Active mobility-oriented urban development: a morpho-syntactic scenario for a mid-sized town

References

• Abley, S., and D. Halden. 2013. “The New Zealand Accesssibility Analysis Methodology.” NZ Transport Agency Research Report 512, March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 1997. “Predicting Where We Walk.” Nature 388: 19–20. doi:10.1038/40266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevolo, C., R. P. Dameri, and B. D’Auria. 2016. “Smart Mobility in Smart City.” In Empowering Organizations Enabling Platforms and Artefacts; vol.11 of the Series, edited by T. Torre, A. Braccini, and R. Spinelli, 13–28. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berghauser Pont, M., and L. H. Marcus. 2015. “Connectivity, Density and Built form: Integrating ‘Spacemate’ with Space Syntax,” Conference:ISUF2015 XXII international Conference: City as organism. New visions for urban life.
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. J. 1978. “The Measurement of Spatial Opportunity in Strategic Planning.” Regional Studies 12 (4): 463–479. doi:10.1080/09595237800185401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy Dalton, R. 2003. “The Secret is to Follow Your Nose.” Environment and Behavior 35: 107–131. doi:10.1177/0013916502238867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutini, V. 2019. “When Cities Lose Their Tail: Sprawl as a Configurational Matter.” In 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, SSS2019.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin, T. H., D. McLaren, and M. Hillman. 1991. Reviving the City:Towards Sustainable Urban Development. London: Continuum International Publishing, ISBN978-0-905966-83-0.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, G., F. Scorza, B. Murgante, et al. 2019. “Cyclable City: A Territorial Assessment Procedure for Disruptive Policy-making on Urban Mobility.” In ICCSA2019, LNCS, vol.11624, edited by S. Misra. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, G., F. Scorza, B. Murgante, et al. 2020. “Hybrid Oriented Sustainable Urban Development: A Pattern of Low-carbon Access to Schools in the City of Potenza.” In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol.12255, edited by O. Gervasi. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_15
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.” Sociometry 40 (1): 35–41. doi:10.2307/3033543
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, H., L. Frank, and R. Jackson. 2004. Urban Sprawl and Public Health:Designing, Planning and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garau, C., F. Masala, and F. Pinna. 2016. “Cagliari and Smart Urban Mobility:Analysis and Comparison.” Cities 56: 35–46. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., and B. Van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility Evaluation of Land-use and Transport Strategie: Review and Research Directions.” Journal of Transport Geography 12: 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. 1997. “Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives.” Environment and Planning A 29 (7): 1175–1194. doi:10.1068/a291175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. 1989. Order and Structure in Urban Space: A Morphological History of the City of London. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1999. “Centrality as a Process:Accounting for Attraction Inequalities in Deformed Grids.” Urban Design International 4 (3&4): 107–127. doi:10.1057/udi.1999.19
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2009a. “Spatial Sustainability in Cities: Organic Patterns and Sustainable Forms.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium (K01:1-20), Stockholm, Sweden:Royal Institute of Technology(KTH).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2009b. “The Genetic Code for Cities–Is It Simpler Than We Thought?” In (Proceedings) Complexity in Cities conference. University of Delft, Sept. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2016. “What Are Cities For? and How Does it Relate to Their Spatial Form?” The Journal of Space Syntax 6 (2): 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., J. Hanson, J. Peponis, J. Hudson, and R. Burdett. 1983. “Space Syntax. A Different Urban Perspective.” Architectural Journal 30: 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and S. Iida. 2005. “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement.” In Proceedings of Spatial Information Theory:International Conference, COSIT 2005, Ellicottsville, N.Y., U.S.A., edited by A. G. Cohn and D. M. Mark, 475–490. Berlin,Germany: Springer-Verlag, September14–18, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, and J. Xu. 1993. “Natural Movement:Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement.” Environment and Planning B 20 (1): 29–66. doi:10.1068/b200029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISPRA. 2018. “Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2016 – National Inventory Report 2018, ISPRA, Rapporti 283/2018.” Accessed 18 November 2019. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/italian-greenhouse-gas-inventory-1990-2016.-national-inventory-report-2018
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., C. Claramunt, and M. Batty. 1999. “Geometric Accessibility and Geographic Information: Extending Desktop GIS to Space Syntax.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 23: 127–146. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00017-4
   Google Scholar
• Karlström, A., and L.-G. Mattsson. 2009. “Place, Space Syntax and Attraction-accessibility.” In Proceedings of the 7thInternational Space Syntax Symposium Edited by Daniel Koch, Lars Marcus and Jesper Steen, Stockholm: KTH, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kolovou, I., J. Gil, K. Karimi, S. Law, and L. Versluis. 2017. “Road Centre Line Simplification Principles for Angular Segment Analysis.” In Proceedings 11thINTERNATIONAL SPACE SYNTAX SYMPOSIUM, 2017, pp. 163.1–163.16. Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Koning, R.d., W. G. Z. Tan, and A. van Nes. 2020. “Assessing Spatial Configurations and Transport Energy Usage for Planning Sustainable Communities.” Sustainability 12: 8146. doi:10.3390/su12198146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf, K. 2009. “Aspects of Urban Form.” Urban Morphology 13 (2): 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. 2000. “Analysis of Human Spatial Behaviour in a GIS Environment: Recent Developments and Future Prospects.” Geographical Systems 2: 85–90. doi:10.1007/s101090050034
   Google Scholar
• Las Casas, G., and F. Scorza. 2016. “Sustainable Planning: A Methodological Toolkit.” In ICCSA2016, LNCS (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol.9786, edited by O. Gervasi, et al. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_53.
