Policy mixes for just sustainable development in regions specialized in carbon-intensive industries: the case of two Norwegian petro-maritime regions

References

• Andersen, A. D., and M. Gulbrandsen. 2020. “The Innovation and Industry Dynamics of Technology Phase-Out in Sustainability Transitions: Insights from Diversifying Petroleum Technology Suppliers in Norway.” Energy Research & Social Science 64: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2015. “Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience.” Regional Studies 49: 733–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 1999. “Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-Scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union.” Urban Studies 36 (3): 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, E., M. Steen, R. Sand, and S. K. Nilsen. 2014. “Resilient Peripheral Regions? The Long-Term Effects of ten Norwegian Restructuring Programmes.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 68: 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., P. Benneworth, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 41 (6): 968–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., T. Hansen, and J. V. Rekers. 2015. “Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective.” Geography Compass 9 (9): 483–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E24. 2020. Kampen om oljeskatten: Oljenæringen og tillitsvalgte barker sammen mot miljøbevegelsen og regjeringen, May 18. E24. https://e24.no/olje-og-energi/i/OpV51A/kampen-om-oljeskatten-oljenaeringen-og-tillitsvalgte-barker-sammen-mot-miljoebevegelsen-og-regjeringen
   Google Scholar
• Ekeland, A. 2016. Sysselsatte i petroleumsnæringene og relaterte næringer 2016. Oslo–Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeron University press.
   Google Scholar
• Finne, H., L. Fjell, and H. Neerland. 2008. Mellom Aker og åker: Evaluering av Innherred Vekst. Trondheim: SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagana, K., E. Uyarraa, and M. Laranjab. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (5): 702–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambhira, A., F. Green, and P. Pearson. 2018. Towards a Just and Equitable Low-Carbon Energy Transition. London: Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., F. Kern, G. Fuchs, N. Hinderer, G. Kungl, J. Mylan, M. Neukirch, and S. Sandra Wassermann. 2016. “The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: A Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-level Analysis of the German and UK Low-carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014).” Research Policy 45: 896–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. 2018. Transition Policy for Climate Change Mitigation: Who, What, Why and How. CCEP Working Paper 1805. The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and T. Hansen. 2019. “Green Industry Development in Different Types of Regions.” European Planning Studies 27: 2163–2183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., J. Rekers, and M. Sotarauta. 2019. “Trinity of Change Agency: Connecting Agency and Structure in Studies of Regional Development.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., and L. Coenen. 2015. “The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmen, A. K., and J. K. Fosse. 2017. “Regional Agency and Constitution of New Paths: A Study of Agency in Early Formation of new Paths on the West Coast of Norway.” European Planning Studies 25: 498–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. 2018. “Setting Energy Justice Apart from the Crowd: Lessons from Environmental and Climate Justice.” Energy Research & Social Science 39: 117–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1993. “Towards a Schumpeterian VVorkfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post- Fordist Political Economy.” Studies in Political Economy 40: 7–39.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, R. 2007. Sluttrapport for Samspelsforum for NæringsUtvikling AS Kommunene Stord, Fitjar og Sveio. Lysaker: institutt for organisasjonsutvikling DA.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, A. 2011. “Cluster Creation by Reconfiguring Communities of Practice.” European Planning Studies 19: 753–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., K. Rogge, and M. Howlett. 2019. “Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: New Approaches and Insights through Bridging Innovation and Policy Studies.” Research Policy 48: 103832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., S. Laakso, A. Lonkila, and M. Kaljonena. 2021. “Moving Beyond Disruptive Innovation: A Review of Disruption in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38: 110–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaaa, P., and F. Kern. 2016. “Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Support? Innovation Policy Mixes.” Research Policy 45: 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., A. Karlsen, S. Dawley, M. Steen, S. Afewerki, and A. Kenzhegaliyeva. 2021. “Legitimation, Institutions and Regional Path Creation: a Cross-National Study of Offshore Wind.” Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., H. E. Normann, T. M. Thune, and J. S. Gonzalez. 2019. “The Green Flings: Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry’s Engagement in Offshore Wind Power.” Energy Policy 127: 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., F. Geels, and R. Raven. 2020. “Challenges in the Acceleration of Sustainability.” Environmental Research Letters 15: 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.” Research Policy 41: 955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., and D. Mulvaney. 2013. “The Political Economy of the ‘Just Transition’.” The Geographical Journal 179: 132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. 2015. New Emission Commitment for Norway for 2030 – Towards Joint Fulfilment with the EU. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Petroleum. 2020. Exploration Activity. norskpetroleum.no: https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/exploration/exploration-activity/
   Google Scholar
• NRK. 2020. Røkke sier skattesystemet er «skapt av genier», September 16. NRK: https://www.nrk.no/norge/rokke-sier-skattesystemet-er-_skapt-av-genier_-1.15162097
   Google Scholar
• NRK. 2020. Slik blir endringene i oljeskatten, June 08. NRK.no: https://www.nrk.no/emne/olje-og-gass-1.224928
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, K., and K. Reichardt. 2016. “Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: An Extended Concept and Framework for Analysis.” Research Policy 45: 1620–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryner, M. 2007. “The Nordic Model: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?” New Political Economy 12: 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæther, B., A. Isaksen, and A. Karlsen. 2011. “Innovation by Co-Evolution in Natural Resource Industries: The Norwegian Experience.” Geoforum 42: 373–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøtun, S. G., and R. Njøs. 2019. “Green Reorientation of Clusters and the Role of Policy: ‘The Normative’ and ‘the Neutral’ Route.” European Planning Studies 27: 2411–2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and A. Karlsen. 2014. “Path Creation in a Single-Industry Town: The Case of Verdal and Windcluster Mid-Norway.” Norwegian Journal of Geography 68: 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevis, D., and R. Felli. 2015. “Global Labour Unions and Just Transition to a Green.” Int Environ Agreements 15: 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., M. Asquith, and F. Geels. 2020. “Making Sustainability Transitions Research Policy-Relevant: Challenges at the Sicience -Policy Interface.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., and B. Sovacool. 2020. “Forever Stuck in Old Ways? Pluralising Incumbencies in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35: 180–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., and A. Doyon. 2019. “Justice in Energy Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. California: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar