References
- Albrechts, L. 2013. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by Using a Coproduction Perspective.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 46–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212452722
- Avermann, N., and J. Schlüter. 2019. “Determinants of Customer Satisfaction with a True Door-to-Door DRT Service in Rural Germany.” Research in Transportation Business & Management, 32, 100420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100420.
- Bacci, E., G. Cotella, and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2020. “La sfida dell’accessibilità nelle aree interne: riflessioni a partire dalla Valle Arroscia.” Territorio, 95, in press.
- Barca, F. 2009. Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report Prepared at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
- Barca, F., P. Casavola, and S. Lucatelli. 2014. A Strategy for Inner Areas in Italy: Definition, Objectives, Tools and Governance. Materiali UVAL Series. http://www.dps.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni_dps/materiali_uval.
- Barca, F., P. McCann, and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches.” Journal of Regional Science 52: 134–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
- Bertolini, L. 2017. Planning the Mobile Metropolis: Transport for People, Places and the Planet. London: Macmillan Education UK.
- Bertolini, L., A. Hull, E. Papa, C. Silva, and R. Ruiz. 2019. “Accessibility: Operationalizing a Concept With Relevance for Planners.” In Designing Accessibility Instruments: Lessons on Their Usability for Integrated Land Use and Transport Planning Practices, edited by C. Silva, N. Pinto, and L. Bertolini, 52–81. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463612-5
- Binder, J., and A. Matern. 2019. “Mobility and Social Exclusion in Peripheral Regions.” European Planning Studies, 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1689926.
- Bowen, G. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Camarero, L., R. do Carmo, and S. Santos. 2020. “Mobility as a Function of Environmental Conditions and Sociodemographic Differentiation: The Case of Gender Inequality in the Lisbon Metropolitan Are.” Revista de estudios regionales 117: 145–172.
- Camarero, L., and J. Oliva. 2019. “Thinking in Rural Gap: Mobility and Social Inequalities.” Palgrave Communications 5 (1): 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x.
- Carrosio, G. 2016. “A Place-based Perspective for Welfare Recalibration in the Italian Inner Peripheries: the Case of the Italian Strategy for Inner Areas.” SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI, 3, 50–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.3280/SP2016-003004.
- Cotella, G., 2019. The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy, Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7
- Cotella, G., and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2020a. “Questioning Urbanisation Models in the Face of Covid-19.” TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 105–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6913.
- Cotella, G., and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2020b. “The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas: A Place-based Approach to Regional Development.” In Dilemmas of Regional and Local Development, edited by, J. Bański, 50–71. London: Routledge.
- Cotella, G., and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2020c. “La strategia nazionale per le aree interne: una svolta place-based per le politiche regionali in Italia.” Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali 129: 22–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.3280/ASUR2020-129002.
- Cotella, G., and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2021. “Rethinking Urbanisation After COVID-19: What Role for the EU Cohesion Policy?” Town Planning Review, 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.54.
- Cresswell, T. 2012. “Mobilities II: Still.” Progress in Human Geography 36: 645–653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349.
- Daniels, R., and C. Mulley. 2012. “Flexible Transport Services: Overcoming Barriers to Implementation in Low-density Urban Areas.” Urban Policy and Research 30 (1): 59–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2012.660872.
- Davison, L., M. Enoch, T. Ryley, M. Quddus, and C. Wang. 2012. “Identifying Potential Market Niches for Demand Responsive Transport.” Research in Transportation Business & Management 3: 50–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.04.007.
- Eder, J. 2019. “Peripheralization and Knowledge Bases in Austria: Towards a New Regional Typology.” European Planning Studies 27 (1): 42–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1541966
- Ellegård, K., and U. Svedin. 2012. “Torsten Hägerstrand’s Time-geography as the Cradle of the Activity Approach in Transport Geography.” Journal of Transport Geography 23: 17–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.023
- ESPON. 2019. ESPON URRUC – Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON EGTC.
- Farrington, J., and C. Farrington. 2005. “Rural Accessibility, Social Inclusion and Social Justice: Towards Conceptualisation.” Journal of Transport Geography, Sustainability and the Interaction Between External Effects of Transport 13 (1): 1–12.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.
- Felice, E., and A. Lepore. 2017. “State Intervention and Economic Growth in Southern Italy: The Rise and Fall of the ‘Cassa per il Mezzogiorno’ (1950–1986).” Business History 59: 319–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2016.1174214.
- Ferreira, A., and P. Batey. 2007. “Re-thinking Accessibility Planning: A Multi-layer Conceptual Framework and Its Policy Implications.” Town Planning Review 78 (4): 429–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.78.4.3
- Ferreira, A., L. Bertolini, and P. Næss. 2017. “Immotility as Resilience? A key Consideration for Transport Policy and Research” Applied Mobilities 2 (1): 16–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1283121.
- Ferreira, A., and E. Papa. 2020. “Re-enacting the Mobility Versus Accessibility Debate: Moving Towards Collaborative Synergies among Experts.” Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8 (3): 1002–1009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.04.006.
- Gallent, N. 2019. “Rural Infrastructures.” In The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning, 361–368. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102375-37
- Gallent, N., and M. Gkartzios. 2019. “Defining Rurality and the Scope of Rural Planning.” In The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning, edited by M. Scott, N. Gallent, and M. Gkartzios, 17–27. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102375-3
- Geurs, K., T. Dentinho, and R. Patuelli. 2016. “Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency. Part 1. Introduction.” In Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency. Challenges for Transport and Public Services, edited by Geurs, K., T. Dentinho, and R. Patuelli, 3–8. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- Geurs, K., and B. van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Transport Geography 12: 127–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
- Handy, S. 2020. “Is Accessibility an Idea Whose Time has Finally Come?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83: 102319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319.
- Handy, S., X. Cao, and P. Mokhtarian. 2005. Correlation or Causality Between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10 (6): 427–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002.
- Harrison, J., and J. Heley. 2015. “Governing Beyond the Metropolis: Placing the Rural in City-region Development.” Urban Studies 52 (6): 1113–1133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014532853.
- Jonas, A., and S. Moisio. 2018. “City Regionalism as Geopolitical Processes: A New Framework for Analysis.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (3): 350–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516679897.
- Kaufmann, V., M. Bergman, and D. Joye. 2004. “Motility: Mobility as Capital.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (4): 745–756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x.
- Kawulich, B. 2005. “Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method.” Qualitative Social Research 6 (2): 43. doi:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466.
- Kenyon, S., J. Rafferty, and G. Lyons. 2003. “Social Exclusion and Transport in the UK: A Role for Virtual Accessibility in the Alleviation of Mobility-related Social Exclusion?” Journal of Social Policy 32 (3): 317–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007037.
- Küpper, P., S. Kundolf, T. Mettenberger, and G. Tuitjer. 2018. “Rural Regeneration Strategies for Declining Regions: Trade-off Between Novelty and Practicability.” European Planning Studies 26 (2): 229–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1361583.
- Levine, J. 2020. “A Century of Evolution of the Accessibility Concept.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 83: 102309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102309.
- Levine, J., J. Grengs, Qingyun Shen, and Qing Shen. 2012. “Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed?” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (2): 157–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.677119.
- Martens, K. 2019. “Why Accessibility Measurement is Not Merely an Option, but an Absolute Necessity.” In Designing Accessibility Instruments: Lessons on Their Usability for Integrated Land Use and Transport Planning Practices, edited by C. Silva, N. Pinto, and L. Bertolini, 37–51. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463612-4
- Mattioli, G. 2014. “Where Sustainable Transport and Social Exclusion Meet: Households Without Cars and Car Dependence in Great Britain.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16 (3): 379–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592.
- Moseley, M. 1979. Accessibility: The Rural Challenge. London: Methuen.
- Nikolaeva, A., P. Adey, T. Cresswell, J. Lee, A. Nóvoa, and C. Temenos. 2019. “Commoning Mobility: Towards a New Politics of Mobility Transitions.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2): 346–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287.
- Oppido, S., and S. Ragozino. 2019. Unbalanced Development and Peripheralisation Processes: A Testing Phase to Map Studies. In: AESOP 2019 Conference – Book of Papers, Università IUAV di Venezia, Venice.
- Oppido, S., S. Ragozino, and G. De Vita. 2020. “Exploring Territorial Imbalances: A Systematic Literature Review of Meanings and Terms.” In New Metropolitan Perspectives, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, edited by C. Bevilacqua, F. Calabrò, and L. Della Spina, 90–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52869-0_8
- Page, N., M. Langford, and G. Higgs. 2018. “An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Accessibility for Investigating Potential ‘Deprivation Amplification’ in Service Provision.” Applied Geography 95: 19–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.003.
- Punziano, G. 2019. “Salute, mobilità, istruzione: strategie per le aree interne.” Scienze Regionali 1: 65–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.14650/92353.
- Sager, T. 2006. “Freedom as Mobility: Implications of the Distinction Between Actual and Potential Travelling.” Mobilities 1 (3): 465–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100600902420.
- Scott, M., N. Gallent, and M. Gkartzios. 2019. “Planning Rural Futures.” In The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning, 633–644. Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102375-63.
- Servillo, L., A. Russo, F. Barbera, and G. Carrosio. 2016. “Inner Peripheries: Towards an EU Place-based Agenda on Territorial Peripherality.” Italian Journal of Planning Practice 6: 42–75.
- Shergold, I., G. Parkhurst, and C. Musselwhite. 2012. “Rural Car Dependence: An Emerging Barrier to Community Activity for Older People.” Transportation Planning and Technology 35 (1): 69–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2012.635417.
- Silva, C., L. Bertolini, M. te Brömmelstroet, D. Milakis, and E. Papa. 2017. “Accessibility Instruments in Planning Practice: Bridging the Implementation Gap.” Transport Policy 53: 135–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.006.
- Silva, C., N. Pinto, and L. Bertolini. 2019. Designing Accessibility Instruments: Lessons on Their Usability for Integrated Land Use and Transport Planning Practices. London: Routledge.
- Staricco, L., and E. Vitale Brovarone. 2018. “Teaching Land Use–Transport Interactions in Italy: Towards an Interdisciplinary Pedagogy?” Planning Practice & Research 33 (4): 474–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1548206.
- Straatemeier, T., and L. Bertolini. 2020. “How Can Planning for Accessibility Lead to More Integrated Transport and Land-use Strategies? Two Examples from the Netherlands” European Planning Studies 28 (9): 1713–1734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1612326.
- Te Brömmelstroet, M., and L. Bertolini. 2010. “Integrating Land use and Transport Knowledge in Strategy-making.” Transportation 37 (1): 85–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0.
- Urso, G. 2020. “Metropolisation and the Challenge of Rural-Urban Dichotomies.” Urban Geography, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1760536.
- Vale, D. 2020. “Effective Accessibility: Using Effective Speed to Measure Accessibility by Cost.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 80: 102263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102263.
- Vitale Brovarone, E., and G. Cotella. 2020. “Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach.” Sustainability 12: 2876. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072876.