Applied research by design: an experimental collaborative and interdisciplinary design charrette

References

• Agnoletti, C. 2017. “Territorial and Settlement Transformation in Tuscany: Between Path Dependence and New Trends, in 2017.” In Report of the Soil Consumption Research Center: The European Dimension of Land Use and National Policies, edited by INU Edizioni, 135–138. Rome: CRCS, Inu Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2019. New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgalassi, David 2010. “Defining and Measuring Polycentric Regions. The Case of Tuscany.” Discussion Papers del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche – Università di Pisa, n. 101. http://www-dse.ec.unipi.it/ricerca/discussion-papers.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D. 2014. “Il progetto del territorio agrourbano per una conversione economica bioregionale.” In La regola e il progetto. Un approccio bioregionalista alla pianificazione territoriale, edited by A. Magnaghi, 69–96. Firenze: Florence University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D. 2018. “Agricultural Park in Europe as Tool for Agriurban Policies and Design: a Critical Overview.” In Agrourbanism: Tools for Governance and Planning of Agrarian Landscape, edited by E. Gottero, 149–170. Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fareri, P., and M. Giraudi. 2009. Rallentare: Il disegno delle politiche urbane. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Fedeli, V. 2017. “Metropolitan Governance and Metropolitan Cities in Italy: Outdated Solutions for Processes of Urban Regionalisation?” Raumforschung und Raumordnung {Spatial Research and Planning} 75 (3): 265–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0430-7
   Google Scholar
• Fedeli, V., C. Perrone, and C. Rossignolo. 2017. “Oltre i confini, in un’ottica di governance transcalare.” In  Ripensare la questione urbana. Regionalizzazione dell’urbano in Italia e scenari di innovazione, edited by A. Balducci, V. Fedeli, and F. Curci, 199–228. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A., and C. Silver, eds. 2018. Urban Planning Education: Beginnings, Global Movement and Future Prospects. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Green Leigh, N., S. French, S. Guhathakurta, and B. Stiftel, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauberg, J. 2011. “Research by Design: A Research Strategy.” Lusófona Arquitectura 5: 46–56. http://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/revlae/issue/current
   Google Scholar
• Lennertz, B., and A. Lutnzenhiser. 2006. The Charrette Handbook. Chicago: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnaghi, A. 2006. “A Green Core for the Polycentric Urban Region of Central Tuscany and the Arno Master Plan.” In Isocarp Review, Cities between Integration and Disintegration: Opportunities and Challenges, 2, 56–71. Sitges: ISoCaRP.
   Google Scholar
• Magnaghi, A. 2013. “The Role of Historical Rural Landscape in Territorial Planning.” In Italian Historical Rural Landscape, edited by M. Agnoletti, 131–139. London and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V. 2010. “N of one Plus Some: An Alternative Strategy for Conducting Single Case Research.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (4): 476–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X10362770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. 1998. “Does Planning Need the Plan?” Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (2): 208–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. 2016. “Teaching Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Service-Based Urban Design and Planning Studios.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (5): 596–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1100962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., and W. Zonneveld. 2018. “The Resurgence of Regional Design.” European Planning Studies 26 (7): 1297–1311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1464127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paba, G., and C. Perrone. 2015. “Foodshed e regional planning: Radici disciplinari e problemi contemporanei.” In: AA.VV. Italia ’45–’45. Radici, Condizioni, Prospettive, 368–373. Rome and Milan: Planum Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Paba, G., and C. Perrone. 2017. “Place Matters: Spatial Implications of Post-Metropolitan Transition.” In Post-metropolitan Territories: Looking for a new Urbanity, edited by A. Balducci, V. Fedeli, and F. Curci, 256–265. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paba, G., C. Perrone, F. Lucchesi, and I. Zetti. 2017. “Territory Matters: A Regional Portrait of Florence and Tuscany.” In Post-metropolitan Territories: Looking for a new Urbanity, edited by A. Balducci, V. Fedeli, and F. Curci, 95–116. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, C. 2017. “Per un diverso planning. Idee, radici e immaginazioni nell’interfaccia tra past planning e planning future.” Ibidem, Planum Readings 8: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Petit-Boix, A., and S. Leipold. 2018. “Circular Economy in Cities: Reviewing How Environmental Research Aligns with Local Practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1270–1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggema, R. 2014. The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. London and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roggema, R. 2016. “Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach.” Urban Science 1 (2): 2–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1010002
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., and M. Seymour. 2008. “Utilizing the Design Charrette for Teaching Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 9 (2): 157–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810856305
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1973. “If Planning is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 127–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar