Regional innovation systems in an era of grand societal challenges: reorientation versus transformation

References

• Abson, D. J., J. Fischer, J. Leventon, J. Newig, T. Schomerus, U. Vilsmaier, H. von Wehrden, P. Abernethy, C. D. Ives, N. C. Jager, and D. L. Lang. 2017. “Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation.” Ambio 46: 30–39. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afewerki, S., and A. Karlsen. 2021. “Policy Mixes for Just Sustainable Development in Regions Specialised in Carbon-Intensive Industries; the Case of Two Norwegian Petro-Maritime Regions.” European Planning Studies, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1941786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. Advanced Introduction to Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, H., A. Bergek, Ø Bjørgum, T. Hansen, A. Kenzhegaliyeva, and M. Steen. 2020. “Implementing Maritime Battery-Electric and Hydrogen Solutions: A Technological Innovation System Analysis.” Transportation Research Part D 87 (2020) 102492: 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.10249.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., L. Coenen, J. Murphy, and B. Truffer. 2020. “Geographies of Transition - From Topical Concerns to Theoretical Engagement: A Comment on the Transtions Agenda.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bours, A., I. Wanzenböck, and K. Frenken. 2021. “Small Wins for Grand Challenges. A Bottom-up Governence Approach to Regional Innovation Policy.” European Planning Studies. 1–20, doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1980502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braams, R., J. Wesseling, A. Meijer, and M. Hekkert. 2021. “Legitimizing Transformative Government. Aligning Essential Government Tasks from Transition Literature with Normative Arguments About Legitimacy from Public Administration Traditions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 39: 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M., A. Andersen, and M. Steen. 2021. “The Role of Regional Innovation Systems in Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Exploring the Problem-Solution Space in Electrification of Maritime Transport.” European Planning Studies, 1–22, doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1988907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calignano, G., and M. Trippl. 2020. “Innovation-Driven or Challenge-driven Participation in International Energy Innovation Networks? Empirical Evidence from the H2020 Programme.” Sustainability 12 (11): 4696. doi:10.3390/su12114696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellano, F., T. Makkonen, N. Dotti, A. Morisson, and A. Rizzo. 2021. “Where Innovation Meets Directionality: An Index to Measure Regional Readiness to Deal with Societal Challenges.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1976114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula, M. 2022. “Implementing the Transformative Innovation Policy in the European Union: How does Transformative Change Occur in Member States?” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2025345.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., B-Å Lundvall, and S. Haneef. 2018. Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., T. Hansen, and J. Rekers. 2015. “Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges.” An Economic Geography Perspective. Geography Compass 9 (9): 483–496. doi:10.1111/gec3.12231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., and K. Morgan. 2020. “Evolving Geographies of Innovation: Existing Paradigms, Critiques and Possible Alternatives.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 74 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and S. Nunes. 2021. “Post-Coronavirus Regional Innovation Policies: From Mega to Giga and Beyond through Sustainable Spatial Planning of Global Tourism.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1936463.
   Google Scholar
• Davelaar, D. 2021. “Transformation for Sustainability: A Deep Leverage Points Approach.” Sustainability Science 16: 727–747. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00872-0.
   Google Scholar
• Diercks, G., H. Larsen, and F. Steward. 2019. “Transformative Innovation Policy: Addressing Variety in an Emerging Policy Paradigm.” Research Policy 48 (4): 880–894. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and I. Wanzenböck. 2022. “Towards a Problem-Oriented Regional Industrial Policy: Possibilities for Public Intervention in Framing, Valuation and Market Formation.” Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.2016680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2019. “Socio-technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Eleboration of the Multi-Level Perspective.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39: 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., H. Gong, K. F, and A. Herr. 2021. “Exploring the Scope of Regions in Challenge-Oriented Innovation Policy: The Case of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.” European Planning Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2017857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyen, D., L. Hermwille, and T. Wehnert. 2017. “Out of the Comfort Zone! Governing the Exnovation of Unsustainable Technologies and Practices.” GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 26 (4): 326–331. doi:10.14512/gaia.26.4.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., N. Frantzeskaki, and D. Loorbach. 2019. “Steering Transformations Under Climate Change: Capacities for Transformative Climate Governance and the Case of Rotterdam, the Netherland.” Regional Environmental Change 19: 791–805. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1329-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2016. “Path Development in Different Regional Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis.” In Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategy, edited by D. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, and A. Rodriguez-Pose, 66–84. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerat, H., and O. Crevoisier. 2021. “From Competitiveness to Territorial Value: Transformative Territorial Innovaion Policies and Achoring Milieus.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2042208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., and F. Kern. 2016. “Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Support? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 45: 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrea, M., and J. Karlsen. 2021. “Think Tanks for a New Generation of Regional Innovation Policies.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1985085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., L. Kempton, P. O'Brien, E. Ormerod, A. Pike, and J. Tomaney. 2022. “Reframing Urban and Regional ‘Development’ for ‘Left Behind’ Places.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 15: 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transition: An Emerging Field of Research and its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., and B. Truffer. 2008. “Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-level Perspective: Towards an Integrated Framework.” Research Policy 37: 596–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, H. 2020. “The Scope of Regional Innovation Policy to Realize Transformative Change – A Case Study of the Chemicals Industry in Western Sweden.” European Planning Studies 28 (12): 2409–2427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2021. “Rebuilding the Economy from the Covid Crisis: Time to Rethink Regional Studies?” Regional Studies, Regional Science 8: 143–161. doi:10.1080/21681376.2021.1919191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., R. Kattel, and J. Ryan-Collins. 2020. “Challenge-driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit.” Journal of Industry, Competetion and Trade 20: 421–437. doi:10.1007/s10842-019-00329-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and L. Soete. 2020. Place-based Innovation for Sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. 1999. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT: Sustainability Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., and C. Sabel. 2019. “The Experimentalist Polity.” In NESTA Radical Visions of Future Government, 75–81. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, C. 2016. “Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future.” In Rethinking Capitalism, Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, edited by M. Jacobs and M. Mazzucato, 191–215. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, A., F. Cappellano, I. Pierantoni, and M. Sargolini. 2022. “Do Natural Disasters Accelerate Sustainability Transitions? Insights from the Central Italy Earthquake.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2022104.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47: 1154–1567. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2011). Den Vanskelige Transformasjonen. In J. Hanson, S. Kasa, & O. Wicken (eds.), Energirikdommens paradokser (ss. 23–44). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2018. “Regional Innovation Policies for New Path Development – Beyond Neo-Liberal and Traditional Systemic Views.” European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1779–1795. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., M. Trippl, and V. Desch. 2021. “New Directions for RIS Studies and Policies in the Face of Grand Societal Challenges.” European Planning Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09654313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., M. Trippl, and A. Frangenheim. 2020. “Policy Options for Green Regional Development: Adopting a Production and Application Perspective.” Science and Public Policy 47 (6): 865–875. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. 2022. Challenge-oriented Regional Innovation Systems and Strategies for Sustainability Transitions. Seville: JRC.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, A. Frangenheim, A. Isaksen, and J. Rypestøl. 2020. “Unravelling Green Regional Industrial Path Development: Regional Preconditions, Asset Modification and Agency.” Geoforum 111: 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., B. Ribeiro, and L. Cale-Clough. 2019. “Exploring the Normative Turn in Regional Innovation Policy: Responsibility and the Quest for Public Value.” European Planning Studies 27 (12): 2359–2375. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1609425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., and K. Frenken. 2020. “The Subsidiarity Principle in Innovation Policy for Societal Challenges.” Global Transitions 2: 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.002.
   Google Scholar