From scandalization to normalization: conceptualizing the mainstreaming of far-right contestations in participatory processes

References

• Ahmed, S. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. 2009. “Communicative Theory.” In Planning Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Amadeu Antonio Stiftung. 2019. Demokratie in Gefahr: Handlungsempfehlungen zum Umgang mit der AFD. Berlin: Amadeo Antonio Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É, and I. Wallerstein. 1988. Race, Nation, Classe: Les Identités Ambiguës. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., and R. Mäntysalo. 2010. “Agonism and Institutional Ambiguity: Ideas on Democracy and the Role of Participation in the Development of Planning Theory and Practice - The Case of Finland.” Planning Theory 9: 333–350. doi:10.1177/1473095210373684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBE, B. B. 2017. Lebendige Orte – Eine Reise durch Barnim und Uckermark. Bundesnetzwerk Bürgerschaftliches Engagement: Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, J., and W. Nicholls. 2008. “Plural Governance, Participation and Democracy in Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32: 87–94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. 2006. “The Participation Trap: The Limitations of Participation for Ethnic and Racial Groups.” International Planning Studies 11: 3–18. doi:10.1080/13563470600935008
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. 2012. “Including the Excluded?” Changing the Understandings of Ethnicity in Contemporary English Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 13: 529–548. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.728005
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2016. “Innovating Inequity: If Race is a Technology, Postracialism is the Genius Bar.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39: 2227–2234. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1202423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojadžijev, M. 2016. “Is There a Post-Racism? On David Theo Goldberg's Conjunctural Analysis of the Post-Racial.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39: 2235–2240. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1202433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. 2011. “Negotiating a ‘Democratic Ethos’: Moving Beyond the Agonistic – Communicative Divide.” Planning Theory 10: 161–186. doi:10.1177/1473095210383081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2017. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2019. In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, K. 2022. “‘Peace, Freedom, No Dictatorship!’: Germans Protest Against Covid Restrictions.” The Guardian, January 25. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/25/peace-freedom-no-dictatorship-germans-protest-against-covid-restrictions
   Google Scholar
• DIFU. 2019. Bürgerdialog in Zeiten aufgeheizter Debatten [Citizens’ Dialogues in Times of Heated Debate]. Accessed 6 October 2020. Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik website: https://difu.de/veranstaltungen/2019-12-12/buergerdialog-in-zeiten-aufgeheizter-debatten
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1996. The Dark Side of Planning: Rationality and ‘Realrationalität’ (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2278431). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Förtner, M., B. Belina, and M. Naumann. 2020. “The Revenge of the Village? The Geography of Right-Wing Populist Electoral Success, Anti-Politics, and Austerity in Germany.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39: 574–596. doi:10.1177/2399654420951803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and B. Sunkara. 2019. The Old is Dying and the New Cannot be Born: From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and Beyond. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Froio, C., P. Gattinara, G. Bulli, and M. Albanese. 2020. CasaPound Italia: Contemporary Extreme-Right Politics . London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gesemann, F., and L. Freudenberg. 2021. Produktive Resonanzräume Schaffen: Gemeinwesenarbeit und Lokale Demokratie [4]. Berlin: DESI: Institut für Demokratische Entwicklung und Soziale Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 2021. Inaugural Lecture: ‘Anti-racism as Politics’. Institute of Advanced Studies (IAS), University College London (UCL). Accessed 10 May 2021. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/institute-of-advanced-studies/events/2021/may/virtual-ias-festival-inaugural-lecture-anti-racism-politics-professor-paul-gilroy
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. 2015. Are we all Postracial Yet? Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. 2015. Planning and Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Contentious Urban Developments. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, N. 2014. “Perspektiven urbaner Dekolonisierung: Die europäische Stadt als ‘Contact Zone’. sub\urban.” zeitschrift für kritische stadtforschung 2: 27–48. doi:10.36900/suburban.v2i1.106
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Nachdr.). Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992. “Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” The Town Planning Review 63: 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Heitmeyer, W. 2018. Autoritäre Versuchungen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. 2020. “On Spatial Planning and Marxism: Looking Back, Going Forward.” Antipode 52: 800–824. doi:10.1111/anti.12614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., and O. Yiftachel. 2000. “New Paradigm or old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 333–342. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2004. “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century.” Planning Theory & Practice 5: 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Keith, M. 2005. After the Cosmopolitan? Multicultural Cities and the Future of Racism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khakee, A. 2020. “Planning Dilemmas.” Planning Theory & Practice 21: 175–181. doi:10.1080/14649357.2019.1700074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipfer, S., and P. Saberi. 2016. “The Times and Spaces of Right Populism: From Paris to Toronto.” Socialist Register 52. https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/25603
   Google Scholar
• Landeshauptstadt Dresden. 2017. Wir Entfalten Demokratie Lokales Handlungsprogramm für ein vielfältiges und weltoffenes Dresden 2017 bis 2022. Dresden: Landeshauptstadt Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2019. Necropolitics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005a. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005b. “The ‘End of Politics’ and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by F. Panizza, 55–72. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2016. The Populist Radical Right: A Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2019. The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, D. 2019. “Urban Conditions for the Rise of the Far Right in the Global City of Frankfurt: From Austerity Urbanism, Post-Democracy and Gentrification to Regressive Collectivity.” Urban Studies 58: 131–147. doi:10.1177/0042098019878395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nettelbladt, G. 2021. “Disrupting Dialogue? The Participatory Urban Governance of Far-Right Contestations in Cottbus.” Urban Planning 6: 91–102. doi:10.17645/up.v6i2.3793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. 2002. “Whiteness and the Participation-Inclusion Dilemma.” Political Theory 30: 384–409. doi:10.1177/0090591702030003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. 2004. The Abolition of White Democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, E., and T. Tasan-Kok. 2019. “Planners’ Role in Accommodating Citizen Disagreement: The Case of Dutch Urban Planning.” Urban Studies 56: 741–759. doi:10.1177/0042098017726738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, A., and P. Gattinara. 2018. “Movement Parties of the Far Right: The Organisation and Strategies of Nativist Collective Actors.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 23: 367–383. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-23-3-367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. 2021. “Conflict, Consent, Dissensus: The Unfinished as Challenge to Politics and Planning.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39: 1294–1309. doi:10.1177/2399654420985849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2008. Recapturing Democracy: Neoliberalization and the Struggle for Alternative Urban Futures. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2009. “Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements?” Planning Theory 8: 140–165. doi:10.1177/1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., and T. Tasan-Kok. 2019. “Governing Urban Diversity: Multi-Scalar Representations, Local Contexts, Dissonant Narratives.” European Urban and Regional Studies 26: 230–238. doi:10.1177/0969776419854947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvan, H., and M. Raab. 2020. Dialog-Veranstaltungen als Demokratisierung? Eine Analyse der Bürgerdialoge in Cottbus in Zeiten völkisch-autoritärer Mobilisierung. [Dialogue as Democratisation? Analysing Neighbourhood Forums During völkisch-authoritarian mobilisation]. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-btu/5206
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, L., and P. Bescherer. 2021. “Organizing with Tenants and Fighting Rightist Resentments: A Case Study from East Germany.” Radical Housing Journal 3: 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, W. 2000. “Zur Komplementarität von Diskurs und Macht in der Planung.” DisP - The Planning Review 36: 4–16. doi:10.1080/02513625.2000.10556733
   Google Scholar
• Rheindorf, M., and R. Wodak. 2019. “Austria First’ Revisited: A Diachronic Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Gender and Body Politics of the Extreme Right.” Patterns of Prejudice 53: 1–19. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2019.1595392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero, J., L. Sotomayor, J. Zanotto, and A. Zitcer. 2020. “Democratic Public or Populist Rabble: Repositioning the City Amidst Social Fracture.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1–14. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskamm, N. 2015. “On the Other Side of “Agonism”: “The Enemy,” The “Outside,” and the Role of Antagonism.” Planning Theory 14: 384–403. doi:10.1177/1473095214533959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, U. 2018. “The Populist Eruption and the Urban Question.” Urban Geography 39: 1425–1430. doi:10.1080/02723638.2018.1448135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2019. “The City in the Age of Trumpism: From Sanctuary to Abolition.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37: 761–778. doi:10.1177/0263775819830969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2019. “Communicative Planning.” In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, and V. Watson, 93–104. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2020. “Populists and Planners: ‘We Are The People. Who Are you?’*.” Planning Theory 19: 80–103. doi:10.1177/1473095219864692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süß, R., and A. Kolioulis. 2020. The Politics of Provocations Against Hostile Institutions. Accessed 22 January 2021. BREAK // LINE website: https://breakline.studio/projects/hostile-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42: 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traverso, E. 2019. The New Faces of Fascism: Populism and the Far Right. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., and J. Duyvendak. 2008. “Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam.” Urban Studies 45: 1485–1503. doi:10.1177/0042098008090685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, M. 2020. “The Enduring Significance of Race and Ethnicity in Urban Communities.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City 1: 1–5. doi:10.1080/26884674.2020.1787755
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., and E. Swyngedouw. 2015. The Post-Political and its Discontents: Space of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 2021. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76: 22–43. doi:10.2307/20048274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhour, S. 2020. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Public Participation in Planning: Contrasting Optimistic, Critical, and Agnostic Understandings.” Planning Theory 19: 349–370. doi:10.1177/1473095219897404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar