Implementing the transformative innovation policy in the European Union: how does transformative change occur in Member States?

References

• Acciai, C., and G. Capano. 2021. “Policy Instruments at Work: A Meta-analysis of Their Applications.” Public Administration 99: 118–136. doi:10.1111/padm.12673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beffa, J. 2005. Pour une nouvelle politique industrielle. Paris: La Documentation française.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2009. Key Concepts in Governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., and M. Haverland. 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A. 2016. “Beyond Success Stories in Innovation Policies: The Need for Middle-level Theories.” Stato & Mercato 106: 69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, W., and J. Edler. 2018. “Demand, Challenges, and Innovation. Making Sense of new Trends in Innovation Policy.” Science and Public Policy 45: 435–447. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. 2015. “Reforms of National Innovation Policies in Europe: Coordinating Sensemaking Across Countries.” In Sources of National Institutional Competitiveness, edited by S. Borras, and L. Seabrooke, 60–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. 2018. “Changes in European Research and Innovation Governance: Coordination Effects & Membership Effects.” In Handbook of Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 401–418. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S., and C. Edquist. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80: 1513–1522. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S., and C. Edquist. 2019. Holistic Innovation Policy: Theoretical Foundations, Policy Problems and Instrument Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. 2008. “Lessons on the Political Coordination of Knowledge and Innovation Policies.” Science and Public Policy 35: 289–298. doi:10.3152/030234208X310347.
   Google Scholar
• Breznitz, D., D. Ornston, and S. Samford. 2018. “Mission Critical: The Ends, Means and Design of Innovation Agencies.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27: 883–896. doi:10.1093/icc/dty027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, L. 2013. “Europe 2020: A Strategy in Search of a Regional Policy Rationale?” Policy Studies 34 (3): 274–290. doi:10.1080/01442872.2013.771056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürzel, T.1999. “Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 573–596. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2020. Economic Growth and Cohesion Policy Implementation in Italy and Spain. Institutions, Strategic Choices, Administrative Change. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2021a. “Centralizing Cohesion Policy in Times of Austerity: Evidence from the Policy Cycle.” Policy Studies 42 (4): 397–414. doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1606903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2021b. “Under Which Conditions is Cohesion Policy Effective: Proposing an Hirschmanian Approach to EU Structural Funds.” Regional & Federal Studies 31 (4): 541–567. doi:10.1080/13597566.2020.1713110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M., and F. Di Mascio. 2021. “Le politiche d'innovazione in prospettiva comparata: i casi di Germania e Francia.” In Lo stato promotore. Come cambia l'intervento pubblico in economia, edited by F. Bassanini, G. Napolitano, and L. Torchia, 279–317. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Casula, M., N. Rangarajan, and P. Shields. 2021. “The Potential of Working Hypotheses for Deductive Exploratory Research.” Quality & Quantity 55: 1703–1725. doi:10.1007/s11135-020-01072-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CEU. 2000. Presidency Conclusions-Lisbon European Council. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• CNEPI. 2016. Quinze ans de politiques d’innovation en France. Parigi: Commission nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. 2007. “Industrial Policies in France: The Old and the New.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 7: 213–227. doi:10.1007/s10842-007-0024-8.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions. 2014. Charter for Multilevel Governance in Europe. Brussels: Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Darvas, Z., and A. Leandro. 2015. The Limitations of Policy Coordination in the Euro Area Under the European Semester. Bruxelles: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R. 2010. “Variations on a Theme. Governing the Knowledge-based Society in the EU Through Methods of Open Coordination in Education and R&D.” Journal of European Integration 32: 157–173. doi:10.1080/07036330903486011.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. 2008. “Comparative Analysis: Case-oriented Versus Variable-oriented Research.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. Della Porta and M. Keating, 198–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., and M. Keating. 2008. “Comparing Approaches, Methodologies and Methods. Some Concluding Remarks.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. Della Porta and M. Keating, 316–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., P. Cunningham, A. Gök, and P. Shapira. 2016. Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and J. Fagerberg. 2017. “Innovation Policy: What, Why, and How.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33: 2–23. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2019. “Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a Role Model?” Research Policy 48: 869–879. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFI. 2016. “Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany: Report 2016.” Berlino: ExpertenKomission Forschung und Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• EFI. 2017. “Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany: Report 2017.” Berlino: ExpertenKomission Forschung und Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• EFI. 2018. “Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany: Report 2018.” Berlino: ExpertenKomission Forschung und Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, K., and G. Wolff. 2018. Is the European Semester Effective and Useful? Bruxelles: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges.” Bruxelles: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Research and Innovation Performance in the EU: Innovation Union Progress at the Country Level.” Bruxelles: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017a. “LAB-FAB-APP. Investing in the European Future We Want, Report of the Independent High-level Group on Maximising the Impact of EU Research & Innovation Programmes.” Bruxelles: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017b. Europe’s Future: Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World, Reflections of the RISE Group (Research, Innovation and Science Policy Experts). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018a. A Renewed European Agenda for Research and Innovation - Europe's Chance to Shape its Future. Bruxelles: COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018b. Accelerating Breakthrough Innovation: Full set of Recommendations from the Independent High-level Group of Innovators on Establishing a European Innovation Council. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018c. Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2018. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018d. “Transitions on the Horizon: Perspectives for the European Union's future research and innovation policies.” Final report from project BOHEMIA, ‘Beyond the horizon: Foresight in support of the EU’s future research and innovation policy’, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. Reflection Paper: Towards a Sustainable Europe by 2030. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020a. Transformative Innovation and Socio-technical Transitions to Address Grand Challenges. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020b. European Innovation Scoreboard 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020c. Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2018. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020d. Delivering on Europe’s Recovery Through Research and Innovation. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020e. Protect, Prepare and Transform Europe: Recovery and Resilience Post COVID-19. ESIR Policy Brief no. 1. Bruxelles: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States & Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2016. “Innovation Systems and Policy: A Tale of Three Countries.” Stato & Mercato 36: 13–39. doi:10.1425/82941.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K. E. Uyarra and M. Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40: 702–713. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., and E. Uyarra. 2016. “Four Dangers in Innovation Policy Studies – and how to Avoid Them.” Industry and Innovation 23: 177–188. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPI. 2008. Innovazione Industriale e Competitività: Francia, Germania, Regno Unito e Spagna a Confronto. Roma: Istituto per la Promozione Industriale.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 1999. “Ideas and Interests; Agendas and Implementation: An Evolutionary Explanation of Policy Change in British Local Government Finance.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (1): 39–62. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00003.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R., and H. Prange. 2004. “Managing Diversity in a System of Multi-Level Governance: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Innovation Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 11: 249–266. doi:10.1080/1350176042000194421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., and M. Mazzuccato. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27: 787–801. doi:10.1093/icc/dty032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirs, M., E. Karo, and K. Ukrainski. 2021. “Transformative Change and Policy-making: The Case of Bioeconomy Policies in the EU Frontrunners and Lessons for Latecomers.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13511610.2021.2003186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and A. Rip. 2014. “The Challenge of addressing grand challenges. A think piece on how innovation can be driven towards the “grand challenges” as defined under the European Union framework programme Horizon 2020,” Report to ERIAB.
   Google Scholar
• Larédo, P., and P. Mustar. 2001. “French Research and Innovation Policy: Two Decades of Transformation.” In Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. An International Comparative Analysis, edited by P. Larédo and P. Mustar, 447–495. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lauvergeon, A. 2013. Un Principe e Sept Ambitions Pour L’innovation. Paris: La Documentation française.
   Google Scholar
• Levratto, N., S. Lhuillery, and T. Zacharewicz. 2018. “RIO Country Report 2017: France.” Lussemburgo: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Littig, B. 2011. “Interviews, Expert.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Science, edited by B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, and L. Morlino, 1343–1346. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. 2005. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed.” Policy Studies 26 (3–4): 291–230. doi:10.1080/01442870500198361.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 1999. “Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (4): 1154–1196. doi:10.1086/210139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and G. Goertz. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 227–249. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mako, C., and M. Illessy. 2015. “Innovation policy review: National and European experience.” QuInnE Working Paper. Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: France 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Main Science and Technology Indicators, Volume 2020, Issue 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science. London: The Tower Building.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2011. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D. 2003. “Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 305–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffa, C., and M. Evangelista. 2021. “Searching for a Middle Ground? A Spectrum of Views of Causality in Qualitative Research.” Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 51 (2): 164–181. doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.10.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47: 1554–1567. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serger, S. S., E. Wise, and E. Arnold. 2015. National Research & Innovation Councils as an Instrument of Innovation Governance. Lund: VINNOVA Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., and M. Somers. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197. doi:10.1017/S0010417500009282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, R., S. Kuhlmann, and P. Shapira. 2010. The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 2007. “From Industrial to Innovation Policy.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 7: 273–284. doi:10.1007/s10842-007-0019-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sofka, W. 2015. “RIO Country Report 2014: Germany.” Lussemburgo: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E. 2015. “Customizing Europe: Transposition as Bottom-up Implementation.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (10): 1368–1387. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E. 2019. Customized Implementation of European Union Food Safety Policy: United in Diversity? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., and F. Sager. 2018. Innovative Approaches to EU Multilevel Implementation: Moving Beyond Legal Compliance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, A., and E. Thomann. 2021. “‘I did it my Way’: Customisation and Practical Compliance with EU Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.185959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar