Organizing innovation contests for public procurement of innovation – a case study of smart city hackathons in Tampere, Finland

References

• Acar, O. A. 2019. “Motivations and Solution Appropriateness in Crowdsourcing Challenges for Innovation.” Research Policy 48 (8): 103716. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, S., A. C. Bullinger, and K. M. Möslein. 2012. “Innovation Contests: A Review, Classification and Outlook.” Creativity & Innovation Management 21 (4): 335–360. doi:10.1111/caim.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, J. H. 2011. “Eyes on a Climate Prize: Rewarding Energy Innovation to Achieve Climate Stabilization.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 35 (1). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1576699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albino, V., U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico. 2015. “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives.” Journal of Urban Technology 22 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhola, K., and A. Nissinen. 2018. “Integrating Cleantech Into Innovative Public Procurement Process – Evidence and Success Factors.” Journal of Public Procurement 18 (4): 336–354. doi:10.1108/JOPP-11-2018-020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almirall, E., M. Lee, and A. Majchrzak. 2014. “Open Innovation Requires Integrated Competition-Community Ecosystems: Lessons Learned from Civic Open Innovation.” Business Horizons 57: 391–400. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2013.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasaw, Y. A. 2003. “Team Characteristics and Team Member Knowledge, Skills, and Ability Relationships to the Effectiveness of Cross-Functional Teams in the Public Sector.” International Journal of Public Administration 26 (10–11): 1165–1203. doi:10.1081/PAD-120019926.
   Google Scholar
• Bleda, M., and J. Chicot. 2020. “The Role of Public Procurement in the Formation of Markets for Innovation.” Journal of Business Research 107: 186–196. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blohm, I., S. Zogaj, U. Bretschneider, and J. M. Leimeister. 2018. “How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively?” California Management Review 60 (2): 122–149. doi:10.1177/0008125617738255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G., and C. Mulligan. 2014. Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon (CREATIVEWORKS LONDON WORKING PAPER NO.6).
   Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp. 2011. “Smart Cities in Europe.” Journal of Urban Technology 18 (2): 65–82. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., and R. Pellegrino. 2018. “Fostering Innovation in Public Procurement Through Public Private Partnerships.” Journal of Public Procurement 18 (3): 257–280. doi:10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. J., and A. Lassiter. 2017. “Big Data, Small Apps: Premises and Products of the Civic Hackathon.” In Seeing Cities Through Big Data, edited by P. (Vonu) Thakuriah, N. Tilahun, and M. Zellner, 543–559. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3_29
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., L. B. Jeppesen, and H. Piezunka. 2019. “How Organizations Manage Crowds: Define, Broadcast, Attract, and Select.” In Managing Inter-Organizational Collaborations: Process Views (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 64), edited by J. Sydow, and H. Berends, 239–270. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X20190000064016
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and H. Piezunka. 2014. “Open to Suggestions: How Organizations Elicit Suggestions Through Proactive and Reactive Attention.” Research Policy 43 (5): 812–827. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. R., E. E. Richard, and K. E. Keeton. 2015. “Open Innovation at NASA: A new Business Model for Advancing Human Health and Performance Innovations.” Research Technology Management 58 (3): 52–58. doi:10.5437/08956308X5803325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C. 2012. Challenge.gov: Using Competitions and Awards to Spur Innovation. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/challengegov-using-competitions-and-awards-spur-innovation
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and L. Georghiou. 2007. “Public Procurement and Innovation-Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy 36: 949–963. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., N. Vonortas, and J. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2015. “Introduction.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler, 1–34. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781783471898.00006
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2012. “Public Procurement for Innovation as Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 41 (10): 1757–1769. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2015. Pre-commercial procurement: A demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innovation? R & D Management. doi:10.1111/radm.12057
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Open data an engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0882:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions: Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/public-procurement-innovative-solutions
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. C., B. Richard, and M. P. Ciuchta. 2015. “Crowdsourcing: A new way of Employing non-Employees?” Business Horizons 58: 377–388. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86: 1–12. doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2013.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillier, T., C. Chaffois, M. Belkhouja, Y. Roth, and B. L. Bayus. 2018. “The Effects of Task Instructions in Crowdsourcing Innovative Ideas.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 13: 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., A. Mainka, and W. Stock. 2016. “Opportunities and Challenges for Civic Engagement: A Global Investigation of Innovation Competitions.” International Journal of Knowledge Society Research 7 (3), doi:10.4018/IJKSR.2016070101.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. 2008. Crowdsourcing : how the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. London: Random House Business.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., and P. Robinson. 2014. “Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?” Review of Policy Research 31 (4): 349–357. doi:10.1111/ropr.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, K., and K. Kemppainen. 2008. “The Involvement of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Public Procurement: Impact of Resource Perceptions, Electronic Systems and Enterprise Size.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 14 (4): 230–240. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2008.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, L. 2012. “Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Innovation Prizes as a Government Policy Instrument.” Minerva 50: 191–196. doi:10.1007/s11024-012-9198-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., T. Kalvet, and R. Kattel. 2011. “Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation.” Urban Studies 48 (7): 1373–1395. doi:10.1177/0042098010374512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, R. K., and M. J. Piore. 2004. Innovation – The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liotard, I., and V. Revest. 2018. “Contests as Innovation Policy Instruments: Lessons from the US Federal Agencies’ Experience.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127: 57–69. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, K. 2015. “SME Suppliers and the Challenge of Public Procurement: Evidence Revealed by a UK Government Online Feedback Facility.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21 (2): 103–112. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., M. Merisalo, and T. Inkinen. 2018. “Containers, Facilitators, Innovators? The Role of Cities and City Employees in Innovation Activities.” European Urban and Regional Studies 25 (1): 106–118. doi:10.1177/0969776417691565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, W. A., and B. Delbecq. 2008. Accelerating Innovation with Prize Rewards: History and Typology of Technology Prizes and a New Contest Design for Innovation in African Agriculture. In International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., and K. C. Desouza. 2013. “Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Challenge.gov.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 882–890. doi:10.1111/puar.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Obwegeser, N., and S. Müller. 2018. “Innovation and Public Procurement: Terminology, Concepts, and Applications.” Technovation 74–75: 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, S., and B. A. Bechky. 2008. “Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (3): 422–459. doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. 2017. “Beyond Proximities: The Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (2): 159–177. doi:10.1177/0309132516629003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Scotchmer, S. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. 2005. “Shared Leadership and Dynamic Capabilities in Regional Development.” In Regionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance, edited by I. Sagan, and H. Halkier, 53–72. New York: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. 2009. “Power and Influence Tactics in the Promotion of Regional Development: An Empirical Analysis of the Work of Finnish Regional Development Officers.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 40 (5): 895–905. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and N. Mustikkamäki. 2012. “Strategic Leadership Relay: How to Keep Regional Innovation Journeys in Motion?” In Leadership and Change in Sustainable Regional Development, edited by M. Sotarauta, I. Horlings, and J. Liddle. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203107058
   Google Scholar
• Spradlin, D. 2012. “Are you Solving the Right Problem?” Harvard Business Review 90 (9): 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine, D. 2009. Federally funded innovation inducement prizes.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and K. T. Ulrich. 2009. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, B., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2013. “Coordinated Unbundling: A way to Stimulate Entrepreneurship Through Public Procurement for Innovation.” Science and Public Policy 40 (5): 674–685. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjornbo, O., and F. R. Westley. 2012. “Game Changers: The Big Green Challenge and the Role of Challenge Grants in Social Innovation.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 3 (2): 166–183. doi:10.1080/19420676.2012.726007.
   Google Scholar
• Torvinen, H., and P. Ulkuniemi. 2016. “End-user Engagement Within Innovative Public Procurement Practices: A Case Study on Public–Private Partnership Procurement.” Industrial Marketing Management 58: 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Barriers to Innovation Through Public Procurement: A Supplier Perspective.” Technovation 34 (10): 631–645. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., and K. Flanagan. 2010. “Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement.” European Planning Studies 18 (1): 123–143. doi:10.1080/09654310903343567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., K. Flanagan, E. Magro, and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2017. “Anchoring the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement to Place: The Role of Conversations.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (5): 828–848. doi:10.1177/2399654417694620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, K. Flanagan, and E. Magro. 2020. “Public Procurement, Innovation and Industrial Policy: Rationales, Roles, Capabilities and Implementation.” Research Policy 49 (1): 103844. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Winden, W., and L. Carvalho. 2019. “Intermediation in Public Procurement of Innovation: How Amsterdam’s Startup-in-Residence Programme Connects Startups to Urban Challenges.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103789. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, M. 2019. D3.2 Report of tendering and procurement processes. STARDUST project deliverable.
   Google Scholar
• Vilhula, A., and M. Vehviläinen. 2020. D3.4 Hackathon - STARDUST challenge - results and the implementation report. STARDUST project deliverable.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. 2012. “Innovation Inducement Prizes: Connecting Research to Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. doi:10.1002/pam.21638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H., D. Li, and W. Hou. 2011. “Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15 (4): 57–88. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar