Spatial justice on the horizon? A combined Theory of Change scenario tool to assess place-based interventions

References

• Aguilar, F. J. 1967. Scanning the Business Environment. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Mark Petticrew, Eva Rehfuess, Rebecca Armstrong, Erin Ueffing, Phillip Baker, Daniel Francis, and Peter Tugwell. 2011. “Using Logic Models to Capture Complexity in Systematic Reviews.” Research Synthesis Methods 2 (1): 33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy –A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., A. Hines, and T. Collins. 2007. “The Current State of Scenario Development: An Overview of Techniques.” Foresight – The Journal of Future Studies, Strategic Thinking, and Policy 9 (1): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, A., and M. Mackenzie. 2007. “Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges?” Evaluation 13 (4): 439–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082129
   Google Scholar
• Börjeson, L., M. Höjer, K. Dreborg, T. Ekvall, and G. Finnveden. 2006. “Scenario Types and Techniques: Towards a User’s Guide.” Futures 38: 723–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, R., G. Wright, G. Burt, G. Cairns, and K. Van Der Heijden. 2005. “The Origins and Evolution of Scenario Techniques in Long Range Business Planning.” Futures 37 (8): 795–812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J., and A. Kubisch. 1998. “Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems.” New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives 2 (15–44): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Copus, A., S. Piras, P. Tobiasz-Lis, K. Dmochowska-Dudek, M. Wójcik, and T. Napierała. 2020. D8.2 Synthesis Report: Towards an operational concept of spatial justice, Project Report, H2020 RELOCAL, Version 1, 30 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, R. G., and Y. C. Yong. 1996. “A Scenario Projection for the South China Sea: Further Experience with Field Anomaly Relaxation.” Futures 28 (3): 269–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00001-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, M., A. Pinker, and A. Copus. 2019. Strengthening Communities on the Isle of Lewis in the Western Isles, United Kingdom: RELOCAL Case Study N°33/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Duckett Dominic, McKee Annie, Sutherland Lee, Kyle Carol, Boden Lisa, Auty Harriet, Bessell Paul, McKendrick Iain. 2017. “Scenario Planning as Communicative Action: Lessons from Participatory Exercises Conducted for the Scottish Livestock Industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114: 138–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durance, P., and M. Godet. 2010. “Scenario Building: Uses and Abuses.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 (9): 1488–1492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsawah Sondoss, Hamilton Serena, Jakeman Anthony, Rothman Dale, Schweizer Vanessa, Trutnevyte Evelina, Carlsen Henrik, Drakes Crystal, Frame Bob, Fu Baihua, Guivarch Celine, Haasnoot Marjolijn, Kemp-Benedict Eric, Kok Kasper, Kosow Hannah, Ryan Mike, van Delden Hedwig. 2020. “Scenario Processes for Socio-environmental Systems Analysis of Futures: A Review of Recent Efforts and a Salient Research Agenda for Supporting Decision Making.” Science of the Total Environment 729: 138393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre. 2009. Scenario Planning: Guidance note. http://www.scribd.com/doc/129432607/Foresight-Scenario-Planning#scribd. Accessed May 22, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2014. “New Economy.” In Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, edited by G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, and G. Kallis, 178–181. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, I. 2018. “Scenario Modelling with Morphological Analysis.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 126: 116–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, H. 1962. Thinking About the Unthinkable. New York, NY: Horizon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and K. Garrett. 2005. “The Use of Logic Models by Community-based Initiatives.” Evaluation and Program Planning 28 (2): 167–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosow, H., and R. Gaßner. 2008. Methods of Futures – and Scenario-analysis: Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria. DIE Studies 39. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., M. Shucksmith, H. Talbot, J. Crawford, and E. Brooks. 2020. D1.2 Revised Conceptual Framework for the Project, H2020 RELOCAL, April 2020 [unpublished document].
   Google Scholar
• Martelli, A. 2014. “From Scenario Building to Scenario Planning: Cross-impact Analysis and Morphological Analysis.” In Models of Scenario Building and Planning: Facing Uncertainty and Complexity, edited by A. Martelli, 157–180. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J., and G. Jordan. 1999. “Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your Programs Performance Story.” Evaluation and Program Planning 22 (1): 65–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora Olivier, Le Mouël Chantal, de Lattre-Gasquet Marie, Donnars Catherine, Dumas Patrice, Réchauchère Olivier, Brunelle Thierry, Manceron Stéphane, Marajo-Petitzon Elodie, Moreau Clémence, Barzman Marc, Forslund Agneta, Marty Pauline, Bui Elisabeth 2020. “Exploring the Future of Land Use and Food Security: A New Set of Global Scenarios.” PloS one 15 (7): e0235597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., and N. Weitz. 2019. “Governing Trade-offs and Building Coherence in Policy-making for the 2030 Agenda.” Politics and Governance 7 (4): 254–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., T. Greenhalgh, G. Harvey, and K. Walshe. 2005. “Realist Review – A New Method of Systematic Review Designed for Complex Policy Interventions.” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10 (1_suppl): 21–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 2001. “Realistic Evaluation Bloodlines.” American Journal of Evaluation 22 (3): 317–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestle Analysis. 2015. Difference between SWOT, PEST, STEEP and STEEPLE analysis. Available at https://pestleanalysis.com/difference-swot-pest-steep-steeple-analysis/ [accessed 29 May 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Piras, S., M. Currie, D. Duckett, A. Copus, P. Tobiasz-Lis, and K. Dmochowska-Dudek. 2020. D8.3 Scenario Report: Trajectories of Spatial Justice and Actions to achieve it across Europe, Project Report, H2020 RELOCAL, Version 2.2, 31 March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T. 2009. “Morphological Analysis.” In Futures Research Methodology — Version 3.0, edited by J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon. Washington, DC: Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Shell.com. 2014. 40 Years of Shell Scenarios. http://s05.static-shell.com/content/dam/shell-new/local/corporate/corporate/downloads/pdf/shell-scenarios-40yearsbook080213.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Spreckley, F. 2009. Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation. A Toolkit. Local Livelihoods, St Oswalds Barn Hertfordshire, UK. http://www.locallivelihoods.com/cmsms/index.php?page=publications. Accessed April 4, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Stame, N. 2004. “Theory-based Evaluation and Types of Complexity.” Evaluation 10 (1): 58–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389004043135
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, D., and H. Clark. 2012. Theory of Change Basics. A Primer. Actknowledge, New York. https://www.actknowledge.org/PDFs/PACETheoryofChangeDiscussionPaper.pdf. Accessed March 9, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1988. Alternative World Scenarios for a New Order of Nations. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Army War College Strategic Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, N. 2000. Realistic Evaluation: An Overview. In Founding conference of the Danish Evaluation Society (Vol. 8).
   Google Scholar
• Van Notten, P., J. Rotmans, M. Van Asselt, and D. Rothman. 2003. “An Updated Scenario Typology.” Futures 35 (5): 423–443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00090-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, I. 2012. Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development. Review Report. London: Department for International Development (DFID).
   Google Scholar
• Weimer-Jehle, W. 2006. “Cross-impact Balances: A System-theoretical Approach to Cross-impact Analysis.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73 (4): 334–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer-Jehle Wolfgang, Buchgeister Jens, Hauser Wolfgang, Kosow Hannah, Naegler Tobias, Poganietz Witold, Pregger Thomas, Prehofer Sigrid, von Recklinghausen Andreas, Schippl Jens, Vögele Stefan 2016. “Context Scenarios and Their Usage for the Construction of Socio-technical Energy Scenarios.” Energy 111: 956–970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2017. External Validity and Policy Adaptation: A Five Step Guide to Mechanism Mapping. Policy Memo. Blavatnik School of Government. University of Oxford. https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/files/documents/BSG-WP-2017-019_0.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2020. “External Validity and Policy Adaptation: From Impact Evaluation to Policy Design.” The World Bank Research Observer 35 (2): 158–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar