Transitions in planning: transformative policy visions of the circular economy and blue bioeconomy meet planning practice

References

• Albrecht, M., and J. Lukkarinen. 2020. “Blue Bioeconomy Localities at the Margins: Reconnecting Norwegian Seaweed Farming and Finnish Small-Scale Lake Fisheries with Blue Policies.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (7–8): 1465–1483. doi:10.1177/2399654420932572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2012. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by using a Coproduction Perspective.” doi:10.1177/1473095212452722
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2015. “Ingredients for a More Radical Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42 (3): 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” Disp 49 (3): 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., A. Barbanente, and V. Monno. 2020. “Practicing Transformative Planning: The Territory-Landscape Plan as a Catalyst for Change.” City, Territory and Architecture 7 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s40410-019-0111-2.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., and J. Grin. 2017. “Beyond Deconstruction. a Reconstructive Perspective on Sustainability Transition Governance.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 22: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., S. Hincks, and G. Sherriff. 2010. “Getting Involved in Plan Making: Participation and Stakeholder Involvement in Local and Regional Spatial Strategies in England.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 574–595. doi:10.1068/c0972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, S., and B. Budde. 2012. “Technological Hype and Disappointment: Lessons from the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Case.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 549–563. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, S., H. Van Lente, and M. Meeus. 2011. “Arenas of Expectations for Hydrogen Technologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1): 152–162. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F. 2006. “Normative Expectations in Systems Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 299–311. doi:10.1080/09537320600777010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, K., and A. Doyon. 2019. “Circular Cities: Exploring Local Government Strategies to Facilitate a Circular Economy.” European Planning Studies 27 (11): 2184–2205. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, J., R. Brown, and M. Farrelly. 2015. “Building Networks and Coalitions to Promote Transformational Change: Insights from an Australian Urban Water Planning Case Study.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 15: 11–25. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. 1966. “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth.” Environmental Quality Issues in a Growing Economy 1–8. doi:10.4324/9781315064147.
   Google Scholar
• Brandão, M., D. Lazarevic, and G. Finnveden. 2020. “Prospects for the Circular Economy and Conclusions.” In Handbook of the Circular Economy, edited by M. Brandão, D. Lazarevic, and G. Finnveden, 505–514. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and J. Law. 2005. “On Qualculation, Agency, and Otherness.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–733. doi:10.1068/d343t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Johnston, K., J. ten Cate, M. Elfering-Petrovic, and J. Gupta. 2019. “City Level Circular Transitions: Barriers and Limits in Amsterdam, Utrecht and The Hague.” Journal of Cleaner Production 235: 1232–1239. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2001. “Planning and the Twin Discourses of Sustainability.” In Planning for a Sustainable Future, edited by S. Batty, S. Davoudi and A. Layard, 81–94. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., W. Mcdowall, M. Hodson, and S. Marvin. 2006. “Negotiating Contested Visions and Place-Specific Expectations of the Hydrogen Economy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 361–374. doi:10.1080/09537320600777127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeset, A.., A. Mazzarella, B. Davíðsdóttir, D. Klinger, S. Levin, E. Rovenskaya, and N. Stenseth. 2018. “What Is Blue Growth? The Semantics of ‘Sustainable Development’ of Marine Environments.” Marine Policy 87: 177–179. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. “Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy.” OJ L327, 22.12.2000. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:en:NOT
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. “COM (2012) 494 final. Blue Growth Opportunities for Marine and Maritime Sustainable Growth.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52012DC0494
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019a. “COM(2019) 640.” The European Green Deal 53 (9): 1689–1699. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019b. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. The EU Blue Bioeconomy Report 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 1973. Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., V. Castán Broto, L. Coenen, and D. Loorbach, eds. 2017. Urban Sustainability Transitions. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228389.
   Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Urban Experimentation & Sustainability Transitions.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 219–228. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomart, E., and M. Hajer. 2003. “Is That Politics? For an Inquiry into Forms in Contemporary Politics.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, edited by B. Joerges and H. Nowotny, 33–61. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006. “Relational Complexity and the Imaginative Power of Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 14 (4): 525–546. doi:10.1080/09654310500421196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, J., and P. Healey. 2008. Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory. Critical Essays in Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2003. “Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot Be ‘Real’.” Planning Theory 2 (1): 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. 2021. “The Limits of the Loops: Critical Environmental Politics and the Circular Economy.” Environmental Politics 3 (1–2): 161–179. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1816052.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., A. Jordan, S. Munaretto, and M. Hildén. 2018. “Policy Experimentation: Core Concepts, Political Dynamics, Governance and Impacts.” Policy Sciences 51 (2): 143–159. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9321-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., J. Lukkarinen, P. Kivimaa, R. Lovio, A. Temmes, M. Hildén, T. Marttila, et al. 2019. “Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for mid-Range Planning.” Sustainability 11 (3): 1–22. doi:10.3390/su11030603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, edited by S. Jasanoff, 13–45. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda, W., P. del Río, O. Hjelm, and D. Bienkowska. 2019. “A Technological Innovation Systems Approach to Analyse the Roles of Intermediaries in Eco-innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 227: 1136–1148. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., and G. Ellis. 2012. “From the Land to Sea and Back Again? Using Terrestrial Planning to Understand the Process of Marine Spatial Planning.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 14 (1): 49–66. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.662382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., S. Hyysalo, W. Boon, L. Klerkx, M. Martiskainen, and J. Schot. 2019. “Passing the Baton: How Intermediaries Advance Sustainability Transitions in Different Phases.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, F. Alkemade, et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacic, Z., R. Strand, and Thomas Völker. 2020. The Circular Economy in Europe: Critical Perspectives on Policies and Imaginaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., and H. Valve. 2017. “Narrating Expectations for the Circular Economy: Towards a Common and Contested European Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 31: 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligtvoet, A., F. Maier, L. Sijtsma, B. van den Broek, A. Doranova, D. Eaton, T. Guznajeva, et al. 2019. Blue Bioeconomy Forum: Roadmap for the Blue Bioeconomy. doi:10.2826/605949
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and R. Huffenreuter. 2015. “Transition Management Taking Stock from Governance Experimentation.” The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 58: 48–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R. 2013. “Coping with the Paradox of Strategic Spatial Planning.” Disp 49 (3): 51–52. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2017. “From Utopian and Realistic to Transformative Planning.” In Encounters in Planning Thought, edited by B. Haselsberger, 35–50. doi:10.4324/9781315630908
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780. doi:10.1177/0306312706077367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2013a. “Placing the Stakes: The Enactment of Territorial Stakeholders in Planning Processes.” Environment and Planning A 45 (4): 781–796. doi:10.1068/a45116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2013b. “Raising the Regional Leviathan: A Relational-Materialist Conceptualization of Regions-in-Becoming as Publics-in-Stabilization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (4): 1368–1395. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2016. Kasvua vesiosaamisesta ja vesiluonnonvarojen kestävästä hyödyntämisestä: Sinisen biotalouden kansallinen kehittämissuunnitelma 2025.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021. Kotimaisen kalan edistämisohjelma. Accessed November 3, 2021. https://mmm.fi/kalat/strategiat-ja-ohjelmat/kotimaisen-kalan-edistamisohjelma.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of agriculture and Forestry. 2018. Out of the Blue: Sinisen biotalouden tutkimus- ja osaamisagenda. Accessed April 2, 2022. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/160942
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2021. Strategic Programme to Promote a Circular Economy. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://ym.fi/en/strategic-programme-to-promote-a-circular-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. 2020. Stronger Together: Cities and Central Government Creating Sustainable Future. Accessed April 2, 2022. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-367-319-9.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. 2008. “Strategic Spatial Planning: Collective Action and Moments of Opportunity.” European Planning Studies 16 (10): 1371–1383. doi:10.1080/09654310802420078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylén, E. 2019. “Can Abstract Ideas Generate Change? The Case of the Circular Economy.” In Leading Change in a Complex World: Transdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by A. Kangas, J. Kujala, A. Heikkinen, A. Lönqvist, H. Laihonen, and J. Bethwaite, 281–299. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, D. 2019. “Energy Efficiency Left Behind? Policy Assemblages in Sweden’s Most Climate-Smart City.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 318–335. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1455807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2015. “Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism.” In Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. doi:10.1177/0094306116671949mm.
   Google Scholar
• Prendeville, S., E. Cherim, and N. Bocken. 2018. “Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26: 171–194. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reike, D., W. Vermeulen, and S. Witjes. 2018. “The Circular Economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? – Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy Through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options.” Resources Conservation & Recycling 135: 246–264. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1108/14636680110803003.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. “Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai.” Antipode 41 (1): 159–179. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitra. 2016. Leading the Cycle Finnish Road Map to a Circular Economy 2016–2025. Helsinki: Sitra.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. 2015. “Race, Transformative Planning, and the Just City.” Planning Theory 14 (2): 152–173. doi:10.1177/1473095213517883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W. 2011. “Strategy-making for Sustainability: An Institutional Learning Approach to Transformative Planning Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (2): 205–221. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.580158.
   Google Scholar
• Valve, H., J. Lukkarinen, A. Belinskij, P. Kara, L. Kolehmainen, A. Klap, R. Leskinen, et al. 2019. Lisäarvoa kalasta ja maatalouden sivuvirroista Varsinais-Suomessa: Sinisen biotalouden murrosareenan tulokset. Accessed April 2, 2022. https://blueadapt.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Lisa%CC%88arvoa-kalasta-ja-maatalouden-sivuvirroista-Varsinais-Suomessa_Sinisen-biotalouden-murrosareenan-tulokset_BlueAdapt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valve, H., D. Lazarevic, and N. Humalisto. 2021. “When the Circular Economy Diverges: The Co-evolution of Biogas Business Models and Material Circuits in Finland.” Ecological Economics 185: 107025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, H. 2012. “Navigating Foresight in a sea of Expectations: Lessons from the Sociology of Expectations.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (8): 769–782. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.715478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, H., M. Leal, and R. Calado. 2020. “Fifty Shades of Blue: How Blue Biotechnology Is Shaping the Bioeconomy.” Trends in Biotechnology 38 (9): 940–943. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierikko, K., H. Nieminen, V. Salomaa, J. Häkkinen, J. Salminen, and J. Sorvari. 2020. Kiertotalous maankäytön suunnittelussa Kaavoitus kestävän ja luonnonvaroja säästävän kaupunkiympäristön edistäjänä. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/322882.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J., A. Smith, and J. Grin. 2009. “Designing Long-Term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 275–302. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Impacts of Urban Living Labs on Sustainability Transitions: Mechanisms and Strategies for Systemic Change Through Experimentation.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 229–257. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder, G., and R. Le Heron. 2017. “Assembling a Blue Economy Moment? Geographic Engagement with Globalizing Biological-Economic Relations in Multi-use Marine Environments.” Dialogues in Human Geography 7 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/2043820617691643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. 2016. “Conceptualizing Urban Transformative Capacity: A Framework for Research and Policy.” Cities 51: 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. 2018. “Urban Planning and Transition Management: Rationalities.” Instruments and Dialectics 11: 415. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., N. Frantzeskaki, and S. Maschmeyer. 2016. “Cities, Systems and Sustainability: Status and Perspectives of Research on Urban Transformations.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar