Strategic spatial planning for sustainable development – Swedish planners’ institutional capacity

References

• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2006. “Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects.” European Planning Studies 14 (10): 1487–1500. doi:10.1080/09654310600852464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2010. “More of the Same is not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37 (6): 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2013. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by Using a Coproduction Perspective.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 46–63. doi:10.1177/1473095212452722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2015. “Ingredients for a More Radical Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design 42 (3): 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” disP – The Planning Review 49 (3): 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., A. Barbanente, and V. Monno. 2020. “Practicing Transformative Planning: The Territory–Landscape Plan as a Catalyst for Change.” City, Territory and Architecture 7 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s40410-019-0111-2.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2012. “Post-political Spatial Planning in England: A Crisis of Consensus?” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (1): 89–103. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2002. “Spatialities of Globalisation.” Environment & Planning A 34 (3): 385. doi:10.1068/a3439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banai, R. 2013. “Plan vs Project Dilemma Revisited: A Progress Review of Urban and Regional Studies Literature.” Urban Studies 50 (4): 807–824. doi:10.1177/0042098012458548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blücher, G. 2006. “Vad betyder det kommunala planmonopolet när kommunerna säljer mark.” In Planering med nya förutsättningar: ny lagstiftning, nya värderingar, edited by G. Blücher and G. Graninger, 133–156. Vadstena: Stiftelsen Vadstena forum för samhällsbyggande.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P. 2014. “The Relationship Between Spatial Planning and Economic Competitiveness: The ‘Path to Economic Nirvana’ or a ‘Dangerous Obsession’.” Environment and Planning A 46 (4): 770–787. doi:10.1068/a4687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. “Urban Governance and the Production of New State Spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000.” Review of International Political Economy 11 (3): 447–488. doi:10.1080/0969229042000282864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. 2004. What to do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. London: Prentince Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., V. Castán Broto, M. Hodson, et al. 2011. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., R. Burgess, and M. Badenhorst. 2009. Planning Through Projects: Moving from Master Planning to Strategic Planning: 30 Cities. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., P. Hall, and A. Power. 2008. “Key Issues for Planning Futures and the Way Forward.” Twenty-First Century Society 3 (3): 229–247. doi:10.1080/17450140802376304.
   Google Scholar
• De Magalhães, C., P. Healey, A. Madanipour, et al. 2002. “Assessing Institutional Capacity for City Centre Regeneration: Newcastle’s Grainger Town.” In Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux, edited by G. Cars, P. Healey, and A. Madanipour, 45–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., and S. Niemeyer. 2006. “Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 634–649. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmqvist, T., M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, et al. 2013. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment. Germany, Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., V. Broto Castan, and L. Coenen. 2017. Urban Sustainability Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricsson, C., and L. Smas. 2015. “Tensions in Nordic Urban Planning.” Nordregio News 2: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Urban Experimentation & Sustainability Transitions.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 219–228. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., and B. Truffer. 2016. “The Interplay of Institutions, Actors and Technologies in Socio-technical Systems – An Analysis of Transformations in the Australian Urban Water Sector.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 103: 298–312. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., H. Mattila, and R. Mäntysalo. 2021. “Multiple Dimensions of Strategic Spatial Planning: Local Authorities Navigating Between Rationalities in Competitive and Collaborative Settings.” Planning Theory & Practice 22 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1904148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, S., B. Hermelin, and L. Smas. 2019. “Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Strategic Spatial Planning: The Importance of Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (8): 1321–1338. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1495620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendinger, and D. Counsell. 2010. The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendinger, and S. Oosterlynck. 2013. “Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality.” Environment and Planning A 45 (1): 217–234. doi:10.1068/a45121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1998. “Building Institutional Capacity Through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning.” Environment and Planning A 30 (9): 1531–1546. doi:10.1068/a301531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2004. “The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (1): 45–67. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies – Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2009. “In Search of the “Strategic” in Spatial Strategy Making.” Planning Theory and Practice 10 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1080/14649350903417191.
   Google Scholar
• Helsingborg Municipality. 2010. Översiktsplan för Helsingborgs kommun, ÖP 2010 - en strategisk översiktsplan för Helsingborgs utveckling. Planhandling. Antagen av kommunfullmäktige 18 maj 2010. Stadsbyggnadsförvaltningen: Helsingborg, 2010. In English: Comprehensive Plan for Helsingborg.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., F. Geels, and A. McMeekin. 2017. “Reconfiguring Urban Sustainability Transitions, Analysing Multiplicity.” Sustainability 9 (2): 1–20. doi:10.3390/su9020299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högström, J., B. Balfors, and M. Hammer. 2018. “Planning for Sustainability in Expansive Metropolitan Regions: Exploring Practices and Planners’ Expectations in Stockholm.” Sweden. European Planning Studies 26 (3): 439–457. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1391751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hytönen, J., and T. Ahlqvist. 2019. “Emerging Vacuums of Strategic Planning: An Exploration of Reforms in Finnish Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 27 (7): 1350–1368. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1580248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., and P. Hagbert. 2020. “Institutional Capacity to Integrate ‘Radical’ Perspectives on Sustainability in Small Municipalities: Experiences from Sweden.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36: 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., and S. Storbjörk. 2012. “Strategy Making and Power in Environmental Assessments. Lessons from the Establishment of an Out-of-Town Shopping Centre in Västerås, Sweden.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 34: 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linköping Municipality. 2010. Linköpings översiktsplan del 1. Gemensam översiktsplan för Linköping och Norrköping. Antagen av kommunfullmäktige i Linköping 10 juni 2010. In English: Comprehensive Plan for Linköping and Norrköping.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström, M., C. Fredriksson, and J. Witzell. 2013. Planning and Sustainable Urban Development in Sweden. Stockholm: Föreningen för samhällsplanering.
   Google Scholar
• Malmö municipality, 2018. Översiktsplan för Malmö. Planstrategi. Antagen av kommunfullmäktige 31 maj 2018. Malmö, Sweden: Stadsbyggnadskontoret.
   Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., and A. Faludi. 1997. “Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24 (6): 815–832. doi:10.1068/b240815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 2000. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Norell Bergendahl, A. 2016. “Den ohållbara resan mot det hållbara resandet: en studie av institutionella förutsättningar för att bedriva planering för hållbart resande i Stockholmsregionen. Thesis.” (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan). Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1991. “Institutions.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. 2014. “The Neoliberalisation of Strategic Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory 13 (3): 288–303. doi:10.1177/1473095213499340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. 2021. “Unsettling the Copenhagen Finger Plan: Towards Neoliberalization of a Planning Doctrine?” International Planning Studies, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13563475.2021.1945913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., J. Van den Broeck, and L. Albrechts. 2010. Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., N. Brenner, and N. Theodore. 2018. “Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism, edited by D. Cahill, M. Cooper, and M. Konings, 3–15. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2010. “Mobilizing Policy: Models, Methods, and Mutations.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 41 (2): 169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, C. 2019. “Perform or Conform? Looking for the Strategic in Municipal Spatial Planning in Sweden.” European Planning Studies 28 (6): 1183–1199. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1614150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk, M. 2011. “Institutional Capacity-Building in Urban Planning and Policy-Making for Sustainable Development: Success or Failure?” Planning Practice & Research 26 (2): 185–206. doi:10.1080/02697459.2011.560461.
   Google Scholar
• Rivolin, J. 2008. “Conforming and Performing Planning Systems in Europe: An Unbearable Cohabitation.” Planning Practice & Research 23 (2): 167–186. doi:10.1080/02697450802327081.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2020. “Institutions and the Fortunes of Territories.” Regional Science Policy and Practice 12 (3): 371–386. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. 2021. Befolkningsstatistik, Folkmängd i riket, län och kommuner 31 december 2020 och befolkningsförändringar 2020. Table. 2021-02-22.Stockholm. https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningens-sammansattning/befolkningsstatistik/pong/tabell-och-diagram/helarsstatistik--kommun-lan-och-riket/folkmangd-i-riket-lan-och-kommuner-31-december-2020-och-befolkningsforandringar-2020
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2016. “Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life.” In Practice Theory and Research, edited by G. Spaargaren, D. Weenick, and M. Lamers, 28–42. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skellefteå kommun. 1991. Översiktsplan. Skellefteå kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., F. Moulaert, and A. Rodriguez. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode 34 (3): 542–577. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., N. Gallent, and J. Morphet. 2010. “An Anatomy of Spatial Planning: Coming to Terms with the Spatial Element in UK Planning.” European Planning Studies 18 (2): 239–257. doi:10.1080/09654310903491572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., E. Störmer, M. Maurer, et al. 2010. “Local Strategic Planning Processes and Sustainability Transitions in Infrastructure Sectors.” Environmental Policy and Governance 20 (4): 258–269. doi:10.1002/eet.550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat . 2020. World Cities Report 2020, The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., and P. Healey. 1999. “Territorial Integration and ‘Plan-Led’ Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 14 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/02697459915698.
   Google Scholar
• Vojnovic, I. 2014. “Urban Sustainability: Research, Politics, Policy and Practice.” Cities 41 (1): 30–44. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Waaranperä, U. 2013. Visionära verk? En kartläggning av svenska myndigheters visionsformuleringar. Stockholms Centrum för Forskning om Offentlig Sektor (SCORE). Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet.
   Google Scholar