Pathways towards integrated cross-border marine spatial planning (MSP): insights from Germany, Poland and the island of Ireland

References

• Ansong, J., H. Calado, and P. Gilliland. 2021b. “A Multifaceted Approach to Building Capacity for Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Based on European Experience.” Marine Policy 132, 103422. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansong, J., E. Gissi, and H. Calado. 2017. “An Approach to Ecosystem-Based Management in Maritime Spatial Planning Process.” Ocean & Coastal Management 141: 65–81. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansong, J., L. McElduff, and H. Ritchie. 2021a. “Institutional Integration in Transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: A Theory-Based Evaluative Framework for Practice.” Ocean & Coastal Management 202, 105430. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansong, J., H. Ritchie, and L. McElduff. 2022. “Institutional Barriers to Integrated Marine Spatial Planning on the Island of Ireland.” Marine Policy 141, 105082. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., A. Charles, and F. Berkes. 2017. Governing the Coastal Commons: Communities, Resilience and Transformation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., J. Blythe, C. White, and C. Campero. 2021. “Blue Growth and Blue Justice: Ten Risks and Solutions for the Ocean Economy.” Marine Policy 125: 104387. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, G., H. Thomas, S. Olsen, D. Benzaken, S. Fletcher, and Mendez-Roldan. 2017. Cross-Border Cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning. European Commission Report.
   Google Scholar
• Chalastani, V., V. Tsoukala, H. Coccossis, and C. Duarte. 2021. “A Bibliometric Assessment of Progress in Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 127: 104329. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cons, J., and R. Sanyal. 2013. “Geographies at the Margins: Borders in South Asia–an Introduction.” Political Geography 35: 5–13. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DHLGH. 2021. National Marine Planning Framework: Government of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Diggon, S., C. Butler, A. Heidt, J. Bones, R. Jones, and C. Outhet. 2021. “The Marine Plan Partnership: Indigenous Community-Based Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy, 132: 103510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C., J. Zaucha, and K. Gee. 2019. “Maritime/Marine Spatial Planning at the Interface of Research and Practice.” In Maritime Spatial Planning, edited by J. Zaucha, and K. Gee, 1–21. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Emerging Europe. 2021. A Polish ‘mega Port’ Project is Worrying German Environmentalists. Accessed 07 December 2021. https://emerging-europe.com/news/a-polish-megaport-project-is-worrying-german-environmentalists/.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, G., J. Pittman, S. Alexander, S. Berdej, T. Dyck, and U. Kreitmair. 2015. “Institutional Fit and the Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2020. Real GDP Per Capita. Accessed 07 December 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_10/default/table?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, L., L. Campbell, N. Boucquey, and K. St. Martin. 2018. “Assembling Enclosure: Reading Marine Spatial Planning for Alternatives.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1): 144–161. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1345611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2013. “Territorial Cohesion, Territorialism, Territoriality, and Soft Planning: A Critical Review.” Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space 45: 1302–1317. doi:10.1068/a45299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2019. “New Horizons: Beyond Territorialism.” Europa XXI 36: 35–44. doi:10.7163/Eu21.2019.36.3.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., A. O'Hagan, C. O'Mahony, H. Ritchie, and S. Twomey. 2015. “Evaluating Conditions for Transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and Opportunities on the Island of Ireland.” Marine Policy 51: 86–95. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacometti, A., J. Moodie, M. Kull, and A. Morf. 2017. Coherent Cross-Border Maritime Spatial Planning for the Southwest Baltic Sea – Results from Baltic SCOPE.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, R., and C. Reina. 2020. “Exploring Why Leaders Do What They Do: An Integrative Review of the Situation-Trait Approach and Situation-Encoding Schemas.” The Leadership Quarterly 31 (1): 101373. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, R. 2018. Cross-Border Resource Management. San Diego: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hassler, B., K. Gee, M. Gilek, A. Luttmann, A. Morf, F. Saunders, I. Stalmokaite, H. Strand, and J. Zaucha. 2018. “Collective Action and Agency in Baltic Sea Marine Spatial Planning: Transnational Policy Coordination in the Promotion of Regional Coherence.” Marine Policy 92: 138–147. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM-VASAB. 2016. Guidelines on Transboundary Consultations, Public Participation and Co-operation.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM/VASAB. 2022. Voluntary Guidance for Assessment of Cross-border Coherence in Maritime Spatial Planning. HELCOM-VASAB MSP WG 23-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jackowska, N. 2008. “The Border Controversy Between the Polish People’s Republic and the German Democratic Republic in the Pomeranian Bay.” Przegląd Zachodni 3: 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S., F. Alves, C. O'Mahony, M. Gomez, A. Rooney, M. Almodovar, et al. 2016. “Transboundary Dimensions of Marine Spatial Planning: Fostering Inter-Jurisdictional Relations and Governance.” Marine Policy 65: 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, S., T. Klenke, F. Ahlhorn, and H. Ritchie. 2012. “Early European Experience in Marine Spatial Planning: Planning the German Exclusive Economic Zone.” European Planning Studies 20 (12): 2013–2031. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2009. “Fisheries and Coastal Governance as a Wicked Problem.” Marine Policy 33 (4): 553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keijser, X., H. Toonen, and J. van Tatenhove. 2020. ““Learning Paradox” in Maritime Spatial Planning.” Maritime Studies 19: 333–346. doi:10.1007/s40152-020-00169-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., G. Ellis, and W. Flannery. 2018. “Conceptualising Change in Marine Governance: Learning from Transition Management.” Marine Policy 95: 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuempel, C., K. Jones, J. Watson, and H. Possingham. 2019. “Quantifying Biases in Marine-Protected-Area Placement Relative to Abatable Threats.” Conservation Biology 33: 1350–1359. doi:10.1111/cobi.13340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackelworth, P. 2012. “Peace Parks and Transboundary Initiatives: Implications for Marine Conservation and Spatial Planning.” Conservation Letters 5 (2): 90–98. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer, B., L. Fullbrook, W. Liu, J. Reed, N. Rivers, N. Vaidianu, A. Westholm, et al. 2022. “Marine Spatial Planning in Regional Ocean Areas: Trends and Lessons Learned.” Ocean Yearbook Online 36 (1): 346–380. doi:10.1163/22116001-03601013.
   Google Scholar
• Morf, A., J. Moodie, E. Cedergren, S. Eliasen, K. Gee, M. Kull, S. Mahadeo, S. Husa, and M. Vološina. 2022. “Challenges and Enablers to Integrate Land-Sea-Interactions in Cross-Border Marine and Coastal Planning: Experiences from the Pan Baltic Scope Collaboration.” Planning Practice & Research 37 (3): 333–354. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2074112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NISRA. 2017. Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measures 2017.
   Google Scholar
• O'Higgins, T., L. O'Higgins, A. M. O'Hagan, and J. O. Ansong. 2019. “Challenges and Opportunities for Ecosystem-Based Management and Marine Spatial Planning in the Irish Sea.” In Maritime Spatial Planning, edited by J. Zaucha, and K. Gee, 47–69. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_3.
   Google Scholar
• Østhagen, A. 2019. Lines at Sea: Why Do States Resolve Their Maritime Boundary Disputes?. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, D., and M. G. Lloyd. 2004. "The Social Reconstruction of the Marine Environment: Towards Marine Spatial Planning?" Town Planning Review 75 (3): 359–378.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2020. “The Territories of Governance: Unpacking the Ontologies and Geophilosophies of Fixed to Flexible Ocean Management, and Beyond.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375: 20190458. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwowarczyk, J., J. Zaucha, A. Koroza, P. Pakszys, J. Pardus, M. Rakowski, K. Romancewicz, and T. Zieliński. 2021. Integrating Cultural Values in Marine Spatial Planning and the Blue Growth. Case study. Gulf of Gdańsk, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Polejack, A. 2021. “The Importance of Ocean Science Diplomacy for Ocean Affairs, Global Sustainability, and the UN Decade of Ocean Science.” Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 248. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.664066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polish Maritime Administration. 2021. Maritime Spatial Plan for Polish Sea Areas in Scale of 1:200 000.
   Google Scholar
• Rauhut, D., F. Sielker, and A. Humer. 2021. EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., J. Ansong, and W. Flannery. 2022. “Marine Spatial Planning for Northern Ireland: From Fragmentation Towards Integration.” In 2nd Edition Planning Law and Practice in Northern Ireland, edited by S. McKay and M. Murra, 307–325. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., and G. Ellis. 2010. “‘A System That Works for the Sea'? Exploring Stakeholder Engagement in Marine Spatial Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (6): 701–723. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.488100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., and L. McElduff. 2020. “The Whence and Whither of Marine Spatial Planning: Revisiting the Social Reconstruction of the Marine Environment in the UK.” Maritime Studies 19 (3): 229–240. doi:10.1007/s40152-020-00170-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, G. 2018. “Ecosystem-based Management in Canada and Norway: The Importance of Political Leadership and Effective Decision-Making for Implementation.” Ocean and Coastal Management 163: 485–497. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, F., M. Gilek, K. Gee, K. Dahl, B. Hassler, A. Luttmann, A. Morf, et al. 2017. BONUS BALTSPACE Deliverable D2.4: Msp as a Governance Approach? Knowledge Integration Challenges in MSP in the Baltic Sea. Stockholm: BONUS BALTSPACE project. Accessed 6 December 2022. https://www.baltspace.eu/files/BONUS_BALTSPACE_D2-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, F., M. Gilek, A. Ikauniece, R. V. Tafon, K. Gee, and J. Zaucha. 2020. “Theorizing Social Sustainability and Justice in Marine Spatial Planning: Democracy, Diversity, and Equity.” Sustainability 12 (6): 2560. doi:10.3390/su12062560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz-Zehden, A., and K. Gee. 2016. “Towards a Multi-Level Governance Framework for MSP in the Baltic.” Bmi 31 (1): 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Spijkerboer, R. 2021. “The Institutional Dimension of Integration in Marine Spatial Planning: The Case of the Dutch North Sea Dialogues and Agreement.” Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 1078. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.712982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symmons, C. 2009. “The Maritime Border Areas of Ireland, North and South: An Assessment of Present Jurisdictional Ambiguities and International Precedents Relating to Delimitation of Border Bays.” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 24: 457–500. doi:10.1163/157180809X455584.
   Google Scholar
• Tafon, R., D. Howarth, and S. Griggs. 2019. “The Politics of Estonia’s Offshore Wind Energy Programme: Discourse, Power, and Marine Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (1): 157–176. doi:10.1177/2399654418778037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanga, B. 2010. The Joint Development Zone Between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe: A Case of Provisional Arrangement in the Gulf of Guinea. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Twomey, S. 2020. Seeking Pathways Towards Improved Transboundary Environmental Governance in Contested Marine Ecosystems. Doctor of Philosophy, University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. 2017. "Transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: A Reflexive Marine Governance Experiment?" Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19 (6): 783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2021. The Second World Ocean Assessment II. New York: United Nations. ISBN: 978-92-1-1-130422-0.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., C. Liu, Y. Hou, and X. Xue. 2022. “Incentive Policies for Transboundary Marine Spatial Planning: An Evolutionary Game Theory-Based Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Management 312: 114905. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., and H. Donnan. 2012. Borders and Border Studies. A Companion to Border Studies. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons, 1–25.
   Google Scholar