   Google Scholar
• Las Casas, G., F. Scorza, and B. Murgante. 2019. “New Urban Agenda and Open Challenges for Urban and Regional Planning.” In New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT2018, edited by F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, and C. Bevilacqua, 282–288. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_33.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. 2013. “The New Transportation Planning Paradigm.” ITE Journal 83 (6): 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. 2016. “Getting Smart About Urban Mobility–Aligning the Paradigms of Smart and Sustainable.” Transportation Research Part A 115: 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Manum, B., and T. Nordström. 2013. “Integrating Bicycle Network Analysis in Urban Design; Improving Bikeability in Trondheim by Combining Space Syntax and GIS-methods Using the Place Syntax Tool.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by Y. O. Kim, et al., (vol. 28, 1–14). Seoul: Sejong University.
   Google Scholar
• McCahill, C., and N. W. Garrick. 2008. “The Applicability of Space Syntax to Bicycle Facility Planning.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2074: 46–51. doi:10.3141/2074-06
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. 2007. “Place-Based Versus People-based Geographic Information Science.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 503–535. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00025.x
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, C., Z. Allam, D. Chabaud, C. Gall, and F. Pratlong. 2021. “Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-pandemic Cities.” Smart Cities 4: 93–111. doi:10.3390/smartcities4010006.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V. 1992. “‘Getting to Know the Built Landscape:Typomorphology’.” In Ordering Space: Types in Architecture and Design, edited by K. Franck and L. Schneekloth, 289–311. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, V. M. 2016. “What is Space Syntax Not? Reflections on Space Syntax as Socio-spatial Theory.” Urban Design International 21 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, I., and N. Kaplan. 2019. “Structural Properties of the Angular and Metric Street Network’s Centralities and Their Implications for Movement Flows.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46: 1182–1200. doi:10.1177/2399808318760571
   Google Scholar
• Papa, E., and D. Lauwers. 2015. “Smart Mobility: Opportunity or Threat to Innovate Places and Cities’.” In 20th International Conference on Urban Planning and regional Development in the Information Society, Ghent, Belgium, CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Raford, N., A. Chiaradia, and J. Gil. 2007. “Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cycklist Route Choice in Central London.” In TRB 2007 Annual Meeting, Washington D. C. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8qz8m4fz
   Google Scholar
• Ratti, C. 2004. “Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 487–499. doi:10.1068/b3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saganeiti, L., A. Favale, A. Pilogallo, F. Scorza, and B. Murgante. 2018. “Assessing Urban Fragmentation at Regional Scale Using Sprinkling Indexes.” Sustainability 10: 3274. doi:10.3390/su10093274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santopietro, L., and F. Scorza. 2021. “The Italian Experience of the Covenant of Mayors: A Territorial Evaluation.” Sustainability 13 (3): 1289. doi:10.3390/su13031289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorza, F., and G. Fortunato. 2021. “Cyclable Cities: Building Feasible Scenario Through Urban Space-morphology Assessment.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 147 (4), doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scorza, F., L. Saganeiti, A. Pilogallo, and B. Murgante. 2020. “Ghost Planning: The Inefficiency of Energy Sector Policies in a Low Population Density Region.” Archivio Di Studi Urbani E Regionali 127: 34–55. doi:10.3280/ASUR2020-127-S1003.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. 1994. “A Life of the Place: A Phenomenological Commentary on Bill Hillier's Theory of Space Syntax.” Nordic Journal of Academical Research 7 (1): 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. 2003. “Review of Bill Hillier’s Space is the Machine.” Environmental & Architectural Phenomenology 14: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Staricco, L. 2013. “Smart Mobility: Opportunità e condizioni.” TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 6: 341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhle, A., L. Marcus, and A. KarlstrÄom. 2005. “Place Syntax - Geographic Accessibility with Axial Lines in GIS.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium in Space Syntax, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Tira, M. 2003. “Safety of Pedestrians and Cyclists in Europe: The DUMAS Approach.” In Sustainable Transport, edited by Rodney Tolley, 339–350. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2007. “From Axial to Road-centre Lines: A new Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 539–555. doi:10.1068/b32067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., and R. C. Dalton. 2005. “A Simplified Route Choice Model Using the Shortest Angular Path Assumption.” In The 8th International Conference on GeoCompuation.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2012. State of the World’s Cities Report 2012/2013: Prosperity of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Van Nes, A., and C. Yamu. 2018. “Space Syntax: A Method to Measure Urban Space Related to Social, Economic and Cognitive Factors.” In The Virtual And The Real in Planning and Urban Design: Perspectives, Practices and Applications, edited by C. Yamu, A. Poplin, O. Devisch, and G. de Roo, 136–150. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Varoudis, T., S. Law, K. Karimi, B. Hillier, and A. Penn. 2013. “Space Syntax Angular Betweenness Centrality Revisited.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by Y. O. Kim, H. T. Park, and K. W. Seo. Seoul: Sejong University. paper077.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. 2000. Complex Spatial Systems: The Modelling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2013. “The Low Carbon City Development Program(LCCDP) Guidebook: A Systems Approach to Low Carbon Development in Cities.” Accessed 18 December 2019. http://www.bridge.ids.ac.uk/go/home&id=65489&type=Document&langID=1
   Google Scholar