544
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Concepts and definitions for a sustainable planning transition: lessons from moments of change

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1421-1443 | Received 18 Jun 2020, Accepted 09 Feb 2021, Published online: 04 Mar 2021

References

  • Abrantes, P., I. Fontes, E. Gomes, and J. Rocha. 2016. “Compliance of Land Cover Changes with Municipal Land Use Planning: Evidence from the Lisbon Metropolitan Region (1990–2007).” Land-Use Policy 51: 120–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.023
  • Alberti, M. 2015. “Eco-evolutionary Dynamics in an Urbanizing Planet.” Trends in Ecology and Technology 30 (2): 114–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.007
  • Atkinson, G. 1996. “Thoughts During the Building Research Establishment’s 75th Anniversary.” Construction History 12: 101–107.
  • Baccini, P., and F. Oswald. 2008. “Designing the Urban – Linking Physiology and Morphology.” In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, edited by G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, 79–88. Springer.
  • Baptista, A., and J. Henriques. 1985. “Os custos sociais de urbanização e o financiamento dos municípios da Área Metropolitana de Lisboa.” Sociedade e Território 3: 31–37.
  • Barles, S. 2007. “Feeding the City: Food Consumption and Flow of Nitrogen, Paris, 1801–1914.” Science of the Total Environment 375 (1-3): 48–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.003.
  • Barrett, B., R. Horne, and J. Fien. 2016. “The Ethical City: A Rationale for an Urgent New Urban Agenda.” Sustainability 8 (11): 1197. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111197.
  • Borges, J., and T. Marat-Mendes. 2019. “When Lisbon Met the Team 10 Cluster City.” Joelho 10: 86–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_10_5
  • Borie, M., M. Pelling, M. Ziervogel, and K. Hyams. 2019. “Mapping Narratives of Urban Resilience in the Global South.” Global Environmental Change 54: 203–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001.
  • Cabral, B. 1968. Racionalização de Soluções de Organização de Fogos: Formas de Agrupamentos da Habitação. Lisbon: LNEC.
  • Campos, V., and J. Ferrão. 2015. O Ordenamento do Território em Portugal – uma Perspectiva Genealógica. Lisbon: ICS Working Papers.
  • Cannigia, G. 1976. Strutture Dello Spazio Antropico: Studi e Note. Rome: Uniedit.
  • CEMAT – Conférence européenne des ministres responsables de l’amenagement du territoire. 2006. CEMAT Glossary of key Expressions Used in Spatial Development Policies in Europe. Brussels: Conseil de l’Europe.
  • Codoban, N., and C. Kennedy. 2008. “The Metabolism of Neighbourhoods.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 134 (1): 21–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:1(21).
  • Congress for the New Urbanism. 1999. The Charter of New Urbanism. New York: MacGraw.
  • Conzen, M. 1960. Alnwick, Northumberland – A Study in Town-Planning Analysis. London: George Philip.
  • Costa, A., and N. Portas. 1966. Racionalização de Soluções da Habitação: Análise e Selecção de Esquemas do Fogo. Lisbon: LNEC.
  • D’Alisa, G., F. Demaria, and G. Kallis. 2015. Degrowth – A Vocabulary for a New Era. London: Routledge.
  • d’Almeida, P. 2015. Bairro(s) do Restelo. Panorama Urbanístico e Arquitectónico. Casal de Cambra: Caleidoscópio.
  • d’Almeida, P., and T. Marat-Mendes. 2019. “Nuno Portas and the Research on Urban Morphology at the Portuguese National Laboratory for Civil Engineering: Retrieving a Possible Glossary of Urban Form.” In 4th ISUFItaly Conference READING BUILT SPACES. Cities in the Making and Future Urban Form, edited by P. Carlotti, L. Ficarelli, and M. Ieva, 213–222. Italy: U+D Editions. https://www.urbanform.it/books/
  • d’Almeida, P., T. Marat-Mendes, and M. Toussaint. 2020. “Portugal’s Rising Research in Architecture and Urbanism: The Influence of International Research Centers and Authors.” Journal of Urban History, 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220968078.
  • Decreto-Lei 208/82 de 28 de Maio, Diário da República n.° 119/1982, Série I. Ministérios da Qualidade de Vida, da Administração Interna e da Habitação, Obras Públicas e Transportes.
  • Decreto-Lei (DL) 31/2014 de 30 de Maio, Diário da República n.° 161/2015, Série I. Ministério do Ambiente, Ordenamento do Território e Energia.
  • Decreto-Lei (DL) 48/98 de 11 de Agosto, Diário da República n.° 222/1999, Série I-A. Ministério do Equipamento, do Planeamento e da Administração do Território.
  • Deyong, S. 2011. “Planetary Habitat: The Origins of a Phantom Movement.” The Journal of Architecture 6 (2): 113–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360110048168.
  • Dias, F., and N. Portas. 1971. Tipologias de Edifícios. Habitação Evolutiva: Princípios e Critérios de Projetos. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Drago, A. 2017. “Is This What The Democratic City Looks Like? Local Democracy, Housing Rights and Homeownership in the Portuguese Context.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (3): 426–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12491.
  • Eisenmenger, N. 2016. “Method Précis: Material Flow Analysis.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 234–238. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Erb, K.-H., T. Fetzel, H. Haberl, T. Kastner, C. Kroisleitner, C. Lauk, M. Niedertschider, and C. Plutzar. 2016. “Beyond Inputs and Outputs: Opening the Black-Box of Land-Use Intensity.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 93–124. Switzerland: Springer.
  • ESDP (European Spatial Development Perspective). 1999. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Ferreira, B. 2010. “(In)Formar a cidade contemporânea.” Unpublished MSc Thesis, ISCTE-IUL, Lisbon.
  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., and H. Weisz. 2016. “The Archipelago of Social Ecology and the Island of the Vienna School.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 3–28. Springer.
  • Gandy, M. 2004. “Rethinking Urban Metabolism: Water, Space and the Modern City.” City 8: 363–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481042000313509.
  • Gandy, M. 2005. “Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1): 26–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2427.2005.00568.x.
  • Gandy, M. 2012. “Queer Ecology: Nature, Sexuality, and Heterotopic Alliances.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30: 727–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/d10511.
  • Gauthiez, B. 2004. “The History of Urban Morphology.” Urban Morphology 8 (2): 71–86.
  • Gomes, P. 2017. Porto é o melhor destino europeu de 2017. Jornal de Negócios. https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/empresas/turismo—lazer/detalhe/porto-e-o-melhor-destino-europeu-de-2017
  • Gonçalves, F. 1974. Legislação Urbanística Portuguesa 1926–1974. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Grande, N. 2012. O Ser Urbano nos Caminhos de Nuno Portas/The Urban Being: on the Trails of Nuno Portas. Guimarães: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.
  • Hatuka, T., I. Rosen-Zvi, M. Birnhack, E. Toch, and H. Zur. 2018. “The Politician Premises of Contemporary Urban Concepts – The Global City, the Sustainable City, the Resilient City, the Creative City and the Smart City.” Planning Theory and Practice 19 (2): 160–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1455216.
  • Hodkinson, S. 2012. “The New Urban Enclosures.” City 16 (5): 500–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.709403.
  • Jenks, M., E. Burton, and K. Williams. 1996. The Compact City. A Sustainable Urban Form? London: E & FN Spon.
  • Kallis, G., F. Demaria, and G. D’Alisa. 2015. “Introduction – Degrowth.” In Degrowth – a Vocabulary for a New Era, edited by G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, and G. Kallis, 73–126. London: Routledge.
  • Kemeny, J. 1997. “The Abolition of the National Swedish Institute for Building Research: Social Change & Political Compromise.” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 14 (3): 133–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730430.
  • Kennedy, C., S. Pincetl, and P. Punje. 2011. “The Study of Urban Metabolism and its Applications to Urban Planning and Design.” Environmental Pollution 159: 1965–1973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022.
  • Kostof, S. 1991. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Krausmann, F., H. Weisz, and N. Eisenmenger. 2016. “Transitions in Sociometabolic Regimes Throughout Human History.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 63–92. Springer.
  • Kropf, K. 2014. “Ambiguity in the Definition of Urban Form.” Urban Morphology 8 (1): 41–57.
  • Lengereau, E. 2018. “Aux Origines de la Recherche Architecturale en France.” In L'Architecture et Connaissance Scientifique, edited by J. Cohen, 20–29. Paris: Éditions du Patrimoine, Centre des Monuments Nationaux.
  • Lopes, R. 1990. Planeamento Municipal e Intervenção Autárquica no Desenvolvimento Local. Lisbon: Escher.
  • Machado, M. 2019. Portugal é o melhor destino da Europa pela terceira vez. E tem outros 24 prémios do turismo. Observador. https://observador.pt/2019/06/08/madeira-eleita-melhor-destino-insular-da-europa-pela-sexta-vez/
  • Marat-Mendes, T. 2011. “Glossaries and Dictionaries of Urban Morphology.” Urban Morphology 15 (2): 161–162.
  • Marat-Mendes, T. 2016. “Physical, Social and Cultural Dimensions of Urban Morphology: Redressing the Balance.” Urban Morphology 20 (2): 167–168.
  • Marat-Mendes, T. 2020. “Designing for Sustainability: Retrieving a Systemic Role for Urban Form.” Urban Morphology 24 (2): 235–238.
  • Marat-Mendes, T., and J. Borges. 2019a. “Mapping Sustainability Transitions in Contemporary Culture.” In 2nd Global Forum of Intellectual Capital 2019, edited by F. Matos, 232–251. Lisboa: ISCTE.
  • Marat-Mendes, T., and J. Borges. 2019b. “Urban Agriculture and the Social Role of Urbanism: Planning and Ethics for Communities and Territories.” Planning for Transition. Book of papers – AESOP 2019 International Congress (pp. 1569–1583). Venice: IUAV-AESOP. https://www.aesop2019.eu/program/#1562081402042-a5ba0b31-2b1a
  • Marat-Mendes, T., and J. Borges. 2019c. The Role of Food on Re-imagining the Sustainable City: From the Neighbourhood to the Region. In M. Juvara and S. Ledwon (Eds.) Beyond the Metropolis. Proceedings of the 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress (pp. 605–623). Bogor-Jakarta: ISOCARP. https://dryfta-assets.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/assets/isocarp2019/eventdocs/1576665851ISOCARP_55th-Congress_Proceedings2.pdf
  • Marat-Mendes, T., J. Borges, A. Dias, and R. Lopes. 2021. “Planning for a Sustainable Food System. The Potential Role of Urban Agriculture in Lisbon Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1880960.
  • Marat-Mendes, T., and M. Cabrita. 2015. “Morfologia Urbana e Arquitectura em Portugal. Notas Sobre uma Abordagem Tipo-Morfológica.” In O Estudo da Morfologia Urbana em Portugal, edited by V. Oliveira, T. Marat-Mendes, and P. Pinho, 65–94. Porto: FEUP.
  • Marat-Mendes, T., J. Mourão, and P. d'Almeida. 2016. “Access to Water in the Lisbon Region in 1900.” Water History 8: 159–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-016-0160-3.
  • Marat-Mendes, T., J. Mourão, P. Bento d'Almeida, S. Niza, and D. Ferreira. 2014. “Água dá, água leva.” Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios 28: 56–87.
  • Marcus, L., M. Pont, and S. Barthel. 2019. “Towards a Social-Ecological Urban Morphology: Integrating Elements of Urban Morphology and Landscape Ecology.” Urban Morphology 23: 115–124.
  • Maretto, M. 2012. Saverio Muratori. A Legacy in Urban Design. Rome: Franco Angeli.
