The role of institutional entrepreneurship in transformation of the national innovation system: the case study of Lithuania

References

• Archer, M. S. 1996. Culture and agency. The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 1999. “Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organisations.” Organisation Studies 20 (5): 777–799. doi:10.1177/0170840699205004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C.J., and M. Howlett. 1992. “The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change.” Policy Sciences 25 (3): 275–294. doi:10.1007/BF00138786.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., R. Pinheiro, and J. Karlsen. 2017. “Strategic Agency and Institutional Change: Investigating the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Systems (RISs).” Regional Studies 51 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkauskas, G. 2014. “The Formation of Innovation System in the Context of the Participants and Their Relationships: The Case of Lithuania.” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 13 (3): 251–264. doi:10.1386/tmsd.13.3.251_1.
   Google Scholar
• Bilic, I., V. Škokic, and M. Lovrinčević. 2021. “Academic entrepreneurship in post-transition country-case study of Croatia.” Journal of Knowledge Economy 12: 41–55. doi:10.1007/s13132-017-0452-6.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. 2011. “Policy Learning and Organisational Capacities in Innovation Policies.” Science and Public Policy 38 (9): 725–734. doi:10.3152/030234211X13070021633323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S., and C. Edquist. 2014. “Education, Training and Skills in Innovation Policy.” Science and Public Policy 42 (2): 215–227. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E., and J. Battilana. 2004. “The Innovative Capacity of Institutional Entrepreneurs: A Reconstruction of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, at the Symposium on Perspectives on Institutional Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, G., and J. Kluver. 2019. “Institutional entrepreneurship in health management: a survey experiment on appreciative inquiry.” Studies in Business and Economics 14 (1): 34–50. doi:10.2478/sbe-2019-0003.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organisations, edited by L. Zucker, 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C., and C. Radaelli. 2013. “Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions.” Political Studies 61 (3): 599–619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, G. 2010. “Critical realism in case study research.” Industrial Marketing Management 39 (1): 118–128. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.06.004.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2005. “Systems of Innovation – Perspectives and Challenges.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, 181–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. 1987. “Instruments and Strategy in Public Policy.” Policy Studies Review 7 (1): 174–186. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00036.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 1997. “Social skill and institutional theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (4): 397–405. doi:10.1177/0002764297040004003.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., S. Jain, and A. Kumaraswamy. 2002. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Sponsorship of Common Technological Standards: Case of Sun Microsystems and Java.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 196–214. doi:10.2307/3069292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin. 2008. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd, doi:10.4135/9781849200387
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., and R. Suddaby. 2006. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms.” The Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 27–48. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., T. Hansen, L. Coenen, J. Miorner, and J. Moodysson. 2019. “Innovation Policy for System-Wide Transformation: The Case of Strategic Innovation Programmes (SIPs) in Sweden.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1048–1061. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., D. Urbano, A. Fayolle, et al. 2016. “Entrepreneurial Universities: Emerging Models in the new Social and Economic Landscape.” Small Business Economics 47 (3): 551–563. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogselius, P. 2005. The Dynamics of Innovation in Eastern Europe Lessons from Estonia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. 1999. “Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (4): 351–371. doi:10.2307/257008.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. 2004. “The Evolution of University–Industry–Government Relationships During Transition.” Research Policy 33 (6): 975–995. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaulova, M., O. Shackleton, W. Liu, A. Gök, and P. Shapira. 2016. “Institutional Change and Innovation System Transformation: A Tale of two Academies.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., and A. Primi. 2012. “The Periphery Paradox in Innovation Policy: Latin America and Eastern Europe Compared.” In Development and Semi-periphery: Post-neoliberal Trajectories in South America and Central Eastern Europe, edited by R. Boschi and C. H. Santana, 265–304. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitanovic, J. 2007. “The Applicability of the Concept of National Innovation Systems to Transition Economies.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 9 (1): 28–45. doi:10.5172/impp.2007.9.1.28.
   Google Scholar
• Kolomytseva, O., and A. Pavlovska. 2020. “The Role of Universities in the National Innovation System.” Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 6 (1): 51–58. doi:10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-51-58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, J., and M. Belitski. 2017. “Entrepreneurial Dynamics and Higher Education Institutions in the Post-Communist World.” Regional Studies 51 (3): 439–453. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1103370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., and A. Ruby. 2018. “Raising Research Productivity in a Post-Soviet Higher Education System: A Case from Central Asia.” European Education 50 (3): 266–282. doi:10.1080/10564934.2018.1444942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., and R. Suddaby. 2006. “Institutions and Institutional Work.” In Handbook of Organisation Studies. 2nd ed., edited by S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, and W. R. Nord, 215–254. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and P. Triantafillou. 2012. “From Performance Measurement to Learning: A New Source of Government Overload?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (4): 597–614. doi:10.1177/0020852312455993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, D. 2016. “Public-sector Entrepreneurship and the Creation of a Sustainable Innovative Economy.” Small Business Economics 46 (4): 553–564. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9706-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loogma, K., K. Tafel-Viia, and M. Ümarik. 2013. “Conceptualising Educational Changes: A Social Innovation Approach.” Journal of Educational Change 14 (3): 283–301. doi:10.1007/s10833-012-9205-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B., K. Joseph, C. Chaminade, and J. Vang. 2009. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T. Lawrence. 2004. “Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: Hiv/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (5): 657–679. doi:10.2307/20159610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S., and R. Ramlogan. 2008. “Innovation Systems and the Competitive Process in Developing Economies.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 48 (2): 433–446. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021.
   Google Scholar
• Mussagulova, A. 2020. “Newly independent, path dependent: The impact of the Soviet past on innovation in post-Soviet states.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 43 (2): 87-105. doi:10.1080/23276665.2020.1805338.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1994. “Economic Performance Through Time.” American Economic Review 84 (3): 359–368. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1992. “The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization.” Organisation Studies 13 (4): 563–588. doi:10.1177/017084069201300403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliokaite, A., Z. Martinaitis, and D. Sarpong. 2016. “Implementing Smart Specialization Roadmaps in Lithuania: Lost in Translation?” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 110: 143–152. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., and B. Stensaker. 2014. “Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The Interpretation of a Global Idea.” Public Organisation Review 14 (4): 497–516. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0241-z.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., and A. Kaderabkova. 2011. Challenges for European Innovation Policy. Cohesion and Excellence from a Schumpeterian Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2/3): 129–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4532139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D., and F. Welter. 2012. “Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in Transition Economies: The Commonwealth of Independent States, Central and Eastern Europe and China Compared.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24 (3-4): 215–233. doi:10.1080/08985626.2012.670914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobh, R., and C. Perry. 2006. “Research Design and Data Analysis in Realism Research.” European Journal of Marketing 40 (11): 1194–1209. doi:10.1108/03090560610702777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniulyte, J. 2021. “Towards the Entrepreneurial University: The Principal-Agent Problem.” Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01246-z.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. doi:10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H., E. Santarelli, and X. Wei. 2020. “Open Innovation Knowledge Management in Transition to Market Economy: Integrating Dynamic Capability and Institutional Theory.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1841942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanovic, J., and S. Wilkins. 2013. “Internationalization as a Strategy to Improve the Quality of Higher Education in Small States: Stakeholder Perspectives in Lithuania.” Higher Education Policy 26 (3): 373–396. doi:10.1057/hep.2013.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windrum, P., D. Schartinger, and J. Waring. 2018. “Co-creation of social innovations and new professional institutions: diffusion of therapeutic patient education (TPE) for diabetes in Austria.” Industry and Innovation 25 (6): 570–593. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1295363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar