Learning to reflect collectively: how to create the right environment for discussing participatory planning practice?

References

• Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. Schön. 1996. Organisational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, C. 2015. “Reflection in Teacher Education: Issues Emerging from a Review of Current Literature.” Reflective Practice 16 (1): 123–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., D. Laws, M. Higgins, R. Scholz, M. Stauffacher, J. Vanaken, and T. Sieverts. 2010. “Reflection in Action, Still Engaging the Professional? Introduction Practising “Beyond the Stable State” Building Reflectiveness Into Education to Develop Creative Practitioners.” Planning Theory & Practice 11: 597–619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.525370
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B. 2015. Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship: A Post-structuralist Agenda for Self-organization in Spatial Planning. Groningen: InPlanning.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B., and W. Rawls. 2021. “Ontological Diversity in Urban Self-organization: Complexity, Critical Realism and Poststructuralism.” Planning Theory, 20 (4): 303–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095221992392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2010. “Relocating Reflection in the Context of Practice.” In Beyond Reflective Practice: New Approaches to Professional Lifelong Learning, edited by H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster, and M. Zukas, 25–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and P. Hager. 2012. “Rethinking Continuing Professional Development Through Changing Metaphors and Location in Professional Practices.” Studies in Continuing Education 34: 17–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.608656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., F. Nick, S. Kilminster, and M. Zukas. 2010. Beyond Reflective Practice: New Approaches to Professional Lifelong Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 2010. “Critical Reflection as an Adult Learning Process.” In Handbook of Reflection and Reflective Inquiry: Mapping a way of Knowing for Professional Reflective Inquiry, edited by N. Lyons, 215–236. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., M. Tait, and C. Watkins. 2014. “Is There Space for Better Planning in a Neoliberal World? Implications for Planning Practice and Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 34: 45–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, S., and T. Karsenti. 2011. “The Collective Dimension of Reflective Practice: The How and Why.” Reflective Practice 12: 569–581. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.590346
   Google Scholar
• De Blust, S., O. Devisch, and J. Schreurs. 2019. “Towards a Situational Understanding of Collective Learning: A Reflexive Framework.” Urban Planning 4: 19–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i1.1673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leo, D., and J. Forester. 2017. “Reimagining Planning: Moving from Reflective Practice to Deliberative Practice – a First Exploration in the Italian Context.” Planning Theory & Practice 18: 202–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1284254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, B., J. Yip, E. Bonsignore, and C. Disalvo. 2017. Participatory Design for Learning, Perspectives from Practice and Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, R. 2012. “Reflective Practice.” In Planning Ideas That Matter, edited by B. Sanyal, L. Vale, and C. Rosan, 313–332. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. 2010. “Beyond Reflective Practice: Reworking the ‘Critical’ in Critical Reflection.” In Beyond Reflective Practice: New Approaches to Professional Lifelong Learning, edited by H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster, and M. Zukas, 37–51. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, NY: Albany State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2013. “On the Theory and Practice of Critical Pragmatism: Deliberative Practice and Creative Negotiations.” Planning Theory 12: 5–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 2008. “The Uses of Planning Theory A Bibliographic Essay.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 247–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08325220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, F. 2014. Being Critically Reflective. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, A. 2019. “Rethinking Reflective Practice in Professional Lifelong Learning Using Learning Metaphors.” Studies in Continuing Education 41: 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1474867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. 2015. Planning and Conflict. Oxford: RTPI and Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2009. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 277–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08325175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. 1995. “Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 183–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadlec, A. 2006. “Reconstructing Dewey: The Philosophy of Critical Pragmatism.” Polity 38: 519–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300067
   Google Scholar
• Kuhk, A., H. Heynen, L. Huybrechts, J. Schreurs, and F. Moulaert. 2019. Participatiegolven. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, E. 1926. The Meaning of Adult Education. New York, NY: New Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., L. Soneryd, and S. Linke. 2017. “The Legitimization of Concern: A Flexible Framework for Investigating the Enactment of Stakeholders in Environmental Planning and Governance Processes.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49: 2517–2535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17727284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., and E. Street. 2015. “Planning at the Neighbourhood Scale: Localism, Dialogic Politics and the Modulation of Community Action.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 794–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/c1363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2011. “Neo-liberal Urban Planning Policies: A Literature Survey 1990–2010.” Progress in Planning 76: 147–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. 2014. “Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 23: 18–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. 2019. “Reflecting on Theory and Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 20: 3–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1574380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakhour, S. 2020. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Public Participation in Planning: Contrasting Optimistic, Critical, and Agnostic Understandings.” Planning Theory 19: 349–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219897404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar