent. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(1), 12–17. doi: 10.1108/00197851311296656
  • Saddozai, S., Hui, P., Akram, U., Khan, M., & Memon, S. (2017). Investigation of talent, talent management, its policies and its impact on working environment. Chinese Management Studies, 11(3), 538–554. doi: 10.1108/CMS-10-2016-0206
  • Safón, V. (2009). Measuring the reputation of top us business schools: A mimic modeling approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3), 204–228. doi: 10.1057/crr.2009.19
  • Schweer, M., Assimakopoulos, D., Cross, R., & Thomas, R. (2012). Building a well-networked organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 35–44.
  • Siegel, R., Siegel, E., & Macmillan, I. (1993). Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 169–180. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90018-Z
  • Sparrow, P., Scullion, H., & Tarique, I. (2014). Strategic talent management: Future directions. In Strategic talent management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/67408
  • Svensson, P., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). An entrepreneurial university strategy for renewing and declining industrieal city: The Norrköping way. European Planning Studies, 20(1), 505–525. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.665616
  • Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266–274. doi: 10.1108/00197851111145853
  • Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. (2010). Global talent management: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019
  • Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). A review of talent management: “infancy or adolescence”?’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1744–1761. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.777543
  • Thunnissen, M., & Van Arensbergen, P. (2015). A multi-dimensional approach to talent. Personnel Review, 44(2), 182–199. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2013-0190
  • Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17, 491–531. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00027-8
  • Walcott, S. (2002). Chinese industrial and science parks: Bridging the gap. The Professional Geographer, 54, 349–364. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00335
  • Westhead, P. (1997). R&D “inputs” and “outputs” of technology-based firms located on and off science parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00041
  • Westhead, P., & Storey, D. (1995). Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms. Omega, 23, 345–360. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00021-F
  • Younger, J., Smallwood, N., Group, T., & Ulrich, D. (2007). Developing your organisation‘s brand as a talent developer. Human Resource Planning, 30(2), 21–29.
  • Zhu, D., & Tann, J. (2005). A regional innovation system in a small-sized region: A clustering model in Zhongguancun Science Park. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 375–390. doi: 10.1080/09537320500211789