1,096
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The emergence of artificial intelligence in the regional sciences: a literature review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1304-1324 | Received 29 Jun 2022, Accepted 08 Jul 2022, Published online: 25 Jul 2022

References

  • Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2018. “The Race Between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment.” American Economic Review 108 (6): 1488–1542. doi:10.1257/aer.20160696
  • Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2020. “The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labour Demand.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13 (1): 25–35. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz022
  • Adler, P., and R. Florida. 2021. “The Rise of Urban Tech: How Innovations for Cities Come from Cities.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1787–1800. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1962520
  • Amabile, T. 2019. “Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and a World of Surprises.” Academy of Management Discoveries 6 (3).
  • Araral, E. 2020. “Why do Cities Adopt Smart Technologies? Contingency Theory and Evidence from the United States.” Cities 106: 102873. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102873
  • Baker, P. M., H. Gaspard, and J. A. Zhu. 2021. “Industry 4.0/Digitalization and Networks of Innovation in the North American Regional Context.” European Planning Studies 29 (9): 1708–1722. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1963053
  • Balland, P. A., and R. Boschma. 2021. “Mapping the Potentials of Regions in Europe to Contribute to new Knowledge Production in Industry 4.0 Technologies.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1652–1666. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1900557
  • Barzotto, M., and L. De Propris. 2021. “The Value of Firm Linkages in the age of Industry 4.0: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” The Annals of Regional Science 67 (2): 245–272. doi:10.1007/s00168-021-01047-0
  • Bessagnet, A., J. Crespo, and J. Vicente. 2021. “Unraveling the Multi-Scalar and Evolutionary Forces of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Historical Event Analysis Applied to IoT Valley.” Technovation 108: 102329. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102329
  • Bilgen, H. 2021. “A Global Comparison Methodology to Determine Critical Requirements for Achieving Industry 4.0.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121036. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121036
  • Buarque, B. S., R. B. Davies, R. M. Hynes, and D. F. Kogler. 2020. “OK Computer: The Creation and Integration of AI in Europe.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13 (1): 175–192. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz023
  • Busch, H. C., C. Mühl, M. Fuchs, and M. Fromhold-Eisebith. 2021. “Digital Urban Production: How Does Industry 4.0 Reconfigure Productive Value Creation in Urban Contexts?” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1801–1815. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1957460
  • Capello, R., and C. Lenzi. 2021. “Industry 4.0 and Servitisation: Regional Patterns of 4.0 Technological Transformations in Europe.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173: 121164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121164
  • Caprotti, F., and D. Liu. 2020. Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities.
  • Chambers, J., and J. Evans. 2020. “Informal Urbanism and the Internet of Things: Reliability, Trust and the Reconfiguration of Infrastructure.” Urban Studies 57 (14): 2918–2935. doi:10.1177/0042098019890798
  • Chang, V. 2021. “An Ethical Framework for big Data and Smart Cities.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 165: 120559. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120559
  • Content, J., and K. Frenken. 2016. “Related Variety and Economic Development: A Literature Review.” European Planning Studies 24 (12): 2097–2112. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
  • Cooke, P. 2020. “Silicon Valley Imperialists Create new Model Villages as Smart Cities in Their own Image.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6 (2): 24. doi:10.3390/joitmc6020024
  • Cooke, P. 2021. “Three Disruptive Models of new Spatial Planning: “attention”, “Surveillance” or “Sustainable” Capitalisms?” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7 (1): 46. doi:10.3390/joitmc7010046
  • Corradini, C., E. Santini, and C. Vecciolini. 2021. “The Geography of Industry 4.0 Technologies Across European Regions.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1667–1680. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1884216
  • Cristianini, N. 2014. “On the Current Paradigm in Artificial Intelligence.” AI Communications 27 (1): 37–43. doi:10.3233/AIC-130582
  • Cristianini, N. 2021. “Shortcuts to Artificial Intelligence.” In Machines We Trust, edited by M. Pelillo, and T. Scantamburlo, 11–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cristianini, N., and T. Scantamburlo. 2020. “On Social Machines for Algorithmic Regulation.” AI & Society 35: 645–662. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00917-8
  • Culot, G., G. Nassimbeni, G. Orzes, and M. Sartor. 2020. “Behind the Definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and Open Questions.” International Journal of Production Economics 226: 107617. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107617
  • De Propris, L., and D. Bailey. 2021. “Pathways of Regional Transformation and Industry 4.0.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1617–1629. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1960962
  • Di Vaio, A., R. Palladino, R. Hassan, and O. Escobar. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence and Business Models in the Sustainable Development Goals Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Business Research 121: 283–314. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019
  • Dignam, A. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence, Tech Corporate Governance and the Public Interest Regulatory Response.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13 (1): 37–54. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsaa002
  • Doloreux, D., and E. Turkina. 2021. “New Path Creation in the Artificial Intelligence Industry: Regional Preconditions, new Actors and Their Collective Actions, and Policies.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1751–1763. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1919610
  • Duman, M. C., and B. Akdemir. 2021. “A Study to Determine the Effects of Industry 4.0 Technology Components on Organizational Performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167: 120615. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120615
  • Fagerberg, J., and B. Verspagen. 2009. “Innovation Studies—The Emerging Structure of a new Scientific Field.” Research Policy 38: 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006
  • Fang, C., X. Yu, X. Zhang, J. Fang, and H. Liu. 2020. “Big Data Analysis on the Spatial Networks of Urban Agglomeration.” Cities 102: 102735. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102735
  • Floridi, L., and J. Cowls. 2019. “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society.” Harvard Data Science Review 1 (1): 1–15.
  • Frank, M. R., D. Wang, M. Cebrian, and I. Rahwan. 2019. “The Evolution of Citation Graphs in Artificial Intelligence Research.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (2): 79–85. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0024-5
  • Fromhold-Eisebith, M., P. Marschall, R. Peters, and P. Thomes. 2021. “Torn Between Digitized Future and Context Dependent Past – How Implementing ‘Industry 4.0’ Production Technologies Could Transform the German Textile Industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 166: 120620. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120620
  • Fröhlich, K., and R. Hassink. 2018. “Regional Resilience: A Stretched Concept?” European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1763–1778. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1494137
  • Furman, J., and R. Seamans. 2019. “AI and the Economy.” Innovation Policy and the Economy 19 (1): 161–191. doi:10.1086/699936
  • Gentili, A., F. Compagnucci, M. Gallegati, and E. Valentini. 2020. “Are Machines Stealing our Jobs?” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13 (1): 153–173. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz025
  • Girasa, R. 2020. Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology: Economic Transformation and Government Regulation. Cham: Springer Nature.
  • Goel, R. K., C. S. Yadav, and S. Vishnoi. 2021. “Self-sustainable Smart Cities: Socio-Spatial Society Using Participative Bottom-up and Cognitive top-Down Approach.” Cities 118: 103370. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103370
  • Gupta, A., P. Panagiotopoulos, and F. Bowen. 2020. “An Orchestration Approach to Smart City Data Ecosystems.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119929. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119929
  • Haefner, N., J. Wincent, V. Parida, and O. Gassmann. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Management: A Review, Framework, and Research Agenda✰.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 162: 120392. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120392
  • He, Q., J. Zhou, S. Tan, Y. Song, L. Zhang, Y. Mou, and J. Wu. 2020. “What is the Developmental Level of Outlying Expansion Patches? A Study of 275 Chinese Cities Using Geographical big Data.” Cities 105: 102395. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102395
  • Henry, M., D. Schraven, N. Bocken, K. Frenken, M. Hekkert, and J. Kirchherr. 2021. “The Battle of the Buzzwords: A Comparative Review of the Circular Economy and the Sharing Economy Concepts.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38: 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.008
  • Hervás-Oliver, J. L. 2021. “Industry 4.0 in Industrial Districts: Regional Innovation Policy for the Toy Valley District in Spain.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1775–1786. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1939861
  • Huang, T. L., and B. S. Liu. 2021. “Augmented Reality is Human-Like: How the Humanizing Experience Inspires Destination Brand Love.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 170: 120853. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120853
  • Hui, E. C., X. Li, T. Chen, and W. Lang. 2020. “Deciphering the Spatial Structure of China's Megacity Region: A new bay Area—The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in the Making.” Cities 105: 102168. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.011
  • Indaco, A. 2020. “From Twitter to GDP: Estimating Economic Activity from Social Media.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 85: 103591. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103591
  • Iqbal, R., F. Doctor, B. More, S. Mahmud, and U. Yousuf. 2020. “Big Data Analytics: Computational Intelligence Techniques and Application Areas.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119253. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.024
  • Jeannerat, H., and T. Theurillat. 2021. “Old Industrial Spaces Challenged by Platformized Value-Capture 4.0.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1738–1750. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1935840
  • Julsrud, T. E., and J. R. Krogstad. 2020. “Is There Enough Trust for the Smart City? Exploring Acceptance for use of Mobile Phone Data in Oslo and Tallinn.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161: 120314. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120314
  • Kagermann, H., W. Wahlster, and J. Helbig. 2013. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Industrie 4.0 Working Group of Acatech.
  • Kahle, J. H., É Marcon, A. Ghezzi, and A. G. Frank. 2020. “Smart Products Value Creation in SMEs Innovation Ecosystems.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 156: 120024. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120024
  • Kandt, J., and M. Batty. 2021. “Smart Cities, big Data and Urban Policy: Towards Urban Analytics for the Long run.” Cities 109: 102992. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102992
  • Keding, C. 2021. “Understanding the Interplay of Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Management: Four Decades of Research in Review.” Management Review Quarterly 71 (1): 91–134. doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00181-x
  • Kim, B., M. Yoo, K. C. Park, K. R. Lee, and J. H. Kim. 2021. “A Value of Civic Voices for Smart City: A big Data Analysis of Civic Queries Posed by Seoul Citizens.” Cities 108: 102941. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102941
  • Kumar, H., M. K. Singh, M. P. Gupta, and J. Madaan. 2020. “Moving Towards Smart Cities: Solutions That Lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119281. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024
  • Kummitha, R. K. R. 2020. “Why Distance Matters: The Relatedness Between Technology Development and its Appropriation in Smart Cities.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 157: 120087. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120087
  • Labory, S., and P. Bianchi. 2021. “Regional Industrial Policy in Times of big Disruption: Building Dynamic Capabilities in Regions.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1829–1838. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1928043
  • Larson, W., and Z. Weihua. 2020. “Self-driving Cars and the City: Effects on Sprawl, Energy Consumption, and Housing Affordability.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 81. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103484
  • Lazzeretti, L. 2020. “What is the Role of Culture Facing the Digital Revolution Challenge? Some Reflections for a Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1836133.
  • Lepore, D., and F. Spigarelli. 2020. “Integrating Industry 4.0 Plans Into Regional Innovation Strategies.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 35 (5): 496–510. doi:10.1177/0269094220937452
  • Lim, C., G. H. Cho, and J. Kim. 2021. “Understanding the Linkages of Smart-City Technologies and Applications: Key Lessons from a Text Mining Approach and a Call for Future Research.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 170: 120893. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120893
  • Liu, W., W. Wu, P. Thakuriah, and J. Wang. 2020. “The Geography of Human Activity and Land use: A big Data Approach.” Cities 97: 102523. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102523
  • Ma, Y., J. Wright, S. Gopal, and N. Phillips. 2020. “Seeing the Invisible: From Imagined to Virtual Urban Landscapes.” Cities 98: 102559. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102559
  • McAfee, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. (2012). “Big Data: The Management Revolution.” Harvard Business Review 90 (10): 60–66, 68, 128. PMID: 23074865.
  • Mohamed, N., J. Al-Jaroodi, I. Jawhar, A. Idries, and F. Mohammed. 2020. “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Applications in Future Smart Cities.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119293. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004
  • Monachesi, P. 2020. “Shaping an Alternative Smart City Discourse Through Twitter: Amsterdam and the Role of Creative Migrants.” Cities 100: 102664. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102664
  • Olson, A. W., F. Calderón-Figueroa, O. Bidian, D. Silver, and S. Sanner. 2021. “Reading the City Through its Neighbourhoods: Deep Text Embeddings of Yelp Reviews as a Basis for Determining Similarity and Change.” Cities 110: 103045. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.103045
  • Pasquale, F. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Perez, C. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The Dynamic of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Ranchod, R. 2020. “The Data-Technology Nexus in South African Secondary Cities: The Challenges to Smart Governance.” Urban Studies 57 (16): 3281–3298. doi:10.1177/0042098019896974
  • Rice, J., and N. Martin. 2020. “Smart Infrastructure Technologies: Crowdsourcing Future Development and Benefits for Australian Communities.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119256. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.027
  • Russell, S., D. Dewey, and M. Tegmark. 2015. “Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence.” Ai Magazine 36 (4): 105–114. doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577
  • Russell, S., and P. Norvig. 2003. Artificial Intelligence:A Modern Approach. 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sandulli, F. D., E. M. Gimenez-Fernandez, and M. I. Rodriguez Ferradas. 2021. “The Transition of Regional Innovation Systems to Industry 4.0: The Case of Basque Country and Catalonia.” European Planning Studies 29 (9): 1622–1636. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1963049
  • Sedita, S. R., A. Caloffi, and L. Lazzeretti. 2020. “The Invisible College of Cluster Research: A Bibliometric Core–Periphery Analysis of the Literature.” Industry and Innovation 27 (5): 562–584. doi:10.1080/13662716.2018.1538872
  • Shamsuzzoha, A., J. Nieminen, S. Piya, and K. Rutledge. 2021. “Smart City for Sustainable Environment: A Comparison of Participatory Strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London.” Cities 114. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194
  • Siltori, P. F., R. Anholon, I. S. Rampasso, O. L. Quelhas, L. A. Santa-Eulalia, and W. Leal Filho. 2021. “Industry 4.0 and Corporate Sustainability: An Exploratory Analysis of Possible Impacts in the Brazilian Context.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167: 120741. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120741
  • Staletić, N., A. Labus, Z. Bogdanović, M. Despotović-Zrakić, and B. Radenković. 2020. “Citizens’ Readiness to Crowdsource Smart City Services: A Developing Country Perspective.” Cities 107: 102883. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102883
  • Wamba, S. F., R. E. Bawack, C. Guthrie, M. M. Queiroz, and K. D. A. Carillo. 2021. “Are we Preparing for a Good AI Society? A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 164: 120482. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120482
  • Wang, M., and F. Vermeulen. 2021. “Life Between Buildings from a Street View Image: What do big Data Analytics Reveal About Neighbourhood Organisational Vitality?” Urban Studies 58 (15): 3118–3139. doi:10.1177/0042098020957198
  • While, A. H., S. Marvin, and M. Kovacic. 2021. “Urban Robotic Experimentation: San Francisco, Tokyo and Dubai.” Urban Studies 58 (4): 769–786. doi:10.1177/0042098020917790
  • Wu, J., Z. Feng, X. Zhang, Y. Xu, and J. Peng. 2020. “Delineating Urban Hinterland Boundaries in the Pearl River Delta: An Approach Integrating Toponym co-Occurrence with Field Strength Model.” Cities 96: 102457. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102457
  • Xiao, J., and R. Boschma. 2021. “The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence in European Regions: the Role of a Local ICT Base.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2117, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography.
  • Yan, J., J. Liu, and F. M. Tseng. 2020. “An Evaluation System Based on the Self-Organizing System Framework of Smart Cities: A Case Study of Smart Transportation Systems in China.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119371. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.009
  • Yang, Z., D. Wu, and D. Wang. 2021. “Exploring Spatial Path Dependence in Industrial Space with big Data: A Case Study of Beijing.” Cities 108: 102975. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102975
  • Zhu, S., W. Jin, and C. He. 2019. ‘On Evolutionary Economic Geography: A Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis.’ European Planning Studies 27 (4): 639–660. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1568395

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.