Territorial governance and actors’ coordination in a local project of anaerobic digestion. A social network analysis

References

• Asheim, B., and A. Isaksen. 2002. “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘sticky’ and Global ‘ubiquitous’ Knowledge.” Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, W. S., and A. C. Bain. 2012. “Assessing the ‘Short Mental Distance’ in eco-Industrial Networks.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 16: 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BECP. 2019. Commission de suivi de site du pôle environnement de Cavigny. Procès-verbal de la réunion du 3 juillet 2019. Service de la coordination des politiques publiques et de l’appui territorial, préfecture de la Manche, p.7.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. 2002. “A Statistical Method for Comparing Aggregate Data Across a Priori Groups.” Field Methods 14 (1): 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdin, S., M. Colas, and F. Raulin. 2019. “Understanding the Problems of Biogas Production Deployment in Different Regions: Territorial Governance Matters Too.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63 (9): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, S., and F. Nadou. 2020. “The Role of a Local Authority as a Stakeholder Encouraging the Development of Biogas: A Study on Territorial Intermediation.” Journal of Environmental Management 258), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110009.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdin, S., and A. Torre. 2020. “The Territorial Big Bang: Which Assessment About the Territorial Reform in France?” European Planning Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1777943.
   Google Scholar
• Boursault, E. 2019. Analyse de la gouvernance territoriale de l’économie circulaire appliquée au cas de la méthanisation. Mémoire de fin d’études, Agrosup Dijon, p.53.
   Google Scholar
• Brullot, S., M. Maillefert, and J. Joubert. 2014. “Stratégies d’acteurs et gouvernance des démarches d’écologie industrielle et territoriale. Développement durable et territoires.” Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie 5 (1): 31. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.10082.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. 1995. “The Concept of Innovative Milieu and its Relevance for Public Policies in European Lagging Regions.” Papers in Regional Science 74 (4): 317–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card Stuart, K., Jock D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chertow, M. 2000. “Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25: 313–337.
   Google Scholar
• Chertow, M., and J. Ehrenfeld. 2012. “Organizing Self-Organizing Systems.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 16: 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., S. Martinat, and R. Cowell. 2019. “Community Tensions, Participation, and Local Development: Factors Affecting the Spatial Embeddedness of Anaerobic Digestion in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Energy Research & Social Science 55: 134–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, J., M. Trimbornm, P. Weiland, and B. Amon. 2006. “Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Slurry.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112: 171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., R. Hardin, and M. Levi. 2005. Cooperation Without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 268p.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2001. “Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–974.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz Sara, C. S., and A. C. Teixeira Aurora. 2010. “The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies-Regional Science Debate.” Regional Studies 44 (9): 1263–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2012. “Fostering Public Engagement in Wind Energy Development: The Role of Intermediaries and Community Benefits.” In Learning from Wind Power: Governance, Societal and Policy Perspectives on Sustainable Energy, edited by J. Szarka, R. Cowell, G. Ellis, P. A. Strachan, and C. Warren, 194–214. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. 2003. “Networks and Social Movements. A Research Programme.” In Social Movements and Networks. Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by M. Diani, and M. Doug, 299–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, C., and A. Torre. 2006. “Local Clusters, Trust, Confidence and Proximity.” In Clusters and Globalisation: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies, edited by C. Pitelis, R. Sugden, and J. Wilson, 175–195. Cheltenham UK, Northampton USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreiro, M. de F., and C. Sousa. 2018. “Governance, Institutions and Innovation in Rural Territories: The Case of Coruche Innovation Network.” Regional Science Policy and Practice 11: 235–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournis, Y., and M. J. Fortin. 2017. “From Social ‘Acceptance to Social ‘Acceptability’of Wind Energy Projects: Towards a Territorial Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati. 2016. “A Review on Circular Economy: The Expected Transition to a Balanced Interplay of Environmental and Economic Systems.” Journal of Cleaner Production 114: 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, A., F. Gioiella, D. Sofia, and N. Lotrecchiano. 2018. “À Novel Methodology and Technology to Promote the Social Acceptance of Biomass Power Plants Avoiding Nimby Syndrome.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 67: 307–312.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossetti, M., J.-F. Barthe, and N. Chauvac. 2011. “Studying Relational Chains from Narrative Material.” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology 110: 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther-Lübbers, W., H. Bergmann, and L. Theuvsen. 2016. “Potential Analysis of the Biogas Production - as Measured by Effects of Added Value and Employment.” Journal of Cleaner Production 129: 556–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewes, A., and D. Lyons. 2008. “The Humanistic Side of Eco-Industrial Parks: Champions and the Role of Trust.” Regional Studies 42: 1329–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm-Nielsen, J. B., T. Al Seadi, and P. Oleskowicz-Popiel. 2009. “The Future of Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Utilization.” Bioresource Technology 10022: 5478–5484.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., and K. Brown. 2005. The network approach to evaluation: Uncovering patterns, possibilities and pitfalls. Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference, South Bank, Brisbane, 10–12 October 2005, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. 2004. “The Quest for Ecological Modernisation: Re-Spacing Rural Development and Agri-Food Studies.” SociologicaRuralis 44 (2): 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTE. 2018. Plan de libération des énergies renouvelables, Groupe de travail "méthanisation. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2003. “The Structure and Function of Complex Networks.” SIAM Review 45 (2): 167–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquin, R. L., and J. Howard-Grenville. 2012. “The Evolution of Facilitated Industrial Symbiosis.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 16 (1): 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PFE. 2020. Rapport annuel sur le prix et la qualité du service public du traitement des déchets 2019. Point Fort Environnement, p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Polge, E., and A. Torre. 2017. “Territorial Governance and Proximity Dynamics. The Case of two Public Policy Arrangements in the Brazilian Amazon.” Papers in Regional Science 97 (4): 909–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, et al. 2009. “Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management.” J. Environ. Manag 90 (5): 1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey-Valette, H., S. Lardon, and E. Chia. 2008. “Governance–Institutional and Learning Plans Facilitating the Appropriation of Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Sustainable Development 11 (2–4): 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Rosado, L., S. Niza, and P. Ferrão. 2014. “An Urban Material Flow Accounting Case Study of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area Using the Urban Metabolism Analyst Method.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 18 (1): 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabidussi, Gert. 1966. “The Centrality Index of a Graph.” Psychometrika 31 (4): 581–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Z., C. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Feng, G. Ren, and X. Han. 2014. “Comparison of Biogas Development from Households and Medium and Large-Scale Biogas Plants in Rural China.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 33: 204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, C. 2012. “Using Social Network Analysis to Study Entrepreneurship: Methodological Issues.” In Social Networks, Innovation and the Knowledge Economy, edited by I. Salavisa, and M. Fontes, 89–105. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A., and R. Boschma. 2009. “Applying Social Network Analysis in Economic Geography: Framing Some Key Analytic Issues.” The Annals of Regional Science 43 (3): 739–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. 2014. “Proximity Relations at the Heart of Territorial Development Processes: From Clusters, Spatial Conflicts and Temporary Geographical Proximity to Territorial Governance.” In Regional Development and Proximity Relations, edited by A. Torre, and F. Wallet, 94–134. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. 2019. “Territorial Development and Proximity Relationships.” In Handbook of Regional and Development Theories, 2nd ed., edited by R. Capello, and P. Nijkamp, Vol. 674, 326–343. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., E. Polge, and F. Wallet. 2019. “Proximities and the Role of Relational Networks in Innovation: The Case of the Dairy Industry in Two Villages of the ‘Green Municipality’ of Paragominas in the Eastern Amazon.” Regional Science Policy & Practice 11: 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and A. Rallet. 2005. “Proximity and Localization.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and J. B. Traversac, eds. 2011. Territorial Governance. Local Development, Rural Areas and Agrofood Systems. Heidelberg & N. York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and F. Wallet. 2013. “Innovation and Governance of Rural Territories.” In Renewing Innovation Systems in Agriculture and Food: How to go Towards More Sustainability?, edited by E. Coudel, H. Devautour, C. T. Soulard, G. Faure, and B. Hubert, Vol. 240, 147–164. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and F. Wallet. 2016. Regional Development in Rural Areas. Analytical Tools and Public Policies, Springer Briefs in Regional Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. p. 110.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A., and B. Zuindeau. 2009. “Proximity Economics and Environment: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., D.-W. P, S. Hunter, H. High, and B. Evans. 2010. “Trust and Community: Exploring the Meanings, Contexts and Dynamics of Community Renewable Energy.” Energy Policy 38 (6): 2655–2663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, D. M., S. McDonagh, and J. D. Murphy. 2017. “Cascading Biomethane Energy Systems for Sustainable Green gas Production in a Circular Economy.” Bioresource Technology 243: 1207–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. L., and R. L. Paquin. 2015. “Organizational Perspectives of Industrial Symbiosis: A Review and Synthesis.” Organization and Environment 28 (1): 32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellinger, A., J. D. Murphy, and D. Baxter, eds. 2013. The Biogas Handbook: Science, Production and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, M. 2006. “Rescaling Rurality: Multilevel Governance of the Agro-Food Sector.” Political Geography 25 (7): 735–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemo, K. H., T. E. Panduro, and M. Termansen. 2019. “Impact of Biogas Plants on Rural Residential Property Values and Implications for Local Acceptance.” Energy Policy 129: 1121–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar