The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas

References

• Akhavan, M. Forthcoming. “Third Places for Work: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on Coworking Spaces and Makerspaces.” In New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories. A Worldwide Investigation, edited by I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8
   Google Scholar
• Arauzo-Carod, J., D. Liviano-Solis, and M. Manjon-Antolin. 2010. “Empirical Studies in Industrial Location: An Assessment of Their Methods and Results.” Journal of Regional Science 50 (3): 685–711. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C. 2006. “Where Do Firms Choose to Locate Their R&D? A Spatial Conditional Logit Analysis on French Data.” European Planning Studies 14 (9): 1187–1208. doi:10.1080/09654310600933314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdikos, V., and E. Iliopoulou. 2019. “Community-Led Coworking Spaces: From Co-location to Collaboration and Collectivization.” In Creative Hubs in Question: Place, Space and Work in the Creative Economy, edited by R. Gill, A. C. Pratt, and T. Virani, 111–129. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Avdikos, V., and A. Kalogeresis. 2017. “Socio-economic Profile and Working Conditions of Freelancers in co-Working Spaces and Work Collectives: Evidence from the Design Sector in Greece.” Area 49 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1111/area.12279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., P. Casavola, and S. Lucatelli. 2014. A Strategy for Inner Areas in Italy: Definition, Objectives, Tools and Governance. Rome: Materiali UVAL. Issue 31.
   Google Scholar
• Beckerich, C., S. Benoit, and M. Delaplace. 2019. “Are the Reasons for Companies to Locate Around Central Versus Peripheral High-Speed Rail Stations Different? The Cases of Reims Central Station and Champagne-Ardenne Station.” European Planning Studies 27 (3): 574–594. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1567111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F., N. Casnici, and F. Squazzoni. 2018. “Solidarity as a Byproduct of Professional Collaboration: Social Support and Trust in a Coworking Space.” Social Networks 54: 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2017.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M. 2016. “Connected Learning in the Library as a Product of Hacking, Making, Social Diversity and Messiness.” Interactive Learning Environments 24 (1): 158–177. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.825811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M., and M. Foth. 2013. “Libraries as Coworking Spaces: Understanding User Motivations and Perceived Barriers to Social Learning.” Library Hi Tech 31 (2): 254–273. doi:10.1108/07378831311329040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzarri, C. 2014. “The Emerging Phenomenon of Coworking. A Redefinition of Job Market in Networking Society (2014).” In Social Dimension of Innovation, edited by Karel Müller, Steffen Roth, and Milan Zak. Prague: Linde. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2533911
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann, B., and K. Axhausen. 2012. “Destination Choice for Relocating Firms: A Discrete Choice Model for the St. Gallen Region, Switzerland.” Papers in Regional Science 91 (2): 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, R., J. Hervás-Oliver, and B. De Miguel-Molina. 2015. “Micro-geographies of Creative Industries Clusters in Europe: From Hot Spots to Assemblages.” Papers in Regional Science 94 (4): 753–772. doi:10.1111/pirs.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R., S. Laudien, V. Fredrich, and L. Görmar. 2018. “Coopetition in Coworking-Spaces: Value Creation and Appropriation Tensions in an Entrepreneurial Space.” Review of Managerial Science 12 (2): 385–410. doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R., and A. Reuschl. 2018. “Coworking-spaces: How a Phenomenon of the Sharing Economy Builds a Novel Trend for the Workplace and for Entrepreneurship.” Review of Managerial Science, 317–334. doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, A., I. Mariotti, and J. van Ommeren. 2004. “The Firm Relocation Decision: An Empirical Investigation.” Annals of Regional Science 38: 335–347. doi:10.1007/s00168-004-0198-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., and D. Iacobucci. 2016. “Local Variety and Firm Diversification: An Evolutionary Economic Geography Perspective.” Journal of Economic Geography 16: 1079–1100. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. 2014. “Different Entrepreneurial Approaches in Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–14. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2533448.
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. 2017. “A Typology of Localized Spaces of Collaborative Innovation.” In Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods – Towards an Understanding of the Economies of Neighbourhoods and Communities, edited by M. van Ham, D. Reuschke, R. Kleinhans, S. Syrett, and C. Mason, 80–97. doi:10.4337/9781785367243.00013
   Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., L. de Dominicis, and H. de Groot. 2016. “Both Marshall and Jacobs Were Right!.” Economic Geography 92 (1): 87–111. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1094371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catungal, J., D. Leslie, and Y. Hii. 2009. “Geographies of Displacement in the Creative City: The Case of Liberty Village.” Toronto. Urban Studies 46 (5–6): 1095–1114. doi:10.1177/0042098009103856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, N., A. Füzi, and G. Loudon. 2019. “Coworking in the Digital Economy: Context, Motivations, and Outcomes.” Futures, 102439. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102439.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, N., and J. Wilson. 2013. “Using Trade Policy to Influence Firm Location.” Economics Letters 119: 45–47. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croce, G., E. Di Porto, E. Ghignoni, and A. Ricci. 2016. “Agglomeration and Workplace Training: Knowledge Spillovers Versus Poaching.” Regional Studies. Taylor & Francis 0 (162): 1–17. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1230270.
   Google Scholar
• Crozet, M., T. Mayer, and J. Mucchielli. 2004. “How do Firms Agglomerate? A Study of FDI in France.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34: 27–54. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, S., and A. Teixeira. 2014. The Determinants of Spatial Location of Creative Industries Start-Ups: Evidence from Portugal Using a Discrete Choice Model Approach, FEP Working Papers 546 (October): 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• De Mooij, R., and S. Ederveen. 2003. “Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research.” International Tax and Public Finance 10 (6): 673–693. doi:10.1023/A:1026329920854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Propris, L., C. Chapain, P. Cooke, S. MacNeill, and J. Mateos-Garcia. 2009. Geography and Creativity, Report 27. UK: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., and K. Lapintie. 2018. “Exploring Multi-Local Working: Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Cities.” International Planning Studies 25 (2): 129–149. doi:10.1080/13563475.2018.1528865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., J. Lilius, and K. Lapintie. 2018. “New Forms of Multi-Local Working: Identifying Multi-Locality in Planning as Well as Public and Private Organizations in Helsinki Region.” European Planning Studies 26 (10): 2015–2035. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., and I. Mariotti. 2020. “Location Factors of NeWSps in the Peripheries.” In Definition and Typologies of the New Working Spaces, Deliverable D 1.1. Internal Working Paper. COST Action CA18214: The Geography of new Working Spaces and Impact on the Periphery (2019-2023), edited by G. Micek, I. Mariotti, M. Di Marino, M. Akhavan, S. Di Vita, B. Lange, T. Paas, A. Sinitsina, L. Alfieri, and M. Chebotareva, 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Di Matteo, D., and I. Mariotti. 2020. “Coworking Spaces and Pandemic Covid-19: Will Peripheral Areas Matter?” RSAI Newsletter 19: 8–9. https://www.regionalscience.org/images/PDF/Newsletter%202020%20May.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Felton, E., C. Collis, and P. Graham. 2010. “Making Connections: Creative Industries Networks in Outer-Suburban Locations.” Journal of Australian Geographer 41 (1): 57–70. doi:10.1080/00049180903535576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, S. 2019. “Different Typologies of ‘Co-Working Spaces’ and the Contemporary Dynamics of Local Economic Development in Rome.” European Planning Studies 27 (9): 1768–1790. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1620697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• French General Commission for Regional Equality-CGET. 2015. Innovation et territoires de faible densité. http://lab-innovation.cget.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/innovation_et_territoires_de_faible_densite_synthese.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. 2007. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. 3rd ed. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuzi, A. 2015. “‘Co-working Spaces for Promoting Entrepreneurship in Sparse Regions: The Case of South Wales’. Regional Studies.” Regional Science 2 (1): 462–469. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053.
   Google Scholar
• Fuzi, A., N. Clifton, and G. Loudon. 2014. “New in-House Organizational Spaces that Support Creativity and Innovation: The Co-working Space.” R & D Management Conference 2014, 3–6 June, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. 2015. “The Rise of Coworking Spaces: A Literature Review.” Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations 15 (1): 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, A., and A. Cossu. 2019. “The Third Wave of Coworking: “Neo-Corporate” Model Versus “Resilient” Practice.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 00 (0): 1–18. doi:10.1177/1367549419886060.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdenitsch, C., T. Scheel, J. Andorfer, and C. Korunka. 2016. “Coworking Spaces: A Source of Social Support for Independent Professionals.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (APR): 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glaeser, E. 2011. Triumph of the City. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayter, R. 1997. The Dynamics of Industrial Location. The Factory, the Firm and the Production System. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, J. 2012. "Preconditions for Sustainable Rural Coworking Spaces in Southwest Finland." MA Thesis, HAMK, VISAMÄKI.
   Google Scholar
• Holguin-Veras, J., N. Xu, H. Levinson, C. Mcknight, R. Weiner, R. Paaswell, K. Ozbay, and D. Ozmen-Ertekin. 2005. “An Investigation on the Aggregate Behavior of Firm Relocations to New Jersey (1990–1999) and the Underlying Market Elasticities.” Networks and Spatial Economics 5: 293–331. doi:10.1007/s11067-005-3037-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, A., and I. Mariotti. 2017. “The Geography of Logistics Firm Location: The Role of Accessibility.” Networks and Spatial Economics 18: 337–361. doi:10.1007/s11067-017-9347-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, A., and I. Mariotti. 2018. “Highways and Firm Performance in the Logistics Industry.” Journal of Transport Geography 72: 139–150. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howkins, J. 2001. The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Inkinen, T., and I. Kaakinen. 2016. “Economic Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Technology Clusters: Lessons from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.” Journal of Urban Technology 23 (1): 95–114. doi:10.1080/10630732.2015.1090196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, M., N. Kivinen, P. Salovaara, and P. Hirkman. 2017. “Towards an Economy of Encounters? A Critical Study of Affectual Assemblages in Coworking.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 33 (4): 235–242. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, A. 2018. “Coworking Spaces in mid-Sized Cities: A Partner in Downtown Economic Development.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (4): 773–788. doi:10.1177/0308518X18760857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., and J. Olhager. 2018. “Comparing Offshoring and Backshoring: The Role of Manufacturing Site Location Factors and Their Impact on Post-Relocation Performance.” International Journal of Production Economics 205: 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., and S. Nenonen. 2016. “Typologies for co-Working Spaces in Finland – What and How?” Facilities 34 (5/6): 302–313. doi:10.1108/09564230910978511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, G., A.-L. Le Nadant, and C. Marinos. 2018. “Coworking Spaces in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: The Role of Proximities for Collaboration Dynamics.” HAL. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01721976
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, K. 2013. “Firm Relocation in the Netherlands: Why Do Firms Move and Where Do They Go?” Papers in Regional Science 92 (4): 691–713. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1995. Development, Economic Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., R. Boix, and F. Capone. 2008. “Do Creative Industries Cluster? Mapping Creative Local Production Systems in Italy and Spain.” Industry and Innovation 15 (5): 549–567. doi:10.1080/13662710802374161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., F. Capone, and R. Boix. 2012. “Reasons for Clustering of Creative Industries in Italy and Spain.” European Planning Studies 20 (8): 1243–1262. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.680585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., F. Capone, and I. Seçilmiş. 2016. “In Search of a Mediterranean Creativity. Cultural and Creative Industries in Italy, Spain and Turkey.” European Planning Studies 24 (3): 568–588. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., and P. Dicken. 1992. Location in Space. A Theoretical Approach to Economic Geography. 2nd ed. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Love, L., and J. Crompton. 1999. “The Role of Quality of Life in Business (re)Location Decisions.” Journal of Business Research 44 (3): 211–222. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00202-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, N., and T. Vinodrai. 2020. “The Maker-Manufacturing Nexus as a Place-Connecting Strategy: Implications for Regions ‘Left Behind’.” Economic Geography. doi:10.1080/00130095.2020.1812381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjón-Antolín, M., and J. Arauzo-Carod. 2011. “Locations and Relocations: Determinants, Modelling, and Interrelations.” The Annals of Regional Science 47 (1): 131–146. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0360-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I. 2015. Transport and Logistics in a Globalizing World. A Focus on Italy, Briefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., and M. Akhavan. 2020. “Exploring Proximities in Coworking Spaces: Evidence from Italy.” European Spatial Research and Policy 27 (1): 37–52. doi:10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., M. Akhavan, and D. Di Matteo. 2021. “The Geography of Coworking Spaces and the Effects on the Urban Context: Are Pole Areas Gaining?” In New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories. A Worldwide Investigation, edited by I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., M. Di Marino, and M. Akhavan. Forthcoming. “The Emergence of Coworking Models in the Face of Pandemic.” In Living with Pandemics: People, Place and Policy, edited by J. R. Bryson, A. Lauren, L. Reardon, and A. Ersoy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., C. Pacchi, and S. Di Vita. 2017. “Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects.” Journal of Urban Technology. doi:10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., and C. Pacchi. Forthcoming. “Coworkers and Coworking Spaces as Urban Transformation Actors. An Italian Perspective.” In New Workplaces: Location Patterns, Urban Effects and Development Trajectories. A Worldwide Investigation, edited by I. Mariotti, S. Di Vita, and M. Akhavan. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, J. 2015. “The Extended Workplace in a Creative Cluster: Exploring Space(s) of Digital Work in Silicon Roundabout.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (1): 125–145. doi:10.1080/13574809.2014.972349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. 2008. “Globalization and Economic Geography: The World is Curved, not Flat”. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 1 (3): 351–370. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. 2015. “Coworking in the City.” Ephemera Theory & Politics in Organisation 15 (February 2011): 121–139. http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/coworking-city?utm_content=buffer7ea1a&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. 2018. “‘Freelance Isn’t Free’. Co-Working as a Critical Urban Practice to Cope with Informality in Creative Labour Markets.” Urban Studies 56 (3): 526–547. doi:10.1177/0042098018782374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, B. 2014. "Building New Places of the Creative Economy. The Rise of Coworking Spaces". 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 Utrecht University, 24, Utrecht, January 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, B., and E. Malecki. 2009. “Organization Versus Space: The Paradoxical Geographies of the Digital Economy.” Geography Compass 3 (1): 256–274. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00203.x.
   Google Scholar
• Morkutè, G., and S. Koster. 2018. “Human Capital as a Location Factor: An Empirical Investigation of Relocating Firms and Their Labour Force in the Netherlands.” Papers in Regional Science 97 (3): 595–616. doi:10.1111/pirs.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S. 2004. “Analysing the Intangible Benefits of Work Space.” Facilities 22 (9/10): 233–239. doi:10.1108/02632770410555940
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Marlow & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 1991. The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, D. 2002. “The Distribution of Foreign Direct Investments in the Service Sector in Istanbul.” Cities 19 (4): 249–259. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00022-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacchi, C. 2015. “Coworking e Innovazione Urbana a Milano.” Imprese & Città 8: 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Pais, I. 2012. La Rete Che Lavora. Milan: EGEA.
   Google Scholar
• Parrino, L. 2015. “Coworking : Assessing the Role of Proximity in Knowledge Exchange.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Nature Publishing Group 13 (3): 261–271. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard Florida, Andres, Rodriguez-Pose, and Michael, Storper, 2020. “Cities in a Post-COVID World,” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2041, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. 2011. The Third Industrial Revolution. How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robelski, S., H. Keller, V. Harth, and S. Mache. 2019. “Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (13): 2379. doi:10.3390/ijerph16132379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to do About it).” Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., and R. Crescenzi. 2008. “Mountains in a Flat World: Why Proximity Still Matters for the Location of Economic Activity.” Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 1 (3): 371–388. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, F., and M. Dej. 2020. “Where do Firms Relocate? Location Optimisation Within and Between Polish Metropolitan Areas.” The Annals of Regional Science 64: 615–640. doi:10.1007/s00168-019-00948-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Serra, D. 2016. “Location Determinants of Creative Industries’ Firms in Spain.” Journal of Regional Research 34: 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2012. “Working Alone, Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26 (4): 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C., Z. Bodrožić, G. Scaratti, and S. Ivaldi. 2019. ““Coworking Is About Community”: But What Is “Community” in Coworking?” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 33 (2): 112–140. doi:10.1177/1050651918816357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E., and V. van de Vrande. 2017. “Solopreneurs and the Rise of co-Working in the Netherlands.” In Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods. Towards an Understanding of the Economies, of Neighbourhoods and Communities, edited by M. van Ham, D. Reuschke, R. Kleinhans, C. Mason, and S. Syrett, 65–79. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stentoft, J., O. Stegman Mikkelsen, and J. Kronborg Jensen. 2016. “Flexicurity and Relocation of Manufacturing.” Operations Management Research 9 (3–4): 133–144. doi:10.1007/s12063-016-0110-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J., and P. Pellenbarg. 2000. “Firm Relocation Decision in the Netherlands: an Ordered Logit Approach.” Papers in Regional Science 79: 191–219. doi:10.1007/s101100050043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oort, F., A. Weterings, and H. Verlinde. 2003. “Residential Amenities of Knowledge Workers and the Location of ICT-Firms in the Netherlands.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 94 (4): 516–523. doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. 1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses.” Econometrica 57: 307–333. doi:10.2307/1912557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A. 1909. Über den Standort der Industrien. Ersterteil: Reinetheorie des Standorts. Tübingen, Mohr (English Translation: Friedrich C.J (1929). Alfred Weber’s Theory of Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yavan, N. 2010. “The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment Within Turkey: An Empirical Analysis.” European Planning Studies 18 (10): 1675–1705. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.504350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, R., M. Burke, and N. Raad. 2019. “Exploring Impact of Future Flexible Working Model Evolution on Urban Environment, Economy and Planning.” Journal of Urban Management. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar