Institutional ethnography: a transformative mode of inquiry in the renovation of a Brussels high-rise housing estate

References

• Atkinson, R. 1999. “Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies 36: 59–72. doi:10.1080/0042098993736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacqué, M., and M. Gauthier. 2011. “Participation, Urbanisme et études Urbaines: Quatre Décennies de Débats et D’expériences Depuis « A Ladder of Citizen Participation » de S. R. Arnstein.” Participations 1 (1): 36–66. doi:10.3917/parti.001.0036
   Google Scholar
• BBRoW. 2016. De Productie van Sociale Woningen nu en Straks. Deel 2: De Renovaties en de Fusies. Art. 23(62). Brussel: BBRoW.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. 2006. “The Participation Trap: The Limitations of Participation for Ethnic and Racial Groups.” International Planning Studies 11 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/13563470600935008.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. 2006. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billo, E., and A. Mountz. 2016. “For Institutional Ethnography: Geographical Approaches to Institutions and the Everyday.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (2): 199–220. doi:10.1177/0309132515572269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokland, T. 2008. “You Got to Remember you Live in Public Housing: Place-Making in an American Housing Project.” Housing, Theory and Society 25 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1080/14036090601151095.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Devault, M. 2006. “What is Institutional Ethnography?” Social Problems 53 (3): 294–298. doi:10.1525/sp.2006.53.3.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C. 2009. “Front-Line Workers and ‘Local Knowledge’: Neighbourhood Stories in Contemporary UK Local Governance.” Public Administration 87 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., M. van Hulst, S. Jeffares, O. Escobar, A. Agger, and L. de Graaf. 2016. “Five Ways to Make a Difference: Perceptions of Practitioners Working in Urban Neighborhoods.” Public Administration Review 76 (4): 576–586. doi:10.1111/puar.12502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 2004. “Towards Participatory Local Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities.” In Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, edited by S. Hickey, and G. Mohan, 25–41. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1991. “Researching Planning Practice.” The Town Planning Review 64 (4): 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemment, J. 2007. Public anthropology and the paradoxes of participation: participatory action research and critical ethnography in provincial Russia, Human Organization 66 (3): 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., J. Kemeny, and T. Manzi. 2003. “Power, Discursive Space and Institutional Practices in the Construction of Housing Problems.” Housing Studies 18 (4): 429–446. doi:10.1080/02673030304252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamoulle, P. 2008. Des Hommes sur le fil. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, G. P., Corman, M. K., Hart, N. D., Johnston, J. L., & Gormley, G. J. 2019. Why institutional ethnography? Why now? Institutional ethnography in health professions education. Perspectives on medical education 8 (1): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0499-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, M. 2020. “An Ethnographic Perspective on Urban Planning in Brazil: Temporality, Diversity and Critical Urban Theory.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44 (2): 185–199. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, P. 2012. “Engager L’anthropologie du Développement à Prendre en Considération le Malaise Post Colonial.” Bulletin de l’APAD, 34–36. doi:10.4000/apad.4108.
   Google Scholar
• Maginn, P. 2007. “Towards More Effective Community Participation in Urban Regeneration: The Potential of Collaborative Planning and Applied Ethnography.” Qualitative Research 7 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1177/1468794106068020.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, P. 2002. “No Teens Allowed: The Exclusion of Adolescents from Public Spaces.” Landscape Journal 21 (1): 156–163. doi:10.3368/lj.21.1.156.
   Google Scholar
• Pattillo, M. 2010. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J., and N. Alfasi. 2008. “An Approach to Planning Discourse Analysis.” Urban Studies 45 (2): 251–272. doi:10.1177/0042098007085962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishbeth, C., F. Ganji, and G. Vodicka. 2018. “Ethnographic Understandings of Ethnically Diverse Neighbourhoods to Inform Urban Design Practice.” Local Environment 23 (1): 36–53. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saija, L. 2014. “Writing About Engaged Scholarship: Misunderstandings and the Meaning of ‘Quality’ in Action Research Publications.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (2): 187–201. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.904922.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1998. Toward Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schaut, C. 2017. “Tout au Nord des Tropiques: Une Architecture Moderne à Bruxelles.” CLARA 4 (1): 203–218. doi:10.3917/clara.004.0203
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2006. Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. 2011. “Trust and the Public Interest in the Micropolitics of Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. 2008. “Quite an Experience: Using Ethnography to Study Local Governance.” Critical Policy Studies 2 (2): 143–159. doi:10.1080/19460171.2008.9518535.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2004. “Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries.” British Journal of Management 15 (S1): S9–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.t01-1-00403.x.
   Google Scholar