Flexible geographies of new working spaces

References

• Ahrendt, Daphne, Jorge Cabrita, Eleonora Clerici, John Hurley, Tadas Leončikas, Massimiliano Mascherini, Sara Riso, and Eszter Sándor. 2020. Living, Working and COVID-19. Luxembourg: Eurofund.
   Google Scholar
• Akhavan, Mina, and Ilaria Mariotti. 2019. “The Effects of Coworking Spaces on Local Communities in the Italian Context.” Territorio 87: 85–92. doi:10.3280/TR2018-087014.
   Google Scholar
• Althoff, Lukas, Fabian Eckert, Sharat Ganapati, and Conor Walsh. 2022. “The Geography of Remote Work.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 93: 103770. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdikos, Vasilis, and Athanasios Kalogeresis. 2017. “Socio-Economic Profile and Working Conditions of Freelancers in Co-Working Spaces and Work Collectives: Evidence From the Design Sector in Greece.” Area 49 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1111/area.12279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednář, Pavel, Lukáš Danko, and Lenka Smékalová. 2021. “Coworking Spaces and Creative Communities: Making Resilient Coworking Spaces Through Knowledge Sharing and Collective Learning.” European Planning Studies, 1–18. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1944065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, Mark, and Marcus Foth. 2013. “Libraries as Coworking Spaces: Understanding User Motivations and Perceived Barriers to Social Learning.” Library Hi Tech 31 (2): 254–273. doi:10.1108/07378831311329040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, Ron. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Gary, and Roger Turner. 2018. “Interrogating the Meaning of a Rural Business Through a Rural Capitals Framework.” Journal of Rural Studies 60: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Gary, Jason Whalley, Anita Füzi, and Ian Merrell. 2021. “Rural Coworking: ‘It’s Becoming Contagious’.” Regions, doi:10.1080/13673882.2021.00001096.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, Gary, Jason Whalley, Anita Fuzi, Ian Merrell, Polly Chapman, and Emma Russell. 2023. “Rural Co-Working: New Network Spaces and New Opportunities for a Smart Countryside.” Journal of Rural Studies 97: 550–559. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botey Gaude, Laura, Jorge Cabrita, Franz Ferdinand Eiffe, Barbara Gerstenberger, Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, Agnès Parent-Thirion, Eleonora Peruffo, Tina Weber, and Christopher White. 2022. Working Conditions in the Time of COVID-19: Implications for the Future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Eurofund.
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, Ricarda B., Yixin Qiu, and Thomas Clauss. 2020. “Coworking-Space Business Models: Micro-Ecosystems and Platforms – Insights from China.” International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 17 (06): 2050044. doi:10.1142/S0219877020500443.
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, Ricarda B., and A. Reuschl. 2018. “Coworking-Spaces: How a Phenomenon of the Sharing Economy Builds a Novel Trend for the Workplace and for Entrepreneurship.” Review of Managerial Science 12 (1): 317–334. doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0210-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brail, Shauna, and Mark Kleinman. 2022. “Impacts and Implications for the Post-COVID City: The Case of Toronto.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 15 (3): 495–513. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsac022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2001. “Localised Knowledge Spillovers vs. Innovative Milieux: Knowledge ‘Tacitness’ Reconsidered.” Papers in Regional Science 80 (3): 255–273. doi:10.1007/PL00013627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2017. “Curating the ‘Third Place’? Coworking and the Mediation of Creativity.” Geoforum 82: 112–126. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchnik, Tsipy, and Amnon Frenkel. 2021. “The Lifestyles of Millennial Coworkers in Urban Spaces: The Case of Tel-Aviv.” European Planning Studies, 1–26. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1950641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. 2015. “Co-Working Spaces and the Localised Dynamics of Innovation in Barcelona.” International Journal of Innovation Management 19 (3): 1540004. doi:10.1142/S1363919615400046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. 2018. “Knowing Communities and the Innovative Capacity of Cities.” City, Culture and Society 13 (June): 8–12. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. 2022. “Building Communities in Rural Coworking Spaces.” In Open Labs and Innovation Management. The Dynamics of Communities and Ecosystems, edited by Valérie Mérindol, and David W. Versailles, 146–168. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chevtaeva, Ekaterina, and Basak Denizci-Guillet. 2021. “Digital Nomads’ Lifestyles and Coworkation.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 21 (September): 100633. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100633.
   Google Scholar
• Cochis, Carlotta, Elisa Mattarelli, Fabiola Bertolotti, Anna Chiara Scapolan, Fabrizio Montanari, and Paula Ungureanu. 2021. “How Perceptions of Work-Life Balance and Technology Use Impact upon Creativity in Collaborative Spaces.” In Digital Transformation and Human Behavior, Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, edited by Concetta Metallo, Maria Ferrara, Alessandra Lazazzara, and Stefano Za, 217–234. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47539-0_16
   Google Scholar
• Coll-Martínez, Eva, and Carles Méndez-Ortega. 2020. “Agglomeration and Coagglomeration of Co-Working Spaces and Creative Industries in the City.” European Planning Studies 0: 1–22. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1847256.
   Google Scholar
• Delventhal, Matthew J., Eunjee Kwon, and Andrii Parkhomenko. 2022. “JUE Insight: How Do Cities Change When We Work from Home?” Journal of Urban Economics 127: 103331. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2021.103331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Marino, Mina, Johanna Lilius, and Kimmo Lapintie. 2018. “New Forms of Multi-Local Working: Identifying Multi-Locality in Planning as Well as Public and Private Organizations’ Strategies in the Helsinki Region.” European Planning Studies 26 (10): 2015–2035. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante, Giacomo, and Margherita Turvani. 2018. “Coworking, the Sharing Economy, and the City: Which Role for the ‘Coworking Entrepreneur’?” Urban Science 2 (3): 83. doi:10.3390/urbansci2030083.
   Google Scholar
• Fasshauer, Ingrid, and Cathy Zadra-Veil. 2016. “Espaces Collaboratifs Ruraux et Émergence de l’entrepreneur « Alter ».” Entreprendre & Innover 31 (4): 17. doi:10.3917/entin.031.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, Emma, Christy Collis, and Phil Graham. 2010. “Making Connections: Creative Industries Networks in Outer-Suburban Locations.” Australian Geographer 41 (1): 57–70. doi:10.1080/00049180903535527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, Stefania. 2019. “Different Typologies of ‘ Co-Working Spaces ‘ and the Contemporary Dynamics of Local Economic Development in Rome.” European Planning Studies, 1–23. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1620697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Katja, Sabine Hielscher, and Timothy Merritt. 2016. “Making Things in Fab Labs: A Case Study on Sustainability and Co-Creation.” Digital Creativity 6268 (March): 1–19. doi:10.1080/14626268.2015.1135809.
   Google Scholar
• Fuzi, Anita. 2015. “Co-Working Spaces for Promoting Entrepreneurship in Sparse Regions: The Case of South Wales.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 462–469. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, Alessandro. 2015. “The Rise of Coworking Spaces : A Literature Review.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 15 (1): 193–205. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/15-1gandini.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, Alessandro, and Alberto Cossu. 2019. “The Third Wave of Coworking: ‘Neo-Corporate’ Model versus ‘Resilient’ Practice.” European Journal of Cultural Studies, doi:10.1177/1367549419886060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, Constance, and Ignasi Capdevila. 2023. “Making, Hacking, Coding: Fablabs as Intermediary Platforms for Modes of Social Manufacturing.” Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, L. E., G. M. Spreitzer, and P. A. Bacevice. 2017. “Co-Constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces.” Organization Studies 38 (6): 821–842. doi:10.1177/0170840616685354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdenitsch, Cornelia, Tabea E. Scheel, Julia Andorfer, and Christian Korunka. 2016. “Coworking Spaces: A Source of Social Support for Independent Professionals.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (April): 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. 2012. “How to Make Almost Anything. The Digital Fabrication Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 91 (6): 43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, Meric S. 2003. “Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There).” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (1): 75–99. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., A. Melchior, B. Schiemer, E. Schüßler, and J. Sydow. 2017. “From Being There to Being Aware: Confronting Geographical and Sociological Imaginations of Copresence.” Environment and Planning A. doi:10.1177/0308518X177435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gress, Douglas R., and Ronald V. Kalafsky. 2015. “Geographies of Production in 3D: Theoretical and Research Implications Stemming from Additive Manufacturing.” Geoforum 60: 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurrutxaga, Mikel. 2021. “Visualizing the Rural Population Growth in Spain during 2020 Triggered by the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 8 (1): 305–307. doi:10.1080/21681376.2021.1958050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamalainen, Markko, and Jesse Karjalainen. 2017. “Social Manufacturing: When the Maker Movement Meets Interfirm Production Networks.” Business Horizons 60 (6): 795–805. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Inge, Louise Manning, and Richard Frost. 2021. “Rural Arts Entrepreneurs’ Placemaking–How ‘Entrepreneurial Placemaking’Explains Rural Creative Hub Evolution during COVID-19 Lockdown.” Local Economy 36 (7–8): 627–649. doi:10.1177/02690942221083838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibert, O., J. Hautala, and J. S. Jauhiainen. 2015. “From Cluster to Process: New Economic Geographic Perspectives on Practices of Knowledge Creation.” Geoforum 65: 323–327. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, Mikko, Nina Kivinen, Perttu Salovaara, and Piia Hirkman. 2017. “Towards an Economy of Encounters? A Critical Study of Affectual Assemblages in Coworking.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 33 (4): 235–242. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, Audrey C. 2018. “Coworking Spaces in Mid-Sized Cities: A Partner in Downtown Economic Development.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (4): 773–788. doi:10.1177/0308518X18760857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, Judit Katonáné, and Erzsébet Szeréna Zoltán. 2017. “Rural Enterprise Hub Supporting Rural Entrepreneurship and Innovation – Case Studies from Hungary.” European Countryside 9 (3): 473–485. doi:10.1515/euco-2017-0028.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Bastian, and Hans-Joachim Bürkner. 2018. “Open Workshops as Sites of Innovative Socio-Economic Practices: Approaching Urban Post-Growth by Assemblage Theory.” Local Environment 23 (7): 680–696. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1418305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Bastian, Bianca Herlo, Yasmine Willi, and Marco Pütz. 2022. “New Working Spaces in Rural Areas.” In The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces, edited by Ilaria Mariotti, Pavel Bednář, and Mina Di Marino, 95–108. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003181163-10
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Bastian, and Suntje Schmidt. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as a Bridging Concept? A Conceptual Contribution to the Debate on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development.” Growth and Change, 12409. doi:10.1111/grow.12409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, Bastian, and Elke Schüßler. 2018. “Unpacking the Middleground of Creative Cities: Spatiotemporal Dynamics in the Configuration of the Berlin Design Field.” Regional Studies 52 (11): 1548–1558. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1413239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurelie, and Henri Isaac. 2016. “The New Office: How Coworking Changes the Work Concept.” Journal of Business Strategy 37 (6): 3–9. doi:10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0105.
   Google Scholar
• Lô, Amadou, and Pauline Fatien Diochon. 2018. “Unsilencing Power Dynamics within Third Spaces. The Case of Renault’s Fab Lab.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 0–1. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, Mina Di, Antti Rehunen, Maija Tiitu, and Kimmo Lapintie. 2021. “New Working Spaces in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area: Understanding Location Factors and Implications for Planning.” European Planning Studies, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1945541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, Ilaria, and Mina Akhavan. 2020. “Exploring Proximities in Coworking Spaces: Evidence from Italy.” European Spatial Research and Policy 27 (1): 37–52. doi:10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, Ilaria, Mina Akhavan, and Federica Rossi. 2021. “The Preferred Location of Coworking Spaces in Italy: An Empirical Investigation in Urban and Peripheral Areas.” European Planning Studies, 1–23. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, Ilaria, Pavel Bednář, and Mina Di Marino. 2022a. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Working Spaces. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003181163
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, Ilaria, Dante Di Matteo, and Federica Rossi. 2022b. “Who Were the Losers and Winners during the Covid-19 Pandemic? The Rise of Remote Working in Suburban Areas.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 9 (1): 685–708. doi:10.1080/21681376.2022.2139194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, Ilaria, Carolina Pacchi, and Stefano Di Vita. 2017. “Co-Working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects.” Journal of Urban Technology 24 (3): 47–66. doi:10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. 2015. “Coworking in the City.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 15: 1. https://ephemerajournal.org/contribution/coworking-city.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. 2019. “‘Freelance Isn’t Free.’ Coworking as a Critical Urban Practice to Cope with Informality in Creative Labour Markets.” Urban Studies 56 (3): 526–547. doi:10.1177/0042098018782374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrell, Ian, Anita Füzi, Emma Russell, and Gary Bosworth. 2022. “How Rural Coworking Hubs Can Facilitate Well-Being through the Satisfaction of Key Psychological Needs.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, doi:10.1177/02690942221075598.
   Google Scholar
• Messenger, Jon, Oscar Vargas Llave, Lutz Gschwind, Simon Boehmer, Greet Vermeylen, and Mathijn Wilkens. 2017. Working Anytime, Anywhere: The Effects on the World of Work. Luxembourg: Eurofund.
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, Bruno. 2013. Building New Places of the Creative Economy. The Rise of Coworking Spaces. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 2002. Celebrating the Third Place: Inspiring Stories about the ‘Great Good Places’ at the Heart of Our Communities. Boston: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orel, Marko. 2019. “Supporting Work-Life Balance with the Use of Coworking Spaces.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 39 (5): 549–565. doi:10.1108/EDI-01-2019-0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrino, Lucia. 2015. “Coworking: Assessing the Role of Proximity in Knowledge Exchange.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 13 (3): 261–271. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani, Arjun, and Nicholas Bloom. 2022. The donut effect of Covud-19 on cities. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 28876. http://www.nber.org/papers/w28876.
   Google Scholar
• Rayna, Thierry, and Ludmila Striukova. 2016. “From Rapid Prototyping to Home Fabrication: How 3D Printing Is Changing Business Model Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 102 (January): 214–224. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Reuschke, Darja. 2019. “The Subjective Well-Being of Homeworkers across Life Domains.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (6): 1326–1349. doi:10.1177/0308518X19842583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Suntje. 2019. “In the Making: Open Creative Labs as an Emerging Topic in Economic Geography?” Geography Compass, 1–16. doi:10.1111/gec3.12463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, Clay. 2012. “Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26 (4): 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standen, Peter, Kevin Daniels, and David Lamond. 1999. “The Home as a Workplace: Work–Family Interaction and Psychological Well-Being in Telework.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 4 (4): 368. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.4.4.368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suire, Raphaël. 2019. “Innovating by Bricolage: How Do Firms Diversify through Knowledge Interactions with FabLabs?” Regional Studies 53 (7): 939–950. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1522431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, Thomas, and Mina Akhavan. 2022. “A Systematic Literature Review of the Effects of Coworking Spaces on the Socio-Cultural and Economic Conditions in Peripheral and Rural Areas.” Journal of Property Investment & Finance, doi:10.1108/JPIF-12-2021-0108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijngaarden, Yosha, Erik Hitters, and Pawan V. Bhansing. 2020. “Cultivating Fertile Learning Grounds: Collegiality, Tacit Knowledge and Innovation in Creative Co-Working Spaces.” Geoforum 109 (February): 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.005.
   Google Scholar