Regional preconditions to shape interpath relations across regions: two cases from the Austrian food sector

References

• Andersen, A. 2012. “Towards a New Approach to Natural Resources and Development: The Role of Learning, Innovation and Linkage Dynamics.” IJTLID 5: 291–324. doi:10.1504/IJTLID.2012.047681
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2020. “The Role of the Regional Innovation System Approach in Contemporary Regional Policy: Is It Still Relevant in a Globalised World?” In Regions and Innovation Policies in Europe, edited by M. González López and B. T. Asheim, 12–29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., D. Doloreux, R. Shearmur, and M. Trippl. 2022. “When History Does not Matter? The Rise of Quebec’s Wine Industry.” Geoforum 128: 115–124. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., M. Hekkert, S. Jacobsson, J. Markard, B. Sandén, and B. Truffer. 2015. “Technological Innovation Systems in Contexts: Conceptualizing Contextual Structures and Interaction Dynamics.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16: 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., and B. Truffer. 2017. “Global Innovation Systems – A Conceptual Framework for Innovation Dynamics in Transnational Contexts.” Research Policy 46: 1284–1298. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., B. Truffer, and L. Coenen. 2016. “Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing.” Economic Geography 92: 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMGF. 2017. Guidance for Cultivated Insects as Food. Vienna: Federal Ministry for Women and Health.
   Google Scholar
• BMLFUW. 2012. Aquakultur 2020 – Österreichische Strategie zur Förderung der Nationalen Fischproduktion. Vienna: Federal Ministry for Agriculture and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2017. “Relatedness as Driver of Regional Diversification: A Research Agenda.” Regional Studies 51: 351–364. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., L. Coenen, K. Frenken, and B. Truffer. 2017. “Towards a Theory of Regional Diversification: Combining Insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies.” Regional Studies 51: 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breul, M., C. Hulke, and L. Kalvelage. 2021. “Path Formation and Reformation: Studying the Variegated Consequences of Path Creation for Regional Development.” Economic Geography 97: 213–234. doi:10.1080/00130095.2021.1922277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., H. Martin, and J. Mattes. 2021. “Grasping Transformative Regional Development from a Co-evolutionary perspective – A Research Agenda,” GEIST Working Paper Series, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, H., M. Brüdern, and L. Deppe. 2020. Nischeninnovationen in Europa zur Transformation des Ernährungssystems. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Frangenheim, A., M. Trippl, and C. Chlebna. 2020. “Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts.” Economic Geography 96: 31–51. doi:10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., F. van Oort, and T. Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies 41: 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., and C. Binz. 2018. “Global Socio-Technical Regimes.” Research Policy 47: 735–749. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnøe. 2003. “Bricolage Versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship.” Research Policy, 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Sotarauta. 2020. “Trinity of Change Agency, Regional Development Paths and Opportunity Spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44: 704–723. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugerell, C., and M. Penker. 2020. “Change Agents’ Perspectives on Spatial–Relational Proximities and Urban Food Niches.” Sustainability 12: 1–18. doi:10.3390/su12062333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, J. 2018. “Insects as Food in the Netherlands: Production Networks and the Geographies of Edibility.” Geoforum 94: 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. 2015. “Industrial Development in Thin Regions: Trapped in Path Extension?” Journal of Economic Geography 15: 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., S.-E. Jakobsen, R. Njøs, and R. Normann. 2019. “Regional Industrial Restructuring Resulting from Individual and System Agency.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32: 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., E. Langemyr Eriksen, and J. Rypestøl. 2020. “Regional Industrial Restructuring: Asset Modification and Alignment for Digitalization.” Growth and Change 51: 1454–1470. doi:10.1111/grow.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2016. “Path Development in Different Regional Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis.” In Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, edited by M. D. Parrilli, R. Dahl-Fitjar, and A. Rodriguez-Pose, 66–84. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., M. Grillitsch, and T. Hansen. 2020. “Agency and Actors in Regional Industrial Path Development. A Framework and Longitudinal Analysis.” Geoforum 111: 176–188. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., S. Dawley, A. Pike, and A. Cumbers. 2019. “Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach.” Economic Geography 95: 113–135. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography – Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution.” Economic Geography 86: 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, H., and R. Martin. 2021. “The Role of Demand for Regional Development – Green Transformations in the Food Industries in Scania and Värmland,” CRA Working Paper, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and A. Malmberg. 1999a. “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 167–185. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., and A. Malmberg. 1999b. “The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions. ‘Ubiquitification’ and the Importance of Localized Learning.” European Urban and Regional Studies 6: 9–25. doi:10.1177/096977649900600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2015. “Tracing Discursive Space: Agency and Change in Sustainability Transitions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90: 379–388. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflitsch, G., and V. Radinger-Peer. 2018. “Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions – A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria).” Sustainability 10. doi:10.3390/su10040918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypestøl, J., A. Isaksen, E. Eriksen, T. Iakovleva, S. Sjøtun, and R. Njøs. 2021. “Cluster Development and Regional Industrial Restructuring: Agency and Asset Modification.” European Planning Studies 29: 2320–2339. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1937951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandén, B., and K. Hillman. 2011. “A Framework for Analysis of Multi-Mode Interaction among Technologies with Examples from the History of Alternative Transport Fuels in Sweden.” Research Policy 40: 403–414. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research.” Political Research Quarterly 61: 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and G. Hansen. 2018. “Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway.” Economic Geography 94: 188–210. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 692.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., M. Trippl, and V. Desch. 2021. “New Directions for RIS Studies and Policies in the Face of Grand Societal Challenges.” GEIST Working Paper Series, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, A. Frangenheim, A. Isaksen, and J. Rypestøl. 2020. “Unravelling Green Regional Industrial Path Development: Regional Preconditions, Asset Modification and Agency.” Geoforum 111: 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, E. Goracinova, and D. Wolfe. 2021. “Automotive Regions in Transition: Preparing for Connected and Automated Vehicles.” Environment & Planning A 53: 1158–1179. doi:10.1177/0308518X20987233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., M. Grillitsch, and A. Isaksen. 2018. “Exogenous Sources of Regional Industrial Change: Attraction and Absorption of Non-Local Knowledge for New Path Development.” Progress in Human Geography 42: 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Huis, A., J. van Itterbeeck, E. Mertens, A. Halloran, G. Muir, and P. Vantomme. 2013. “Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security.” FAO Forestry Paper 171, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Wepner, B., S. Giesecke, M. Kienegger, D. Schartinger, and P. Wagner. 2018. Fit4Food2030 – Report on Baseline and Description of Identified Trends, Drivers and Barriers of EU Food System and R&I.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar