The regressive planning practice of private sector planners under the pressure of political and market forces in Turkey

References

• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2013. “The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning.” Planning Practice & Research 28 (1): 6–26. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, O. 2012. “The Negative Effects of Construction Boom on Urban Planning and Environment in Turkey: Unraveling the Role of the Public Secto.” Habitat International 36 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balta, M., and F. Eke. 2011. “Spatial Reflection of Urban Planning in Metropolitan Areas and Urban Rent; A Case Study of Cayyolu, Ankara.” European Planning Studies 19 (10): 1817–1838. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.614396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candan, T. 2019. Togo Towers The Tip of the Iceberg Accessed November 21, 2018. https://www.aydinlik.com.tr/togo-kuleleri-buzdaginin-ustu-turkiye-aralik-2019
   Google Scholar
• Ersoy, M. 2011. “The Planning Approach that Becomes the Same by Centralizing From the Local to the National”. Accessed July 2, 2020. http://www.melihersoy.com/makaleler/
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1996. “The Dark Side of Planning: Rationality and ‘Realrationalität’.” In Explorations in Planning Theory, edited by S. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R. Burchell, 365–382. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, R. 1990. “Planning Consultancy: Can It Serve the Public Interest.” Public Administration 68 (2). doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00757.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijzen, J. 2010. Outsourcing Planning: What do Consultants do in a Regional Spatial Planning in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gürakar, E. 2018. Economics of Favoritism: Public Procurements in the AKP Period. Istanbul: İletişim Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, K. 2005. “Planning for Sustainability: Experiences in two Contrasting Communities.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (1): 27–40. doi:10.1080/01944360508976403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, T. 2010. “Implicit Corruption in the Reconstruction: Privileged Privatization and Urban Rent.” Journal of Business Ethics 6: 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kilinc, N., and S. Turk. 2021. “Plan Changes in Istanbul (Turkey) as Project-led Practices in a Plan-led Planning System.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1865276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., and M. Long. 2019. “Ethical Dilemmas in Professional Planning Practice in the United States.” Journal of the American Planning Association 85 (4): 393–404. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1627238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. 2019. “Shifting Agendas: Private Consultants and Public Planning Policy.” Urban Affairs Review 55 (6): 1666–1701. doi:10.1177/1078087417752475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C., and R. Arroyo. 2017. “Special Ethical Considerations for Planners in Private Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association 83 (2): 168–179. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C., and R. Norton. 2013. “Planning Consultants and Local Planning: Roles and Values.” Journal of the American Planning Association 79 (2): 138–147. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.883251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C., and R. Norton. 2015. “Planning Consultants’ Influence on Local Comprehensive Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 35 (2): 199–208. doi:10.1177/0739456X14566868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2001. “Collaborative Visioning or Urban Planning as Therapy? The Politics of Public–Private Policy Making.” The Professional Geographer 53 (2): 207–218. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momani, B., and L. Khirfan. 2013. “Explaining the Use of Planning Consultants in Ontario Cities.” Canadian Public Administration 56 (3): 391–413. doi:10.1111/capa.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocak, H. 2020. Betrayal - Rent Crimes Against Istanbul. Cumhuriyet Kitapları.
   Google Scholar
• Öncü, A. 1988. “Politics of the Urban Land Market in Turkey:1950-80.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 12 (1): 38–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1988.tb00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., E. Street, and M. Wargent. 2018. “The Rise of the Private Sector in Fragmentary Planning in England.” Planning Theory & Practice 19 (5): 734–750. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1532529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penpecioğlu, M., and T. Taşan-Kok. 2016. “Alienated and Politicized? Young Planners’ Confrontation with Entrepreneurial and Authoritarian State Intervention in Urban Development in Turkey.” European Planning Studies 24 (6): 1037–1055. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1135233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. 2018. “Private Consultants, Planning Reform, and the Marketisation of Local Government Finance.” In Planning Practice: Critical Perspectives from the UK, edited by J. Ferm, and J. Tomaney, 132–137. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2009. “Planners’ Role: Torn Between Dialogical Ideals and Neoliberal Realities.” European Planning Studies 17 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, S. 2019. “The Urbanization Policy of Turkey: An Uneasy Symbiosis of Unimplemented Policy with Centralized Pragmatic Interventions.” Turkish Studies 20 (4): 599–618. doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1602826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S. 2014. “Interdisciplinary Approaches to Political Clientelism and Patronage in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 15 (4): 655–670. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.985809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W. 2009. “Australian Urban Planners: Hybrid Roles and Professional Dilemmas?” Urban Policy and Research 27 (2): 189–203. doi:10.1080/08111140902908873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşan Kok, T. 2012. “Introduction: Contradictions of Neoliberal Urban Planning.” In Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning, edited by Tuna Taşan Kok, and Guy Beaten, 1–19. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zanotto, J. 2019. “Detachment in Planning Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 20 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1560491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar