Exceptional architecture, learning processes, and the contradictory performativity of norms and standards

References

• Ahuja, S., N. Nikolova, and S. Clegg. 2017. “Paradoxical Identity: The Changing Nature of Architectural Work and its Relation to Architects’ Identity.” Journal of Professions and Organization 4 (1): 2–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaily-Mattar, N., J. Dreher, and A. Thierstein. 2018. “Repositioning Cities Through Star Architecture: How Does it Work?” Journal of Urban Design 23 (2): 169–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1408401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., and P. Cohendet. 2004. Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., and P. G. Røe. 2016. “The Social Context and Politics of Large Scale Urban Architecture: Investigating the Design of Barcode, Oslo.” European Urban and Regional Studies 24 (3): 304–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416643751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balke, J., P. Reuber, and G. Wood. 2017. “Iconic Architecture and Place-Specific Neoliberal Governmentality: Insights from Hamburg’s Elbe Philharmonic Hall.” Urban Studies 55 (5): 997–1012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017694132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, T., and S. N. Smith 2010. “Communities of Practice as Cause and Consequence of Transnational Governance: The Evolution of Social and Environmental Certification.” In Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance, edited by M. L. Djelic and S. Quack, 347–374. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Joseph, E. 2005. The Code of the City: Standards and the Hidden Language of Place Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botzem, S., and L. Dobusch. 2012. “Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 737–762. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broudehoux, A.-M. 2010. “Images of Power: Architectures of the Integrated Spectacle at the Beijing Olympics.” Journal of Architectural Education 63 (2): 52–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2010.01058.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzin, A., and D. Rehfeld. 2013. “The Balance of Change and Continuity in the German Construction Sector’s Development Path.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 57 (1–2): 15–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2013.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, N., and E. Shove. 2018. “Standards? Whose Standards?” Architectural Science Review 61 (5): 272–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1502158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., and P. Pattberg. 2009. “World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 707–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109345056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L., and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2006. Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., and J. Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as ‘Epistemic Objects’.” Organization Studies 30 (1): 07–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608083014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. R. 2009. “The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms: Embedding and Emplacing Buildings.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2537–2554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. R. 2010. “Global Architects: Learning and Innovation Through Communities and Constellations of Practice.” Environment and Planning A 42 (12): 2842–2858. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a4311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J., N. Cass, and J. Connaughton. 2018. “How Market Standards Affect Building Design: The Case of Low Energy Design in Commercial Offices.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (3): 627–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17752681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J., and S. Yalciner. 2015. “Local Variants of Mobile Sustainable Building Assessment Models: The Marketization and Constrained Mutation of BREEAM ES.” Global Networks 15 (3): 360–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12083.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., and S. Guy. 2009. “Re-interpreting Regulations: Architects as Intermediaries for Low-Carbon Buildings.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2577–2594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. “Over Budget, Over Time, Over and Over Again: Managing Major Projects.” In The Oxford Handbook of Project Management, edited by P. W. G. Morris, J. K. Pinto, and J. Söderlund, 321–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius, and W. Rothengatter. 2003. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, E. 2018. “Repoliticising Multi-Stakeholder Standards Processes: The Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials' Standards and Certification Scheme.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (4): 805–824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1285286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuerst, F., P. McAllister, and C. B. Murray. 2011. “Designer Buildings: Estimating the Economic Value of ‘Signature’ Architecture.” Environment & Planning A 43 (1): 166–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a43270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. 2003. “Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There).” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (1): 75–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbauer, M. 2015. “Circulating Knowledge, Marketization and Norm-Making: International Developers and Construction Firms in Eastern Europe Since 2000.” Global Networks 15 (3): 288–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbauer, M., and N. Čamprag. 2018. “Urban Megaprojects, Nation-State Politics and Regulatory Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe: The Belgrade Waterfront Project.” Urban Studies 56 (4): 649–671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018757663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C. 2005. “Innovation in Construction: A Sociology of Technology Approach.” Building Research & Information 33 (6): 512–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500288605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harty, C. 2008. “Implementing Innovation in Construction: Contexts, Relative Boundedness and Actor-Network Theory.” Construction Management & Economics 26 (10): 1029–1041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802298413.
   Google Scholar
• Heeg, S., and N. Bitterer. 2015. “Communities of Practice and Transnational Standards: Changing Building Practices in Warsaw's Commercial Property Sector.” Global Networks 15 (3): 343–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and E. Street. 2009. “Regulating Design: The Practices of Architecture, Governance and Control.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2507–2518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingemansson Havenvid, M., Å Linné, L. E. Bygballe, and C. Harty. 2019a. The Connectivity of Innovation in the Construction Industry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingemansson Havenvid, M., Å Linné, L. E. Bygballe, and C. Harty. 2019b. “In Pursuit of a New Understanding of Innovation in the Construction Industry: The Significance of Connectivity.” In The Connectivity of Innovation in the Construction Industry, edited by M. Ingemansson Havenvid, Å Linné, L. E. Bygballe, and C. Harty, 1–10. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. 2010. “Architecture and Crisis: Re-Inventing the Icon, Re-Imag(in)ing London and Re-Branding the City.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (4): 453–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00398.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampland, M., and S. L. Star. 2009. Standards and their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A., and L. Busch. 2010. “Standards, Techno-Economic Networks, and Playing Fields: Performing the Global Market Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (3): 507–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903319870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. 1996. The Social Dimension of the Learning Economy. DRUID Working Paper No. 96-1. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.66537.
   Google Scholar
• Lütke Daldrup, E., P. Oswalt, and K. Enders. 2018. Die Durchschlagskraft des sektoralen Diskurses. ARCH+ 233. Berlin: ARCH+ Verlag GmbH. 208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and J. Moodysson. 2011. “Innovation in Symbolic Industries: The Geography and Organization of Knowledge Sourcing.” European Planning Studies 19 (7): 1183–1203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, K., and D. Gibbs. 2020. “Sustainability Transitions and Policy Dismantling: Zero Carbon Housing in the UK.” Geoforum 108: 119–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. 2012. “The Role of the Public Institution in Iconic Architectural Development.” Urban Studies 49 (15): 3289–3305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012443862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, B. 2000. “Evaluating the Influence of a Large Cultural Artifact in the Attraction of Tourism – The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao Case.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (2): 264–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870022184859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S., and E. Cheyns. 2013. “Voluntary Standards, Expert Knowledge and the Governance of Sustainability Networks.” Global Networks 13 (4): 459–477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, S., P. Gibbon, and J. Vestergaard. 2011. Governing Through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. 2014. “Delivering Flagship Projects in an Era of Regulatory Capitalism: State-led Privatization and the London Olympics 2012.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (1): 176–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., A. J. Salter, and D. M. Gann. 2005. “Last among Equals: A Comparison of Innovation in Construction, Services and Manufacturing in the UK.” Construction Management and Economics 23 (6): 631–644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500126940.
   Google Scholar
• Schweber, L. 2013. “The Effect of BREEAM on Clients and Construction Professionals.” Building Research & Information 41 (2): 129–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.768495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2018. “What is Wrong with Energy Efficiency?” Building Research & Information 46 (7): 779–789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklair, L., and L. Gherardi. 2012. “Iconic Architecture as a Hegemonic Project of the Transnational Capitalist Class.” City 16 (1–2): 57–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.662366.
   Google Scholar
• Sohar, C., and O. Thill. 2020. Das geht doch nicht in Deutschland! Der Architekt als Kombinator von Normen. Baumeister, München: GEORG GmbH & Co. KG.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 2009. “Governing Life by Standards: A View from Engagements.” Social Studies of Science 39 (5): 793–813. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709338767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, J., V. Dimitrova, and J. Ruge. 2021. “Large-scale Construction Projects as Drivers of Innovation?” In Constructing Innovation: How Large-Scale Projects Drive Novelty in the Construction Industry, edited by J. Thiel, V. Dimitrova, and J. Ruge, 8–17. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, P. 2011. “Relational and Dialectical Spaces of Knowing: Knowledge, Practice, and Work in Economic Geography.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 43 (5): 1098–1117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a43186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., and M. Sexton. 2011. “Motivations for Innovation in the Built Environment: New Directions for Research.” Building Research & Information 39 (5): 473–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.592268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar