Migration, place-making and the rescaling of urban space

References

• Abdelhady, D. 2008. “Representing the Homeland: Lebanese Diasporic Notions of Home and Return in a Global Context.” Cultural Dynamics 20 (1): 53–72. doi:10.1177/0921374007088055.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S., C. Castada, A. M. Fortier, and M. Sheller. 2020. Uprootings/Regroundings: Questions of Home and Migration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baycan-Levent, T., and P. Nijkamp. 2009. “Characteristics of Migrant Entrepreneurship in Europe.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 21 (4): 375–397. doi:10.1080/08985620903020060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. 2015. Planning Matter: Acting with Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. 2016. Migration and the Search for Home: Mapping Domestic Space in Migrants’ Everyday Lives. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P., and A. M. Brighenti. 2017. “Immigrants and Home in the Making: Thresholds of Domesticity, Commonality and Publicness.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9487-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. 2009. The Urban Connection: An Actor-Relational Approach to Urban Planning. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boym, S. 2008. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brembeck, H. 2019. “Metamorphoses, or How Self-Storage Turned from Homes into Hotels.” In Overwhelmed by Overflows?, edited by B. Czarniawaska, and O. Löfgren, 44–59. Lund: Lund University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2010. “On Territorology: Towards a General Science of Territory.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (1): 52–72. doi:10.1177/0263276409350357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2020. “Urban Phases: Crystallisation.” City, Culture and Society 20: 100327. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2019.100327.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, F. 2018. “Using the City: Migrant Spatial Integration as Urban Practice.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 307–320. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniggia, G., and G. L. Maffei. 2001. Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building. Firenze: Alinea Editrice.
   Google Scholar
• Cesari, J. 2005. “Mosque Conflicts in European Cities: Introduction.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (6): 1015–1024. doi:10.1080/13691830500282626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, F. L. 2012. “Transnational Mobilities and Urban Spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 316–335. doi:10.1177/0309132511423126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çaglar, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2018. Migrants and City-Making: Dispossession, Displacement, and Urban Regeneration. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Neergaard, M., L. Kofoed, and K. Simonsen. 2017. “Purpose-Built Mosques in Copenhagen: Visibility, Publicity and Cultural Dispute.” NA 29 (1): 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Diatlova, A. 2018. “Conceptualisation of Home Among Russian-Speaking Women Engaged in Commercial Sex in Finland.” Gender, Place & Culture 25 (1): 61–79. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1400950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2010. “The Craft of Scalar Practices.” Environment and Planning A 42 (2): 332–346. doi:10.1068/a4299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frykman, M. P. 2016. “Cosmopolitanism in Situ: Conjoining Local and Universal Concerns in a Malmö Neighbourhood.” Identities 23 (1): 35–50. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2015.1016525.
   Google Scholar
• Frykman, M. P., and M. Humbracht. 2013. “Making Palpable Connections: Objects in Migrants’ Transnational Lives.” Ethnologia Scandinavica 43: 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., and A. Çağlar. 2009. “Towards a Comparative Theory of Locality in Migration Studies: Migrant Incorporation and City Scale.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (2): 177–202. doi:10.1080/13691830802586179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, K., and N. Björling. 2020. “Migrationens ojämna geografi.” Mistra Urban Futures Report 2020:2. Gothenburg: Mistra and Chalmers.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, C., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2013. “Translocality: Concepts, Applications and Emerging Research Perspectives.” Geography Compass 7 (5): 373–384. doi:10.1111/gec3.12048.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2013. “Rescaling the Transnational City: In Search of a ‘Trans-methodology.” Originally presented at British Sociological Association Annual Conference: Engaging Sociology, 3–5 April 2013, British Sociological Association, Grand Connaught Rooms, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hatuka, T., and E. Toch. 2016. “The Emergence of Portable Private-Personal Territory: Smartphones, Social Conduct and Public Spaces.” Urban Studies 53 (10): 2192–2208. doi:10.1177/0042098014524608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2007. Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvi, L. 2016. “Exploring the Domestic Homes of Sikhs in Finland as a “Cosmos of Senses”.” Home Cultures 13 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/17406315.2016.1122963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J. 2013. Transcultural Cities: Border Crossing and Placemaking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, A., and K. Bradley. 2017. “Planning for Sharing – Providing Infrastructure for Citizens to be Makers and Sharers.” Planning Theory & Practice 18 (4): 597–615. doi:10.1080/14649357.2017.1321776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, B. A. 2015. “Hellige bygninger på grænsefladen i dansk kommunalpolitik.” Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift 62: 91–105. doi:10.7146/rt.v0i62.22571.
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M. 2019. “Scale Alignment: On the Role of Material Culture for Urban Design.” Urban Design International 24 (1): 7–15. doi:10.1057/s41289-018-0071-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M., and J. Wirdelöv. 2019. “The Neighbourhood in Pieces: The Fragmentation of Local Public Space in a Swedish Housing Area.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 43 (5): 870–887. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koefoed, L., and K. Simonsen. 2012. “(Re)Scaling Identities: Embodied Others and Alternative Spaces of Identification.” Ethnicities 12 (5): 623–642. doi:10.1177/1468796811434487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, B. R. 2011. “Drawing Back the Curtains: The Role of Domestic Space in the Social Inclusion and Exclusion of Refugees in Rural Denmark.” Social Analysis 55 (2): 142–158. doi:10.3167/sa.2011.550208.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A., and D. P. McCormack. 2010. “Globalizations Big and Small: Notes on Urban Studies, Actor-Network Theory, and Geographical Scale.” In Urban Assemblages, edited by I. Farías, and T. Bender, 53–72. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, B. 2021. “Sensing Scalarity: Towards a Humanistic Approach to Scale.” Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/03091325211018748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listerborn, C. 2015. “Geographies of the Veil: Violent Encounters in Urban Public Spaces in Malmö, Sweden.” Social & Cultural Geography 16 (1): 95–115. doi:10.1080/14649365.2014.950690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, J. 2017. The Construction of Equality: Syriac Immigration and the Swedish City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, J. 2019. “An Awkward Technocracy: Mosques, Churches, and Urban Planners in Neoliberal Sweden.” American Ethnologist 46 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1111/amet.12736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, J. 2020. ““A “Border Concept”: Scandinavian Public Space in the Twenty-First Century.” In Architecture of Coexistence: Building Pluralism, edited by A. Aksamija, 172–183. Massachusetts: Archi Tangle.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. 2011. “Reconstructing Scale: Towards a new Scalar Politics.” Progress in Human Geography 35 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1177/0309132510367841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2005. “Issues Spark a Public into Being: A key but Often Forgotten Point of the Lippmann-Dewey Debate.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour, and P. Weijbel, 208–217. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A., and N. Smith. 2001. “States, Scales and Households.” Progress in Human Geography 25 (4): 615–619. doi:10.1191/030913201682688968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1992. “Politics and Space/Time.” New Left Review 196: 65–65.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2013. “Placing the Stakes: The Enactment of Territorial Stakeholders in Planning Processes.” Environment and Planning A 45 (4): 781–796. doi:10.1068/a45116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2014. “Spatial Planning and/as Caring for More-Than-Human Place.” Environment and Planning A 46 (5): 1001–1011. doi:10.1068/a140086c.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, N. 2013. “The Decline and Fall of Richmond Hill: Commodification and Place-Change in Late 18th-Early 19th Century New York.” Anthropological Theory 13 (1/2): 137–168. doi:10.1177/1463499613483406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, E. H., and K. Simonsen. 2003. “Scaling from ‘Below’: Practices, Strategies and Urban Spaces.” European Planning Studies 11 (8): 911–927. doi:10.1080/0965431032000146123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikielska-Sekuła, K. 2016. “Meaning and Functions of Norwegian-Turkish Vernacular Space in Drammen, Norway.” Border Crossing 6 (2): 325–336. doi:10.33182/bc.v6i2.497.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. 2007. “De religiösa samfundens betydelse som offentliga mötesplatser för människor i förskingringen.” In Periferin i centrum: gränsöverskridande praktiker i Stockholms offentliga rum, edited by K. Nylund, 333–383. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. 2008. Den självorganiserade staden: appropriation av offentliga rum i Rinkeby. Lund: Lunds universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Räthzel, N. 2005. “Hetero-Homogeneity. Some Reflections on Meeting Places in Tensta.” NA 18 (1): 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., and L. Tate. 2016. Actor Networks of Planning: Exploring the Influence of Actor Network Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. 2000. Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salih, R., and B. Riccio. 2010. “Transnational Migration and Rescaling Processes. The Incorporation of Migrant Labour.” In Locating Migration: Rescaling Cities and Migrants, edited by N. Glick Schiller, and A. Çağlar, 123–142. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, I. 2019. Towards a Minor Urbanism: Thinking Community Without Unity in Recent Makings of Public Space. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiz, A. 2017. “Staging a ‘Chinatown’ in Berlin: The Role of City Branding in the Urban Governance of Ethnic Diversity.” European Urban and Regional Studies 24 (3): 290–303. doi:10.1177/0969776416637208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoll, C., and G. Semi. 2013. “Shadow Circuits: Urban Spaces and Mobilities Across the Mediterranean.” Identities 20 (4): 377–392. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2013.822376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheringham, M. 2006. Everyday Life: Theories and Practices from Surrealism to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silj, A. 2010. European Multiculturalism Revisited. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sixtensson, J. 2009. Hemma och främmande i staden: Kvinnor med slöja berättar. Malmö: Malmö University Publications in Urban Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1993. "Homeless/Global: Scaling Places." In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, edited by J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson and L. Tickner, 87–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stolcke, V. 1995. “Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe.” Current Anthropology 36 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1086/204339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen, M. 2014. Negotiating Home and Belonging. Young Kurds in Finland. Turku: University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. 2012. “On Nonscalability, The Living World is not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scales.” Common Knowledge 18 (3): 505–524. doi:10.1215/0961754X-1630424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacher, M. 2007. “Integration Through Housing?” Working paper, Center for Bolig og Velfærd, Sociologisk Institut, Københavns Universitet.
   Google Scholar