The embeddedness of companies in regional energy transitions

References

• Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien. 2022. “Bundesländer-Übersicht zu Erneuerbaren Energien.” www.foederal-erneuerbar.de
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., and A. Isaksen. 2002. “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1023/A:1013100704794.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, A. L., and F. Landau. 2019. “Assessing the Local Embeddedness Dynamics of the Baumwollspinnerei Cultural Quarter in Leipzig: Introducing the POSES Star Framework.” European Planning Studies 27 (8): 1564–1586. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1592120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baù, M., F. Chirico, D. Pittino, M. Backman, and J. Klaesson. 2019. “Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 43 (2): 360–385. doi:10.1177/1042258718796089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2003. “Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?” Journal of Economic Issues 37 (3): 769–787. doi:10.1080/00213624.2003.11506613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., M. Hekkert, S. Jacobsson, J. Markard, B. Sandén, and B. Truffer. 2015. “Technological Innovation Systems in Contexts: Conceptualizing Contextual Structures and Interaction Dynamics.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16: 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, C., T. Magnusson, and D. Sushandoyo. 2015. “Transition Pathways Revisited: Established Firms as Multi-Level Actors in the Heavy Vehicle Industry.” Research Policy 44 (5): 1017–1028. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., and H. Gong. 2021. “Legitimation Dynamics in Industrial Path Development: New-to-the-World Versus new-to-the-Region Industries.” Regional Studies 80 (7): 1–14. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., V. Květoň, S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, and M. Trippl 2020. “The Dark Side of Regional Industrial Path Development: Towards a Typology of Trajectories of Decline.” European Planning Studies 28 (8): 1455–1473. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466.
   Google Scholar
• Bögel, P., K. Pereverza, P. Upham, and O. Kordas. 2019. “Linking Socio-Technical Transition Studies and Organisational Change Management: Steps Towards an Integrative, Multi-Scale Heuristic.” Journal of Cleaner Production 232 (4): 359–368. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.286.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, H., and K. McCormick. 2014. “Local Power: Exploring the Motivations of Mayors and key Success Factors for Local Municipalities to go 100% Renewable Energy.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 4 (1): 488. doi:10.1186/2192-0567-4-5.
   Google Scholar
• Cantner, U., and H. Graf. 2006. “The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis.” Research Policy 35 (4): 463–480. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., and J. Mattes. 2020. “The Fragility of Regional Energy Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37: 66–78. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., T. Hansen, A. Glasmeier, and R. Hassink. 2021. “Regional Foundations of Energy Transitions. Cambridge Journal of Regions.” Economy and Society 14 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsab010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2004. “Introduction: Regional Innovation Systems – An Evolutionary Approach.” In Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, edited by P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, and H.-J. Braczyk. 2nd ed., 1–18. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., D [Danny] MacKinnon, and R. Pollock. 2019. “Creating Strategic Couplings in Global Production Networks: Regional Institutions and Lead Firm Investment in the Humber Region, UK.” Journal of Economic Geography 19 (4): 853–872. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewald, U., and B. Truffer. 2012. “The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets.” European Planning Studies 20 (3): 397–420. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. 2003. “Regional Innovation Systems in the Periphery: The Case of the Beauce in Québec (Canada).” International Journal of Innovation Management 07 (01): 67–94. doi:10.1142/S1363919603000738.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, J., and M. Trippl. 2019. “Innovation in the Periphery: Compensation and Exploitation Strategies.” Growth and Change 50 (4): 1511–1531. doi:10.1111/grow.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. L., and A. Isaksen. 2021. “The Emergence of new Industries at the Regional Level: Alignment of Organizational and Regional Industrial Culture.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 8 (1): 387–401. doi:10.1080/21681376.2021.1987976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2022. “NUTS 3 Level Data.” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/data
   Google Scholar
• Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven, and L. Coenen. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991–998. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G., and S. Jaworska. 2019. “One Transition, Many Transitions? A Corpus-Based Study of Societal Sustainability Transition Discourses in Four Civil Society’s Proposals.” Sustainability Science 14 (6): 1643–1656. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0631-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2011. “Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway.” European Planning Studies 19 (4): 555–574. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., and A. Rok. 2018. “Co-producing Urban Sustainability Transitions Knowledge with Community, Policy and Science.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 29 (23): 47–51. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Fraunhofer IEE. 2018. “Windenergiereport Deutschland.” Kassel. http://windmonitor.iee.fraunhofer.de/opencms/export/sites/windmonitor/img/Windmonitor-2018/WERD_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2014. “Reconceptualising the co-Evolution of Firms-in-Industries and Their Environments: Developing an Inter-Disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework.” Research Policy 43 (2): 261–277. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2022. “Causality and Explanation in Socio-Technical Transitions Research: Mobilising Epistemological Insights from the Wider Social Sciences.” Research Policy 51 (6): 104537. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104537.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and T. Hansen. 2018. “Green Industrial Path Development in Different Types of Regions.” Papers in Innovation Studies 11. http://www.circle.lu.se/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., and L. Coenen. 2015. “The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92–109. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, J., and G. Hollinshead. 2011. “The Embeddedness of Software Development in the Ukraine: An Offshoring Country Perspective.” European Planning Studies 19 (9): 1633–1650. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.586189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, M. 2012. “The Social Embeddedness of Multinational Companies: A Literature Review.” American Journal of Sociology 10 (3): 549–579. doi:10.1093/ser/mws010.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, M., and J. Mattes. 2014. “Die soziale Einbettung multinationaler Unternehmen.” In Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Reader des Soziologietages 2012 an der Universität Bochum, edited by M. Löw, 659–673. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., and S. O. Negro. 2009. “Functions of Innovation Systems as a Framework to Understand Sustainable Technological Change: Empirical Evidence for Earlier Claims.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (4): 584–594. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsmark, H., J. Frishammar, P. Söderholm, and H. Ylinenpää. 2016. “The Role of Pilot and Demonstration Plants in Technology Development and Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1743–1761. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, M. 2004. “‘Spatial’ Relationships? Towards a Reconceptualization of Embedded Ness.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (2): 165–186. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph479oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhrsen, J. 2018. “Exogenous Shocks, Social Skill, and Power: Urban Energy Transitions as Social Fields.” Energy Policy 117: 307–315. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losacker, S., H. Hansmeier, J. Horbach, and I. Liefner. 2021. “The Geography of Environmental Innovation: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research.” Papers in Innovation Studies 15. http://www.circle.lu.se/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Losacker, S., and I. Liefner. 2020. “Regional Lead Markets for Environmental Innovation.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37: 120–139. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, M., and J. Mattes. 2022. “Facing Transition Phase Two: Analysing Actor Strategies in a Stagnating Acceleration Phase.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174: 121221. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, H. B., and M. Steen. 2020. “Make at Home or Abroad? Manufacturing Reshoring Through a GPN Lens: A Norwegian Case Study.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 113 (3): 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.015.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D [Danny]. 2012. “Beyond Strategic Coupling: Reassessing the Firm-Region Nexus in Global Production Networks.” Regional Studies 12 (1): 227–245. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr009.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., B. Soppe, and T. Thune, eds. 2020. “Sustainability Transitions: Bridging Systems and Organizational Perspectives to Tackle Grand Challenges: Call for Papers EGOS. Sub-theme 54.” https://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1581807636341&subtheme_id=1542700474937
   Google Scholar
• Martin, H., and L. Coenen. 2015. “Institutional Context and Cluster Emergence: The Biogas Industry in Southern Sweden.” European Planning Studies 23 (10): 2009–2027. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.960181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and P. Sunley. 2006. “Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. 2013. “The Regional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies: A Critical Perspective.” European Planning Studies 21 (4): 433–451. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, J., and M. Heidenreich. 2012. “Conclusion: Corporate Embeddedness as a Strategic and Dynamic Process of Skilled Actors.” In Institutional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies, edited by Martin Heidenreich, 329–343. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, J., A. Huber, and J. Koehrsen. 2015. “Energy Transitions in Small-Scale Regions – What we Can Learn from a Regional Innovation Systems Perspective.” Energy Policy 78 (1): 255–264. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.011.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., and T. Fenzl. 2019. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, edited by N. Baur and J. Blasius, 633–648. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., and M. Trippl. 2019. “Embracing the Future: Path Transformation and System Reconfiguration for Self-Driving Cars in West Sweden.” European Planning Studies 27 (11): 2144–2162. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1652570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary. 2022. “Definition of ‘Discourse’.” https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/discourse_1
   Google Scholar
• Pflitsch, G., and V. Radinger-Peer. 2018. “Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions—A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria).” Sustainability 10 (4): 918. doi:10.3390/su10040918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., A. Lagendijk, and M. Vale. 2000. “Critical Reflections on ‘Embeddedness’ in Economic Geography: The Case of Labour Market Governance and Training in the Automotive Industry in the North-East Region of England.” In Restructuring Industry and Territory. The Experience of Europe’s Regions, edited by Anna Giunta, Arnoud Lagendijk, and Andy Pike, 59–82. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietmann, C. 2021. “Hidden Champions and Their Integration in Rural Regional Innovation Systems: Insights from Germany.” Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie. Advance online publication. doi:10.1515/zfw-2021-0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, S. 2020. “The Regional Facet of a Global Innovation System: Exploring the Spatiality of Resource Formation in the Value Chain for Onshore Wind Energy.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36: 331–344. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, S. 2021. “Zooming in on a Multi-Scalar Innovation System: The Role and Relevance of Regions in the Onshore Wind Energy Sector in Germany.” (Dissertation). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17381.32489/1
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, S., and C. Chlebna. 2021. “A Spatial Perspective on the Legitimacy of a Technological Innovation System: Regional Differences in Onshore Wind Energy.” Energy Policy, Article 112193. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohe, S., and C. Chlebna. 2022. “The Evolving Role of Networking Organizations in Advanced Sustainability Transitions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 183 (7): 121916. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121916.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, S., and J. Mattes. 2022. “What About the Regional Level? Regional Configurations of Technological Innovation Systems.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 129: 60–73. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2007. “Niches in Evolutionary Theories of Technical Change.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17 (5): 605–622. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillak, S., and L. Kanger. 2020. “Global Pressures vs. Local Embeddedness: The de- and Restabilization of the Estonian oil Shale Industry in Response to Climate Change (1995–2016).” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34 (6357): 96–115. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2012. “Local Demonstrations for Global Transitions—Dynamics Across Governance Levels Fostering Socio-Technical Regime Change Towards Sustainability.” European Planning Studies 20 (3): 461–479. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. 2022. “Regionalstatistik.” https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., and G. Pflitsch. 2018. “Micro-dynamics in Regional Transition Paths to Sustainability – Insights from the Augsburg Region.” Applied Geography 90: 296–307. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., and G. Pflitsch. 2020. “Transition Topology: Capturing Institutional Dynamics in Regional Development Paths to Sustainability.” Research Policy 49 (7): 104006. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suitner, J., and M. Ecker. 2020. ““Making Energy Transition Work”: Bricolage in Austrian Regions’ Path-Creation.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36 (3): 209–220. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• TerWal, A., and R. Boschma. 2011. “Co-evolution of Firms, Industries and Networks in Space.” Regional Studies 45 (7): 919–933. doi:10.1080/00343400802662658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., and L. Coenen. 2012. “Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies.” Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkina, E., and A. van Assche. 2018. “Global Connectedness and Local Innovation in Industrial Clusters.” Journal of International Business Studies 49 (6): 706–728. doi:10.1057/s41267-018-0153-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heiligenberg, H. A., G. J. Heimeriks, M. P. Hekkert, and R. P. Raven. 2022. “Pathways and Harbours for the Translocal Diffusion of Sustainability Innovations in Europe.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 42 (2–5): 374–394. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.011.
   Google Scholar
• van Prud'homme Reine, P., and B. Dankbaar. 2011. “A Virtuous Circle? Co-Evolution of Regional and Corporate Cultures.” European Planning Studies 19 (11): 1865–1883. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.618684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., D. Reimsbach, and G. Braam. 2018. “Political Embeddedness and the Diffusion of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in China: A Trade-off Between Financial and CSR Performance?” Journal of Cleaner Production 198: 1185–1197. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Wind Power. 2019. “Germany Wind Farms Database.“ Tournefeuille. https://www.thewindpower.net/
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, S., J. Markard, B. Truffer, and H. Rohracher. 2013. “Informal Institutions Matter: Professional Culture and the Development of Biogas Technology.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8: 20–41. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E., M. Trippl, and M. Plechero. 2017. “Institutional Thickness Revisited.” Economic Geography 93 (4): 325–345. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1331703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S., and P. DiMaggio. 1990. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar