Measuring territorial cohesion trends in Europe: a correlation with EU Cohesion Policy

References

• Abrahams, G. 2014. “What ‘Is’ Territorial Cohesion? What Does It ‘Do’?: Essentialist Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Using Concepts.” European Planning Studies 22 (10): 2134–2155. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.819838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzotto, M., C. Corradini, F. Fai, S. Labory, and P. Tomlinson. 2020. “Smart Specialisation, Industry 4.0 and Lagging Regions: Some Directions for Policy.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 7 (1): 318–332. doi:10.1080/21681376.2020.1803124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., G. Untiedt, and J. Zaleski. 2009. The Economic Return of Cohesion Expenditure for Member States. Brussels: Directorate General For Internal Policies Policy Department B: Structural And Cohesion Policies, the European Parliament's Committee on Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., and J. Zaucha. 2017. Territorial Cohesion: A Missing Link Between Economic Growth and Welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsma, A., and D. Kancs. 2015. “RHOMOLO: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelling Approach to the Evaluation of the European Union’s R&D Policies.” Regional Studies 49 (8): 1340–1359. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1034665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. 2008. “Regional Competitiveness. Toward a Concept of Territorial Capital.” In Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe. European Competiveness and Global Strategies, edited by R. Capello, R. Camagni, B. Chizzolini, and U. Fratesi, 33–48. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. 2020. “The Pioneering Quantitative Model for TIA: TEQUILA.” In Territorial Impact Assessment. Advances in Spatial Science (The Regional Science Series), edited by E. Medeiros, 27–54. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., and G. Perucca. 2019. “Citizens’ Perception of Cohesion Policy: From Theory to Empirical Evidence.” Regional Studies 53 (11): 1520–1530. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1587398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., D. Díaz-Fuentes, and M. Fernández-Gutiérrez. 2016. “Public Infrastructure Services in the European Union: Challenges for Territorial Cohesion.” Regional Studies 50 (2): 358–373. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1044958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., and G. Santinha. 2014. “European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Lens.” European Planning Studies 22 (3): 459–480. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.744384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, F., U. Fratesi, and V. Monastiriotis. 2020. “Back to the member states? Cohesion Policy and the national challenges to the European Union.” Regional Studies 54 (1): 5–9. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1662895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., and M. Giua. 2020. “One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states.” Regional Studies 54 (1): 10–20. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Adda, D., D. Iacobucci, and F. Perugini. 2021. “Smart Specialisation Strategy in practice: have regions changed the allocation of Structural Funds?” Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1890326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbinet, G. 2017. “The Territorial Dimension of EU Policies and Territorial Equalities.” In Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, edited by E. Medeiros, 44–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dao, H., P. Cantoreggi, and V. Rousseaux. 2017. “Operationalizing a Contested Concept: Indicators of Territorial Cohesion.” European Planning Studies 25 (4): 638–660. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1281230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao, H., P. Plagnat, and V. Rousseaux. 2013. “Sigma-Convergence as a Measure of Territorial Cohesion.” In Second ESPON 2013 Scientific Report – Science in Support of European Territorial Development and Cohesion, edited by F. Holstein, S. Zillmer, and K. Böhme, 32–37. Luxembourg: ESPON Programme 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2005. “Understanding Territorial Cohesion.” Planning Practice and Research 20 (4): 433–441. doi:10.1080/02697450600767926.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cataldo, M., and V. Monastiriotis. 2020. “Regional Needs, Regional Targeting and Regional Growth: An Assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK Regions.” Regional Studies 54 (1): 35–47. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1498073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2017. Seventh Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2007. “Feasibility Study on Monitoring Territorial Development Based on ESPON Key Indicators, Part A: Tentative Spatial Monitoring Report, Final Report.” ESPON project 4.1.3. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2014. ETMS – Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2004. “Territorial Cohesion: Old (French) Wine in New Bottles?’.” Urban Studies 41 (7): 1349–1365. doi:10.1080/0042098042000214833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2006. “From European Spatial Development to Territorial Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 40 (6): 667–678. doi:10.1080/00343400600868937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2007. “Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society.” European Planning Studies 15 (4): 567–583. doi:10.1080/09654310701232079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2013. “Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the ‘Territorialism’ Underlying.” Regional Studies 47 (9): 1594–1606. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.657170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., and F. Wishlade. 2017. “The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts.” Regional Studies 51 (6): 817–821. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghinoi, S., B. Steiner, T. Makkonen, and R. Hassink. 2021. “Smart Specialisation Strategies on the Periphery: A Data-Triangulation Approach to Governance Issues and Practices.” Regional Studies 55 (3): 402–413. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1791321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, A., G. Daly, P. Pinch, N. Adams, V. Valtenbergs, M. Burns, and H. Johannesson. 2015. “Indicators for Spatial Planning and Territorial Cohesion: Stakeholder-Driven Selection Approach for Improving Usability at Regional and Local Levels.” Regional Studies 49 (9): 1588–1602. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1018883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. 2005. “The Future of the ESDP in the Framework of Territorial Cohesion.” disP - The Planning Review 41 (161): 19–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2005.10556921.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., and H. Moilanen. 2012. “Territoriality in the Strategies and Practices of the Territorial Cohesion Policy of the European Union: Territorial Challenges in Implementing “Soft Planning”.” European Planning Studies 20 (3): 481–500. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2016. “Territorial Cohesion: An EU Concept.” European Journal of Spatial Development 60. http://www.nordregio.org/publications/territorial-cohesion-an-eu-concept/.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2017. “From Smart Growth to European Spatial Planning: a new paradigm for EU Cohesion Policy post-2020.” European Planning Studies 25 (10): 1856–1875. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1337729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2019. “Spatial Planning, Territorial Development and Territorial Impact Assessment.” Journal of Planning Literature 34 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1177/0885412219831375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2020. Territorial Impact Assessment. Advances in Spatial Science (The Regional Science Series). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., and D. Rauhut. 2020. “Territorial Cohesion Cities: A Policy Recipe for Achieving Territorial Cohesion?” Regional Studies 54 (1): 120–128. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie, J., M. Meijer, V. Salenius, and M. Kull. 2021. “Territorial Governance and Smart Specialisation: Empowering the Sub-national Level in EU Regional Policy.” Territory, Politics, Governance, doi: 10.1080/21622671.2021.1905542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percoco, M. 2017. “Impact of European Cohesion Policy on Regional Growth: Does Local Economic Structure Matter?” Regional Studies 51 (6): 833–843. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1213382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petridou, E., and D. Ioannides. 2012. “Conducting Creativity in the Periphery of Sweden: A Bottom-Up Path Towards Territorial Cohesion.” Creative Industries Journal 5 (1-2): 119–137. doi:10.1386/cij.5.1-2.119_1.
   Google Scholar
• Prezioso, M. 2008. “Cohesion Policy: Methodology and Indicators Towards Common Approach.” Romanian Journal of Regional Science 2 (2): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Prezioso, M. 2020. “STeMA: A Sustainable Territorial Economic/Environmental Management Approach.” In Territorial Impact Assessment. Advances in Spatial Science (The Regional Science Series), edited by E. Medeiros, 55–76. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. 2014. “‘Old Wine in New Bottles’? Smart Specialisation in Wales.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 1 (1): 152–157. doi:10.1080/21681376.2014.944209.
   Google Scholar
• Rauhut, D, and A. Humer. 2020. EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: trajectories in economic thought. European Planning Studies 28(11): 2116–2133. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1709416
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. London: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez–Pose, A. 2017. The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209
   Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A. 2019. “Technological Diversification and Smart Specialisation: The Role of Cooperation.” Regional Studies 53 (9): 1269–1283. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1530753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., J. Bilau, and M. Basílio. 2021. “Do Anchor Infrastructures Matter for Regional Smart Specialisation Strategy? The Case of Alentejo.” Regional Studies 55 (3): 453–464. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1722804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, P. 2005. “Territorial Cohesion in Europe?” Planning Theory & Practice 6 (3): 389–400. doi:10.1080/14649350500209397.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. 2010. “Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 11 (3): 397–416. doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.500135.
   Google Scholar
• Sörvik, J., J. Teräs, A. Dubois, and M. Pertoldi. 2019. “Smart Specialisation in Sparsely Populated Areas: Challenges, Opportunities and New Openings.” Regional Studies 53 (7): 1070–1080. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1530752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., F. Faller, and E. Fyhn Ullern. 2019. “Fostering Renewable Energy with Smart Specialisation? Insights into European Innovation Policy.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 73 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1080/00291951.2018.1554696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TA. 2020. Territorial Agenda 2030. A Future for All Places. Informal Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion 1 December 2020, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2021. Human Development Report to explore uncertainty in the Anthropocene. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., C. Marzocchi, and J. Sorvik. 2018. “How Outward Looking Is Smart Specialisation? Rationales, Drivers and Barriers.” European Planning Studies 26 (12): 2344–2363. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1529146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Well, L. 2012. “Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion.” European Planning Studies 20 (9): 1549–1567. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.708021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weck, S., A. Madanipour, and P. Schmitt. 2021. “Place-based Development and Spatial Justice.” European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1928038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., and K. Böhme. 2020. “Measuring Territorial Cohesion Is not a Mission Impossible.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 627–649. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1607827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., and T. Komornicki. 2019. “Territorial Cohesion: The Economy and Welfare of Cities.” In Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Book Series, edited by E. Medeiros, 39–66. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar