Review of research into urban experimentation in the fields of sustainability transitions and environmental governance

References

• Ansell, C. K., and M. Bartenberger. 2016. “Varieties of Experimentalism.” Ecological Economics 130: 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison-Wesley Series on Organization Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co, Reading, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., J. Grin, B. Pel, and S. Jhagroe. 2016. “The Politics of Sustainability Transitions.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 557–567. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., and J. M. Wittmayer. 2015. “Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18: 628–649. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I., and M. V. Flinders2004. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, X., B. Roberts, and J. Chen. 2010. “Urban Sustainability Experiments in Asia: Patterns and Pathways.” Environmental Science & Policy 13: 312–325. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecroft, R., H. Trenks, R. Rhodius, C. Benighaus, and O. Parodi. 2018. “Reallabore als Rahmen Transformativer und Transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien.” In Transdisziplinär Und Transformativ Forschen: Eine Methodensammlung, edited by R. Defila, and A. Di Giulio, 75–100. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bellinson, R., and E. Chu. 2019. “Learning Pathways and the Governance of Innovations in Urban Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21: 76–89. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1493916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belur, J., L. Tompson, A. Thornton, and M. Simon. 2018. “Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making.” Sociological Methods & Research 5 (2): 837–865. doi:10.1177/0049124118799372.
   Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. M., T. M. Benney, and A. K. Gerlak. (Eds.) 2020. Agency in Earth System Governance, 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108688277
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A. 2014. “Worlding Cities through their Climate Projects?” City 18: 269–286. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.906715.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A., and R. Tschötschel. 2016. “World Port Cities as Cosmopolitan Risk Community: Mapping Urban Climate Policy Experiments in Europe and East Asia.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34: 717–736. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614673.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, J. J., and R. R. Brown. 2012. “Governance Experimentation and Factors of Success in Socio-Technical Transitions in the Urban Water Sector.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79: 1340–1353. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39: 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. S., and P. J. Vergragt. 2008. “Bounded Socio-Technical Experiments as Agents of Systemic Change: The Case of a Zero-Energy Residential Building.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75: 107–130. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30: 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and V. Castán Broto. 2013. “Government by Experiment? Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38: 361–375. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., V. Castán Broto, and G. Edwards. 2015. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. Abingdon: Routledge. Oxon, UK; New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., V. Castán Broto, and A. Maassen. 2014a. “Low-carbon Transitions and the Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure.” Urban Studies 51: 1471–1486. doi:10.1177/0042098013500089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., G. A. S. Edwards, and S. Fuller. 2014b. “Contesting Climate Justice in the City: Examining Politics and Practice in Urban Climate Change Experiments.” Global Environmental Change 25: 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and K. Kern. 2006. “Local Government and the Governing of Climate Change in Germany and the UK.” Urban Studies 43: 2237–2259. doi:10.1080/00420980600936491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., S. Marvin, Y. Voytenko Palgan, K. McCormick, M. Breitfuss-Loidl, L. Mai, T. von Wirth, and N. Frantzeskaki. 2019. “Urban Living Laboratories: Conducting the Experimental City?” European Urban and Regional Studies 26 (4): 317–335. doi:10.1177/0969776418787222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen. 2013. “Coding In-Depth Semistructured Interviews.” Sociological Methods & Research 42: 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and R. Cowley. 2017. “Interrogating Urban Experiments.” Urban Geography 38: 1441–1450. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1265870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., G. Mingardo, and J. van Haaren. 2012. “Green Urban Transport Policies and Cleantech Innovations: Evidence from Curitiba, Göteborg and Hamburg.” European Planning Studies 20: 375–396. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., and H. Bulkeley. 2013a. “A Survey of Urban Climate Change Experiments in 100 Cities.” Global Environmental Change 23: 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., and H. Bulkeley. 2013b. “Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 1934–1948. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., and H. Bulkeley. 2018. “Realigning Circulations: How Urban Climate Change Experiments Gain Traction.” In Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments, edited by B. Turnheim, P. Kivimaa, and F. Berkhout, 69–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, E. K. 2016. “The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation Through Urban Policy Experiments.” Environmental Policy and Governance 26: 439–451. doi:10.1002/eet.1727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., R. Raven, and G. Verbong. 2010. “Local Niche Experimentation in Energy Transitions: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Proximity Advantages and Disadvantages.” Technology in Society 32: 295–302. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, P. R., K. Foley, and M. J. Collier. 2016. “Operationalizing Urban Resilience Through a Framework for Adaptive co-Management and Design: Five Experiments in Urban Planning Practice and Policy.” Environmental Science & Policy 62: 112–119. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., and J. Trounstine. 2012. “Urban Politics and the New Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics, edited by S. Clarke, P. John, and K. Mossberger, 51–70. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• den Hartog, H., F. Sengers, Y. Xu, L. Xie, P. Jiang, and M. de Jong. 2018. “Low-carbon Promises and Realities: Lessons from Three Socio-Technical Experiments in Shanghai.” Journal of Cleaner Production 181: 692–702. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignum, M., H. Dorst, M. van Schie, T. Dassen, and R. Raven. 2020. “Nurturing Nature: Exploring Socio-Spatial Conditions for Urban Experimentation.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 7–25. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, M., J. de Kraker, and A. Hommels. 2018. “Anticipating Constraints on Upscaling from Urban Innovation Experiments.” Sustainability 10: 2796. doi:10.3390/su10082796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 1996. “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature.” Political Studies 44: 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., and D. Marsh. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13: 5–23. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. A. S., and H. Bulkeley. 2018. “Heterotopia and the Urban Politics of Climate Change Experimentation.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36: 350–369. doi:10.1177/0263775817747885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., F. Kern, S. Borgström, L. Gorissen, S. Maschmeyer, and M. Egermann. 2018. “Urban Sustainability Transitions in a Context of Multi-Level Governance: A Comparison of Four European States.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26: 101–116. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderlein, H., S. Walti, and M. Zurn. 2012. Handbook on Multi-Level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. P. 2011. “Resilience, Ecology and Adaptation in the Experimental City.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 223–237. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 2016. “Trials and Tribulations: Problematizing the City Through/as Urban Experimentation.” Geography Compass 10: 429–443. doi:10.1111/gec3.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., F. Berkhout, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven. 2016. “The Experimental City: New Modes and Prospects of Urban Transformation.” In The Experimental City, edited by J. Evans, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, 1–12. London, UK; New York NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. P. M., H. Bulkeley, Y. Voytenko, K. McCormick, and S. Curtis. 2018. “Circulating Experiments : Urban Living Labs and the Politics of Sustainability.” In The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics, edited by K. Ward, A. E. G. Jonas, B. Miller, and D. Wilson, 416–425. New York, NY, USA; Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and A. Karvonen. 2014. “‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’ - Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 413–430. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M., and R. Brown. 2011. “Rethinking Urban Water Management: Experimentation as a way Forward?” Global Environmental Change 21: 721–732. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G. 2020. “Capitalism in Sustainability Transitions Research: Time for a Critical Turn?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35: 241–250. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G., and R. Nunes. 2014. “Success and Failure of Grassroots Innovations for Addressing Climate Change: The Case of the Transition Movement.” Global Environmental Change 24: 232–250. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C. 2006. “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–Ecological Systems Analyses.” Global Environmental Change 16: 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16: 22–27. doi:10.2307/464648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., and N. Kabisch. 2016. “Designing a Knowledge co-Production Operating Space for Urban Environmental Governance—Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany.” Environmental Science & Policy 62: 90–98. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Urban Experimentation & Sustainability Transitions.” European Planning Studies 27: 219–228. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study.” Research Policy 31: 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2004. “Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Synthesis.” In System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, edited by B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, and K. Green, 19–47. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. “Processes and Patterns in Transitions and System Innovations: Refining the co-Evolutionary Multi-Level Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72: 681–696. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., and J. J. Deuten. 2006. “Local and Global Dynamics in Technological Development: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective on Knowledge Flows and Lessons from Reinforced Concrete.” Science and Public Policy 33: 265–275. doi:10.3152/147154306781778984.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36: 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., T. Heikkila, S. L. Smolinski, D. Huitema, and D. Armitage. 2018. “Learning our way out of Environmental Policy Problems: A Review of the Scholarship.” Policy Sciences 51: 335–371. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasbergen, P. 1996. “Learning to Manage the Environment.” In Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, edited by W. M. Lafferty, and J. Meadowcroft, 175–193. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hakelberg, L. 2014. “Governance by Diffusion: Transnational Municipal Networks and the Spread of Local Climate Strategies in Europe.” Global Environmental Politics 14: 107–129. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, I. 2019. “Urban Sustainability Experiments in Their Socio-Economic Milieux: A Quantitative Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production 209: 515–527. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2004. “Creativity and Urban Governance.” Policy Studies 25: 87–102. doi:10.1080/0144287042000262189.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2018. “Conditioning Experimentation: The Struggle for Place-Based Discretion in Shaping Urban Infrastructures.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36: 1480–1498. doi:10.1177/2399654418765480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., F. Geels, and A. McMeekin. 2017. “Reconfiguring Urban Sustainability Transitions, Analysing Multiplicity.” Sustainability 9: 299. doi:10.3390/su9020299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. “Urbanism in the Anthropocene: Ecological Urbanism or Premium Ecological Enclaves?” City 14: 298–313. doi:10.1080/13604813.2010.482277.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. (Eds.) 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management, Transport, Development and Sustainability. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., N. Frantzeskaki, and D. Loorbach. 2018. “Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam.” In Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments, edited by B. Turnheim, P. Kivimaa, and F. Berkhout, 123–144. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., A. Jordan, S. Munaretto, and M. Hildén. 2018. “Policy Experimentation: Core Concepts, Political Dynamics, Governance and Impacts.” Policy Sciences 51: 143–159. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9321-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., D. Huitema, J. Schoenefeld, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster. 2018. “Governing Climate Change Polycentrically: Setting the Scene.” In Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?, edited by A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster, 3–25. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A. 2018. “The City of Permanent Experiments?” In Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments, edited by B. Turnheim, P. Kivimaa, and F. Berkhout, 201–215. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., J. P. M. Evans, and B. van Heur. 2013. “The Politics of Urban Experiments: Radical Change or Business as Usual?” In After Sustainable Cities? Routledge, edited by M. Hodson, and S. Marvin, 104–115. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., and B. van Heur. 2014. “Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 379–392. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. “Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10: 175–198. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, K. 2019. “Cities as Leaders in EU Multilevel Climate Governance: Embedded Upscaling of Local Experiments in Europe.” Environmental Politics 28: 125–145. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, K., and G. Alber. 2008. “Governing Climate Change in Cities: Modes of Urban Climate Governance in Multi-Level Systems.” Competitive cities and Climate Change: OECD conference proceedings. milan, Italy, pp. 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K., and H. Bulkeley. 2009. “Cities, Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance: Governing Climate Change Through Transnational Municipal Networks.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47: 309–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00806.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019a. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48: 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., M. Hildén, D. Huitema, A. Jordan, and J. Newig. 2017. “Experiments in Climate Governance – A Systematic Review of Research on Energy and Built Environment Transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., S. Hyysalo, W. Boon, L. Klerkx, M. Martiskainen, and J. Schot. 2019b. “Passing the Baton: How Intermediaries Advance Sustainability Transitions in Different Phases.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., and D. Mukhtar-Landgren. 2018. “Experimental Governance: The Role of Municipalities in Urban Living Labs.” European Planning Studies 26: 988–1007. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York, NY, USA: McGraw.
   Google Scholar
• Levenda, A. M. 2018. “Mobilizing Smart Grid Experiments: Policy Mobilities and Urban Energy Governance.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37: 634–651. doi:10.1177/2399654418797127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin-Keitel, M., T. Mölders, F. Othengrafen, and J. Ibendorf. 2018. “Sustainability Transitions and the Spatial Interface: Developing Conceptual Perspectives.” Sustainability 10: 1880. doi:10.3390/su10061880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., and R. K. W. Wurzel. 2017. “Environmental Leaders and Pioneers: Agents of Change?” Journal of European Public Policy 24: 951–968. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23: 161–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42: 599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, S. H. J., and T. Hansen. 2019. “Cities and Climate Change – Examining Advantages and Challenges of Urban Climate Change Experiments.” European Planning Studies 27: 282–299. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1421907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and its Prospects.” Research Policy 41: 955–967. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and J. C. Sharman. 2009. “Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer.” Policy Studies 30: 269–288. doi:10.1080/01442870902863851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Voytenko Palgan. 2018. “Introduction.” In Urban Living Labs: Experimenting with City Futures. Routledge, edited by S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Voytenko Palgan, 1–17. London, UK; New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., and E. Heiskanen. 2017. “Making it Experimental in Several Ways: The Work of Intermediaries in Raising the Ambition Level in Local Climate Initiatives.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011. “The City as a Machine for Learning.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 360–376. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00430.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., R. Dowling, C. Brennan, and H. Bulkeley. 2015. “Urban Carbon Governance Experiments: The Role of Australian Local Governments.” Geographical Research 53: 39–52. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. 2011. “Engaging with the Politics of Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 70–75. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhaylov, S., M. Laver, and K. R. Benoit. 2012. “Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos.” Political Analysis 20: 78–91. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D., A. Kronsell, Y. Voytenko Palgan, and T. von Wirth. 2019. “Municipalities as Enablers in Urban Experimentation.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21: 718–733. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1672525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevens, F., N. Frantzeskaki, L. Gorissen, and D. Loorbach. 2013. “Urban Transition Labs: Co-Creating Transformative Action for Sustainable Cities.” Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevens, F., and C. Roorda. 2014. “A Climate of Change: A Transition Approach for Climate Neutrality in the City of Ghent (Belgium).” Sustainable Cities and Society 10: 112–121. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2013.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 20: 550–557. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes.” Global Environmental Change 19: 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, D. 2019. “Energy Efficiency Left Behind? Policy Assemblages in Sweden’s Most Climate-Smart City.” European Planning Studies 27: 318–335. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1455807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Z., S. Greyling, D. Simon, H. Arfvidsson, N. Moodley, N. Primo, and C. Wright. 2017. “Local Responses to Global Sustainability Agendas: Learning from Experimenting with the Urban Sustainable Development Goal in Cape Town.” Sustainability Science 12: 785–797. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0500-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., K. Schulz, J. Vervoort, S. van der Hel, O. Widerberg, C. Adler, M. Hurlbert, K. Anderton, M. Sethi, and A. Barau. 2017. “Exploring the Governance and Politics of Transformations Towards Sustainability.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Y. Wei, and X. Bai. 2019. “Scaling Urban Sustainability Experiments: Contextualization as an Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 227: 302–312. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U., W. Spekkink, and J. Quist. 2019. “Local Sustainability Initiatives: Innovation and Civic Engagement in Societal Experiments.” European Planning Studies 27: 300–317. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1464549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. 2005. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism,” 2nd ed. London, UK: Continuum. New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing. Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso, and J. M. Grove. 2004. “Resilient Cities: Meaning, Models, and Metaphor for Integrating the Ecological, Socio-Economic, and Planning Realms.” Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 369–384. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R. P. J. M., E. Heiskanen, R. Lovio, M. Hodson, and B. Brohmann. 2008. “The Contribution of Local Experiments and Negotiation Processes to Field-Level Learning in Emerging (Niche) Technologies.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28: 464–477. doi:10.1177/0270467608317523.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., F. Sengers, P. Spaeth, L. Xie, A. Cheshmehzangi, and M. de Jong. 2019. “Urban Experimentation and Institutional Arrangements.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 258–281. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, P. of G.R.A.W., S. F. S. A. Binder, and B. A. Rockman. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution Than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight/The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy 3: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, D. 2008. “Cities’ Contribution to Global Warming: Notes on the Allocation of Greenhouse gas Emissions.” Environment and Urbanization 20: 539–549. doi:10.1177/0956247808096127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., and L. Bertolini. 2019. “Urban Experimentation as a Politics of Niches.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51: 831–848. doi:10.1177/0308518X19826085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., F. Stelzer, M. Bergmann, M. Singer-Brodowski, M. Wanner, G. Caniglia, and D. J. Lang. 2017. Reallabore im Kontext transformativer Forschung: Ansatzpunkte zur Konzeption und Einbettung in den internationalen Forschungsstand. IETSR Discussion papers in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Ethik und Transdisziplinäre Nachhaltigkeitsforschung 1.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. 2014. “Urbane Reallabore: Ein Blick in die Aktuelle Forschungswerkstatt.” Planung Neu Denken Online 3: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., L. Kanger, and G. Verbong. 2016. “The Roles of Users in Shaping Transitions to new Energy Systems.” Nature Energy 1: 16054. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuer, A., M. Ornetzeder, and H. Rohracher. 2010. “Negotiating the Local Embedding of Socio-Technical Experiments: A Case Study in Fuel Cell Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22: 729–743. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.496286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., F. Berkhout, A. J. Wieczorek, and R. Raven. 2016. “Experimenting in the City: Unpacking Notions of Experimentation for Sustainability.” In The Experimental City, edited by J. Evans, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, 15–31. London, UK; New York NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., B. Turnheim, and F. Berkhout. 2021. “Beyond Experiments: Embedding Outcomes in Climate Governance.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39 (6): 1148–1171. doi:10.1177/2399654420953861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., A. J. Wieczorek, and R. Raven. 2019. “Experimenting for Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Literature Review.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Haxeltine. 2012. “Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30: 381–400. doi:10.1068/c10222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Smith. 2007. “Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: Towards a new Research and Policy Agenda.” Environmental Politics 16: 584–603. doi:10.1080/09644010701419121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, D., and R. Raven. 2021. “Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity.” Urban Planning 6: 195–207. doi:10.17645/up.v6i1.3525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer-Brodowski, M., R. Beecroft, and O. Parodi. 2018. “Learning in Real-World Laboratories: A Systematic Impulse for Discussion.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27: 23–27. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, E., and M. Acuto. 2018. “Networking Cities After Paris: Weighing the Ambition of Urban Climate Change Experimentation.” Global Policy 9: 549–559. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2011. “The Transition Town Network: A Review of Current Evolutions and Renaissance.” Social Movement Studies 10: 99–105. doi:10.1080/14742837.2011.545229.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., T. Hargreaves, S. Hielscher, M. Martiskainen, and G. Seyfang. 2016. “Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48: 407–432. doi:10.1177/0308518X15597908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and R. Raven. 2012. “What is Protective Space? Reconsidering Niches in Transitions to Sustainability.” Research Policy 41: 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2012. “Local Demonstrations for Global Transitions—Dynamics Across Governance Levels Fostering Socio-Technical Regime Change Towards Sustainability.” European Planning Studies 20: 461–479. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2012. “Transfer and Translation of Policy.” Policy Studies 33: 483–499. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2011. “Depoliticized Environments: The end of Nature, Climate Change and the Postpolitical Condition.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69: 253–274. doi:10.1017/S1358246111000300.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., P. Johnstone, and J. Schot. 2018. “Unpacking the Formation of Favourable Environments for Urban Experimentation: The Case of the Bristol Energy Scene.” Sustainability 10: 879. doi:10.3390/su10030879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., J. Schot, R. Raven, and P. Johnstone. 2019. “Seedbeds, Harbours, and Battlegrounds: On the Origins of Favourable Environments for Urban Experimentation with Sustainability.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 211–232. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., and T. von Wirth. 2021. “Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change? A Critical Appraisal and Three Steps Forward.” Urban Transformations 3: 8. doi:10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tosun, J. 2018. “Diffusion: An Outcome of and an Opportunity for Polycentric Activity?” In Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?, edited by A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster, 152–168. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., P. Kivimaa, and F. Berkhout. (Eds.) 2018a. Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments, 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. New York, NY, USA; Port Melbourne, Australia; New Delhi, India; Singapore. doi:10.1017/9781108277679
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., P. Kivimaa, and F. Berkhout. 2018b. Experiments and Beyond: An Emerging Agenda for Climate Governance Innovation, in: Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. New York, NY, USA; Port Melbourne, Australia; New Delhi, India; Singapore, 216–241.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York, NY, USA: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Afffairs, Population Division.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, S., and J. Rotmans. 2008. Deepening, Broadening and Scaling up. A Framework for Steering Transition Experiments (No. Essay 02). Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions, Delft/Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch-Ohlenschlager, S. J. M. 2010. Transition Experiments: Exploring Societal Changes Towards Sustainability. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• van den Heiligenberg, H., G. Heimeriks, M. Hekkert, R. Raven, and J. Sol. 2018. “Contrasting Regional Habitats for Urban Sustainability Experimentation in Europe.” Sustainability 10: 1624. doi:10.3390/su10051624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heiligenberg, H. A. R. M., G. J. Heimeriks, M. P. Hekkert, and F. G. van Oort. 2017. “A Habitat for Sustainability Experiments: Success Factors for Innovations in Their Local and Regional Contexts.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 204–215. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. 2018. “City and Subnational Governance: High Ambitions, Innovative Instruments and Polycentric Collaborations?” In Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?, edited by A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster, 81–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, B., and P. J. Beers. 2020. “Understanding and Governing Learning in Sustainability Transitions: A Review.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 255–269. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo, B., J. Halbe, P. J. Beers, G. Scholz, and J. Vinke-de Kruijf. 2020. “Learning About Learning in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 251–254. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Poeck, K., L. Östman, and T. Block. 2020. “Opening up the Black box of Learning-by-Doing in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 298–310. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Steenbergen, F., and N. Frantzeskaki. 2018. “The Importance of Place for Urban Transition Experiments: Understanding the Embeddedness of Urban Living Labs.” In Urban Living Labs: Experimenting with City Futures, edited by S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, L. Mai, K. McCormick, and Y. Voytenko Palgan, 231–247. London, UK; New York, NY, USA: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, L. 2008. “Systematic Reviewing.” Social Research Update 54: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Impacts of Urban Living Labs on Sustainability Transitions: Mechanisms and Strategies for Systemic Change Through Experimentation.” European Planning Studies 27: 229–257. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., and M. Levin-Keitel. 2020. “Lokale Nachhaltigkeitsexperimente als Raumwirksame Interventionen: Theoretische Grundlagen und Handlungskonzepte.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 29: 98–105. doi:10.14512/gaia.29.2.7.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., and F. Schroth. 2018. “Experimentation: The Politics of Innovation and Learning in Polycentric Governance.” In Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?, edited by A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, and J. Forster, 99–116. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voytenko, Y., K. McCormick, J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2016. “Urban Living Labs for Sustainability and low Carbon Cities in Europe: Towards a Research Agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, S., A. Bleicher, C. Polzin, F. Rauschmayer, and J. Rode. 2017. “The Nature of Experiments for Sustainability Transformations: A Search for Common Ground.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, F. R., O. Tjornbo, L. Schultz, P. Olsson, C. Folke, B. Crona, and Ö Bodin. 2013. A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 18. doi:10.5751/ES-05072-180327
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A. J., R. Raven, and F. Berkhout. 2015. “Transnational Linkages in Sustainability Experiments: A Typology and the Case of Solar Photovoltaic Energy in India.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 149–165. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2016. “Can low Carbon City Experiments Transform the Development Regime?” Futures 77: 80–96. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., F. Avelino, F. van Steenbergen, and D. Loorbach. 2017. “Actor Roles in Transition: Insights from Sociological Perspectives.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., J. van der Heijden, S. Juhola, and J. Patterson. 2019. “Learning in Urban Climate Governance: Concepts, key Issues and Challenges.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21: 1–15. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1558848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. K. W., D. Liefferink, and D. Torney. 2020. Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. New York, NY, USA.
   Google Scholar