References
- Archibugi, D., and M. Planta. 1996. “Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys.” Technovation 16 (9): 451–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
- Armbruster, H., A. Bikfalvi, S. Kinkel, and G. Lay. 2008. “Organizational Innovation: The Challenge of Measuring Non-Technical Innovation in Large-Scale Surveys.” Technovation 28 (10): 644–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.003
- Asheim, B., H. Smith, and C. Oughton. 2011. “Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy.” Regional Studies 45 (7): 875–891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
- Bachtler, J., I. Begg, D. Charles, and L. Polverari. 2017. “The Long-Term Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy: Assessing the Achievements of the ERDF, 1989-2012.” In EU Cohesion Policy, edited by P. B. J. Bachtler, 11–20. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis.
- Balland, P., R. Boschma, J. Crespo, and D. Rigby. 2019. “Smart Specialisation Policy in the European Union: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification.” Regional Studies 53 (9): 1252–1268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
- Balland, P., R. Boschma, and J. Ravet. 2019. “Network Dynamics in Collaborative Research in the EU, 2003–2017.” European Planning Studies 27 (9): 1811–1837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1641187
- Bliemel, M., and E. Maine. 2008. “Network Embeddedness as a Predictor of Performance for New Technology-Based Firms.” International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship 1 (3): 313–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTE.2008.020542
- Cappellano, F., and J. Kurowska-Pysz. 2020. “The Mission-Oriented Approach for (Cross-Border) Regional Development.” Sustainability 12 (12): 5181. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125181
- Centre, E. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD publishing.
- Coenen, L., T. Hansen, and J. Rekers. 2015. “Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. an Economic Geography Perspective.” Geography Compass 9 (9): 483–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12231
- Coenen, L., J. Moodysson, and B. Asheim. 2004. “Nodes, Networks and Proximities: On the Knowledge Dynamics of the Medicon Valley Biotech Cluster.” European Planning Studies 12 (7): 1003–1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000267876
- Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
- Dotti, N. F., and A. Spithoven, 2017. “Spatial perspectives on knowledge brokers: Evidence from Brussels.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (10): 2203–2222.
- Dotti, N. F., and A. Spithoven, 2018. Economic drivers and specialization patterns in the spatial distribution of Framework Programme's participation. Papers in Regional Science, 97 (4): 863–882.
- Dyer, D., and J. Keating. 1979. Methodology for Testing Homogeneity of Variances. University of Texas at Arlington: Arlington.
- Engels, T., T. Ossenblok, and E. Spruyt. 2012. “Changing Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009.” Scientometrics 93 (2): 373–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2
- European Commission. 2019, 05 25. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2019 Methodology Report. Retrieved from European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/37783
- European Environment Agency. 2017. Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Fagerberg, J. 2018. “Mobilising Innovation for Sustainability Transitions: A Comment on Transformative Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1568–1576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012
- Fagerberg, J., and Hutschenreiter, G. (2020). Coping with societal challenges: Lessons for innovation policy governance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20: 279–305.
- Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th Edition). London: Sage.
- Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and I. Wanzenböck. 2021. “Towards a Problem-Oriented Regional Industrial Policy: Possibilities for Public Intervention in Framing, Valuation and Market Creation.” CIMR Research Working Paper Series - Working Paper N.52, 1–21.
- Florio, M. 2019. Investing in Science: Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Research Infrastructures. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Garcia-Bernabeu, A., J. Cabello, and F. Ruiz. 2020. “A Multi-Criteria Reference Point Based Approach for Assessing Regional Innovation Performance in Spain.” Mathematics 8 (5): 797. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050797
- Glänzel, W., H. Moed, U. Schmoch, and M. Thelwall. 2019. Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380.
- Grillitsch, M., T. Hansen, L. Coenen, J. Miörner, and J. Moodysson. 2019. “Innovation Policy for System-Wide Transformation: The Case of Strategic Innovation Programmes (SIPs) in Sweden.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1048–1061. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
- Grupp, H., and M. Mogee. 2004. “Indicators for National Science and Technology Policy: How Robust are Composite Indicators?” Research Policy 33 (9): 1373–1384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.007
- Grupp, H., and T. Schubert. 2010. “Review and new Evidence on Composite Innovation Indicators for Evaluating National Performance.” Research Policy 39 (1): 67–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002
- Hauser, C., M. Siller, T. Schatzer, J. Walde, and G. Tappeiner. 2018. “Measuring Regional Innovation: A Critical Inspection of the Ability of Single Indicators to Shape Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 129, 43–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019
- Hekkert, M., M. Janssen, J. Wesseling, and S. Negro. 2020. “Mission-oriented Innovation Systems.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 76–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011
- Hoekman, J., K. Frenken, and R. Tijssen. 2010. “Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration Within Europe.” Research Policy 39 (5): 662–673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
- Jolliffe, I. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer.
- Kalutkiewicz, M., and R. Ehman. 2014. “Patents as Proxies: NIH Hubs of Innovation.” Nature Biotechnology 32 (6): 536–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2917
- Kogler, D., G. Heimeriks, and L. Leydesdorff. 2018. “Patent Portfolio Analysis of Cities: Statistics and Maps of Technological Inventiveness.” European Planning Studies 26 (11): 2256–2278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1530147
- Lepori, B., and M. Guerini. 2017. KNOWMAK Manual (D5.2). Retrieved from https://project.knowmak.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/KNOWMAK-D5.2-KNOWMAK-Manual.pdf
- Li, G., and Q. Weng. 2007. “Measuring the Quality of Life in City of Indianapolis by Integration of Remote Sensing and Census Data.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 28 (2): 249–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600735624
- Lim, K. 2004. “The Relationship Between Research and Innovation in the Semiconductor and Pharmaceutical Industries (1981–1997).” Research Policy 33: 287–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.08.001
- Loorbach, D. 2007. Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Utrecht: International Books.
- Lupova-Henry, E., and N. Dotti. 2019. “Governance of Sustainable Innovation: Moving Beyond the Hierarchy-Market-Network Trichotomy? A Systematic Literature Review Using the ‘who-how-What’framework.” Journal of Cleaner Production 210: 738–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.068
- Makkonen, T., and R. van der Have. 2013. “Benchmarking Regional Innovative Performance: Composite Measures and Direct Innovation Counts.” Scientometrics 94 (1): 247–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0753-2
- Martin, H. 2020. “The Scope of Regional Innovation Policy to Realise Transformative Change–a Case Study of the Chemicals Industry in Western Sweden.” European Planning Studies 28 (12): 2409–2427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1722616
- Maynard, D., B. Lepori, J. Petrak, X. Song, and P. Laredo. 2020. “Using Ontologies to Map Between Research Data and Policymakers’ Presumptions: The Experience of the KNOWMAK Project.” Scientometrics 125 (2): 1275–1290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03664-6
- Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
- Mazzucato, M., and C. Perez. 2015. “Innovation as Growth Policy.” In The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change, and Governance, edited by J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius, and B. R. Martin, 229–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McCann, P., and L. Soete. 2020. Place-based Innovation for Sustainability (No. JRC121271). Joint Research Center: Seville.
- Moed, H., W. Glänzel, and U. Schmoch. 2006. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Mueller, S., P. Sandner, and I. Welpe. 2015. “Monitoring Innovation in Electrochemical Energy Storage Technologies: A Patent-Based Approach.” Applied Energy 137, 537–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.082
- Muhonen, R., P. Benneworth, and J. Olmos-Peñuela. 2020. “From Productive Interactions to Impact Pathways: Understanding the Key Dimensions in Developing SSH Research Societal Impact.” Research Evaluation 29 (1): 34–47.
- Nagaoka, S., K. Motohashi, and A. Goto. 2010. “Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. Hall, and N. Rosenberg, 1083–1127. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Nelson, A. 2009. “Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion.” Research Policy 38: 994–1005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023
- Pahl-Wostl, C. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes.” Global Environmental Change 19 (3): 354–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
- Parrilli, M., and H. Heras. 2016. “STI and DUI Innovation Modes: Scientific-Technological and Context-Specific Nuances.” Research Policy 45 (4): 747–756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.001
- Pyka, A. 2017. “Dedicated Innovation Systems to Support the Transformation Towards Sustainability: Creating Income Opportunities and Employment in the Knowledge-Based Digital Bioeconomy.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3 (4): 27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7
- Rijke, J., R. Brown, C. Zevenbergen, R. Ashley, M. Farrelly, P. Morison, and S. van Herk. 2012. “Fit-for-purpose Governance: A Framework to Make Adaptive Governance Operational.” Environmental Science & Policy 22: 73–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010
- Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. “Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?” Regional Studies 47 (7): 1034–1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., and U. Fratesi, 2007. Explaining the scarce returns of European structural policies from a new economic geography perspective. New Directions in Economic Geography: New Horizons in Regional Science, 338–358.
- Salas Gironés, E., R. van Est, and G. Verbong. 2019. “Transforming Mobility: The Dutch Smart Mobility Policy as an Example of a Transformative STI Policy.” Science and Public Policy 46 (6): 820–833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz032
- Schot, J., and W. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–1567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
- Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2018. “Regional Innovation Policies for New Path Development–Beyond neo-Liberal and Traditional Systemic Views.” European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1779–1795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
- Tödtling, F., M. Trippl, and V. Desch. 2021. “New Directions for RIS Studies and Policies in the Face of Grand Societal Challenges (No. 2021 (01)).” GEIST Working Paper Series.
- Trippl, M., M. Grillitsch, and A. Isaksen. 2018. “Exogenous Sources of Regional Industrial Change: Attraction and Absorption of Non-Local Knowledge for New Path Development.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 687–705. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517700982
- Uyarra, E., B. Ribeiro, and L. Dale-Clough. 2019. “Exploring the Normative Turn in Regional Innovation Policy: Responsibility and the Quest for Public Value.” European Planning Studies 27 (12): 2359–2375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1609425
- Wanzenböck, I., and K. Frenken. 2020. “The Subsidiarity Principle in Innovation Policy for Societal Challenges.” Global Transitions 2: 51–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.002
- Wanzenböck, I., R. Lata, and D. Ince. 2020. “Proposal Success in Horizon 2020: A Study of the Influence of Consortium Characteristics.” Quantitative Science Studies 1 (3): 1136–1158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00067
- Weber, K., and H. Rohracher. 2012. “Legitimising Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change: Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-Level Perspective in a Comprehensive ‘Failures’ Framework.” Research Policy 41 (6): 1037–1047.