Combinatorial innovation modes in SMEs: mechanisms integrating STI processes into DUI mode learning and the role of regional innovation policy

References

• Alhusen, H., T. Bennat, K. Bizer, U. Cantner, M. Kalthaus, T. Proeger, R. Sternberg, and S. Töpfer. 2019. The Doing-Using-Interacting Mode of Innovation in SMEs: A Novel Measurement Approach. ifh working papers No. 23. Göttingen: Ifh.
   Google Scholar
• Amara, N., R. Landry, N. Becheikh, and M. Ouimet. 2008. “Learning and Novelty of Innovation in Established Manufacturing SMEs.” Technovation 28 (7): 450–463. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apanasovich, N. 2016a. “Modes of Innovation. A Grounded Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7 (3): 720–737. doi:10.1007/s13132-014-0237-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apanasovich, N., H. Alcalde Heras, and M. Parrilli. 2016b. “The Impact of Business Innovation Modes on SME Innovation Performance in Post-Soviet Transition Economies. The Case of Belarus.” Technovation 57-58: 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apanasovich, N., H. Alcalde-Heras, and M. Parrilli. 2017. “A New Approach to Business Innovation Modes: The ‘Research, Technology and Human Resource Management (RTH) Model’ in the ICT Sector in Belarus.” European Planning Studies 25 (11): 1976–2000. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1322040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” The Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 155. doi:10.2307/2295952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., R. Boschma, and P. Cooke. 2011. “Constructing Regional Advantage. Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases.” Regional Studies 45 (7): 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., L. Coenen, and J. Vang. 2007. “Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases. Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 (5): 655–670. doi:10.1068/c0648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., M. Grillitsch, and M. Trippl. 2016. “Regional Innovation Systems:. Past-Presence-Future.” In Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, edited by C. Carrincazeaux, D. Doloreux, and R. Shearmur, 45–62. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aslesen, H., A. Isaksen, and J. Karlsen. 2012. “Modes of Innovation and Differentiated Responses to Globalisation—A Case Study of Innovation Modes in the Agder Region, Norway.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3 (4): 389–405. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0060-9.
   Google Scholar
• Aslesen, H., and I. Pettersen. 2017. “Entrepreneurial Firms in STI and DUI Mode Clusters. Do They Need Differentiated Cluster Facilitation?” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 904–922. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1300238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V., and G. Mueller. 2002. “CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending.” Management Science 48 (6): 782–801. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennat, T., and R. Sternberg. 2020. “Knowledge Bases in German Regions: What Hinders Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics and How Regional Innovation Policies May Help.” European Planning Studies 28 (2): 319–339. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1656168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMBF. 2018. Forschungs- und Innovationsförderung. Ein Wegweiser für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen [Research and Innovation Funding: Guideline for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprizes]. Berlin: Referat Grundsatzfragen, Innovation und Transfer und Koordinierung. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation. A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, S., S. Nielen, and E. May-Strobl. 2018. Innovationstätigkeit des nicht-forschenden Mittelstands [Innovation Activities in Non-R&D-Based SMEs]. IfM-Materialien No. 266. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Y. Chen, and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2011. “The Influence of Scope, Depth, and Orientation of External Technology Sources on the Innovative Performance of Chinese Firms.” Technovation 31 (8): 362–373. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., and C. Winch. 2006. “A European Skills Framework?—But What Are Skills? Anglo-Saxon Versus German Concepts.” Journal of Education and Work 19 (3): 255–269. doi:10.1080/13639080600776870.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D.” The Economic Journal 99 (397): 569. doi:10.2307/2233763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128. doi:10.2307/2393553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, M. 2010. “Technology and Industrial Clusters: How Different are They to Manage?” Science and Public Policy 37 (9): 679–688. doi:10.3152/030234210X12778118264413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2012. “Relatedness, Transversality and Public Policy in Innovative Regions.” European Planning Studies 20 (11): 1889–1907. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2014. “Transversal or Linear? Knowledge Externalities and the Complexity of Knowledge interactions.” In Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Knowledge, edited by C. Antonelli, 99–105. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., and R. Nelson. 2013. “The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art.” Eurasian Business Review 3 (1): 3–46.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., and M. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2013. “Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway.” Research Policy, Policy Management and Economic Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation 42 (1): 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2017. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung [Qualitative Social Science. An introduction], Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie, Vol. 55694, Originalausgabe, 8. Auflage, rowohlts enzyklopädie im Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2018. Designing Qualitative Research, The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit, Edited by Uwe Flick; 1st volume, 2nd edition. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC, Melbourne: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1994. “The Economics of Technical Change.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (5): 463–514. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, W., J. Revilla Diez, and D. Schiller. 2013. “Interactive Learning, Informal Networks and Innovation: Evidence from Electronics Firm Survey in the Pearl River Delta, China.” Research Policy 42 (3): 635–646. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Observations. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• González-Pernía, J., M. Parrilli, and I. Peña-Legazkue. 2015. “STI–DUI Learning Modes, Firm–University Collaboration and Innovation.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (3): 475–492. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9352-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and J. Rekers. 2016. “How Does Multi-Scalar Institutional Change Affect Localized Learning Processes? A Case Study of the Med-Tech Sector in Southern Sweden.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (1): 154–171. doi:10.1177/0308518X15603986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haus-Reve, S., R. D. Fitjar, and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2019. “Does Combining Different Types of Collaboration Always Benefit Firms? Collaboration, Complementarity and Product Innovation in Norway.” Research Policy 48 (6): 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, M., and J. Mattes. 2019. “Regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster.” In Handbuch Innovationsforschung, edited by B. Blättel-Mink, I. Schulz-Schaeffer, and A. Windeler, 1–17. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., T. Sandven, and B. Ebersberger. 2015. “Recruitment, Knowledge Integration and Modes of Innovation.” Research Policy 44 (1): 138–153. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hippel, E. von. 2005. “Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation.” Journal für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. 2008. ““Low-Tech” Innovations.” Industry & Innovation 15 (1): 19–43. doi:10.1080/13662710701850691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtskog, H. 2017. “Forms of Innovation—Insights from Product Development.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0318-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2010. “Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway.” European Planning Studies 18 (12): 1993–2008. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.516523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2012a. “Combined and Complex Mode of Innovation in Regional Cluster Development: Analysis of the Light-Weight Material Cluster in Raufoss, Norway.” In Interactive learning for innovation: A Key Driver Within Clusters and Innovation, edited by B. Asheim and M. Parrilli, 115–136. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2012b. “What is Regional in Regional Clusters? The Case of the Globally Oriented Oil and Gas Cluster in Agder, Norway.” Industry & Innovation 19 (3): 249–263. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.669616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2013. “Can Small Regions Construct Regional Advantages? The Case of Four Norwegian Regions.” European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (2): 243–257. doi:10.1177/0969776412439200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Nilsson. 2013. “Combined Innovation Policy: Linking Scientific and Practical Knowledge in Innovation Systems.” European Planning Studies 21 (12): 1919–1936. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2017. “Innovation in Space. The Mosaic of Regional Innovation Patterns.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 122–140. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, and BÅ Lundvall. 2007. “Forms of Knowledge and Modes of innovation.” Research Policy 36 (5): 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. 2010. “Institutional Learning.” In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, edited by B-Å Lundvall, 23–46. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., E. Lorenz, and BÅ Lundvall. 2002. “Why All This Fuss About Codified and Tacit Knowledge?” Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (2): 245–262. doi:10.1093/icc/11.2.245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B-Å. 1985. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction, Industrial Development Research Series, 31 Research Report. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., J. Moodysson, and E. Zukauskaite. 2011. “Regional Innovation Policy Beyond ‘Best Practice’. Lessons from Sweden.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2 (4): 550–568. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0067-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Content Analysis. Basics and Technics]. Neuausgabe, Beltz Verlagsgruppe, s.l.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, S., and R. Lopes. 2015. “Firm Performance, Innovation Modes and Territorial Embeddedness.” European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1796–1826. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1021666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrilli, M., R. Fitjar, and A. Rodriguez-Pose. 2016. “Business Innovation Modes: A Review from a Country Perspective.” In Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, edited by M. Parrilli, R. Dahl Fitjar, and A. Rodriguez-Pose, 197–121. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parrilli, M., and H. Heras. 2016. “STI and DUI Innovation Modes. Scientific-Technological and Context-Specific Nuances.” Research Policy 45 (4): 747–756. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammer, C., D. Czarnitzki, and A. Spielkamp. 2009. “Innovation Success of Non-R&D-Performers: Substituting Technology by Management in SMEs.” Small Business Economics 33 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9185-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2007. “Qualitative Stichprobenkonzepte [Qualitative Sampling].” In Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis, edited by G. Naderer and E. Balzer, Vol. 15, 231–245. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Solga, H., P. Protsch, C. Ebner, and B.-F. Christian. 2014. The German Vocational Education and trAining System: Its Institutional Configuration, Strengths, and Challenges. WZB Berlin: Social Sciences Center.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. 2019. Weiterbildung. Accessed 20 January 2020. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Weiterbildung/Publikationen/Downloads-Weiterbildung/berufliche-weiterbildung-5215001197004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., and B. Klement. 2012. “Cumulative and Combinatorial Micro-Dynamics of Knowledge. The Role of Space and Place in Knowledge Integration.” European Planning Studies 20 (11): 1843–1866. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomä, J. 2017. “DUI Mode Learning and Barriers to Innovation—A Case from Germany.” Research Policy 46 (7): 1327–1339. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomä, J., and V. Zimmermann. 2019. “Non-R&D, Interactive Learning and Economic pErformance: Revisiting Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises.” ifh working papers, No. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. 2010. “Learning by Doing.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. Hall and N. Rosenberg, 429–476. Amsterdam, Boston: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Toner, P. 2010. “Innovation and Vocational Education.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 21 (2): 75–98. doi:10.1177/103530461002100206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner, P. 2011. “Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of Major Themes in the Literature.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2011 (01): 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. 2011. “Regional Innovation Systems and Knowledge-Sourcing Activities in Traditional Industries—Evidence from the Vienna Food Sector.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 43 (7): 1599–1616. doi:10.1068/a4416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, P., and C. Simms. 2017. “An Examination of Product Innovation in Low- and Medium-Technology Industries: Cases from the UK Packaged Food Sector.” Research Policy 46 (3): 605–623. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar