Dynamic recombinant relatedness and its role for regional innovation

References

• Aarstad, J., O. Kvitastein, and S. Jakobsen. 2016. “Related and Unrelated Variety as Regional Drivers of Enterprise Productivity and Innovation: A Multilevel Study.” Research Policy 45 (4): 844–856. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., L. Anselin, and A. Varga. 2002. “Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of new Knowledge.” Research Policy 31 (7): 1069–1085. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamic, L., and E. Adar. 2003. “Friends and Neighbors on the Web.” Social Networks 25 (3): 211–230. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00009-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1999. “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.” Management Science 45 (7): 905–917. doi:doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., and C. Karlsson. 2007. “Knowledge in Regional Economic Growth—The Role of Knowledge Accessibility.” Industry and Innovation 14 (2): 129–149. doi:10.1080/13662710701252450.
   Google Scholar
• Antonietti, R., and G. Cainelli. 2011. “The Role of Spatial Agglomeration in a Structural Model of Innovation, Productivity and Export: A Firm-Level Analysis.” The Annals of Regional Science 46 (3): 577–600. doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0359-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. 2007. “The Structure of Invention.” Research Policy 36 (2): 274–287. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., F. Perruchas, and D. Consoli. 2020. “Specialization, Diversification, and Environmental Technology Life Cycle.” Economic Geography 96 (2): 161–186. doi:10.1080/00130095.2020.1721279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2017. “Relatedness as Driver of Regional Diversification: A Research Agenda.” Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–364. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., R. Eriksson, and U. Lindgren. 2009. “How Does Labour Mobility Affect the Performance of Plants? The Importance of Relatedness and Geographical Proximity.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (2): 169–190. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. “Mobility of Skilled Workers and co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., K. Frenken, and B. Los. 2015. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An Analysis of US State-Level Patenting.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 767–781. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.940305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S., J. Eggers, and D. Keum. 2022. “Bottleneck Resources, Market Relatedness, and the Dynamics of Organizational Growth.” Organization Science 33 (3): 1049–1067. doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., and K. Frenken. 2016. “Related Variety and Economic Development: A Literature Review.” European Planning Studies 24 (12): 2097–2112. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdemo, T., and D. Örtqvist. 2020. “Related Variety as a Driver of Regional Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Moderated and Mediated Model With Non-Linear Effects.” Research Policy 49 (7): 104073. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firgo, M., and P. Mayerhofer. 2017. “(Un)Related Variety and Employment Growth at the Sub-Regional Level.” Papers in Regional Science, doi:10.1111/pirs.12276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R., and B. Timmermans. 2017. “Regional Skill Relatedness: Towards a new Measure of Regional Related Diversification.” European Planning Studies 25 (3): 516–538. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1244515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. 2001. “Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search.” Management Science 47 (1): 117–132. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., F. Van Oort, and T. Verburg. 2007. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth.” Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, T., and R. Rutten. 2007. “Innovation in Regions.” European Planning Studies 15 (2): 253–270. doi:10.1080/09654310601078788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of new Regional Industrial Path Development.” Regional Studies 53 (11): 1636–1645. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., C. Klaerding, and P. Marques. 2014. “Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism.” Regional Studies 48 (7): 1295–1307. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.889815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, M., K. Lundquist, and L. Olander. 2016. “Regional Analysis and the Process of Economic Development: Changes in Growth, Employment and Income.” In Structural Analysis and the Process of Economic Development, edited by J. Ljungberg, 149–173. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. 2021. “Economic Complexity Theory and Applications.” Nature Reviews Physics 3 (2): 92–113. doi:10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1.
   Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S. 2005. “An Evolutionary Integrated View of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Measures and Historical Perspectives.” European Planning Studies 13 (4): 497–519. doi:10.1080/09654310500107084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingstrup, M. J., and M.-P. Menzel, 2019. “The emergence of relatedness between industries: The example of offshore oil and gas and offshore wind energy in Esbjerg, Denmark”. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1929. Utrecht: Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. 2015. Service Innovation in an Evolutionary Perspective. Eindhoven: Eindhoven Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Juhász, S., T. Broekel, and R. Boschma. 2021. “Explaining the Dynamics of Relatedness: The Role of co-Location and Complexity.” Papers in Regional Science 100 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1111/pirs.12567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kander, A., J. Taalbi, J. Oksanen, K. Sjöö, and N. Rilla. 2019. “Innovation Trends and Industrial Renewal in Finland and Sweden 1970–2013.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 67 (1): 47–70. doi:10.1080/03585522.2018.1516697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., and D. Bain, eds. 1993. New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusk, K., and M. Martynovich. 2021. “Dynamic Nature of Relatedness, or What Kind of Related Variety for Long-Term Regional Growth.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 112 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1111/tesg.12427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K., L. Olander, and M. Martynovich. 2017. “The Technology Shift Thesis: Understanding Long Term Growth and Transformation in a Regional System.” In Research Reports in Human Geography 2017:1. Lund: Department of Human Geography, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., and R. van der Have. 2013. “Benchmarking Regional Innovative Performance: Composite Measures and Direct Innovation Counts.” Scientometrics 94 (1): 247–262. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0753-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miguelez, E., and R. Moreno. 2018. “Relatedness, External Linkages and Regional Innovation in Europe.” Regional Studies 52 (5): 688–701. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., and D. Grimshaw. 2005. “Does EDS Add Value? The Expansion of IT Outsourcing and the Nature and Role of Computer Services Firms” In DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., and M. Henning. 2013. “Skill Relatedness and Firm Diversification.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (3): 297–316. doi:10.1002/smj.2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., M. Henning, and R. Boschma. 2011. “How do Regions Diversify Over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of new Growth Paths in Regions.” Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–265. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., A. Otto, and A. Weyh. 2017. “Inter-industry Labor Flows.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 142: 275–292. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noteboom, B. 2000. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noteboom, B., W. Van Haverbeke, G. Duysters, V. Gilsing, and A. van den Oord. 2007. “Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity.” Research Policy 36 (7): 1016–1034. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt, M., T. Bauwens, K. Frenken, and L. Holstenkamp. 2022. “Institutional Relatedness and the Emergence of Renewable Energy Cooperatives in German Districts.” Regional Studies 56 (4): 548–562. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1890708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. 2016. “Longitudinell Integrationsdatabas för Sjukförsäkrings- och Arbetsmarknadsstudier (LISA) 1990–2013.” In Arbetsmarknad och Utbildning Bakgrundsfakta 2016:1. Örebro: SCB.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1991. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 125–134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634943 doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K. 2014. Innovation and Transformation in the Swedish Manufacturing Sector, 1970–2007. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K., J. Taalbi, A. Kander, and J. Ljungberg. 2014. “SWINNO: A Database of Swedish Innovations, 1970–2007.” In Lund Papers in Economic History. General Issues; No. 133. Lund: Department of Economic History, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and A. Venables. 2004. “Buzz: Face-to-Face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (4): 351–370. doi:10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. 2014. Innovation as Creative Response: Determinants of Innovation in the Swedish Manufacturing Industry, 1970–2007. Lund: Lund Univeristy.
   Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. 2017. “What Drives Innovation? Evidence from Economic History.” Research Policy 46 (8): 1437–1453. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. 2019. “Origins and Pathways of Innovation in the Third Industrial revolution1.” Industrial and Corporate Change 28 (5): 1125–1148. doi:10.1093/icc/dty053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, S., and N. Carbonara. 2014. “The Role of Knowledge Variety and Intensity for Regional Innovation.” Small Business Economics 43 (2): 493–509. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. 1998. “Recombinant Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 331–360. doi:10.1162/003355398555595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., and D. Kogler. 2020. “Related to What? Reviewing the Literature on Technological Relatedness: Where we are now and Where Can we go?” Papers in Regional Science 99 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1111/pirs.12481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. 2018. “Neighbourhood Related Diversity, Human Capital and Firm Innovation.” Papers in Regional Science 97 (2): 217–252. doi:10.1111/pirs.12255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar