Land use challenges, sustainability and the spatial planning balancing act: Insights from Sweden and Switzerland

References

• Baeten, G. (2012). Normalising neoliberal planning: The case of Malmö, Sweden. In T. Taşan-Kok, & G. Baeten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies, and politics (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8924-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Z., Oueslati, W., & Silva, J. (2015). Exploring the effect of urban structure on individual well-being. OECD Environment Working Papers, 95. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2004). Measuring quality in planning, managing the performance process. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.-L., & Kilchenmann, P. (2005). Interactive tools for e-democracy: Examples from Switzerland. In M. Böhlen, J. Gamper, W. Polasek, & M. Wimmer (Eds.), E-Government: Towards Electronic democracy (pp. 36–47). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32257-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P., & Vermeulen, W. (2009). Land markets and their regulation: The economic Impacts of planning. In H. Geyer (Ed.), International Handbook of urban policy (pp. 151–193). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Colding, J., & Barthel, S. (2017). An urban ecology critique on the “smart city” model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, E. (1999). Social equity in planning. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5070/BP313113027
   Google Scholar
• Devecchi, L. (2012). Von politischen Grabenkämpfen zur kooperativen Planung [Paradigm change in urban development policy – towards an urban regime in Zurich?]. disP -The Planning Review, 48(4), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.776815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Factsheet RIS3 (National/Regional Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation) for the implementation of its Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, L., Honiden, T., & Schumann, A. (2018). Indicators for resilient cities, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2018/02. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – The concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief 9, June 2009. Brussels: EU Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. CESifo Working Paper, No. 246.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D. (2016). The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1161063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D., Hartmann, T., & Hengstermann, A. (2018). Planning with or against property rights. In J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann, & A. Hengstermann (Eds.), Instruments of land policy: Dealing with scarcity of land (pp. 337–349). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grünberger, S., & Omann, I. (2011, June 14–17). Quality of life and sustainability. Links between sustainable behaviour, social capital and well-being. Paper presented at 9th Conference of the European society for ecological economics held in Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. (2014). Place-based leadership: A new agenda for spatial planning and local governance. Borderlands: The Journal of Spatial Planning in Ireland, 4, 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, M. (2000). Sustainable measures: What is sustainability, anyway? (2nd ed.). North Andover, MA: Sustainable Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Hengstermann, A. (2018). Building obligations in Switzerland: Overcoming the passivity of plan implementation. In J.-D. Gerber, T. Hartmann, & A. Hengstermann (Eds.), Instruments of land policy: Dealing with scarcity of land (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hengstermann, A., & Gerber, J.-D. (2015). Aktive Bodenpolitik – Eine Auseinandersetzung vor dem Hintergrund der Revision des eidgenössischen Raumplanungsgesetzes [Active land policy – A discussion in the light of the revision of the Swiss Land Use Planning Law]. Flächenmanagement und Bodenordnung (FuB), 6, 241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Högström, J., Balfors, B., & Hammer, M. (2017). Planning for sustainability in expansive metropolitan regions: Exploring practices and planners’ expectations in Stockholm, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1391751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K. (2005). The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J., & Schwick, C. (2014). Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland. Ecological Indicators, 38, 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, A. (2012). Wellbeing and spatial planning. In P. Walker, & M. John (Eds.), From public health to Wellbeing (pp. 58–78). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Khansari, N., Mostashari, A., & Mansouri, M. (2014). Conceptual modeling of the impact of smart cities on household energy consumption. Procedia Computer Science, 28, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Pettersson, F. (2017). Changes, problems, and challenges in Swedish spatial planning: An analysis of power dynamics. Sustainability, 9(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, G., & Guo, Y. (2014, May 31). Adapting Swiss policies to needs of Singapore. The Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, J., & Seager, T. (2008). Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(7), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.635
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., & Rochat, P. (2017). ‘Tamed Tieboutianism’ and spatial inequalities in Swiss metropolitan areas. In J. Sellers, M. Arretche, D. Kübler, & E. Razin (Eds.), Inequality and governance in the metropolis: Place equality regimes and fiscal choices in eleven Counties (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57378-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2017). The equal metropolis? Can social policies counteract diversity in Swedish metropolitan settings? In J. Sellers, M. Arretche, D. Kübler, & E. Razin (Eds.), Inequality and governance in the metropolis: Place equality regimes and fiscal choices in eleven Counties (pp. 237–252). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lintz, G., & Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Report on the first conference of the RSA research network on smart city-regional governance for sustainability. Regions Magazine, 305(1), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2017.11869007
   Google Scholar
• Loepfe, M., & Van Wezemael, J. (2015). Rethinking politics and the (post-)political through Deleuze-Guattarian micro-politics. In J. Metzger, P. Allmendinger, & S. Oosterlynck (Eds.), Planning against the political: Democratic deficits in European territorial governance (pp. 86–106). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, P. (2016). SBE16 Torino: Towards post carbon cities. An introduction. NEWDIST, special issue SBE16 Towards Post-Carbon Cities, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C., Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2018). Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Rader Olsson, A. (Eds.). (2013). Sustainable Stockholm. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (1995). Measurement, understanding and perception: The conflicting realities. In R. Hambleton, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Urban policy evaluation: Challenge and change (pp. 89–99). London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, N. (2017). Creating innovative and resilient regions through smart specialisation – but how? Nordregio News, 1, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Moraci, F., Errigo, M., Fazia, C., Burgio, G., & Foresta, S. (2018). Making less vulnerable cities: Resilience as a new paradigm of smart planning. Sustainability, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP- The Planning Review, 44(172), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M., Stjernström, O., & Keskitalo, E. (2017). The role of participation in the planning process: Examples from Sweden. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 22(8), 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1319805
   Google Scholar
• Pinson, G. (2008). Some observations from France. In B. Scholl (Ed.), Spatial planning and development in Switzerland: Observations and suggestions from the international group of experts (pp. 41–44). Zurich: Swiss Federal Office for Spatial Development (ARE).
   Google Scholar
• Pleger, L. (2017). Voters’ acceptance of land use policy measures: A two-level analysis. Land Use Policy, 63, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, M., & Schmitt, P. (2016). Planning for resource efficiency in Stockholm. In P. Schmitt, & L. Van Well (Eds.), Territorial governance across Europe: Pathways, practices and prospects (pp. 95–110). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroth, O. (2010). From information to participation. Interactive landscape visualization as a tool for collaborative planning. Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH.
   Google Scholar
• Solly, A. (2016). From post-industrial wasteland to eco success: the innovative renewal of Hammarby Sjöstad. NEWDIST, special issue SBE16 Towards Post-Carbon Cities, 443–451.
   Google Scholar
• Solly, A., Berisha, E., Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2020). How sustainable are land use tools? A Europe-wide typological investigation. Sustainability, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneryd, L., & Lindh, E. (2019). Citizen dialogue for whom? Competing rationalities in urban planning, the case of Gothenburg, Sweden. Urban Research & Practice, 12(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1436721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T. (2012). Introduction: Contradictions of neoliberal urban planning. In T. Taşan-Kok, & G. Baeten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies, and politics (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tunström, M., Smas, L., & Liisa Perjo, L. (2016, June 22–24). Envisioning sustainable lifestyles in Stockholm’s urban development. In M. Schrenk, V. Popovich, P. Zeile, P. Elisei, & C. Beyer (Eds.), Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society (pp. 857–861). REAL CORP.
   Google Scholar
• VASAB – Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea. (2010). Long term perspective for the territorial development of the Baltic Sea region. Riga: VASAB Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2020, January 24). You are now remotely controlled. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/24/opinion/sunday/surveillance-capitalism.html
   Google Scholar