  • Mattoso, J. 1998. História de Portugal. vol. VII: O Estado Novo (1926–1974). Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.
  • Mayer, A., A. Schaffartzik, F. Krausmann, and N. Eisenmenger. 2016. “More Than the Sum of Its Parts: Patterns in Global Material Flows.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 217–233. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Meadows, D., D. Meadows, L. Randers, and W. Behrens. 1972. Limits to Growth: A Report for THE CLUB of ROME’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
  • Moore, J. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.
  • Mourão, J., and T. Marat-Mendes. 2015. “Urban Planning and Territorial Management in Portugal. Antecedents and Impacts of the 2008 Financial and Economic Crisis.” In Cities in Crisis – Socio-Spatial Impacts of the Economic Crisis in Southern European Countries, edited by J. Knieling, and F. Othengraffen, 157–171. London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725048
  • Muratori, S. 1959. Studi per una Operante Storia Urbana di Venezia. Rome: Instituto poligrafico dello Stato.
  • Naveh, Z. 2004. “Multifunctional, Self-Organizing Biosphere Landscapes and the Future of our Total Human Ecosystem.” World Futures 60 (7): 469–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020490518324.
  • Niza, S., D. Ferreira, J. Mourão, P. d’Almeida, and T. Marat-Mendes. 2016. “Lisbon’s Womb: An Approach to the City Metabolism in the Turn to the Twentieth Century.” Regional Environmental Change 16 (6): 1725–1737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0918-7.
  • Oliveira, V. 2006. “The Morphological Dimension of Municipal Plans.” Urban Morphology 10 (2): 101–113.
  • Oliveira, V. 2018. Teaching Urban Morphology. Springer.
  • Oliveira, V., and R. Vaz. 2020. “Is the Concept of Urban Metabolism Useful for Planning Practice?” European Planning Studies, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1740173.
  • Parham, S. 2016. Food and Urbanism. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Parker, P., and S. Schmidt. 2017. “Enabling Urban Commons.” CoDesign 13 (3): 202–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355000.
  • Pereira, R. 1963. “Problemática da Habitação em Portugal.” Análise Social 1: 33–66.
  • Pereira, R. 1968. “O Problema da Habitação em Portugal: Necessidades e sua Evolução.” Arquitectura 101: 6–9.
  • Pereira, M. 1970. Modelo de Análise Dinâmica de uma Zona Urbana. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Pereira, M. 1971a. Organização e Qualidade do Espaço Urbano: Modelo de Análise Dinâmica do Sistema Urbano à Escala de Zona Urbana. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Pereira, M. 1971b. Organização e Qualidade do Espaço Urbano: Inquérito Piloto à Utilização da Cidade. Preparação do Inquérito e Colecta de Dados. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Pereira, M. 1973. “Modelo do Sistema Urbano à Escala de Zona Urbana.” Análise Social 37: 5–49.
  • Pereira, M. 1982. Definição de Forma Urbana no Planeamento Físico. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Pereira, M., and M. Gago. 1974. O uso do Espaço na Habitação. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Pereira, M., and N. Portas. 1967. Inquérito à Habitação Urbana: Objetivos Gerais do Inquérito. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Petridis, P., M. Fischer-Kowalski, S. Singh, and D. Noll. 2017. “The Role of Science in Sustainability Transitions: Citizen Science, Transformative Research, and Experiences from Samothraki Island, Greece.” Island Studies Journal 12 (1): 115–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.8.
  • Portas, N. 1965. Estudos Sobre Habitação: Relato Sucinto dos Contactos Estabelecidos por Ocasião do Congresso UIA. Lisbon: LNEC.
  • Portas, N. 1969. Funções e Exigências de áreas da Habitação. Lisboa: LNEC.
  • Portas, N. 2005a. Arquitectura(s). História e Crítica, Ensino e Profissão. Porto: FAUP.
  • Portas, N. 2005b. Arquitectura(s). Teoria e Desenho, Investigação e Projecto. Porto: FAUP.
  • Purdy, J. 2018. After Nature – a Politics for the Anthropocene. Harvard: University Press.
  • Rogers, R. 1997. Cities for a Small Planet. London: Basic Books.
  • Rosenberg, F. 2012. “Science for Architecture. Designing Architectural Research in Post-War Sweden.” Footprint. Delft Architectural Theory Journal 10/11: 99–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.6.1-2.752.
  • Rull, V. 2018. “What If the ‘Anthropocene’ Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch?” Quaternary 1: 24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/quat1030024.
  • Scoffham, E. 1994. The New City State. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
  • Scoffham, E., and T. Marat-Mendes. 2000. “The ‘Ground Rules’ of Sustainable Urban Form.” In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, edited by K. Williams, E. Burton, and M. Jenks, 97–104. London: E & FNSpon.
  • Servillo, L. 2010. “Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory and Practice 11 (3): 397–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.500135.
  • Sikka, T. 2020. “Activism and Neoliberalism: Two Sides of Geoengineering Discourse.” Capitalism Nature Society 30 (1): 84–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1554690.
  • Singh, S., and W. Haas. 2016. “Method Précis: A Methodological Guide for Local Studies.” In Social Ecology, edited by H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, and V. Winiwarter, 539–542. Switzerland: Springer.
  • Smith, N. 2002. “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode 34 (3): 427–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00249.
  • Soriano, C. 2020. “On the Anthropocene Formalization and the Proposal by the Anthropocene Working Group.” Geologica Acta 18 (6): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1344/GeologicaActa2020.18.6.
  • Steadman, P. 2016. “Research in Architecture and Urban Studies at Cambridge in the 1960s and 1970s: What Really Happened.” The Journal of Architecture 21 (2): 291–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1165911.
  • Steel, C. 2008. Hungry City – How Food Shapes our Lives. London: Vintage.
  • Steffen, W., W. Broadgate, L. Deutsch, O. Gaffney, and C. Ludwig. 2015. “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration.” The Anthropocene Review 2: 81–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785.
  • Taylor, N. 2003. “More or Less Meaningful Concepts in Planning Theory (And How to Make Them More Meaningful): A Plea for Conceptual Analysis and Precision.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 91–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022001.
  • Thomson, G., and P. Newman. 2017. “Urban Fabrics and Urban Metabolism – From Sustainable to Regenerative Cities.” Resources Conservation Recycling 132: 218–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.010
  • Thomson, G., and P. Newman. 2018. “Cities and the Anthropocene. Urban Governance for the new era of Regenerative Cities.” Urban Studies, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018779769.
  • Tibbs, H. 2011. “Changing Cultural Values and the Transition to Sustainability.” Journal of Future Studies 15 (1): 13–32.
  • Tulumello, S., A. Ferreira, A. Colombo, C. Di Giovanni, and M. Allegra. 2018. “Comparative Planning and Housing Studies Beyond Taxonomy: A Genealogy of the Special Programme for Rehousing (Portugal).” Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning 2: 32–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2018.01.003.
  • United Nations. 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  • United Nations. 2017a. New Urban Agenda – Habitat III. New York: United Nations. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf
  • United Nations. 2017b. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables Working Paper ESA/P/WP/248. New York: United Nations. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf
  • van den Akker, R., and T. Vermeulen. 2017. “Periodizing the 2000s, or, the Emergence of Metamodernism.” In Metamodernism – Historicity, Affect and Depth After Postmodernism, edited by R. van den Akker, A. Gibbons, and T. Vermeulen, 1–19. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Viljoen, A., and K. Bohn. 2012. “The CPUL City Toolkit: Planning Productive Urban Landscapes for European Cities.” In Sustainable Food Planning: Evolving Theory and Practice, edited by A. Viljoen, and J. Wiskerke, 477–491. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic. doi:https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-187-3
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1986. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wolman, A. 1965. “The Metabolism of Cities.” Scientific American 213 (3): 179–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.